『とと姉ちゃん』反戦メッセージ封印の一方でモデル「暮しの手帖」編集部には「政治色が強すぎ」と批判が! via livedoor NEWS

先日、本サイトではNHK連続ドラマ小説『とと姉ちゃん』をめぐって、モデルになった雑誌「暮しの手帖」(暮しの手帖社)の元関係者や古い読者から「事実と全然違う」との声が上がっていることをお伝えした。

 だが、これは細部の問題ではなく、背景に『とと姉ちゃん』が「暮しの手帖」の本質を避けて通ろうとしていることがある。「暮しの手帖」は同誌の名物編集長・花森安治氏と、一緒に同誌を立ち上げた、とと姉ちゃんのモデル・大橋鎮子氏の「戦争に反対しなくてはいけない」という思いから生まれた雑誌だ。暮らしを大切にすることと、戦争をしない世の中にしていくこと。暮らしを守ることはつまり平和を守ることだという考えが「暮しの手帖」の根幹にはある。

 ところが、NHKは、番組プロデューサー・落合将氏がインタビューで「花森さんはわりと反権力的な方で、政治や政府にも一家言があったとされている。そこを朝ドラでストレートにやるにはなかなかハードルがある」と語っていたように、この反戦争、反権力的姿勢をドラマから排除してしまった。

 かつての同誌を知る人たちが、この本質をないがしろにするドラマ化に怒るのは当然だろう。

[…]
さらに、松浦氏の姿勢が鮮明になったのが、福島原発事故への対応だった。東日本大震災の後、「暮らしを守る」という方針を掲げる同誌なら、原発事故や放射能の問題を独自の視点で記事にしてくれるだろう、と注目が集まっていたが、松浦編集長のもとで同誌が原発問題にふれることはなかった。

 松浦氏の講演レポート(文化経済研究会2016年1月講演)によると、原発問題を取り上げなかったことで「凄いバッシングを受けました」と松浦氏は当時を振り返っている。だが、同時に松浦氏は原発事故や放射能の問題を取り上げなかったにもかかわらず部数が伸びたことをあげ、こうつづけている。

「僕自身びっくりして、被災地の仮設住宅を訪ねました。すると読者の方が皆さん言うんですが、テレビも雑誌もネットも、悲惨な話しかしない時に『暮しの手帖』だけはどこのページを見ても震災のことも、放射能のことも書かれていなかった。あの時皆さんは現実逃避するために『暮しの手帖』を選んでくれたんです。雑誌やメディアは真実を伝えるという役割もありますよ。でも現実逃避させるという役割もあるんです」
[…]
花森安治氏は1970年発行の「暮しの手帖」で、同誌のスタンスをこのような文章にして掲載している。

〈さて ぼくらは もう一度
 倉庫や 物置きや 机の引出しの隅から
 おしまげられたり ねじれたりして
 錆びついている〈民主々義〉を 探しだしてきて 錆びをおとし 部品を集め
 しっかり 組みたてる
 民主々義の〈民〉は 庶民の民だ
 ぼくらの暮しを なによりも第一にするということだ
 ぼくらの暮しと 企業の利益とが ぶつかったら 企業を倒す ということだ
 ぼくらの暮しと 政府の考え方が ぶつかったら 政府を倒す ということだ
 それが ほんとうの〈民主々義〉だ〉(「見よぼくら一銭五厘の旗」/『一戔五厘の旗』所収、暮しの手帖社)

 この花森氏の文章にもあるように〈ぼくらの暮し〉こそを守ろうという確固たる思いが、「暮しの手帖」を唯一無二の存在たらしめてきたのだ。

 むしろ、そうした〈民主々義〉の雑誌を壊したのが、松浦編集長だった。現在は削除されているが、松浦氏は2011年の年末にFacebook上でこんなエピソードを紹介していた。
[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 『とと姉ちゃん』反戦メッセージ封印の一方でモデル「暮しの手帖」編集部には「政治色が強すぎ」と批判が! via livedoor NEWS

Zuma nuclear power plan: Gift from Parliament’s secretive budget office? via BizNews.com

How has South Africa come so far down the road to a nuclear power deal that could easily cripple the economy for decades to come and is so obviously laden with benefits for a clique? With so many checks and balances in place in a modern democracy, it is not easy for politicians to access state coffers. One method that has gained currency in South Africa appears to be state capture, which involves setting up companies with friends and family who successfully pitch for state contract work. Other steps are required for state capture, particularly where there are lucrative proposals for projects that are not yet in place – starting with selling the concepts to Parliamentary decision-makers. In this piece, a former insider of South Africa’s secretive Parliamentary Budget Office reveals how a combination of possible incompetence and muddying the waters around mandates appear to have played their role in adding momentum to President Jacob Zuma’s plans to develop a trillion-rand nuclear power programme for South Africa. It is a sobering reminder that the political independence and transparency of offices whose work feeds into national decision-making are essential in adding to the checks and balances designed to keep politicians in a democracy on the moral straight-and-narrow. – Jackie Cameron


By Mike Cohen

(Bloomberg) — Russia is seen as the frontrunner to win the right to build South African nuclear power plants that may be worth as much as $100 billion. With a six-month deadline to award contracts, who’s going to pay for the country’s biggest project yet remains a mystery.

Price-tag estimates for as many as eight reactors generating 9,600 megawatts, which the government wants to begin operating from 2023 and complete by 2029, range from $37 billion to $100 billion. Bids are due to start this quarter, with Russia’s Rosatom Corp. seen as a leader. Areva SA, EDF SA, Toshiba Corp.’s Westinghouse Electric Corp., China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding Corp. and Korea Electric Power Corp. have also shown interest.

The planned investment comes as the government battles to fend off a junk-grade credit rating and the National Treasury seeks to rein in the budget deficit. Proceeding with the nuclear plants could result in a large increase in public debt, the International Monetary Fund warned in a June 24 report.

“There appears to be a simple-minded assumption that countries like China or Russia will provide cheap plants and offer finance,” Steve Thomas, professor of energy policy at the University of Greenwich in the U.K., who has monitored South Africa’s nuclear plans since 1997, said in a June 24 phone interview. “That’s an illusion.”

[…]
Not Needed

A study published in 2013 by the University of Cape Town’s Energy Research Centre found nuclear plants weren’t needed and wouldn’t be cost-effective for 15 to 25 years, based on a projected cost of $7,000 per kilowatt installed.

The Department of Energy’s 2013 master-plan — which the government rejected — suggested deferring a decision on whether to build atomic power facilities until at least 2025, and scrapping the option if the cost exceeded $6,500 per kilowatt of capacity. Thomas estimates current costs at about $8,000 per kilowatt installed.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

原発避難、宅地不足解消進む 地価高騰は一段落 いわき via 朝日新聞

20日に公表された基準地価では、被災各地での変化が目立った。東日本大震災の発生から5年が過ぎ、原発避難者の集中で高騰した福島県いわき市の地価は落ち着いたが、4月の熊本地震で大きな被害が出た地域では、下落率が全国で最も大きくなった。

「新しいタウンが芽生えます」「来春43区画 分譲開始予定」。いわき市のJRいわき駅から車で約15分、約1・7ヘクタールの田んぼだった土地に看板が立つ。都市計画法で郊外の農地への住宅の新築は規制されてきたが、市が許可に転じ、地元建設会社が宅地を造成することになった。
[…]
 いわき市は東京電力福島第一原発から約50キロ離れ、避難指示が出た自治体から県内最多の約2万4千人が避難している。長期化する避難生活で、市内で新居を求める人が増え、急激な地価上昇を招いた。昨年は住宅地の上昇率トップ10のうち八つが同市(上昇率12・3~15・3%)で、市の平均の上昇率も7・6%と被災3県で最大だった。楢葉町から家族で避難する女性(57)は「家を建てようと考えたこともあったが、もう手が出ない」と嘆く。

[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Risk of another Chernobyl or Fukushima type accident plausible, experts say via Science Daily

Date:September 19, 2016Source:University of SussexSummary:The biggest-ever statistical analysis of historical accidents suggests that nuclear power is an underappreciated extreme risk and that major changes will be needed to prevent future disasters.

A team of risk experts who have carried out the biggest-ever analysis of nuclear accidents warn that the next disaster on the scale of Chernobyl or Fukushima may happen much sooner than the public realizes.

Researchers at the University of Sussex, in England, and ETH Zurich, in Switzerland, have analysed more than 200 nuclear accidents, and — estimating and controlling for effects of industry responses to previous disasters — provide a grim assessment of the risk of nuclear power.

Their worrying conclusion is that, while nuclear accidents have substantially decreased in frequency, this has been accomplished by the suppression of moderate-to-large events. They estimate that Fukushima- and Chernobyl-scale disasters are still more likely than not once or twice per century, and that accidents on the scale of the 1979 meltdown at Three Mile Island in the USA (a damage cost of about 10 Billion USD) are more likely than not to occur every 10-20 years.

As Dr Spencer Wheatley, the lead author, explains: “We have found that the risk level for nuclear power is extremely high.

[…]

Professor Benjamin Sovacool of the Sussex Energy Group at the University of Sussex, who co-authored the studies, says: “Our results are sobering. They suggest that the standard methodology used by the International Atomic Energy Agency to predict accidents and incidents — particularly when focusing on consequences of extreme events — is problematic.

“The next nuclear accident may be much sooner or more severe than the public realizes.”

[…]

The 15 most costly nuclear events analysed by the team are:

  1. Chernobyl, Ukraine (1986) — $259 billion
  2. Fukushima, Japan (2011) — $166 billion
  3. Tsuruga, Japan (1995) — $15.5 billion
  4. TMI, Pennsylvania, USA (1979) — $11 billion
  5. Beloyarsk, USSR (1977) — $3.5 billion
  6. Sellafield, UK (1969) — $2.5 billion
  7. Athens, Alabama, USA (1985) — $2.1 billion
  8. Jaslovske Bohunice, Czechoslovakia (1977) — $2 billion
  9. Sellafield, UK (1968) — $1.9 billion
  10. Sellafield, UK (1971) — $1.3 billion
  11. Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA (1986) — $1.2 billion
  12. Chapelcross, UK (1967) — $1.1 billion
  13. Chernobyl, Ukraine (1982) — $1.1 billion
  14. Pickering, Canada (1983) — $1 billion
  15. Sellafield, UK (1973) — $1 billion

Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by University of Sussex. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

県内の除染事業者 およそ5割で法令違反 (福島県)via 日テレNews

県内の除染事業者を対象に行った国の調査で、全体のおよそ5割に労働条件などの法令違反が見つかった。
福島労働局がことし1月からの半年間に、県内で除染作業を行う506の事業者を対象に労働条件などを調査したところ、全体のおよそ5割にあたる271の事業者に法令違反があった。

違反の多くは、時間外の労働に対して正規の割増賃金を支払っていないなど、賃金に関するもので、中には、除染現場の放射線量を事前に測定しなかった事例などもあった。

続きは県内の除染事業者 およそ5割で法令違反 (福島県)

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Hanford whistleblowers awarded $216,000 in back pay, compensation via Tri-City Herald

Two Hanford whistleblowers have been awarded back pay and compensation after they raised safety concerns related to a medical tracking system and then were laid off. Associated Press
Two Hanford whistleblowers have been awarded $216,000 in back pay and compensation, plus interest and attorney fees, after being suspended from their jobs by Computer Sciences Corp.
[…]

The two workers were suspended in September 2012 after they reported failures in a new electronic medical record system, including a problem tracking health risks for individual workers.

The problem created the potential for workers at risk for chronic beryllium disease to be exposed to the metal, despite medical restrictions that should have protected them.

CSC initially was ordered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to pay back wages of $186,000 to the two former workers in late 2014.

[…]

In addition, “special pay” the employees were offered as they worked long hours to try to get the medical record system ready to operate was withheld.

CSC said withholding the special pay was not retaliatory.

“Whatever this evidentiary hash may be, it is not clear, and it is not convincing,” the judge said in his decision.

Most of the back pay in the judgment went to Clem, as Spencer had a non-Hanford job lined up for when HPM took over the contract, knowing HPM planned to cut IT positions. Clem was not offered a job with HPM or interviewed, even as openings became available.

Clem received back pay totaling almost $173,000, which included the special pay he was told he would receive and then was denied. Clem also received $30,000 in compensatory damages and Spencer received $10,000.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

福島第一原発事故当時、内閣官房副長官だった福山哲郎が語る、本音と事故から得た教訓via ローリングストーン

連載|SAVE HUMANITY:福山哲郎[民進党/参議院議員]

事故を目の当たりにした以上、原発のない社会を作るために尽力し続けていく

福島第一原発事故当時、内閣官房副長官だった福山哲郎。事故対応に当たった彼は積極的に事故当時の官邸内の様子を発信してきた一人だが、果たして福島第一原発事故は徹底検証されたと考えているのだろうか?その本音、そして事故から得た教訓を改めて聞いた。

福島原発事故当時の官邸の様子が描かれた映画『太陽の蓋』を拝見しました。

実は、あの映画は私の著書『原発危機 官邸からの証言』がきっかけで作られたそうなんですが、いかがでした?

"官邸(民主党)を美化して描いている"という批判も耳にはしますが、何が真実なのかは現場にいたわけではないのでわかりません。ただ、いろいろな本や調査結果の資料を読んでもいまひとつわかり難かった事故対応を巡る全体像が立体的に見え、役に立ちました。話を進める前に伺いたいのですが、"菅(直人)さんが総理じゃなく、自民党政権だったら良かったのに・・・"という意見を耳にしますが、もし自民党政権だったら、事故対応はどうなっていたと思いますか?

当事者だった私が"自民党だったら"という仮説で話すのはあまり適切ではないとは思います。歴史にifはありません。ただ、民主党は東電の事故に対する損害賠償額の上限をつけなかったのですが、自民党政権であったなら、原子力損害賠償法上の無限責任の賠償をしたかどうかはわかりません。実際、政権内にいた自民党出身の方は上限を設けるべきだと主張されていました。それともうひとつ・・・。

もうひとつは?

枝野(幸男)官房長官と菅総理(肩書きは当時)と私で、避難は1秒でも1分でも早く、そしてできるだけ遠くにしてもらう。それから情報もできるだけ早く、オープンにしようと話し合って決めていました。しかし、避難の規模を大きくするということは、東電の補償も大きくなる。そこは自民党政権だったらどうだったのか。既に公になっている通り、自民党と東電の関係は歴史的にとても深く繋がってきた。なので、避難のスピードや規模に影響があったかもしれません。
[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Massive Sinkhole in Florida Is Leaking Radioactive Water Into the Ground via Center for Biological Diversity (Reader Supported News)

News broke late Thursday that a massive sinkhole below a phosphate strip mine 30 miles east of Tampa has been releasing radioactive waste into the Floridan aquifer for three weeks.

News reports indicate that Mosaic, the owner of the mine, and state officials have known about the problem for three weeks, but failed to notify the public. The sinkhole formed below a phosphogypsum stack, which is a pile of radioactive waste hundreds of feet tall produced by phosphate mining, and in this case may pose a serious threat to drinking water for millions of Floridians.

“Enough is enough. Florida must finally take a stand against this destructive, radioactive phosphate mining that is putting our health and environment at risk,” said Jaclyn Lopez, Florida director at the Center for Biological Diversity.

“Mosaic wants to mine an additional 50,000 acres of Florida’s beautiful, biodiverse lands, but this incident makes clear it can’t even handle the radioactive waste it currently generates. We must come together and demand that our counties, our state and our federal government reject further expansion of this dangerous industry.”

Radioactive phosphogypsum is produced during phosphate mining when sulfuric acid is applied to phosphoric ore, releasing naturally occurring uranium and radium. Besides leaving massive piles of radioactive waste, this process produces radon gas in the air, which is cancer causing.

Forty percent of the phosphate ore that’s mined in Florida is shipped overseas, but 100 percent of the radioactive phosphogypsum waste that’s generated remains in the United States, the majority of it in Florida, where it stays forever. That’s five tons of radioactive waste for every one ton of usable phosphate.

Phosphate mining creates 60-foot-deep to 80-foot-deep open pits thousands of acres wide. Florida is home to the world largest phosphate mine, and now Mosaic wants to strip mine an additional 52,000 acres in Manatee, Hardee and De Soto counties.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

In Fukushima, A Bitter Legacy Of Radiation, Trauma and Fear via Environment 360

Five years after the nuclear power plant meltdown, a journey through the Fukushima evacuation zone reveals some high levels of radiation and an overriding sense of fear. For many, the psychological damage is far more profound than the health effects.

by fred pearce

Japan’s Highway 114 may not be the most famous road in the world. It doesn’t have the cachet of Route 66 or the Pan-American Highway. But it does have one claim to fame. It passes through what for the past five years has been one of the most radioactive landscapes on the planet – heading southeast from the Japanese city of Fukushima to the stricken nuclear power plant, Fukushima Daiichi, through the forested mountains where much of the fallout from the meltdown at the plant in March 2011 fell to earth.

It is a largely empty highway now, winding through abandoned villages and past overgrown rice paddy fields. For two days in August, I traveled its length to assess the aftermath of the nuclear disaster in the company of Baba Isao, an assemblyman who represents the town of Namie, located just three miles from the power plant and one of four major towns that remain evacuated.

At times, the radiation levels seemed scarily high – still too high for permanent occupation. But radiation was just the start. More worrying, I discovered, was the psychological and political fallout from the accident. While the radiation – most of it now from caesium-137, a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 30 years – is decaying, dispersing, or being cleaned up, it is far from clear that this wider trauma has yet peaked. Fukushima is going to be in rehab for decades.

I began my journey with Baba, a small bustling man of 72 years, at Kawamata, a town on Highway 114 that is a gateway to the mountains beyond.

These mountains are where the fallout was greatest, and the forests that cover most of their slopes have retained the most radioactivity. The mountains make up most of the government-designated “red zone,” where radiation doses exceed 50 millisieverts a year and which are likely to remain uninhabited for many years.

A second “yellow zone” has doses of 20-50 millisieverts, where returning may soon be possible; and a third “green zone,” with less than 20 millisieverts, is deemed safe to live in, and an organized return is under way or planned. Zones are re-categorized as radioactivity decays and hotspots are decontaminated.

[…]

I checked my meter. It read 26 millisieverts per year in the hay shed, but shot up to an alarming 80 in undergrowth outside. That was four times the safe level for habitation. No wonder Baba had no plans to return. “I am just the son of a farmer. I wonder who has a right to destroy our home and my livelihood,” he mused bitterly. “Please tell the world: No Nukes.”

At his local post office, an official monitor by the road measured 56 millisieverts. Mine agreed, but when we pointed it close to a sprig of moss pushing through the tarmac, it went off the scale. “They measured 500 millisieverts here last week,” Baba said. “Moss accumulates radioactivity.”

As we drove on, the roadside was now marked every few kilometers by massive pyramids of black plastic bags, containing radioactive soil that had been stripped from roadside edges, paddy fields, and house gardens as part of government efforts to decontaminate the land. An estimated 3 million bags, all neatly tagged, now await final disposal at facilities planned along the coast. But the task of transporting the soil is so huge that the authorities are building a new road so trucks can bypass the scenic mountain villages along Highway 114.

Read more at In Fukushima, A Bitter Legacy Of Radiation, Trauma and Fear

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

The legacy of a nuclear power plant via Make Wealth History

While we were on holiday in Wales this summer, we passed Lyn Trawsfynydd and despite the protestations of my wife, we paused to take in the view:

That’s Trawsfynydd nuclear power station, a name I can neither pronounce nor spell. It’s the only nuclear site in Britain that was built inland rather than on the coast. And not just anywhere inland either, but right in the middle of Snowdonia National Park. The logic of this is not entirely clear, but nuclear power was more exciting in the 1950s. And besides, the architect was briefed to design a building that would blend into the landscape.

[…]

The first stage of decommissioning was to remove the fuel and ship it to Sellafield for long term ignoring. After that the process of making the site safe began. At first this was just a matter of monitoring. As certain parts of the building became less radioactive, it was safe enough to send in the robots and start dismantling them. Any part of the site that had been in contact with nuclear fuel has to be carefully taken apart and safely stored. There’s a lot of this ‘intermediate nuclear waste’ to store, including a fair amount of uncatalogued waste that was stashed on site during its operation. Beginning in 1995, this stage of decommissioning was finally completed this year.

2016 is something of a landmark in the story of Trawsfynydd then, as the site is now ‘passively safe’ – as opposed to actively dangerous, I presume. That means they can lift the one-mile emergency area, and there’s little risk of a radiation incident in one of Britain’s most beautiful national parks.

Next comes some more traditional demolition work. Unless the Sir Basil Spence fans get a last-minute campaign together, those big square reactor buildings will be reduced in size. Then the site will sit for a bit longer until radiation levels decay enough to move that stored waste. We haven’t decided where it will go yet, but that’s scheduled to happen in the 2040s.

With the hazardous material off-site, we can clean up the storage facilities and begin to think about finally clearing the site. That is due to begin in 2074, with the site returned to its original state in 2083.

That 90-year decommissioning process is, by the way, the accelerated version and Magnox are quite proud of their innovative work at Trawsfynydd. It was originally going to take 135 years.

Read more at The legacy of a nuclear power plant 

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The legacy of a nuclear power plant via Make Wealth History