Featured Topics / 特集
-

A nuclear power plant in Byron, Illinois. Taken by photographer Joseph Pobereskin (http://pobereskin.com). カレンダー
-
Latest Posts / 最新記事
- Nuclear’s cleanup cost threatens the expansion dream via DW 2026/03/21
- Germany won’t return to nuclear power, chancellor says via DW 2026/03/12
- President Trump’s radical attack on radiation safety via Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2025/10/27
- ‘It’s Sellafield or nothing’: what life is like growing up in the shadow of Europe’s oldest nuclear site via The Guardian 2025/10/07
- Holtec’s announcement that Palisades has transitioned back to “operations status” via Beyond Nuclear 2025/08/27
Discussion / 最新の議論
- Leonsz on Combating corrosion in the world’s aging nuclear reactors via c&en
- Mark Ultra on Special Report: Help wanted in Fukushima: Low pay, high risks and gangsters via Reuters
- Grom Montenegro on Duke Energy’s shell game via Beyond Nuclear International
- Jim Rice on Trinity: “The most significant hazard of the entire Manhattan Project” via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
- Barbarra BBonney on COVID-19 spreading among workers on Fukushima plant, related projects via The Mainichi
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- March 2026 (2)
- October 2025 (2)
- August 2025 (1)
- June 2025 (2)
- May 2025 (10)
- February 2025 (1)
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (4)
- June 2024 (3)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (6)
- January 2024 (4)
- November 2023 (8)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (7)
- August 2023 (5)
- July 2023 (10)
- June 2023 (12)
- May 2023 (15)
- April 2023 (17)
- March 2023 (20)
- February 2023 (19)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (11)
- November 2022 (12)
- October 2022 (7)
- September 2022 (6)
- August 2022 (22)
- July 2022 (29)
- June 2022 (15)
- May 2022 (46)
- April 2022 (36)
- March 2022 (47)
- February 2022 (24)
- January 2022 (57)
- December 2021 (27)
- November 2021 (32)
- October 2021 (48)
- September 2021 (56)
- August 2021 (53)
- July 2021 (60)
- June 2021 (55)
- May 2021 (48)
- April 2021 (64)
- March 2021 (93)
- February 2021 (69)
- January 2021 (91)
- December 2020 (104)
- November 2020 (126)
- October 2020 (122)
- September 2020 (66)
- August 2020 (63)
- July 2020 (56)
- June 2020 (70)
- May 2020 (54)
- April 2020 (85)
- March 2020 (88)
- February 2020 (97)
- January 2020 (130)
- December 2019 (75)
- November 2019 (106)
- October 2019 (138)
- September 2019 (102)
- August 2019 (99)
- July 2019 (76)
- June 2019 (52)
- May 2019 (92)
- April 2019 (121)
- March 2019 (174)
- February 2019 (146)
- January 2019 (149)
- December 2018 (38)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (89)
- September 2018 (118)
- August 2018 (194)
- July 2018 (22)
- June 2018 (96)
- May 2018 (240)
- April 2018 (185)
- March 2018 (106)
- February 2018 (165)
- January 2018 (241)
- December 2017 (113)
- November 2017 (198)
- October 2017 (198)
- September 2017 (226)
- August 2017 (219)
- July 2017 (258)
- June 2017 (240)
- May 2017 (195)
- April 2017 (176)
- March 2017 (115)
- February 2017 (195)
- January 2017 (180)
- December 2016 (116)
- November 2016 (115)
- October 2016 (177)
- September 2016 (178)
- August 2016 (158)
- July 2016 (201)
- June 2016 (73)
- May 2016 (195)
- April 2016 (183)
- March 2016 (201)
- February 2016 (154)
- January 2016 (161)
- December 2015 (141)
- November 2015 (153)
- October 2015 (212)
- September 2015 (163)
- August 2015 (189)
- July 2015 (178)
- June 2015 (150)
- May 2015 (175)
- April 2015 (155)
- March 2015 (153)
- February 2015 (132)
- January 2015 (158)
- December 2014 (109)
- November 2014 (192)
- October 2014 (206)
- September 2014 (206)
- August 2014 (208)
- July 2014 (178)
- June 2014 (155)
- May 2014 (209)
- April 2014 (242)
- March 2014 (190)
- February 2014 (170)
- January 2014 (227)
- December 2013 (137)
- November 2013 (164)
- October 2013 (200)
- September 2013 (255)
- August 2013 (198)
- July 2013 (208)
- June 2013 (231)
- May 2013 (174)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (230)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
Top Topics / TOPトピック
- anti-nuclear
- Atomic Age
- Capitalism
- East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
- energy policy
- EU
- France
- Hanford
- health
- Hiroshima/Nagasaki
- Inequality
- labor
- Nuclear power
- nuclear waste
- Nuclear Weapons
- Radiation exposure
- Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
- Safety
- TEPCO
- U.S.
- UK
- エネルギー政策
- メディア
- ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
- 健康
- 公正・共生
- 兵器
- 再稼働
- 労働における公正・平等
- 原子力規制委員会
- 原発推進
- 反原発運動
- 大飯原発
- 安全
- 広島・長崎
- 廃炉
- 東京電力
- 東日本大震災・福島原発
- 汚染水
- 米国
- 脱原発
- 被ばく
- 資本主義
- 除染
- 食の安全
Choose Language / 言語
原発避難、二審は東電の賠償増額 via Kyodo
初の控訴審判決、仙台高裁
東京電力福島第1原発事故で避難指示を受けた住民ら216人が、ふるさとを奪われたなどとして、東電に損害賠償を求めた訴訟の控訴審で、仙台高裁は12日、東電に支払いを命じた一審福島地裁いわき支部判決を変更し、賠償額を計約1億5千万円増額する判決を言い渡した。全国で約30ある同種訴訟で初めての控訴審判決。
判決理由で小林久起裁判長は「東電は2008年4月ごろには、福島第1原発に敷地の高さを超える津波が到来し、原子炉を安全に停止する機能を喪失する可能性があると認識していた」と指摘した。
[…]
“Proud to be an American?” What an American admiral forgets about nuclear war via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
By Monica Montgomery
n late February, Adm. Charles Richard, head of US Strategic Command, told a House committee that the innovations going into a new nuclear warhead are what make him “proud to be an American.”
He was referring to the W93, a new nuclear warhead that will be used on submarine-launched ballistic missiles and that the Trump administration wants $53 million to start work on this year. While the design and timeline remain unclear, the administration forecasts that the price tag for developing and building this new weapon will reach over $1 billion per year in the next four years. The W93 would join or replace at least three other submarine-launched nuclear warheads that already exist and for which billions already have been and are still being spent to modernize.
[…]
ICAN had invited Setsuko Thurlow, a Hiroshima survivor and ICAN campaigner, to begin the forum. Thurlow was 13 years old when an American aircraft dropped an atomic bomb on her home city. A twist of fate put her and 30 of her classmates outside the bomb’s epicenter; over 300 of her other classmates were not as fortunate. As Thurlow says, those classmates instantly perished with “a flash of light and heat that wiped them from the face of earth.”
Thurlow recounted how she floated in the air for several seconds after the bomb’s explosion, before she lost consciousness. When she awoke, she was trapped under the rubble of a collapsed building, shrouded in silent darkness. After crawling out, she saw that the rubble was on fire and that the sky, previously flooded with the morning’s early light, had turned dark. Most of the 30 classmates with her that morning could not get out. They burned alive.
She made her way to a nearby hill. In the scene stretching before her, lifeless bodies lay strewn about, while a “ghostly” procession of survivors streamed past, their flesh burnt, swollen, and hanging from their bones.
When she reunited with her four-year-old nephew the following day, Thurlow saw how the explosion had scorched him beyond recognition. He died four days later.
Thurlow today strives for nuclear weapons’ elimination because of this image: “the symbol of innocent children of the world” who would fall victim to the next nuclear attack.
She has recounted her story thousands of times, even though she says each new telling is no less difficult. She does it to ensure that the world does not forget the pain and destruction caused by what counts as just one “small” nuclear weapon by today’s standards.
Her testimony elicited sorrow, followed by bewilderment, frustration, and indignation. These are the emotions that all the stories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors elicit.
Testimony by the commander of my country’s nuclear forces should not do the same. Yet, bewilderment, frustration, and indignation are exactly what I feel when I hear a new nuclear warhead hailed as a source of national pride. All this, and sorrow too.
Billions of dollars for yet another nuclear weapon that would make, in Thurlow’s haunting words, “the living envy the dead” do not make me proud.
Decades of irrevocable degradation and radiation that nuclear weapons has inflicted—and is still inflicting—on marginalized communities and our shared environment do not make me proud.
[…]
Read more.
声明:福島第一原発事故から9年~「オリンピック」で覆い隠してはならない被害の実態 via FoE Japan
「見えない化」される被害
2011年3月11日に発生した東日本大震災とそれに続く東電福島第一原発事故から9年が経過しました。しかし、まだ事故は継続しています。
広範囲におよぶ放射能汚染が生じ、自然のめぐみとともにあった人々の暮らしは大きな打撃を受けました。
原発事故は多くのものを奪いました。生業、生きがい、コミュニティ、友人や隣人と過ごすかけがえのない時間、平穏な日常…。いわば、人が人として生きてきた基盤が失われてしまったのです。
「原発はすべてものを奪った。俺らだって今も山には入れない。家にはやっぱり子ども達がいてよ、子ども達と一緒に山に行ってよ、そんで山の物を採ったりよ、いろいろ教えたりそれが当たり前だったから。そんな事、いまは何にもできないから」。飯舘村の元酪農家で、今はそばの栽培に取り組む長谷川健一さんはこう語ります。
一方で、「復興」「オリンピック」のかけ声のもとに、放射能汚染や被害の実態が「見えない化」され、健康被害や不安を口にできない空気が醸成されています。
「福島は今、オリンピックが最大限に利用され、未だに続く事故の被害や避難者が抱える問題を、うまく可視化できなくしようとしています」と三春町に住む武藤類子さんは指摘します。
避難指示解除と聖火リレー
避難指示はどんどん解除されています。3月4日には帰還困難区域の常磐線双葉駅(双葉町)の周辺、5日には大野駅(大熊町)の周辺、10日には、夜ノ森駅(富岡町)の周辺の避難指示が解除されました。3月15日には常磐線が開通し、3月末には聖火リレーが今回解除された地域を通過します。
福島県の調査によれば、聖火リレーのコース上や沿道で、毎時0.46マイクロシーベルト(郡山市)、0.77マイクロシーベルト(飯舘村)など、除染基準である毎時0.23マイクロシーベルトをはるかに上回る放射線量が観測されています。また、「ちくりん舎」および「ふくいち周辺環境放射線モニタリングプロジェクト」が、聖火リレー・コースおよびその周辺69か所で行った調査によると、全調査地点中62%で、毎時0.23マイクロシーベルトを上回り、7か所で100万Bq/m2を超える高い土壌汚染を示す地点がありました。これらの地域はすでに避難指示が解除され、人が居住している場所でもあります。あまりに被ばく防護が軽視されているのではないでしょうか。
「これが本当の“復興”?」
相次いで避難指示が解除されても、帰還はなかなか進みません。旧避難指示区域の居住率は3割以下にとどまります(復興関連事業の企業関係者、廃炉・除染関係の作業員などを含む)。若い世代が帰還せず、高齢者の1~2人世帯が点在する地域が多い状況です。
「近所では次々に家が取り壊されている。もともとのコミュニティの形は跡形もない。これが本当に“復興”なのか」と富岡町に帰還した91歳の男性は語ります。
それにもかかわらず、避難者向けの住宅提供などの支援は相次いで打ち切られています。2020年3月には、双葉町と大熊町を除く帰還困難区域からの避難者に対する住宅の無償提供が終了します。対象となる2,274世帯のうち、211世帯については4月以降の住宅確保の見通しはたっていません。
福島県が事故当時18歳以下だった人たちに対して定期的におこなう甲状腺検査では、甲状腺がんまたは疑いと診断された人の数は237人、うち手術してがんと確定したのは186人にのぼっています(2020年2月13日までの公表資料による)。しかし、多くのもれがあることがわかっており、甲状腺がんの数や症例は、必ずしもあきらかではありません。福島県が設置した委員会は、一巡目二巡目の検査の結果について「罹患統計などから推定される有病数に比べて数十倍のオーダーで多い」とした上で「事故の影響は考えづらい」などとしています。
甲状腺がんが多く見出されている理由として、一部の専門家たちは「過剰診断論」を唱えていますが、手術を行った医師は、多くの患者にリンパ節転移や周辺組織への広がりがみられたとし、いずれも手術が必要な症例であったと述べています。
汚染土の再利用と汚染水の海洋放出
除染で発生した汚染土もまた、「見えない化」されようとしています。環境省は1,400万m3とされている汚染土を公共事業や農地造成に「再利用」する方針を打ち出しました。環境省はこの4月から再利用のための施行規則を運用しようといています。しかし、情報公開や住民への説明が十分行われるのか定かではありません。
各地で住民たちが反対しています。福島県二本松市の農道でおこなわれるはずだった実証事業は、住民の猛反対で中止されました。環境省は、南相馬市小高区の常磐自動車道の4車線化の盛り土に汚染土を使う実証事業を計画していますが、地元行政区の区長たちが全員反対している状況です。
福島第一原発のサイトでは、多核種除去装置(ALPS)で処理した汚染水が増え続けています。タンクはすでに960基で、貯蔵されている処理水は116万m3以上となりました。 これに関しては、大型タンクによる陸上保管やモルタル固化による保管、敷地の拡張などが提案されていたのにもかかわらず、汚染水の取り扱いについて検討を行っていた政府の委員会は、そうした提案を十分検討しないまま、海洋などへの放出が現実的な選択肢だとする報告書をまとめました。
被害者を中心に据えた復興へ
現在、除染やインフラ、ニーズが定かではないスポーツ施設や道路などに多額の予算がふりわけられています。一方で、避難者への住宅提供などの支援は打ち切られ、除染以外の被ばく対策はほとんど行われておらず、保養も民間団体が細々と行っているにすぎません。
「復興」の名のもとに、避難者「数」を減らし、被ばく影響を否定することによって、原発事故被害者はむしろ追いつめられています。
私たちは、日本政府に対して、現在の被害を直視し、原発事故被害者全員への完全な賠償と、被害者の生活再建と尊厳を取り戻す真の復興のための政策を実施することを求めます。
私たちはまた、世界中の人たちと手をとりあって、原発事故の惨禍を二度と繰り返さないために、被害者とともに立ち、原発も核もない平和な世界に向けて、歩みを進めたいと思います。
以 上国際環境NGO FoE Japan
〒173-0037 東京都板橋区小茂根1-21-9
TEL: 03-6909-5983 / FAX: 03-6909-5986
The Half lives of the abandoned via Beyond Nuclear International
By Cindy Folkers
“Whatever I do, all pleasure has disappeared from my life…we are living with a narrow range of activities.”
Akemi Shima was a resident of Date (duh-tay) City when the reactors at Fukushima exploded, spewing radioactive particles into the air, across the land, and into the waters. (She tells her story in her own words this week as well. See here.)
[…]
“…from fall to winter, one week out of every month, all the skin on [my son’s] body turned reddish black; he couldn’t move, and had to stay in bed. He repeatedly experienced having his skin peel off, heal, [and] then peel off again. That continued for approximately 3 years [after the catastrophe began]. Sometimes, he ended up being hospitalized.”
Shima’s son and daughter had eczema, a common skin condition for children in Japan. It worsened considerably soon after the catastrophe. Her son suffered symptoms associated with radiation exposure, including heavy nosebleeds. Nosebleeds were so widespread among Date City’s children that recommendations for treating them were featured in a school health newsletter.
Even though evacuation recommendations were lifted about one year later for certain areas in Date City, many people were hesitant to return to the contaminated zone. The issue of resettlement had not been resolved and studies of human health remained controversial.
Beginning in August of 2011, glass badges were distributed to approximately 8000 children, pregnant women, and those living in areas with high levels of radiation. In July of the following year, glass badges were distributed to all residents of Date City, numbering approximately 60,000.
However, outside researchers published studies using residents’ badge data without their knowledge or permission – a violation of ethical guidelines for human subject research. These studies became mired in distrust, bad science and charges of scientific misconduct.
Akemi Shima participated in the badge study, and noticed some scientifically questionable practices and assumptions that were later detailed in a paper she co-authored with Shin-ichi Kurokawa, Professor Emeritus of The High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
In 2019, the University of Tokyo and Fukushima Medical University cleared their researchers — the authors of the controversial badge data studies — of scientific misconduct, a charge requiring intent. However, scientific inconsistencies, mathematical miscalculations and concerns over invalid conclusions remain.
“During my [first] three years in Fukushima, I stopped accepting certain words… ‘Kizuna’, ‘Reconstruction’, and ‘Reputational damage’. In the process of reconstruction and prevention of reputational damage, even the truth has become invisible, and what has happened is just as if it had never happened.”
Kizuna or “ties that bind” is a phrase mobilized by the Japanese government from the earliest days of the disaster to claim that inquiries about radiation harm will hurt the community and therefore people should remain quiet, no matter the suffering.
To rebuild life in Date City, the prefectural government, at the urging of the national government and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), attempted to enshrine the reckless notion of “rehabilitation” – the idea that one can live with radioactive contamination and that health and recovery responsibilities reside with individuals and communities, not industry or government. Adopting a “rehabilitation/recovery” regime mandates that residents’ concerns about health impacts and continuing exposure are downplayed or brushed aside altogether, even by institutions that should be trustworthy.
A year after the nuclear catastrophe began, Shima’s daughter, already under periodic heart monitoring for an unrelated childhood condition which had now passed, had a benign bone tumor removed from her leg. Her daughter had trouble getting up in the morning and was diagnosed with a condition related to chronic fatigue syndrome. At this time, Shima also had her children examined by Fukushima Prefecture as part of the Fukushima Health Management Survey established by Fukushima Medical University to track health after the catastrophe began. When the prefecture examined Shima’s 11-year old daughter she was told there were no abnormalities. However, after a second examination, doctors from a different clinic found two thyroid cysts. Her 13-year old son had one cyst detected by the prefecture, but upon the second screening, also at a different facility, two were found.
Other families tell of inconsistent test results between Fukushima Prefecture exams and those conducted at other institutions. Shima relates how examinations varied at the different institutions with the prefecture examination taking a few seconds to a few minutes while the second clinic took more than 10 minutes. Such a short time will miss lesions that could lead to cancers, according to a doctor at the clinic who performed the reexaminations. The prefectural clinics authorized by FMU to conduct exams refuse to hand over personal medical data to the patient without a cumbersome request system and payment for materials reproduction, further stoking mistrust among exposed inhabitants.
Additionally, prefecture experts claim that thyroid cancers after Chernobyl didn’t appear until four or five years after exposure. They therefore conclude the circumstances will be the same for Fukushima, despite what appear to be increases in metastatic thyroid cancers. Shima has noticed the appearance of other rare types of cancers as well that are not receiving the attention that thyroid cancer has.
[…]
“Responsibility for the nuclear accident is neglected, and everything else is “self-responsibility”. “I know well…[t]he limits of decontamination.”
Akemi Shima and other residents feel abandoned; first because they were told it was safe to stay; and now because they are largely left with responsibility for cleaning up TEPCO’s radioactive legacy. If Date City residents want levels lower than 5 mSv/year, they have to do the cleanup themselves; despite the ICRP recommended 1 mSv per year level; and despite levels below 4 mSv being associated with increases in childhood cancers and impairment of neural development during pregnancy.
“Living in a radioactive environment requires you to be vigilant tirelessly, whether for shopping, eating, or drinking water, and evaluate the situation yourself to make choices. We had to make up our minds to accept an abnormal lifestyle so that we could continue to live our daily lives.”
Shima points out that even if short-lived radiocesium has completely decayed, the level of radioactivity is still 10 times what it was before the catastrophe. It will likely remain so for generations, as demonstrated by the radiological contamination from Chernobyl. Shima relates how even higher doses are dismissed by officials. They claim that those areas are passed through, not lived in. But these officials do not account for children playing in those areas.
[…]
Read more.
The Price of Staying: Evacuation was not mandatory for these now suffering Fukushima victims via Beyond Nuclear International
By Akemi Shima
[…]
“Eight years after the construction of our house, on March 11, 2011 the accident of the power plant occurred, and our family life was turned upside down. My husband and I were 42 years old, my son was in elementary school 4th grade (12 years old) and my daughter was in elementary school 3rd grade (10 years old).
“At that time, I had no knowledge about nuclear or radioactive substances. If I had had some knowledge in this area, by running away from it we probably could have avoided being irradiated. I am burdened by this regret. Without any financial leeway, with my sick children and my parents who are here, I could not resolve myself to get away from Date.
“From the 11th of March all life lines were cut and I had to go to the water stations where I took the children. To find food we had to walk outside sometimes soaked in the rain. After several days as we still had no water, we had to go to the town hall to use the toilet, where the water was not cut. It was then that I saw a group of people dressed in white protective suits entering the town hall. We thought that they were probably coming to help the victims of the tsunami. But now, I understand that the radioactive pollution was such that protections were necessary and we, without suspecting anything, were exposed.
“The risk of this exposure was not communicated to us. In June 2011 my son had so many heavy nosebleeds that his sheets were all red. The children with the same symptoms were so numerous that we received a notice containing recommendations through the school’s “health letter”. During a medical examination at the school, my son was found to have a heart abnormality and had to be monitored by a holter. My son, who was 12 at the time of the accident, was also suffering from atopic dermatitis. During the school spring break he had to be hospitalized after his symptoms worsened. Today we still cannot identify the symptoms that cause him to suffer.
“One year after the accident, my daughter complained of pain in her right leg. In the hospital, an extra-osseous osteoma was diagnosed and she had to undergo bone excision the following year. In her first year of junior high school in the winter term, she could not get up in the morning. She had orthostatic dysfunction. In agreement with her we decided that she would go to school three times a week in a system with flexible hours.
[…]
“Living in a radioactive environment requires you to be vigilant tirelessly, whether for shopping, eating, or drinking water, and evaluate the situation yourself to make choices. We had to make up our minds to accept an abnormal lifestyle so that we could continue to live on a daily basis.
“Whatever I do, all pleasure has disappeared from my life. I discovered that there were some hotspots of more than 10 μSv per hour near my home on the way to my children’s school. I reported it to the town hall, but they did not do anything. The reason given is that there is no temporary storage to store it. I had to remove the contaminated soil myself and I stored it in my garden. The city of Date decided on its own decontamination policy and also introduced a standard of 5mSv per year at the end of 2011.
“In my case I wanted to reduce the radioactive pollution as soon as possible and I decontaminated my garden myself. The city encouraged people to decontaminate on their own. I did it too. And that represented 144 bags. The following year I did again. The radioactive debris bags resulting from the decontamination until March 2014 remained in my garden for two years, and were then taken to the temporary storage area.
[…]
“Even today, while the state of nuclear emergency is still official, this abnormal situation has become our daily life. I fear that the “reconstruction” advocated by the state, violates the fundamental rights of residents and that this unacceptable life is now considered normal. Our lives are at a standstill.
“This suffering will continue. My deepest wish is that through this lawsuit, the responsibility of the State and Tepco that caused the accident be recognized.”
Read more.
Statement on 9th Anniversary of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster: Don’t Let the Olympics Obscure the True Impacts via FoE Japan
Nine years have passed since the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami struck the Tohoku region on March 11, 2011, and the ensuing accident at the TEPCO Daiichi nuclear power plant. The impacts of this nuclear accident continue to this day.
Radiation contaminated a large area and has had serious impacts on the environment and the livelihoods that so much depended on the natural environment.
The nuclear accident robbed people in the region of many things: livelihoods, a purpose in life, community, precious time with friends and neighbors, and a peaceful daily life. The very foundations of their lives were taken away.
“Nuclear power robbed us of everything. We still can’t go into the forests. Families with children used to go into the forest to gather wild plants and teach about nature. That was a common practice, taken for granted. But today we can’t do any of that.” Those are the words of Kenichi Hasegawa, a former dairy farmer who is now growing buckwheat (soba).
Meanwhile, in the midst of much fanfare about reconstruction efforts and the Olympics, the real status of radioactive contamination and damage from the disaster is being kept out of view, and an atmosphere has been created where people cannot talk about health impacts and other concerns.
“In Fukushima today, the Olympics are being exploited to the maximum in an effort to make it difficult to see the issues facing evacuees from damage from the accident, which continue to this day,” says Ruiko Muto, a resident of Miharu Town.
Lifting of evacuation orders, Olympic torch relay
One after another, the government is lifting evacuation orders in the affected area. On March 4, evacuation orders were lifted in so-called “difficult-to-return zone” around Futaba Station, Futaba town on the Joban Line of East Japan Railway Company. On March 5 it was the area around Ono Station in Okuma town. On March 10 it was the area around Yonomori Station, Tomioka town. On March 15, the Joban Line trains will start running. And at the end of March, the Olympic torch relay will be passing through these areas where evacuation orders were lifted.
According to studies by Fukushima Prefecture, radiation doses far exceeding the decontamination standard of 0.23 microsieverts per hour have been observed along roads and the Olympic torch route, including 0.46 microsieverts per hour in Koriyama city and 0.77 microsieverts per hour in Iitate. According to surveys by the Radioactivity Monitoring Center for Citizens (Chikurinsha) and the Fukuichi Area Environmental Radiation Monitoring Project (Fukuichi = TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant) at 69 sites along the torch relay route and surrounding area, readings exceeded 0.23 microsieverts per hour at 62% of all survey sites, and high levels of soil contamination were found at seven sites, where readings exceeded one million Bq/m2. These areas are where evacuation orders have already been lifted, and residents are living there in some cases. This leaves one the impression that the need to protect people from radiation exposure is not being treated seriously enough.
“Is this what reconstruction looks like?”
Even where evacuation orders have been lifted, the return of residents has been very slow. The occupancy rate is below 30% in areas where evacuation orders have already been lifted (this number even includes decontamination and nuclear plant deconstruction workers, “reconstruction” business-related personnel and new residents). Young people are not returning, and in many areas the majority of households consist of one or two elderly persons.
“In my neighborhood, more and more houses are being torn down. There is virtually no trace of the original community. Is this what reconstruction looks like?” Those are the words of a 91-year-old man who returned to live in Tomioka.
Despite this, housing and other forms of assistance for evacuees is steadily being terminated. In March 2020, the provision of free housing stopped for evacuees from “difficult-to-return zones” with the exceptions of the towns of Futaba and Okuma. Among the affected 2,274 households, 221 of them still have no prospect of securing housing for April onwards.
Regular thyroid gland testing by Fukushima Prefecture for persons who were under the age of 18 at the time of the accident has found 237 persons diagnosed with or suspected of thyroid cancer, of which 186 cases of thyroid cancer were confirmed by surgery (numbers based on publicly available materials, up to February 13, 2020). However, we know that many cases have been overlooked, so the real numbers and medical cases of thyroid cancer are not always as stated officially. A prefectural committee stated that the results of the first and second rounds of testing were “tens of orders of magnitude higher than the number of cases estimated from disease statistics, etc.” and “It is difficult to consider the impacts of the accident.” Some experts claim that “over diagnosis” is one reason so many cases of thyroid cancer are being detected, but doctors who performed surgeries have stated that many patients had lymph node metastases and that it had spread to surrounding tissue, and that surgery is required in both cases.
Reuse of contaminated soil arising from decontamination work, ocean release of contaminated water
There are also efforts to make “contaminated soil” arising from decontamination work disappear from view. (This is soil that has been removed from populated areas and farmland as a result of decontamination work. It contains low-level radioactive material.) Japan’s Ministry of the Environment has announced a policy to “reuse” 14 million cubic meters of contaminated soil in public works and agricultural land development projects. The Ministry intends to begin implementing the related regulations in April. But what is not clear is whether sufficient information will be disclosed and explanations provided to residents.
Residents in many communities have vociferously opposed these plans. A demonstration project for an agricultural road in Nihonmatsu, Fukushima, was cancelled due to intense opposition from the community. The Ministry is planning a demonstration project to use contaminated soil as roadbed fill to expand the Joban Expressway to four lanes in Odaka Ward (Minamisoma City), but all heads of the local administrative districts are opposed.
The volume of processed contaminated water from the Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant site continues to grow. Already 960 tanks are storing 1.16 million cubic meters of treated water.
Alternative proposals have been made to store the contaminated water in large tanks on land, to use mortar solidification, and to expand the current site, but the government committee that examined the treatment of contaminated water has submitted its final report, concluding that discharge into the ocean is a viable option, even without having adequately considered the alternatives proposed.
Need a shift to victim-centered reconstruction efforts
A huge amount of funding is currently being allocated to decontamination and infrastructure work, as well as for roads and sports facilities for which the demand is not even assured. Meanwhile, housing and other assistance for evacuees from the disaster is being terminated, there has been almost no other effort to protect people from radiation exposure other than specific decontamination efforts. It is, in fact, citizen groups are really the only ones that are conscientiously providing protection or services for victims to rest and recuperate. Nuclear disaster victims are being pushed into the corner in the name of reconstruction, with government efforts to reduce the official numbers of evacuees and to deny the impacts of radiation exposure.
We call upon the government of Japan to honestly face the current impacts of the nuclear disaster, to implement policies for full compensation for all victims of this nuclear disaster, and for real reconstruction efforts to restore the victims’ lives and dignity. We join with people around the world to stand with together the victims and continue working towards a peaceful world without nuclear power and nuclear weapons, with the aim of ensuring that the catastrophe of a nuclear accident is never repeated.
RSF urges Japan to stop pressuring the media on Fukushima-related topics via RSF Reporters Without Borders
[…]
On Wednesday, March 11th, Japan will commemorate the 9th anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant accident, the worst atomic disaster after Chernobyl, caused by a tsunami and collectively resulting in 18,500 dead and missing, 160,000 evacuees and a continuous release of massive amounts of radioactive materials until today. Since the accident, the media have consistently encountered pressure and censorship attempts when trying to investigate the topic.
“It is essential for the public to access independent information on the accurate radiation levels,” says Cédric Alviani, RSF’s East Asia bureau head. “The government is currently encouraging the remaining evacuees to settle back to the contaminated areas, but it must be fully transparent on the health hazard residents would be exposed to.”
Many Japanese journalists denounce heavy self-censorship in the media, which they attribute to the government and nuclear lobby’s efforts at concealing information seen as giving a “negative image” of Japan and hindering the preparation of the 2020 Olympic Games, set in Tokyo this summer.
A senior TV reporter who formerly worked for a major news program and wishes to remain anonymous recalls “intense pressure from the government and advertisers” to discourage his team from reporting on the long-term effects of the radioactive substances released by the plant. “We even heard of phone calls from Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s cabinet asking our management to move some journalists they disliked to another department.”
In 2014, the board of daily newspaper The Asahi Shimbun even had to make a public apology for having published an article pointing out that 90% of the nuclear plant’s employees were offsite during the accident, drawing the government’s ire. The authors, award winning journalists Hideaki Kimura and Tomomi Miyazaki, were transferred to a non-writing section and later forced to resign.
Martin Fackler, who served as the New York Times Tokyo bureau chief from 2009 to 2015, considers that the authorities “clearly lack transparency” and believes that the Asahi Shimbun’s retraction case “successfully deterred other big media from investigating Fukushima-related stories.”
UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression David Kaye has expressed serious concerns about freedom of the press in Japan in 2017, and noted a further erosion in 2019.
Japan ranked 67th out of 180 in the 2019 World Press Freedom Index.JAPANASIA – PACIFICCONDEMNING ABUSES
Read more.
Why is the UAE, where solar energy is abundant, about to open four nuclear reactors? via The Conversation
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is building the world’s largest concentrated solar power plant, capable of generating 700 megawatts. During daylight, solar power will provide cheap electricity, and at night the UAE will use stored solar heat to generate electricity.
But at the same time, four nuclear reactors are nearing completion in the UAE, built by the South Korean Electric Power Corporation, KEPCO. The nuclear power plant is named Barakah – Arabic for divine blessing.
The UAE’s investment in these four nuclear reactors risks further destabilising the volatile Gulf region, damaging the environment and raising the possibility of nuclear proliferation.
Safety flaws
The UAE nuclear contract remains South Korea’s one and only export order, despite attempts by KEPCO to win contracts in Lithuania, Turkey, Vietnam and the UK. Barakah, construction of which began in 2011, is in the Gharbiya region of Abu Dhabi, on the coast.
Although nuclear reactor design has evolved over time, key safety features haven’t been included at Barakah. This is important, since these reactors might not be able to defend against an accidental or deliberate airplane crash, or military attack.
Particularly worrying is the lack of a “core-catcher” which, if the emergency reactor core cooling system fails, works to keep in the hot nuclear fuel if it breaches the reactor pressure vessel. Concrete cracking in all four reactor containment buildings hasn’t helped, nor has the installation of faulty safety relief valves.
All this is further complicated by large-scale falsification of KEPCO quality control documents, which ended up in a far-reaching criminal investigation and convictions in 2013.
[…]
The debate over nuclear power and climate is hotting up, with some scientists suggesting new nuclear can help. Yet, the International Panel on Climate Change recently reported that extreme sea-level events will significantly increase, whether emissions are curbed or not. All coastal nuclear plants, including Barakah, will be increasingly vulnerable to sea-level rise, storm surges, flooding of reactor and spent fuel stores. The UAE’s governmental environmental assessment of global heating’s impact on Barakah is conspicuous by its absence.
[…]
Read more.
Posted in *English
Tagged energy policy, KEPKO, United Arab Emirates
Comments Off on Why is the UAE, where solar energy is abundant, about to open four nuclear reactors? via The Conversation

