Skip to content


Critics: Don’t let dollars blur the debate on nuclear waste via The State

Experts and activists who doubt chemical reprocessing is the solution to the nation’s creeping commercial nuclear spent-fuel problem Thursday cautioned state and federal officials not to allow jobs and profits to cloud that issue.

The nuclear critics made their case to the Governor’s Nuclear Advisory Council, a day after the SRS Community Reuse Organization released a report asserting the region has many of the assets necessary to a national solution to the nation’s ever-rising spent fuel inventory.

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/03/15/2676637/critics-dont-let-dollars-blur.html#storylink=cpy
[...]
Centered in Aiken, the group said the study it commissioned would use SRS and its 60-year-old H-Canyon chemical separation facilities to help address closure of the spent-fuel cycle, which suffered a national setback when the U.S. government scrapped plans three years ago to open a permanent repository for spent fuel and high-level waste at the Yucca Mountain facility in Nevada.

The SRS group told the advisory council they were not interested in accumulating nuclear waste at SRS or elsewhere in the region simply to store it. But bringing much of the nation’s 70,000 metric tons of nuclear waste to South Carolina and reprocessing it could mean up to 1,700 jobs here and generate $12 million in taxes, the group-sponsored study said.

The nuclear critics took issue with the group, which represents five counties — Aiken, Allendale and Barnwell in the Palmetto State and Richmond and Columbia counties in Georgia.

“We need to get this issue right,” said Arjan Makhijani, one of the nuclear critics speaking to the council, and president of the Institute for Energy & Environmental Research.

Makhijani said the Aiken group failed to present to the council a neutral, full description of the downsides of the reprocessing debate and its issues.

Rick McLeod, SRS Community Reuse Organization executive director, presented the group’s case to the council and sought to calm fears. “This is not a decision document. It’s a study document only,” McLeod said.

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/03/15/2676637/critics-dont-let-dollars-blur.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here.

Posted in *English.

Tagged with , , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.