MINSK, 5 October (BelTA) – It is incorrect to view the construction of the Belarusian nuclear power plant as a potential threat of territory pollution, Deputy Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency Alexander Bychkov told media on 5 October.
Alexander Bychkov said: “If you treat the construction of the power plant like that, you should live a totally different life, you should stop using coal and other amenities”. He pointed out that according to the statistics collected during he operation of many modern stations their radioactive impact on the environment is, as a rule, less dangerous than the impact of coal-fired power plants. “It is a fact. By the way, radioactive impact on the personnel is lower than the impact during oil extraction. Therefore, it is not a good idea to view the construction of the nuclear power plant as a potential threat of territory pollution. It is incorrect,” stressed the IAEA Deputy Director General.
Alexander Bychkov reminded that two missions had visited Belarus already to examine nuclear power plant construction sites. The conclusions the two missions made are positive.
The IAEA Deputy Director General also pointed out that while working out recommendations concerning the construction of nuclear power plants, members of IAEA missions do not interfere in domestic tensions between the sides, which are in favor of and against the construction of the nuclear power plant. “We get quite many letters, however, I’d like to underline one important thing: we work only with government agencies of participating states”.
Continue reading at IAEA against potential threat label on Belarusian nuclear station
Featured Topics / 特集
Latest Posts / 最新記事
- French Report ” Nuclear Power Plant Flexibility at EDF” via ianfairlie.org 2021/01/17
- 水爆実験が残したもの マーシャル諸島で暮らした映画監督が伝えたいこと via 毎日新聞 2021/01/16
- 原発関連死、7町村で人口1%超 via Reuters 2021/01/16
- A Voice for Nuclear Victims via Catholic Outlook 2021/01/15
- 少数派だからこそ声を 原発事故で避難生活送る森松さんvia朝日新聞 2021/01/15
Discussion / 最新の議論
- 3sottamir on 3rd Anniversary of Fukushima: “accident” over, catastrophe continues via Nuclear Energy Information Service
- audiodownload on 「原因は放火」 チェルノブイリ立ち入り禁止区域の火災、1週間余りでようやく鎮火via Sputnik
- digibeatmusic on 「原因は放火」 チェルノブイリ立ち入り禁止区域の火災、1週間余りでようやく鎮火via Sputnik
- mcafee.com/activate on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
- pyramid infinity on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- January 2021 (56)
- December 2020 (104)
- November 2020 (126)
- October 2020 (122)
- September 2020 (66)
- August 2020 (63)
- July 2020 (56)
- June 2020 (70)
- May 2020 (54)
- April 2020 (85)
- March 2020 (88)
- February 2020 (97)
- January 2020 (130)
- December 2019 (75)
- November 2019 (106)
- October 2019 (138)
- September 2019 (102)
- August 2019 (99)
- July 2019 (76)
- June 2019 (52)
- May 2019 (92)
- April 2019 (121)
- March 2019 (174)
- February 2019 (146)
- January 2019 (149)
- December 2018 (38)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (89)
- September 2018 (118)
- August 2018 (194)
- July 2018 (22)
- June 2018 (96)
- May 2018 (240)
- April 2018 (185)
- March 2018 (106)
- February 2018 (165)
- January 2018 (241)
- December 2017 (113)
- November 2017 (198)
- October 2017 (198)
- September 2017 (226)
- August 2017 (219)
- July 2017 (258)
- June 2017 (240)
- May 2017 (195)
- April 2017 (176)
- March 2017 (115)
- February 2017 (195)
- January 2017 (180)
- December 2016 (116)
- November 2016 (115)
- October 2016 (177)
- September 2016 (178)
- August 2016 (158)
- July 2016 (201)
- June 2016 (73)
- May 2016 (195)
- April 2016 (183)
- March 2016 (201)
- February 2016 (154)
- January 2016 (161)
- December 2015 (141)
- November 2015 (153)
- October 2015 (212)
- September 2015 (163)
- August 2015 (189)
- July 2015 (178)
- June 2015 (150)
- May 2015 (175)
- April 2015 (155)
- March 2015 (153)
- February 2015 (132)
- January 2015 (158)
- December 2014 (109)
- November 2014 (192)
- October 2014 (206)
- September 2014 (206)
- August 2014 (208)
- July 2014 (178)
- June 2014 (155)
- May 2014 (209)
- April 2014 (242)
- March 2014 (190)
- February 2014 (170)
- January 2014 (227)
- December 2013 (137)
- November 2013 (164)
- October 2013 (200)
- September 2013 (255)
- August 2013 (198)
- July 2013 (208)
- June 2013 (231)
- May 2013 (174)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (230)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
Top Topics / TOPトピック
anti-nuclear
Atomic Age
Capitalism
East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
energy policy
EU
Hanford
health
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
Inequality
labor
Nuclear power
nuclear waste
Nuclear Weapons
Radiation exposure
Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
Safety
TEPCO
U.S.
UK
エネルギー政策
メディア
ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
健康
公正・共生
兵器
再稼働
労働における公正・平等
原子力規制委員会
原発推進
反原発運動
大飯原発
安全
広島・長崎
廃炉
東京電力
東日本大震災・福島原発
汚染水
米国
脱原発
被ばく
資本主義
避難
除染
食の安全
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.