Skip to content

On a bad power trip via Power Engineering

NEW DELHI, Aug. 14 — The unprecedented northern power grid failure on July 30 and the North-eastern power grid failure on July 31 plunged 700 million Indians into darkness. This is an ominous warning of a deep crisis in our power sector. Strangely, though not surprisingly, this is being used as a pretext to advance the cause of nuclear power generation following the Indo-US nuclear deal. The official explanation for the grid failure is that states have violated grid discipline and overdrawn power. This leads to a fall in transmission frequency, which causes such a collapse. Normally, in order to isolate and separate a particular section of the grid, which becomes vulnerable to such overdrawing, special protection systems – under frequency relays (UFRs) – are installed to prevent the frequency from dropping. Whether such UFRs were installed or they were ineffective needs to be examined. The UFRs are there in the southern grid and, hence, it did not collapse. Even the explanation of overdrawing by the states appears specious with the monsoon having set in and the peak demand on the grid actually coming down.

Nuclear energy is the most expensive energy option for India. Eminent scientists have estimated that the cost per mega-watt would be R11.1 crore from imported nuclear reactors. The prime minister has announced a target of 40,000 MW of nuclear power. If 30,000 MW of this were to come from foreign reactors, it will cost us R3,30,000 crore. The same amount of thermal energy would cost R1,20,000 crore. Using gas or hydral generation, the cost would be only R90,000 crore. By using the nuclear option for generating 30,000 MW, India would be spending anywhere beyond R2 lakh crore more than by using the available alternatives. Can we afford such an expensive option?

It is cruel to pursue such a course when the finance minister talks of cutting subsidies for the poor in the name of fiscal discipline. We are unable to provide food security to our people, but are willing to create newer avenues for profit maximisation. Can this be allowed? Sitaram Yechury is CPI(M) politburo member and Rajya Sabha MP

Read more at On a bad power trip

Posted in *English.

Tagged with , , , , .

5 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Kunal Rabari says

    Today I’m going to share with you the Complete Douchebag Workout 2 Cheats list (100% Working).

  2. abdul rehman says

    Today I’m going to share with you the Complete “Types of Motor Winding “

  3. Shubham Rabari says

    Modulus of Rupture (psi, kg/cm2)
    Modulus of rupture (MOR) is like a three-point bend test. MOR measures the bond strength of the test specimen. For castables, it measures the bonding strength of the cement matrix. The particle size and packing of the aggregate system are factors in MOR, but the maturity of the cement bond contributes more to MOR values.

  4. Shubham Rabari 3 says

    Beams are horizontal members considered among the most commonly designed elements of structure whereas girders are also horizontal members that support smaller beams but act as the main support of a structure with dynamic load bearing capacity.

  5. karan thapar says

    step-growth vs chain-growth polymerization is an extremely easy topic to understand response continues quickly toward the start yet the sub-atomic weight increments just gradually and high MW’s are just accomplished toward the finish of the cycle by long oligomers responding with each-other

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.