GOP preserves Yucca Mountain as nuclear waste storage site via Washington Examiner

Nevada Democrats failed Wednesday night to remove language from the House fiscal 2018 spending bill that would prohibit the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump in their state from being closed.

[…]

The Obama administration attempted to close the facility, but a federal appeals court said the move was illegal. The site is not complete but requires a license application submitted by the Energy Department to be approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The $789 billion spending bill being debated Wednesday night contains $150 million for licensing the Yucca Mountain facility.

Read more at GOP preserves Yucca Mountain as nuclear waste storage site

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

福島、コメの全量検査を見直しへ 年内にも素案提示 via 山陰中央新報

福島県は27日、東京電力福島第1原発事故を受け全ての県産米を対象に実施している放射性物質検査「全量全袋検査」の今後の在り方を探る検討会を開き、現在の全量検査を見直し、新たな態勢づくりの議論を進めることを決めた。

(略)

検討会にはJAや地元の消費者団体などが出席し、冒頭を除き非公開で行われた。県によると、「いつまでも検査を続けられない。有識者の意見を聞いた上で、あと何年続けるか決めるべきだ」「風評払拭のために当面は続けた方がいい」といった意見が出たが、現状の検査を見直すことでは一致したという。

全文は福島、コメの全量検査を見直しへ 年内にも素案提示

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

福島県産モモ輸出70トン設定 全農県本部、タイとマレーシア中心 via 福島民友

全農県本部は本年度、旬を迎えた県産モモの輸出量を昨年度実績約27トンの2.6倍となる約70トンに設定した。

輸出国は実績のあるタイとマレーシアを中心に交渉を進めている。輸出量の増加と輸送コストの低減化を図り、生産者の所得向上を目指す。

JAグループ福島が26日までに示した。船便でモモを輸出するに当たっては、コンテナ内部を低温・低酸素状態にして鮮度を保つ「CAコンテナ」を活用して取扱量の拡大を図る。

続きは福島県産モモ輸出70トン設定 全農県本部、タイとマレーシア中心

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Pohakuloa Radiation Contamination and more… via Malu ‘Aina

POHAKULOA

Maybe More Military Depleted Uranium than Thought

Retired Nuclear Geologist, Dr. Mike Reimer, PhD of Kona says “the amount of DU (Depleted Uranium) present at PTA (the military 133,000-acre Pohakuloa Training Area located in the center of Hawaii Island) is likely greatly understated.” Dr. Reimer says “The amount (of DU) typically is estimated based on a probable number of DU spotting rounds used for practice. It is highly probable that not only were spotting rounds used but also dummy warheads constructed of DU.”

Dr. Reimer has sent a July 24, 2017 letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) asking them to investigate this matter. If indeed some dummy M-390 nuclear warheads, each constructed with more than 50 pounds of DU, were fired along with an estimated 2000 DU 8 ounce spotting rounds at Pohakuloa, “there could be upwards of thousands of pounds or more DU at PTA,” according to Dr. Reimer. And it should be noted that PTA has had decades of high explosives used in this same impact area which likely has turned much of this DU metal into oxide particles than can be carried long distances by the wind. According to Hawaii Doctor, Lorrin Pang, MD, inhaled DU oxide alpha particles are the most deadly form of radiation, causing various cancers and genetic damage. See the short video below where Dr. Pang explains the health dangers of inhaling DU oxide dust particles. The danger applies equally to troops who train at Pohakuloa, residents and visitors alike. https://vimeo.com/19153948)

On Wednesday, July 19th, the Hilo Hawaiian Civic Club sponsored an excellent forum on Pohakuloa held at Hawaii Community College. Speakers included Isaac “Paka” Harp, Dr. Lorrin Pang, and Ruth Aloua. Paka Harp started by showing a 17 min video “An Uncomfortable Truth”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzfEFlVQ0gU about the illegal overthrow and ongoing military occupation of Hawaii by the U.S. Dr. Pang emphasized that DU used at Pohakuloa raises ethical questions of exposing people to unknown risks without their informed consent. (See http://westhawaiitoday.com/5634673.html )

Ruth Aloua, who has lived and farmed in Waiki’i, the closest neighbors to PTA, spoke passionately from the heart about what the bombing of Pohakuloa means to her – for people, plants and animals, air, land and water, ancestors and future generations. She covered it all. You can view her inspiring talk here – = https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=cTpLp07vZF4&app=desktop

 

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

CAB tables debate on German spent nuclear fuel via The Star

Citizens Advisory Board, or CAB, could not agree on how to proceed with their recommendations for the receipt of German spent nuclear fuel for treatment and storage at SRS, resulting in the topic being tabled for another meeting.

[…]

CAB board members were not the only ones with concerns, after receiving many emails from the public, including concerns over the German spent nuclear fuel proposal.

According to the draft document, CAB has several concerns in key areas of the German spent nuclear fuel proposal, including whether it’s needed.

According to the document, DOE has failed to establish a compelling purpose saying, “A formal Memorandum by National Nuclear Security Administration clearly states that the German spent nuclear fuel ‘is not a proliferation concern.’ Therefore, bringing it to the US for safeguarding is unnecessary.”

According to the document, the German spent nuclear fuel is very stable and Germany is “a wealthy and stable first-world ally, capable of safety and securely managing this spent nuclear fuel.”

The draft document also stated that the DOE has not identified all reasonable alternatives.

 

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

規制委、原発延長受け付け前倒し 計画的対策可能に via 日本経済新聞

原子力規制委員会は運転開始から40年を超す老朽原発の運転延長の申請を3年以上前倒しで受け付ける規則に改める。運転期間35年から申請できるようにする。電力会社が延長できるかどうかを早い段階で分かるようにして、定期検査時などの停止中に計画的に対策を取れるようにする。これまでに延長が認められた原発は、期限間際で結論が出たため対策に時間がかかり、すぐには動かせなかった。

原発の運転期間は原則40年だが、最大20年延長が認められる。そのためには、電力会社は規制委に申請し、原子炉の経年劣化の確認などの審査を受ける必要がある。現状では運転40年の1年3カ月前から申請できる。審査が運転40年までに終わらなければ、その時点で審査は打ち切りとなり、電力会社は廃炉を余儀なくされる。審査の行く末が分かるまで老朽化対策を進めるのをためらう要因になっている。

[…]

 

全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

内部被曝測定に初歩的ミスか? 改善進まぬ旧動燃体質 via テクノロジーonline

前々回、前回と2回に渡り、2017年6月に発生した日本原子力研究開発機構の大洗研究開発センター燃料研究棟の内部被曝事故の経緯と原因を考察してきた。最終回では、なぜこうした事故を繰り返すのか、根本の原因を考察する。

両者とも測定評価ミスの可能性も

今回の被曝評価ではどちらも、緊急の医学的処置の要否を判断するため、測定の難しいα線測定からの放射能量の評価や、時間のかかるバイオアッセイ検査ではなく、肺モニターを採用している。超小型α線検出器の肺内部への挿入はできず、肺の汚染を直接検査するには外科手術による切開しか方法がない。医療リスクを考慮すれば、現実的には今のところ肺モニター法がベストといえる。

1回目の内部被曝検査に際しては、5人の作業者は大洗のPFRFから東海村にある核燃料サイクル工学研究所に移送されている。前述したように事故直後に作業服などの汚染が確認されていたことから、移送前には体外をシャワーで洗い流し除染している。バイオアッセイ検査で予測されるより大きな値が検出されたのは、このときの洗浄が不十分で身体表面に付着していた両核種を測定してしまったのではないか。

[…]

 

 

全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

乳歯の被ばく状況調査 福島歯科医師会が事故後生まれ、提供求める via 東京新聞

 東京電力福島第一原発事故を受け、福島県歯科医師会などが県内外から提供された子どもの乳歯に含まれている放射性物質を測定する研究を進めている。胎児期の歯の形成段階で体内に取り込まれた放射性物質がそのまま残りやすい性質に着目、世代間や地域間で比較し、事故後の被ばく状況や健康影響の解明につなげるのが狙いだ。

 環境省の研究調査事業として二〇一三年度に開始した。これまで北海道、新潟、静岡、熊本、沖縄の歯科医師会と連携し、本人や両親の同意を得て、約五千五百六十本の乳歯を集めた。

 対象となる主な放射性物質はストロンチウムで、化学的性質がカルシウムと似ているため骨や歯にたまりやすく、検出量から被ばく線量を推定できる。東北大(仙台市)と奥羽大(福島県郡山市)が今月までに分析を終えた五千本では、ほとんどの歯で微量の放射性物質が検出されたが、地域間での差は確認できなかった。過去に行われた核実験や自然界に存在する放射性物質が原因とみられ、第一原発事故による影響は考えにくいとしている。

 ただ、これらのほとんどが事故前に生まれた世代の乳歯とみられる。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

WHY THE SCARIEST NUCLEAR THREAT MAY BE COMING FROM INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE via Vanity Fair

Donald Trump’s secretary of energy, Rick Perry, once campaigned to abolish the $30 billion agency that he now runs, which oversees everything from our nuclear arsenal to the electrical grid. The department’s budget is now on the chopping block. But does anyone in the White House really understand what the Department of Energy actually does? And what a horrible risk it would be to ignore its extraordinary, life-or-death responsibilities?

[…]

Tread in the newspapers that Trump had created a small “Landing Team.” According to several D.O.E. employees, this was led by, and mostly consisted of, a man named Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, which, upon inspection, proved to be a Washington, D.C., propaganda machine funded with millions of dollars from ExxonMobil and Koch Industries. Pyle himself had served as a Koch Industries lobbyist and ran a side business writing editorials attacking the D.O.E.’s attempts to reduce the dependence of the American economy on carbon. Pyle says that his role on the Landing Team was “voluntary,” adding that he could not disclose who appointed him, due to a confidentiality agreement. The people running the D.O.E. were by then seriously alarmed. “We first learned of Pyle’s appointment on the Monday of Thanksgiving week,” recalls D.O.E. chief of staff Kevin Knobloch. “We sent word to him that the secretary and his deputy would meet with him as soon as possible. He said he would like that but could not do it until after Thanksgiving.”

[…]

There was a reason Obama had appointed nuclear physicists to run the place: it, like the problems it grappled with, was technical and complicated. Moniz had helped lead the U.S. negotiations with Iran precisely because he knew which parts of their nuclear- energy program they must surrender if they were to be prevented from obtaining a nuclear weapon. For a decade before Knobloch joined the D.O.E., in June 2013, he had served as president of the Union of Concerned Scientists. “I had worked closely with D.O.E. throughout my career,” he says. “I thought I knew and understood the agency. But when I came in I thought, Holy cow.”

[…]

According to a former Obama official, he was replaced by a handful of young ideologues who called themselves “the Beachhead Team.” “They mainly ran around the building insulting people,” says a former Obama official. “There was a mentality that everything that government does is stupid and bad and the people are stupid and bad,” says another. They allegedly demanded to know the names and salaries of the 20 highest-paid people in the national-science labs overseen by the D.O.E. They’d eventually, according to former D.O.E. staffers, delete the contact list with the e-mail addresses of all D.O.E.-funded scientists—apparently to make it more difficult for them to communicate with one another. “These people were insane,” says the former D.O.E. staffer. “They weren’t prepared. They didn’t know what they were doing.”

[…]

Roughly half of the D.O.E.’s annual budget is spent on maintaining and guarding our nuclear arsenal, for instance. Two billion of that goes to hunting down weapons-grade plutonium and uranium at loose in the world so that it doesn’t fall into the hands of terrorists. In just the past eight years the D.O.E.’s National Nuclear Security Administration has collected enough material to make 160 nuclear bombs. The department trains every international atomic-energy inspector; if nuclear power plants around the world are not producing weapons-grade material on the sly by reprocessing spent fuel rods and recovering plutonium, it’s because of these people. The D.O.E. also supplies radiation-detection equipment to enable other countries to detect bomb material making its way across national borders. To maintain the nuclear arsenal, it conducts endless, wildly expensive experiments on tiny amounts of nuclear material to try to understand what is actually happening to plutonium when it fissions, which, amazingly, no one really does.

[…]

A quarter of the budget went to cleaning up all the unholy world-historic mess left behind by the manufacture of nuclear weapons. The last quarter of the budget went into a rattlebag of programs aimed at shaping Americans’ access to, and use of, energy.

There were reasons these things had been shoved together. Nuclear power was a source of energy, and so it made sense, sort of, for the department in charge of nuclear power also to have responsibility for the weapons-grade nuclear materials—just as it sort of made sense for whoever was in charge of weapons-grade uranium and plutonium to be responsible for cleaning up the mess they made.

[…]

Take the project to carve football-field-length caverns inside New Mexico salt beds to store radioactive waste, at the so-called WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant) facility. The waste would go into barrels and the barrels would go into the caverns, where the salt would eventually entomb them. The contents of the barrels were volatile and so needed to be seasoned with, believe it or not, kitty litter. Three years ago, according to a former D.O.E. official, a federal contractor in Los Alamos, having been told to pack the barrels with “inorganic kitty litter,” had scribbled down “an organic kitty litter.” The barrel with organic kitty litter in it had burst and spread waste inside the cavern. The site was closed for three years, significantly backing up nuclear-waste disposal in the United States and costing $500 million to clean, while the contractor claimed the company was merely following procedures given to it by Los Alamos.

The list of things that might go wrong inside the D.O.E. was endless. The driver of a heavily armed unit assigned to move plutonium around the country was pulled over, on the job, for drunken driving. An 82-year-old nun, along with others, cut through the perimeter fence of a facility in Tennessee that housed weapons-grade nuclear material. A medical facility ordered a speck of plutonium for research, and a weapons-lab clerk misplaced a decimal point and FedExed the researchers a chunk of the stuff so big it should have been under armed guard—whereupon horrified medical researchers tried to FedEx it back.

[…]

“Broken Arrow” is a military term of art for a nuclear accident that doesn’t lead to a nuclear war. MacWilliams has had to learn all about these. Now he tells me about an incident that occurred back in 1961, and was largely declassified in 2013, just as he began his stint at D.O.E. A pair of four-mega-ton hydrogen bombs, each more than 250 times more powerful than the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, broke off a damaged B-52 over North Carolina. One of the bombs disintegrated upon impact, but the other floated down beneath its parachute and armed itself. It was later found in a field outside Goldsboro, North Carolina, with three of its four safety mechanisms tripped or rendered ineffective by the plane’s breakup. Had the fourth switch flipped, a vast section of eastern North Carolina would have been destroyed, and nuclear fallout might have descended on Washington, D.C., and New York City.

[…]

The site of Hanford was chosen for its proximity to the Columbia River, which could supply the cooling water while its dams provided the electricity needed to make plutonium. Hanford was also chosen for its remoteness: the army was worried about both enemy attacks and an accidental nuclear explosion. Hanford was, finally, chosen for its poverty. It was convenient that what would become the world’s largest public-works project arose in a place from which people had to be paid so little to leave.

From 1943 until 1987, as the Cold War was ending and Hanford closed its reactors, the place created two-thirds of the plutonium in the United States’ arsenal—a total of 70,000 nuclear weapons since 1945. You’d like to think that if anyone had known the environmental consequences of plutonium, or if anyone could have been certain that the uranium bomb would work, they’d never have done here what they did. “Plutonium is hard to produce,” said MacWilliams. “And hard to get rid of.” By the late 1980s the state of Washington had gained some clarity on just how hard and began to negotiate with the U.S. government. In the ensuing agreement the United States promised to return Hanford to a condition where, as MacWilliams put it, “kids can eat the dirt.” When I asked him to guess what it would cost to return Hanford to the standards now legally required, he said, “A century and a hundred billion dollars.” And that was a conservative estimate.

[…]

The next morning, with a pair of local guides, I drive into the D.O.E. project most direly in need of management. In my lap is a book of instructions for visitors: “Report any spill or release,” it says, among other things. “Nobody in the world has waste like ours,” says one of my guides as we enter the site. No one has so much strontium 90, for instance, which behaves a lot like calcium and lodges inside the bones of any living creatures it penetrates, basically forever. Along with chromium and tritium and carbon tetrachloride and iodine 129 and the other waste products of a plutonium factory it is already present in Hanford’s groundwater. There are other nuclear-waste sites in the United States, but two-thirds of all the waste is here. Beneath Hanford a massive underground glacier of radioactive sludge is moving slowly, but relentlessly, toward the Columbia River.

[…]

Three years ago the D.O.E. sent the local tribes a letter to say they shouldn’t eat the fish they caught in the river more than once a week. But for the longest time, the effects of radiation on the human body were either ignored or insincerely explored: no one associated with the business of creating it wanted the knowledge that might disrupt it. Downwind of Hanford, people experienced unusually high rates of certain kinds of cancer, miscarriages, and genetic disorders that went largely ignored.

[…]

In 1962 a Hanford worker named Harold Aardal, exposed to a blast of neutron radiation, was whisked to a hospital, where he was told he was perfectly O.K. except that he was now sterile—and back then it didn’t even make the news. Instead, Hanford researchers in the late 1960s went to a local prison and paid the inmates to allow the irradiation of their testicles, to see just how much radiation a man can receive before the tails fall from his sperm.

[…]

Because it, too, is cold and dark, it is of less concern than the land surrounding it, for that is where the waste from the plant got dumped. The Nagasaki bomb contained about 14 pounds of plutonium, but the waste generated fills acres of manicured dirt, the texture of a baseball infield, just downhill from the plant. “The tank farm,” they call it.

On these farms lay buried 177 tanks, each roughly the size of a four-story apartment building and capable of holding a million gallons of “high-level waste.” Fifty-six million gallons now in the tanks are classified as “high-level waste.” What, you might ask, is high-level waste? “Incredibly dangerous stuff,” says Tom Carpenter, executive director of the Hanford Challenge, the organization which has monitored the site since the late 1980s. “If you’re exposed to it for even a few seconds you probably got a fatal dose.”

[…]

Hanford turns out to be a good example of an American impulse: to avoid knowledge that conflicts with whatever your narrow, short-term interests might be. What we know about Hanford we know mainly from whistle-blowers who worked inside the nuclear facility—and who have been ostracized by their community for threatening the industry in a one-industry town. (“Resistance to understanding a threat grows with proximity,” writes Brown.) One hundred and forty-nine of the tanks in the Hanford farms are made of a single shell of a steel ill-designed to contain highly acidic nuclear waste. Sixty-seven of them have failed in some way and allowed waste or vapors to seep out. Each tank contains its own particular stew of chemicals, so no two tanks can be managed in the same way. At the top of many tanks accumulates a hydrogen gas, which, if not vented, might cause the tank to explode. “There are Fukushima-level events that could happen at any moment,” says Carpenter. “You’d be releasing millions of curies of strontium 90 and cesium. And once it’s out there it doesn’t go away—not for hundreds and hundreds of years.”

The people who created the plutonium for the first bombs, in the 1940s and early 1950s, were understandably in too much of a rush to worry about what might happen afterward. They simply dumped 120 million gallons of high-level waste, and another 444 billion gallons of contaminated liquid, into the ground. They piled uranium (half-life: 4.5 billion years) into unlined pits near the Columbia River. They dug 42 miles of trenches to dispose of solid radioactive waste—and left no good records of what’s in the trenches. In early May of this year a tunnel at Hanford, built in the 1950s to bury low-level waste, collapsed. In response, the workers dumped truckloads of dirt into the hole. That dirt is now classified as low-level radioactive waste and needs to be disposed of.

[…]

It turned out no one wanted to make a serious study of the risks at Hanford. Not the contractors who stood to make lots of money from things chugging along as they have. Not the career people inside the D.O.E. who oversaw the project and who feared that an open acknowledgment of all the risks was an invitation to even more lawsuits. Not the citizens of Eastern Washington, who count on the $3 billion a year flowing into their region from the federal government. Only one stakeholder in the place wanted to know what was going on beneath its soil: the tribes. A radioactive ruin does not crumble without consequences, and yet, even now, no one can say what these are.

Read more at WHY THE SCARIEST NUCLEAR THREAT MAY BE COMING FROM INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE 

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on WHY THE SCARIEST NUCLEAR THREAT MAY BE COMING FROM INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE via Vanity Fair

生業訴訟って? /福島 via 毎日新聞

原発賠償拡大求め 国、東電の事故責任争う

 なるほドリ 10月10日に福島地裁で「生業(なりわい)訴訟」の判決があるって聞いたけど、どんな裁判なの?

 記者 東京電力福島第1原発事故の被災者が国と東電を相手取った全国最大の集団訴訟です。公害訴訟では原告らがスローガンを掲げることもあり「『生業を返せ、地域を返せ!』福島原発訴訟」の略称です。原発事故関連の訴訟は1万2000人以上の避難者らが18都道府県で計約30件起こし、裁判史上屈指の規模になりました。中でも生業訴訟の原告数は3割を占める3864人(提訴時)です。

 請求内容は(1)原告の居住地の空間放射線量を事故前の状態(毎時0・04マイクロシーベルト以下)に原状回復させる(2)原状回復の実現まで1人当たり月5万円の慰謝料を支払う--です。判決は3月17日の前橋地裁、9月22日に予定される千葉地裁に続き3例目になります。

(略)

 Q 何が争点なの?

 A 現行の賠償ルールから、どれだけ金額の水準や賠償対象地域を広げられるかです。賠償基準になっている国の「中間指針」について、国も東電も合理的だと主張しています。しかし、原告側は「加害者側が一方的に決めた」と問題視し、賠償ルールを変更させ、裁判に参加していない人も含めた「全体救済」を目指しているのです。

 前橋・千葉地裁の訴訟とは異なり、原告一人一人の個別事情ではなく、地域ごとに賠償額が判断される見通しです。例えば「県北の原告に100万円支払え」という判決が出たと仮定すると、その地域の住民は誰でも裁判をすれば賠償を認められることになり、国や東電は賠償ルールの見直しを迫られることになります。

(略)

生業訴訟の原告らは「被害者は私たちで最後にしてほしい」と被害根絶を目指しています。原発のない社会につなげるためにも、原発を推進してきた国や東電の責任を明らかにしようとしているのです。=回答・土江洋範(福島支局)

全文は生業訴訟って? /福島 via 毎日新聞

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments