On January 7 2013, CNRS (the French National Center for Scientific Research) gave access to a « scientific multimedia site » on nuclear energy intended for the general public.
As a CNRS researcher trained in economics, based in Japan, where I have been developing since the last two years research on the forms and limits of human protection in the context of the Fukushima disaster, I am anxious to dissociate myself from what is said in this « animation » aiming at the mass indoctrination and at keeping quiet about the situation in Fukushima.
The reasons of my dissociation are given here. I concentrate my arguments against the «animation» on the following seven points:
- The questionable estimates of the numbers of victims from radiation exposure
- The absence of less a accommodating picture on Chernobyl’s morbidity provided by
- Ukrainian authorities
- The ignorance of radiation effects through transgenerational genomic instability and
- the bystander effect
- An implicit concession to the “radiophobia” approach
- The silence on the WHO-IAEA 1959 agreement
- A questionable interpretation of the origin of the Fukushima nuclear disaster
- The silences on the Fukushima disaster.
* About 55.000 readers accessed and over 400 comments were made after a shorter French
version of that article that was published on 16 January 2013. Up to now no official answer
or public statement was made by any representative of the CNRS or of the CNRS website
dealing with nuclear energy, to respond or contradict the present analysis.Continue reading: Fukushima: Is the CNRS a purveyor of ignorance?* Or Fukushima: the CNRS does not tell the truth and indoctrinates the masses* by Thierry Ribault (PDF)
Related article: Fukushima : le CNRS tait la vérité et domestique les masses via Rue89
Featured Topics / 特集
Latest Posts / 最新記事
- 福島第一原発事故10年、特別除染地域の85%で除染進まず 廃炉計画では新たな代替案が不可欠 via グリーンピース・ジャパン 2021/03/04
- 85% of Special Decontamination Area remained contaminated Fukushima Daiichi decommissioning road map unachievable – a new plan is inevitable via Greenpeace Japan 2021/03/04
- French report grapples with nuclear fallout from Algerian War via the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 2021/03/04
- 教科書に載ってない「ビキニ」 29歳監督が撮った男たちの苦悩 via 毎日新聞 2021/03/04
- Ex-PMs Kan, Koizumi urge Japan to quit nuclear power generation via The Mainichi 2021/03/04
Discussion / 最新の議論
- DramaCool on German energy study offers framework for Japanese policy chaos via The Japan Times online
- halodunia davit on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
- Polisi Tangerang on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
- PrepaidCardStatus on The Real Risks at Oi via SimplyInfo
- Horinaja on Iceland: We Won’t Sign Nuclear Weapons Ban Until Others Do, Too via Grapevine
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- March 2021 (17)
- February 2021 (69)
- January 2021 (91)
- December 2020 (104)
- November 2020 (126)
- October 2020 (122)
- September 2020 (66)
- August 2020 (63)
- July 2020 (56)
- June 2020 (70)
- May 2020 (54)
- April 2020 (85)
- March 2020 (88)
- February 2020 (97)
- January 2020 (130)
- December 2019 (75)
- November 2019 (106)
- October 2019 (138)
- September 2019 (102)
- August 2019 (99)
- July 2019 (76)
- June 2019 (52)
- May 2019 (92)
- April 2019 (121)
- March 2019 (174)
- February 2019 (146)
- January 2019 (149)
- December 2018 (38)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (89)
- September 2018 (118)
- August 2018 (194)
- July 2018 (22)
- June 2018 (96)
- May 2018 (240)
- April 2018 (185)
- March 2018 (106)
- February 2018 (165)
- January 2018 (241)
- December 2017 (113)
- November 2017 (198)
- October 2017 (198)
- September 2017 (226)
- August 2017 (219)
- July 2017 (258)
- June 2017 (240)
- May 2017 (195)
- April 2017 (176)
- March 2017 (115)
- February 2017 (195)
- January 2017 (180)
- December 2016 (116)
- November 2016 (115)
- October 2016 (177)
- September 2016 (178)
- August 2016 (158)
- July 2016 (201)
- June 2016 (73)
- May 2016 (195)
- April 2016 (183)
- March 2016 (201)
- February 2016 (154)
- January 2016 (161)
- December 2015 (141)
- November 2015 (153)
- October 2015 (212)
- September 2015 (163)
- August 2015 (189)
- July 2015 (178)
- June 2015 (150)
- May 2015 (175)
- April 2015 (155)
- March 2015 (153)
- February 2015 (132)
- January 2015 (158)
- December 2014 (109)
- November 2014 (192)
- October 2014 (206)
- September 2014 (206)
- August 2014 (208)
- July 2014 (178)
- June 2014 (155)
- May 2014 (209)
- April 2014 (242)
- March 2014 (190)
- February 2014 (170)
- January 2014 (227)
- December 2013 (137)
- November 2013 (164)
- October 2013 (200)
- September 2013 (255)
- August 2013 (198)
- July 2013 (208)
- June 2013 (231)
- May 2013 (174)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (230)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
Top Topics / TOPトピック
anti-nuclear
Atomic Age
Capitalism
East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
energy policy
EU
France
Hanford
health
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
Inequality
labor
Nuclear power
nuclear waste
Nuclear Weapons
Radiation exposure
Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
Safety
TEPCO
U.S.
UK
エネルギー政策
メディア
ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
健康
公正・共生
兵器
再稼働
労働における公正・平等
原子力規制委員会
原発推進
反原発運動
大飯原発
安全
広島・長崎
廃炉
東京電力
東日本大震災・福島原発
汚染水
米国
脱原発
被ばく
資本主義
除染
食の安全
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.