Why We Still Need Nuclear via The New York Times

N two weeks the Tennessee Valley Authority, America’s largest public power producer, will decide whether to complete construction of a long-deferred generating unit at the Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, in northeast Alabama. If we proceed, Bellefonte 1 would become the T.V.A.’s third nuclear unit brought into service in the 21st century.This is, understandably, a controversial issue. Why are we thinking of expanding our fleet of nuclear plants in the wake of the Fukushima disaster? After all, some countries seem to be going the other way: Germany and others are planning to cut back or eliminate their nuclear power facilities altogether.

Indeed, whether the Bellefonte project moves forward or not, the T.V.A. is committed to demonstrating that a methodical, safety-driven approach to nuclear development works. Along with the possibility of restarting work at Bellefonte, in recent years we have upgraded our Browns Ferry 1 reactor, also in Alabama, and we are completing a second reactor at our Watts Bar plant, in eastern Tennessee.

Continue reading at Why We Still Need Nuclear

This entry was posted in *English and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Why We Still Need Nuclear via The New York Times

  1. yukimiyamotodepaul says:

    The author only talks about “risks” in running the power plant. But what about nuclear waste? What about the warm water flowing into the river after having circulated in the plant?

Leave a Reply