UNSCEARに要望書を提出しました・ On the occasion of UNSCEAR’s Public Meeting, we write with the wish for UNSCEAR to face the realities of Fukushima’s pediatric thyroid cancer and patients via あじさいの会

UNSCEAR(原子放射線の影響に関する国連科学委員会)の前議長ら3人が内堀福島県知事を訪問した2022年7月20日、あじさいの会はUNSECAR関係者に提言書を手渡しました。

手渡した提言書は以下のとおりです。

UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR)

July 20, 2022 “Ajisai no Kai” thyroid cancer support group Motomi Ushiyama, Representative Chikako Chiba, Secretary General

On the occasion of UNSCEAR’s Public Meeting, we write with the wish for UNSCEAR to face the realities of Fukushima’s pediatric thyroid cancer and patients.

We respectfully acknowledge your efforts in preparing the UNSCEAR report on the impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident.

Since 2016, we have been supporting pediatric thyroid cancer patients and their families, listening to their grief, agony, anxieties, hardships, difficulties utilizing the prefectural system, and submitting requests for action to the prefecture.

We have read the 2020/2021UNSCEAR report.

The average thyroid equivalent dose of infants in Fukushima Prefecture in the first year of the accident were significantly lower than those reported in 2013, because 1) Japan’s buildings are concrete and block radiation, 2) Japanese people consume a lot of seaweed such as kombu and thus take in little radioactive iodine in their thyroids, and 3) Japan limited shipping at an early stage. Further, there have been and will not be any impacts on genes, in other words, on future generations. We were taken aback by the reasoning so removed from Fukushima and its our realities.

In reality, at the 44th Meeting of the Fukushima Prefectural Oversight Committee of the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) on May 13th this year, it was reported that 274 people were diagnosed “malignant or suspected malignant” by the thyroid ultrasound examination (TUE).

227 of these patients received operation, and of them, 226 patients received diagnostic confirmation of thyroid cancer. It has also been shown that there are about 30 additional patients of pediatric thyroid cancer that have not been identified or presented on by the prefecture.

The March 2016 interim report on the FHMS also report “frequent occurrences” of pediatric thyroid cancer in Fukushima after the nuclear accident.

Amongst the patients we support are people who were diagnosed with cancer in elementary, middle, or high school, and who gave up on their studies due to treatment, or whose employment was impacted. There are people whose cancer reemerged two to three years after the surgery, who have had further surgeries and received, multiple times, the physically and mentally exhausting radioactive iodine therapy, and those whose lives are threated due to metastasis in the lungs. There are families, anxious of reemergence or metastasis, unable to freely consult with those around them, and forced to lead isolated lives.

Many children are suffering from thyroid cancer. This is a fact. Citizens in Fukushima, in Japan, that suspect that exposure to radiation has impacted the frequent occurrence of thyroid cancer after the accident, are not few.

On January 27th this year, six youth of the patients whose thyroid cancers were found through the thyroid tests (TUE) of the FHMS have filed a lawsuit against TEPCO. Four of the six patients are forced to undergo re-operation due to reemergence of cancer.

There were objections to the report that there was “no association” with radiation exposure due to the nuclear power plant accident from within the Oversight Committee of the Fukushima Prefectural Health Management Survey and the Thyroid Examination Evaluation Committee. Furthermore, the June 2019 summary of the Thyroid Examination Evaluation Committee states that further examination and analysis of multiple factors, including radiation dose, regional classification, and examination intervals, is necessary.

The scientific fact is that at present, it cannot be determined that all pediatric thyroid cancers in Fukushima are unrelated to radiation exposure due to the nuclear power plant accident.

Further, accurate surveys are necessary in order to provide objective information based on scientific findings. However, the prefectural health survey does not accurately capture the actual number and status of pediatric thyroid cancer patients in the prefecture. In addition, the failure to accurately measure radiation doses on a large scale immediately after the accident has resulted in the current situation where no satisfactory scientific explanation can be obtained. However, the recent UNSCEAR report suppresses patient anxiety, instills distrust in science, and leads thyroid cancer patients and their families to isolation. We were pushed to make this proposal by people who did not develop cancer but who carry anxieties due to their exposure to radiation, and people who feel despair and resentment as if their very existence and suffering had been abandoned.

It is an indisputable fact that the Fukushima nuclear accident has contaminated not only Fukushima Prefecture but also a large area of eastern Japan, that mountains and forests remain contaminated, that difficult-to-return zones remain, that tens of thousands of people are still forced to live as evacuees, and that a nuclear emergency declaration remains in effect.

Is Japan and Fukushima Prefecture today not refusing to acknowledge this fact, suppressing people from expressing their anxieties about radiation exposure, and framing those speaking the truth to be criticized as spreading rumors? And they point to the UNSCEAR report as their foundation.

We ask you in earnest, to reconsider the 2020 and 2021 reports with consideration of the possibility that the UNSCEAR report would further increase the anxiety, isolation, and despair of thyroid cancer patients and their families, and that it would further strengthen discrimination and prejudice against them.

source

原子放射線の影響に関する国連科学委員 殿 

                              2022年7月20日 甲状腺がん支援グループあじさいの会  代表 牛山 元美

事務局長 千葉 親子

国連科学委員会(UNSCEAR)パブリックミーティングの開催にあたり ―福島の小児甲状腺がん発症及び患者の現状に直視して頂く事を願い提言いたしますー

 「国連科学委員会」(UNSCEAR)福島第一原子力発電所事故の影響に関する報告書の作成にご尽力いただき敬意を表します。

 私たちは2016(平成28)年から、小児甲状腺がん患者本人やご家族の支援活動を通し、彼らの悲しみ、苦悩、不安、生活の困難、県の制度利用のしにくさなどの声に耳を傾け、対処を求めて県に要望書などを提出してまいりました。

今回、2020年2021年報告書を読ませていただきました。 福島県の乳幼児の事故一年目の甲状腺平均吸収線量は2013年報告にくらべ大幅に減少させられており、その理由として、①日本の建物はコンクリートで放射能の遮蔽があった。②日本人は昆布など海産物をたくさん摂取しているから甲状腺に放射性ヨウ素の取り込みは少ない。③日本は出荷制限が早かった、などがあげられています。

また、原発事故による放射線の健康影響として、甲状腺がんを含めたあらゆるがんは、子どもたちから高齢者までの全ての年齢層について増えていないし、今後も増えない。そしてあらゆる遺伝子影響、つまり次世代への影響も起きていないし、今後も起きないと結論されました。現場、現状とはかけ離れた理由に驚きました。

しかし今年5月13日の第44回県民健康調査検討委員会において、甲状腺検査で「悪性ないし悪性疑い」と判定された人は274人、うち手術を受けた227人中226人が甲状腺がんと診断確定したと報告されています。この他に、県が把握・発表していない小児甲状腺がん患者が約30人いることも明らかになっています。

原発事故後の福島で小児甲状腺がんが「多発」していることは、2016(平成28)年3月の県民健康調査における中間とりまとめにも記載されています。

私たちが支援している患者さんの中には、小・中・高校生でがんを宣告され、治療のため学業をあきらめた人、就職に影響した人もいます。手術後2,3年で癌が再発し、再手術、さらに放射性ヨウ素服用という心身共に負担の大きい治療を何度も受けている人、肺転移で命の危険を感じている人もいます。再発や転移の不安を抱え、まわりに気軽に相談もできず、孤立した生活を強いられているご家族が現実にいます。

「多くの子どもたちが甲状腺がんに苦しんでいる」ことは事実です。 原発後の甲状腺がんの多発に被ばくの影響を疑っている県民、国民は少なくありません。

今年1月27日、福島県民健康調査における甲状腺検査で甲状腺がんが発見された患者の若者6人が、東京電力を相手に提訴を行い裁判が起きています。6人のうち4人は再発、再手術を強いられています。

原発事故による放射線被ばくと「関連なし」とする報告に対しては、福島県民健康調査検討委員会や甲状腺検査評価部会内でも異を唱える意見がありました。さらに被ばく線量、地域分け、検査間隔等複数の要因についてさらなる検討解析が必要と、2019(令和元)年6月の甲状腺検査評価部会まとめにも記載されています。

現時点で、福島の小児甲状腺がんのすべてが原発事故による放射線被ばくと無関係であるとは断定できないことこそが科学的事実です。

科学的知見に基づく客観的な情報を発信するためには、更なる正確な調査が必要ですが、県民健康調査は県内の小児甲状腺がん患者の実数、実態を正確に把握できていません。また、事故直後の被ばく線量を正確に大規模に測定しなかったことが、納得のいく科学的な説明が得られない現状を招いています。

しかし、今般の「国連科学委員会」(UNSCEAR)報告は、患者の不安を押さえつけ、科学への不信を植え付け、甲状腺がん患者と家族を孤独に追いやるものです。

がんの発症をせずとも、被ばくによる不安を抱える人々、まさに自分たちの存在、苦悩が見捨てられたかのような絶望を感じ、憤る姿に押され、私たちはこの提言をすることに至りました。

福島原発事故が起きたことで福島県のみにとどまらず東日本の広い国土が放射能に汚染され、今も山林は汚染されたまま、いまだに帰還困難区域がなくならず、何万人もの県民が避難生活を強いられ、原子力緊急事態宣言が出されたままであることも紛れもない事実です。 その事実を認めず、被曝への不安を口にすることを封じて、事実を語ることに対して風評と非難するように仕向けているのが「国連科学委員会」(UNSCEAR)の報告を基にした今の日本であり福島県ではないでしょうか。

「国連科学委員会」(UNSCEAR)の報告によって甲状腺がん患者やご家族の不安や孤独感、絶望感が高まり、彼らに対する差別や偏見がより強まる可能性を深く理解され、2020年2021年報告書を再検討されることを心より強く要望いたします。

原文

Posted in *English, *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on UNSCEARに要望書を提出しました・ On the occasion of UNSCEAR’s Public Meeting, we write with the wish for UNSCEAR to face the realities of Fukushima’s pediatric thyroid cancer and patients via あじさいの会

Why Is There More Talk about Using Nuclear Weapons Than about Banning Them? via FAIR

Karl Grossman

It’s of critical importance—indeed, existential importance—to the world: the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. And a coalition of peace organizations in the United States is charging that media are acting like the treaty “does not exist.”

The Nuclear Ban Treaty Collaborative is waging a campaign to encourage press coverage of the treaty, which, it argues, “provides the only pathway to a safe, secure future free of the nuclear threat” (Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance Newsletter6/22).

[…]

But its provisions only apply to nations which are party to it. Countries with nuclear weapons—including the United States, Russia and China—have not. Instead, “so far, they have refused, boycotted meetings, and even pressured countries not to sign on,” the Federation of American Scientists has noted (FAS1/22/09). 

Media attention vital 

Media attention is vital if the TPNW is to become a reality. But as the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance (OREPA), a member of the Collaborative, explained in its June newsletter

The last time the New York Times mentioned the TPNW was October of 2020, when Honduras became the 50th nation to ratify the Treaty, triggering its Entry in Force. In all the coverage of nuclear weapons since then, including a surge since Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, the TPNW has not been mentioned once.

National Public Radio has had four significant reports about nuclear weapons in the last three months, including a seven minute report on Sunday, March 27. None of the reports mentioned the TPNW—the last time NPR mentioned it was in January 2021 when it reported on the Treaty’s entry into force, noting it was a significant treaty becoming international law. Since then, crickets.

CNN is marginally better. A search of the website for “nuclear weapons” turns up almost daily reports; but the Treaty on the Prohibition on Nuclear Weapons gets only one mention—an op-ed on May 3 from Ira Helfand, co-president of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War.

The Collaborative is calling for media to cover the treaty whenever reporting on the threat of nuclear weapons.

Plenty of nuclear talk

Ralph Hutchison, coordinator of OREPA, said in an interview: 

What became alarming was that there was a revival of coverage of nuclear weapons after Vladimir Putin made his threat. In all those articles we seemed to be locked into Cold War thinking which ignores the reality that an alternative to “mutually assured destruction” exists: the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. And yet there was nothing.

Indeed, according to a search of the Nexis news database, US newspapers have mentioned “nuclear weapons” 5,243 times between February 24, when Putin began talking about their potential use in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and August 4. Only 43 of those times included a mention of the treaty; the great majority of these were letters to the editor or opinion columns.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Why Is There More Talk about Using Nuclear Weapons Than about Banning Them? via FAIR

原発事故の被ばく、国連科学委が「健康被害の可能性は低い」と結論も…福島の会場からは疑問の声 via 東京新聞

東京電力福島第一原発事故後の放射線被ばくによる健康への影響に関する報告書をまとめた国連の科学委員会(UNSCEAR)が21日、福島県いわき市で研究者らとの意見交換会を開いた。ギリアン・ハース前議長は「総合的に被ばく線量は少なく、がんなどの健康被害が増加する可能性は低い」と説明。研究者らからは「被ばくを過小評価している」などと疑問の声が上がった。

報告書は、事故後から2019年末までに公表された査読付き論文などの結果をまとめ、昨年3月に公開された。執筆したミハイル・バラノフ博士は、福島県で小児甲状腺がんが多く確認されていることについて「超高感度のスクリーニング検査の結果が影響していると思う」と述べた。

会場からは多くの質問が出た。「3.11甲状腺がん子ども基金」代表理事で医学博士の崎山比早子さんは、50年以上前の論文などに基づき、日本人は海産物を多く食べるために事故で放出した放射性ヨウ素の被ばくを世界平均の半分と推計したことを問題視。「福島県民健康調査で分かる通り、摂取量は日本人も世界平均と変わらない。被ばくの明らかな過小評価になっている」と指摘した。

 高エネルギー加速器研究機構の物理学者、黒川真一名誉教授は「誤ったグラフやデータが複数あるほか、物理的にあり得ない数値を出し、論文引用の誤りで被ばく線量の過小評価をしている。科学的な報告書とは程遠い」と批判。黒川氏らの研究者グループは、報告書を独自に検証して結論の撤回を求めてもいる。 

[…]

 委員会のメンバー3人は20日、福島県知事と面会。その直後、小児甲状腺がん患者らを支援する「あじさいの会」の千葉親子ちかこさん(74)がボリスラバ・メットカーフ事務局長に「報告書の結論は、患者や家族への差別や偏見を助長しかねない」と直接再考を求めた。

千葉さんに同行した、事故当時中学生で甲状腺がんになった女性は「初期被ばく線量の十分なデータがない中、被ばくとがんの因果関係がないと決め付けられ苦しい。正しい調査をしてほしい」と訴えた。(片山夏子)

全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 原発事故の被ばく、国連科学委が「健康被害の可能性は低い」と結論も…福島の会場からは疑問の声 via 東京新聞

福島第一原発「処理水」放出 東電、海底トンネル4日着工発表 「もう始まるの?」市民絶句 via 東京新聞

 東京電力は3日、福島第一原発(福島県大熊町、双葉町)の汚染水を浄化処理した後の水の海洋放出に向け、海底トンネルなどの設備工事を4日に始めると発表した。来年春の放出開始を目指すが、気象条件などで海上工事が遅れた場合、設備の完成は来年夏ごろにずれ込む可能性があるという。漁業関係者を中心に反対の声は強く、実際に放出できるかは不透明だ。(増井のぞみ)

[…]

東電は、一部の工事は同意の対象外として進めており、海底トンネルにつながる貯水槽が入る穴は掘り終えた。 記者会見した東電福島第一廃炉推進カンパニーの松本純一氏は、理解が得られなければ海洋放出はしないとした福島県漁連との約束文書について「漁業関係者との文書は順守することで間違いない」と明言。ただ、理解を得ていく道筋については「説明を尽くす」と繰り返すだけだった。 

着工前に東電幹部が漁業関係者に説明するかを問われると、「予定はない」と答えた。一方、岸田文雄首相は同日に全国漁業協同組合連合会の坂本雅信会長と面会。漁業継続のための大型基金について「使い方は漁業者の意見を聞いた上で、理解を得られるようにしたい」と述べた。 

東電の計画では、放射性物質トリチウムが主に残る処理水を大量の海水で薄めて国の排出基準の40分の1未満にし、海底トンネルを通じて沖合約1キロに放出する。

◆「政府に声届かない」市民団体が抗議

 東京電力が福島第一原発の処理水の海洋放出に向けた設備工事の開始を発表した3日、福島県の市民団体は県庁前で抗議行動を展開し、原発が立地する自治体の首長らは風評被害対策の徹底などを政府に要請した。

「え、もう始まるの」。3日午後、翌日の着工方針を聞いた「これ以上海を汚すな!市民会議」共同代表の織田千代さん(67)=福島県いわき市=は絶句した。福島県や大熊町、双葉町が工事に同意してからわずか2日後の着工。「引き返せない状態になっていくのでは」と不安を募らせた。

この日の午前には、同会が県庁前で横断幕を掲げて抗議。その後に開いた記者会見で、織田さんは「放出ありきで計画が進んでいる。これだけ反対や不安の声があるのに、政府にはこの声は届かないのか」と憤った。同県伊達市の渡辺馨さん(66)は「工事を進めて既成事実を作り、押し切って海洋放出するのではないかと不安」と懸念した。

福島県の内堀雅雄知事と吉田淳・大熊町長、伊沢史朗・双葉町長は経済産業省を訪れ、萩生田光一経産相に要望書を提出。内堀知事は報道陣に「放出によって福島県民が積み重ねてきた努力が水泡に帰すことがないよう、政府一丸となって(風評被害などに対する)必要な対策をしてほしい」と話した。(片山夏子、増井のぞみ)

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 福島第一原発「処理水」放出 東電、海底トンネル4日着工発表 「もう始まるの?」市民絶句 via 東京新聞

Living in the light of Christ’s peace: A conversation toward nuclear disarmament via Archdiocese of Santa Fe

77th Anniversary of the Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki, Japan

Mass and Interfaith Discussion

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

5:15 p.m. MT Mass at the Cathedral Basilica

of St. Francis of Assisi

Followed by Panel Discussion with Interfaith Leaders at 6:15 p.m.

In Japan this is 8:15 am and 9:15 am Wednesday, August 10, 2022

ALBUQUERQUE – Wednesday, August 3, 2022 – IMMEDIATE RELEASE – Join Most Reverend John C. Wester, Archbishop of Santa Fe, on August 9, 2022, for 5:15 p.m. Mountain Time Mass at the Cathedral Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Archbishop Wester’s homily will be centered on his pastoral letter, “Living in the Light of Christ’s Peace: A Conversation Toward Nuclear Disarmament,” released on January 11, 2022. Following his homily, Archbishop Wester will offer a healing prayer for those harmed by the production and use of nuclear weapons. This includes victims of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings in Japan; Trinity Test Downwinders; uranium and nuclear weapons workers in New Mexico and beyond; and any future victims in the accelerating new nuclear arms race.

Mass will be followed by a panel discussion with prominent interfaith leaders on the need for nuclear disarmament and a Q&A session at 6:15 p.m. Confirmed interfaith leaders include Archbishop John C. Wester; Rev. Talitha Arnold, Senior Minister of the United Church of Santa Fe; Mrs. Samia Assed of the Islamic Center of New Mexico in Albuquerque; The Rev. Holly Beaumont of Interfaith Worker Justice; Roshi Joan Halifax of the Upaya Zen Center in Santa Fe; and Former Governor of Cochiti Pueblo, Regis Pecos.

In the pastoral letter, Archbishop Wester reflects upon his trip to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Catholic social teaching on nuclear weapons, the history of the development and production of nuclear weapons in New Mexico, and Jesus’ example of nonviolence. He encourages all to read the pastoral letter and use the reflection questions and suggestions for action. The complete pastoral letter can be accessed here, and the summary here. Panel bios can be found here.

Livestream the event on August 9, 2022:

5:15 p.m. Mass and healing ceremony youtu.be/M4SnixeGwyE

6:15 p.m. Interfaith dialogue youtu.be/U88tJwq7yNsm

Masks and social distancing are encouraged. For more information, contact the Archdiocese of Santa Fe Office of Social Justice and Respect Life 505.831.8205. –END

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Living in the light of Christ’s peace: A conversation toward nuclear disarmament via Archdiocese of Santa Fe

UN nuclear chief: Ukraine nuclear plant is “out of control” via AP

By EDITH M. LEDERER

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. nuclear chief warned that Europe’s largest nuclear power plant in Ukraine “is completely out of control” and issued an urgent plea to Russia and Ukraine to quickly allow experts to visit the sprawling complex to stabilize the situation and avoid a nuclear accident.

Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said in an interview Tuesday with The Associated Press that the situation is getting more perilous every day at the Zaporizhzhia plant in the southeastern city of Enerhodar, which Russian troops seized in early March, soon after their Feb. 24. invasion of Ukraine.

“Every principle of nuclear safety has been violated” at the plant, he said. “What is at stake is extremely serious and extremely grave and dangerous.”

Grossi cited many violations of the plant’s safety, adding that it is “in a place where active war is ongoing,” near Russian-controlled territory.

The physical integrity of the plant hasn’t been respected, he said, citing shelling at the beginning of the war when it was taken over and continuing information from Ukraine and Russia accusing each other of attacks at Zaporizhzhia.

There is “a paradoxical situation” in which the plant is controlled by Russia, but its Ukrainian staff continues to run its nuclear operations, leading to inevitable moments of friction and alleged violence, he said. While the IAEA has some contacts with staff, they are “faulty” and “patchy,” he said.

Grossi said the supply chain of equipment and spare parts has been interrupted, “so we are not sure the plant is getting all it needs.” The IAEA also needs to perform very important inspections to ensure that nuclear material is being safeguarded, “and there is a lot of nuclear material there to be inspected,” he said.

“When you put this together, you have a catalog of things that should never be happening in any nuclear facility,” Grossi said. “And this is why I have been insisting from day one that we have to be able to go there to perform this safety and security evaluation, to do the repairs and to assist as we already did in Chernobyl.”

The Russian capture of Zaporizhzhia renewed fears that the largest of Ukraine’s 15 nuclear reactors could be damaged, setting off another emergency like the 1986 Chernobyl accident, the world’s worst nuclear disaster, which happened about 110 kilometers (65 miles) north of the capital Kyiv.

Russian forces occupied the heavily contaminated site soon after the invasion but handed control back to the Ukrainians at the end of March. Grossi visited Chernobyl on April 27 and tweeted that the level of safety was “like a `red light’ blinking.” But he said Tuesday that the IAEA set up “an assistance mission” at Chernobyl at that time “that has been very, very successful so far.”

The IAEA needs to go to Zaporizhzhia, as it did to Chernobyl, to ascertain the facts of what is actually happening there, to carry out repairs and inspections, and “to prevent a nuclear accident from happening,” Grossi said.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on UN nuclear chief: Ukraine nuclear plant is “out of control” via AP

「バカにされたような思い」処理水放出計画を福島県が了解 県庁前では抗議集会もvia TUF てレビュー福島

福島第一原発にたまり続ける処理水を海に放出する計画について、2日、福島県と大熊町、双葉町は設備の着工を了解しました。一夜明け、内堀知事が萩生田経済産業大臣に要望書を手渡したほか、県庁前には放出に反対する市民が抗議の集会を開きました。

2日、処理水を海に放出する東電の計画について、内堀知事と大熊町の吉田町長、双葉町の伊澤町長は設備の着工を了解しました。

今月30日に一部で避難指示解除を控える双葉町からは……。

双葉町・伊澤町長「町内で現実に生活を始めることを認識し、引き続き原発の安全かつ着実な廃炉作業が計画的に進むように取り組んでいただきたい」

放出に反対する意見や、懸念が根強く残る中での事前了解。内堀知事は今回の了解について、次のように位置づけました。

[…]

一方、福島県庁前には、放出に反対する市民が集まり、事前了解について抗議しました。

これ以上海を汚すな!市民会議・片岡輝美さん「事前了解の先にあるのは海洋放出ですし、そのような言い方で私たち県民は納得しない。私たちにしてみればバカにされているような思い」

これに先立ち、市民らは会見を開き、県に対し了解を取り消すよう求めました。

これ以上海を汚すな!市民会議・織田千代共同代表「廃炉のために欠かせないと言いながら、その廃炉の最終形も示されない中で早急に海洋放出を進めるのは間違い」

こうした中東電は、処理水を放出するためのトンネル工事を4日から開始すると明らかにしました。不十分な理解と反対や懸念が残る中、来年春を目指した技術的な準備だけが着々と進みつつあります。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 「バカにされたような思い」処理水放出計画を福島県が了解 県庁前では抗議集会もvia TUF てレビュー福島

Koide Hiroaki: The Shooting of Mr. Abe via Pearls and Irritations & Atomicage

The young Koide Hiroaki chose the field of nuclear engineering because he wanted to contribute to the future of energy-poor Japan. Once he grasped that nuclear power was a technology so risky that it required disposable places and people in every aspect of its operation, he decided to dedicate himself to its abolition. During 40-odd years at the Kyoto University Reactor Research Institute, he and like-minded colleagues dedicated themselves to this cause, offering their expertise to citizen movements and legal struggles, making specialist knowledge accessible to many. The Fukushima nuclear disaster, which began on March 11, 2011, was a crushing blow to their efforts. In the days, months, and decade following the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Koide became the preeminent scientific critic of nuclear power.

In 2015, upon retirement from Kyoto University, Koide relocated to Matsumoto City. Surrounded by the Japan Alps, hiking and cultivating his garden, he has continued to exercise his sense of social responsibility through lecturing and writing. On the 3rd day of each month, he has stood at Matsumoto Station with a placard bearing the words, “‘No’ to Abe’s politics.” Rain or shine, for one hour, 30 to 40 citizens join him in silent standing. When Mr. Abe resigned in 2020, Koide rued that he was free to plead ill health and abandon the scene of his misdeeds with utter impunity. Nor did he believe that Mr. Abe’s departure meant the end of his politics—the promotion of nuclear power, the exacerbation of inequality, willful passage of legislation facilitating military engagement and further erosion of Article 9 of the Constitution that renounced “war as a sovereign right,” all freighted with unaddressed acts of corruption. His fellow citizens agreed, and they have continued to stand on the 3rd of each month.

In response to multiple requests for his reaction to the July 8th shooting death, Koide, on July 9th, wrote the essay that follows during a flight to Sapporo to deliver a lecture. Upon learning that at least one recipient who posted it on Facebook had it promptly taken down, Koide decided to post it on his own site. The following translation, made with his permission, is based on that text, with preface added. That version will appear as the lead essay in the fall issue of the quarterly Kisetsu (formerly NO NUKES voice), to appear on September 11.[i]

                                                                                                            Norma Field

A Country Descending into War

            On July 8th, two days before the House of Councilors election, Mr. Abe was gunned down and died. I wrote the words that follow shortly thereafter. The fears I had initially have unfortunately been born out: the mass media have only busied themselves lauding Mr. Abe’s achievements. I do not know how much this may have impacted the results of the election. What is clear is that the Liberal Democratic Party has won by a landslide, and the forces favoring Constitutional revision have more than the two-thirds majority necessary for such action.

            In war, human beings kill each other. In modern wars, the heaviest damage is inflicted on ordinary people who are non-combatants. War must not be waged, whatever the justification. But Mr. Abe has been awarded the highest decoration of the country, the Collar of the Supreme Order of the Chrysanthemum, and it is said that a state funeral will be held in the fall.[ii]  Threatening trouble “if the bad guys attack us,” Mr. Abe and the Liberal Democratic Party have steadfastly strengthened the military; they are preparing to revise the Constitution so as to make Japan capable of waging war. And now, many Japanese are supportive of this position. We have fallen on perilous times. My heart sinks.  

Thoughts on the Shooting of Mr. Abe

            Mr. Abe has been gunned down. He is dead. I am not saddened. If I were to name those whom I detest most on the fingers of one hand, Mr. Abe would be included. He oversaw enactment of the Act on Protection of Specially Designated Secrets; the Legislation for Peace and Security, including the right of collective self-defense (“war law”); and the establishment of a criminal conspiracy law. He launched a bid to host the Olympics in Tokyo to divert attention from the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Finally, he worked toward Constitutional revision. Everything he did, everything he was attempting to do, had to do with making money and preparing the path for Japan to become a country capable of waging war.

            Mr. Abe was the despicable sort of person who was overbearing toward countries and people deemed weak, and obsequious before the powerful. A thoroughgoing basher of the DPRK (North Korea) who groveled before Mr. Trump, Mr. Abe purchased vast amounts of weaponry as the latter directed. Lying came to him as naturally as breathing. The Moritomo Gakuen elementary school scandal; the Kake Gakuen veterinary school scandal; the “cherry-blossom party” scandal; the two-per household distribution of manifestly substandard “Abe masks” as Covid-19 relief measure—Mr. Abe and the special-interest groups that were his hangers-on spent tax-payer money as freely as if it were their own. When threatened with exposure, he drew on bureaucratic offices at his beck and call to conceal, alter, and destroy evidence and managed to avoid incrimination. In the course of this, an official was even driven to suicide, but Mr. Abe took no responsibility and got off scot-free. I would like to have exposed each one of his misdeeds and seen to his punishment.

            It has been my publicly stated position that every human being is irreplaceable, that it is wrong for any of us to kill or be killed. It is true that I wished Mr. Abe might die before he could commit further misdeeds, but I did not think it permissible to kill him. Rather, I find it regrettable that he was killed before he could be charged for the acts he had already committed.

            Many people have called the shooting a “barbarous act not permissible in a democratic society,” but I do not subscribe to such a view. All acts, all events, take place within the great flow of history. To attempt an evaluation of individual acts in isolation from history is erroneous. In any case, it stretches credulity to think that there might still be people who believe Japan to be a democratic nation.

Mr. Abe’s policies drove citizens, especially young people, into a life of poverty and robbed them of the capacity to think about politics. While proclaiming that elections were the heart of democracy, he exploited single-seat constituencies to suit his agenda, and however low the turnout, so long as he won, he proceeded to do as he pleased. He took hard-earned tax money and spent it freely on himself and his family members. It would be absurd to even contemplate the amount of taxpayer money poured into nuclear power and wasted. All 57 nuclear power plants in Japan were deemed to be safe and licensed when the Liberal Democratic Party held power. Of course, the Fukushima Daiichi plant was also deemed safe and licensed. It is the accident at this plant that created immense harm and innumerable victims such that even now, 11 years later, a “declaration of nuclear emergency” continues to be in effect, and people continue to suffer. Nevertheless, not a single member of the Liberal Democratic Party, Mr. Abe included, nor a single member of the bureaucracy that has supported this party and operated nuclear power plants has taken responsibility. Even the courts are but an agency of the state that has permitted the operation of nuclear power plants. They refuse to acknowledge state responsibility; nor will they hold the chair, president, and other executives of TEPCO accountable.[iii] Having learned from Fukushima that however tragic an accident may occur, no one will be held to account, they have already announced their continued support of nuclear power generation. Going forward, they talk of doubling the defense budget and turning Japan into a country that can wage war.

            A foolish government for a foolish citizenry. If that defines democracy, perhaps so. But if such is the case, the sorrow of the downtrodden and the oppressed will one day explode. I cannot know what was in the mind of the person who shot Mr. Abe. But, to repeat, I will not subscribe to the view denouncing the act from the outset as “unforgivable barbarism.”

            What concerns me, with election day for the House of Councilors just around the corner, is people feeling sorry for Mr. Abe and letting that drive their voting. I am, moreover, apprehensive that this incident could be used as justification for bolstering the Peace and Security and conspiracy laws, making this an even more undemocratic, unseemly nation.


[i] For more background on Koide Hiroaki, see Field, “Introduction,” The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and the Tokyo Olympics, APJ-Japan Focus (March 1, 2019). All hyperlinked references and notes are by Field.

[ii] Now set for September 27, 2022.

[iii] In the sole criminal proceeding issuing from the Fukushima disaster, three TEPCO executives were declared “not guilty” of criminal negligence in Tokyo District Court on September 19, 2019. See Johnson, Fukurai and Hirayama, “Reflections on the TEPCO trial: prosecution and acquittal after Japan’s nuclear meltdown,” APJ -Japan Focus (January 15, 2020). The case is now in the Tokyo High Court, with a decision expected next January. In civil proceedings, on June 17, 2022, the Supreme Court denied state responsibility in the case of four lawsuits filed by evacuees although on March 2, 2022, it had sided with plaintiffs in ordering higher compensation from TEPCO. On July 13, 2022, in a “derivative” lawsuit brought by activist TEPCO shareholders, four executives were ordered to pay $97 billion for the damages, including human suffering, caused by their failure to take tsunami protection measures. This is a record amount ordered by a Japanese court; a lengthy appeals process most certainly lies ahead.

Koide (second from left) standing with fellow citizens in front of Matsumoto Station, 3 April 2019 (photo by Shigekazu Iwane)

A version of this text appeared in Pearls and Irritations: John Menadue’s Public Policy Journal, on August 3, 2022.

アベさんに対する銃撃について思うこと 

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Koide Hiroaki: The Shooting of Mr. Abe via Pearls and Irritations & Atomicage

2022.7.28 東電刑事裁判 弁論再開と最高裁判決等の証拠調べを求める! 報告学習会 via IWJ

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 2022.7.28 東電刑事裁判 弁論再開と最高裁判決等の証拠調べを求める! 報告学習会 via IWJ

使用済み核燃料の再処理工場 完成時期の延期検討へ 日本原燃 via NHK News Web Aomori News Web

六ヶ所村で使用済み核燃料の再処理工場の建設を進めている日本原燃の増田尚宏社長は、29日の会見で、およそ2か月後に迫った工場の完成目標時期について「延期も視野に考えないといけない時期に来た」と述べ、延期を検討する考えを示しました。

[…]

理由について増田社長は、完成の前提となる、安全対策工事などをめぐる原子力規制委員会の審査が続いていることや、当初の計画よりも工事の量が増え、安全に進めるためにも、計画を精査する必要があることなどをあげています。

また、延期した場合の期間については「2年も3年もかかるものにはならないとは思う」と述べた一方で、数ヶ月程度にはとどまらないという見通しを示しました。

再処理工場は当初、25年前の平成9年に完成する計画でしたが、たび重なるトラブルなどの影響で、これまでに25回延期されています。

【ウラン濃縮工場は再開延期】。
原子力発電所で使う核燃料の製造に必要な濃縮ウランを製造する六ヶ所村の工場について、日本原燃は29日、ことし9月からとしていた運転再開の時期について、安全対策工事の状況などを踏まえ、来年2月に変更したと発表しました。

六ヶ所村にある「ウラン濃縮工場」は、原発で使う核燃料に必要な濃縮ウランを製造する国内唯一の商業施設で、国の新しい規制基準に対応する安全対策工事などを行うため、2017年9月から運転を停止しています。

日本原燃は、ことし9月から工場の運転再開を目指す方針を示していましたが、安全対策工事に遅れが出ているとして、運転再開時期を来年の2月に変更したと29日、発表しました。

【再処理廃液トラブルで社長陳謝】。
六ヶ所村にある使用済み核燃料の再処理工場で今月、高レベルの放射性廃液を冷却する機能が一時停止したトラブルについて、日本原燃の増田尚宏社長は「地域の皆さまに大変心配をおかけしてしまい、深くお詫び申し上げます」と陳謝しました。

六ヶ所村の再処理工場では、今月2日、高レベルの放射性廃液を保管するタンクの1つで廃液を冷却する設備の機能が、およそ8時間にわたり停止するトラブルがありました。

[…]

トラブルの原因について日本原燃は、タンクを冷却するための水が循環する2系統ある配管のうち1つが工事中で、その配管の弁を閉じるよう指示された作業員が、誤って稼働している配管の弁のバルブを閉じてしまった可能性があるとしています。

再発防止策について増田社長は、冷却機能に影響を与える弁は、物理的に操作ができないよう施錠するとともに、安全に関する設備を工事などで1系列にする場合は、通常より監視を強化するなどと説明しました。

その上で「再発防止策を徹底し、引き続き安全を最優先に取り組んでいきたい」と述べました。

全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 使用済み核燃料の再処理工場 完成時期の延期検討へ 日本原燃 via NHK News Web Aomori News Web