Skip to content


Volcanoes or earthquakes. Which one is a bigger threat to Hanford? via Yakima Herald.com

Annette Cary
Tri-City Herald

  • RICHLAND, Wash. — Earthquakes. Floods. Volcanoes.

    All are risks the Department of Energy evaluates at the highly contaminated Hanford nuclear reservation, with the latest focus on volcanic ash.

    “Natural hazards and nuclear facilities do not always go together,” Stephen McDuffie, an engineer who examines such hazardous scenarios for DOE, said at a recent talk at Washington State University Tri-Cities.

    […]

    High level radioactive waste in tanks inside the plant must be kept well mixed to prevent the risk of an uncontrolled nuclear reaction or a buildup of flammable hydrogen. The mixing system uses compressed air to keep the waste mixed by suctioning it up and then forcefully expelling it, similar to the way a turkey baster works.

    DOE commissioned a study from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory looking at what would happen with concentrations of ash days after an event, with the results going to Bechtel National to make sure the vitrification plant could withstand a 10,000-year event.

    “They came back and said this is going to be very hard — and expensive— because this is a lot of ash,” McDuffie said.

    But DOE compared the basic numbers for the ashfall in the study with real eruptions around the world and how ash resuspended in the air after those eruptions. It concluded that assumptions for the study had not been realistic, McDuffie said.

     
    […]

    he study results are not expected to affect the start up of treatment of low-activity radioactive waste at the plant by a court-ordered deadline of 2023. The big concern is high level waste.

    Whether the plant could withstand a severe earthquake has been evaluated previously, with construction stopped at parts of the plant in 2006 for much of the next two years to make sure that the plant was designed to withstand a severe earthquake.

    Concerns had been raised about plant design standards that had been established in 1999 on a seismic hazard analysis completed in 1996. Some limited testing in 2004 prompted by concerns of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board showed that the subsurface beneath the plant dampened earthquakes less than originally thought.

     
    […]

    At Hanford, the most vulnerable facility was determined to be the water-filled concrete pool holding nearly 2,000 capsules of radioactive cesium and strontium, McDuffie said. The capsules contain about a third of the radioactivity of the waste at Hanford.

    A severe earthquake could crack the pool and allow the water used to help cool the capsules to drain out, likely over a period of days.

    A project is underway that will allow the capsules to be moved to dry storage.

    The flooding hazard at Hanford is associated not with routine fluctuations of water in the Columbia River, but with the risk of failures of dams upstream from Hanford, McDuffie said.

 

 

 

Read more.

Posted in *English.

Tagged with , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.