Skip to content


Report: Nuclear industry’s safety measures are ‘inadequate’ via The Hill

The U.S. nuclear industry is not prepared to prevent or handle the catastrophic damage a natural disaster could wreak on a nuclear power plant, according to a new report.

While the industry has made improvements in safety after the devastating earthquake and tsunami that created a melt-down at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in 2011, the National Academy of Sciences report warns more must be done.

The problem, according to the report, is U.S. safety regulations are focused on an operator’s ability to respond to “specified failures” or “design-basis-events,” like equipment failures, loss of power, or the inability to cool the reactor core.That isn’t enough, according to the National Academy of Sciences, which was commissioned to investigate the Fukushima incident.

All of the most devastating nuclear disasters from Japan’s, to Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl were spurred by what is called “beyond-design-basis events,” the report states.

“The overarching lesson learned from the Fukushima Daiichi accident is that the nuclear plant licensees and their regulators must actively seek out and act on new information about hazards that have the potential to affect the safety of nuclear plants,” said Joseph Shepherd, who sat on the committee for the report.

The committee found that the current way the industry regulates safety at nuclear plants is based on very specific incidents that could occur, making it “clearly inadequate for preventing core-melt accidents.”

Posted in *English.

Tagged with , , , , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.