Israel attacks Iran: What we know so far via Aljazeera

13 Jun 2025

Israel has attacked several Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites, and carried out assassinations of top military officials and nuclear scientists. An initial wave of strikes was carried out on Friday morning. A second, separate attack on the city of Tabriz, northwest Iran, was reported by local media later on Friday.

On Friday afternoon, the semi-official state media group, the Iranian Fars news agency reported “unofficial statistics” showing that more than 70 people had been killed and more than 320 were injured in Israel’s attacks.

[…]

What is the danger of hitting nuclear facilities?

Attacking nuclear facilities can cause several consequences of unpredictable scope, including radioactive leaks, explosions and long-term contamination.

Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says the UN body is closely monitoring the situation in Iran.

He said that the IAEA can confirm that the Natanz site was among the targets hit by Israel.

“The Agency is in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels. We are also in contact with our inspectors in the country.”[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Israel attacks Iran: What we know so far via Aljazeera

核ごみ施設受け入れゼロ 全国47知事アンケートvia YAHOO!JAPANニュース (共同)

原発から出る高レベル放射性廃棄物(核のごみ)の最終処分場に関する共同通信社の47都道府県知事アンケートで、福島、島根、鹿児島などの13人の知事が、最終処分場受け入れや3段階の選定調査に「どちらも反対」との回答を選んだことが12日、分かった。残る34人はいずれの選択肢も選ばず、処分場受け入れや調査に「賛成」はゼロだった。  調査の第1段階である文献調査は北海道の2町村に続き昨年5月、佐賀県玄海町が受け入れたが、続く自治体はない。第2段階の概要調査へ進むには知事の同意が不可欠で、核のごみの行き先が見通せないまま、原発の活用が進む矛盾が改めて裏付けられた形だ。  アンケートは玄海町での文献調査開始から6月で1年になるのに合わせて4月上旬に送付し、5月中旬までに回答を得た。調査と処分場について「どちらも賛成」「調査には賛成するが処分場受け入れは反対」「どちらも反対」など五つの選択肢から回答を求めた。必要に応じて追加取材した。

原文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged | Comments Off on 核ごみ施設受け入れゼロ 全国47知事アンケートvia YAHOO!JAPANニュース (共同)

Trump Administration Gutting Regulatory Agency, Recent Nuclear Incidents, Coverup: No Time to Open Illinois for More Nuclear Power, Nuclear Watchdog Group Asserts via Nuclear Energy Information Service Illinois

PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Use:  Thursday, May 28, 2025

Contact:  David Kraft,  (773)342-7650 (o); (630)506-2864 (c);  neis@neis.org

Trump Administration Gutting Regulatory Agency, Recent Nuclear Incidents, Coverup: No Time to Open Illinois for More Nuclear Power, Nuclear Watchdog Group Asserts

CHICAGO—At a time when the Illinois Legislature and Governor Pritzker are contemplating the repeal of the Illinois nuclear power moratorium, recent real-world events argue strongly against that move, a local safe-energy advocacy organization argues.

On Friday, May 23, President Trump signed Executive Orders (E/Os) which effectively gut the regulatory power of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to fulfill its mandate to protect the public health, safety and environment.

On the same day it was learned that the aged Quad Cities nuclear reactor station in Illinois had experienced a manual emergency shutdown on May 19, and fire on May 22; and further, that a serious nuclear incident that occurred in March 2023 had been covered up by both the utility and the NRC.

Many experts – including two former Chairs of the NRC — have savaged Trump’s ill-advised weakening of nuclear power regulation. (see attached statement list below).  NEIS points out that the Administration’s desire to expand nuclear while slashing regulation of both aging reactors and experimental, unproven new reactors is a recipe for disaster.  The Boeing plane disasters, the East Palestine train derailment, even the Fukushima reactor disaster – all had their root cause in either de-regulation, self-regulation by industry, or government-industry collusion.

“These events show beyond a doubt that while current regulation is clearly suspect, gutting it further at a time when some Illinois legislators and officials want to expand nuclear power is an outright threat to Illinois,” maintains David Kraft, director of the 43-year old Chicago-based safe-energy advocacy/anti-nuclear organization Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS). “Now is simply NOT the time to repeal the nuclear moratorium,” he asserts.

Legislation SB1527 and HB3604 call for the repeal of the 1987 nuclear construction moratorium, which simply states that no new reactors will be built in Illinois until the Federal Government demonstrates that it has an operational facility to dispose of – not merely store – high-level radioactive waste (HLRW).  The U.S. has failed to build such a facility; and all HLRW remains in storage at reactor sites.  Illinois – with 11 operating and 3 shuttered/decommissioned reactors – currently stores 11,000+ tons of HLRW, more than any other state.

Illinois is powerless to enact protective legislation to compensate for the regulatory safety void created by the Trump E/Os.  The NRC retains preemptive authority on all matters pertaining to safety and security at nuclear power plants.  No state can enact regulations stricter than those created and administered by the NRC, no matter how well-intentioned or protective.  Therefore, neither Governor Pritzker nor the Legislature can enact anything that will provide additional safeguards.

The Quad Cities reactors are owned by Constellation Energy are older and the same design as those which melted down and exploded during the Fukushima disaster.  A manual “scram” – an emergency shutdown – occurred on May 19, followed by a fire on May 22.  But just before these incidents, it was revealed that according to the NRC a serious accident that involved contaminating workers with radioactive water had occurred in March 2023, but was initially covered up by the plant staff.  Three years after the fact, the NRC has still not brought any corrective action or fines to bear.

As if to punctuate this sorry operational and regulatory performance, on Tuesday May 27 the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released a report titled, The Terrible 13: The Worst Safety and Security Violators in the US Nuclear Power Fleet.” The Quad Cities reactors are listed in this Report.

“Governor Pritzker is reported to have said that he wants to, ‘expand the options for nuclear in the state of Illinois….But it has to be done in the right way.’” Kraft notes.

“Under these conditions, there is no ‘right way.’  The questionable level of current regulation, and now the further erosion of even that via the E/Os are not the conditions calling for more nuclear power,” Kraft states.

“Current reactors are showing signs of aging. New reactors would require greater oversight during start-up phase.  With reduced regulatory oversight, neither will be safe.  Now is clearly not the time to bring more nuclear power to Illinois,” Kraft maintains.

“One bad day at the nuclear office will reduce Illinois to becoming the Belarus of North America,” he concludes, referring to the country most heavily impacted by the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

–30–

Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS) was formed in 1981 to watchdog the nuclear power industry, and to promote a renewable, non-nuclear energy future.

Numerous competent nuclear experts have decried the Trump Administration’s irresponsible nuclear deregulation action:

Statements by Dr. Ed Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists:

“This push by the Trump administration to usurp much of the agency’s autonomy as they seek to fast-track the construction of nuclear plants will weaken critical, independent oversight of the U.S. nuclear industry and poses significant safety and security risks to the public,” UCS added.

Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the UCS, said, “Simply put, the U.S. nuclear industry will fail if safety is not made a priority.”

“By fatally compromising the independence and integrity of the NRC, and by encouraging pathways for nuclear deployment that bypass the regulator entirely, the Trump administration is virtually guaranteeing that this country will see a serious accident or other radiological release that will affect the health, safety, and livelihoods of millions,” Lyman added. “Such a disaster will destroy public trust in nuclear power and cause other nations to reject U.S. nuclear technology for decades to come.”

Statements by Dr. Alison Macfarlane, former Chairwoman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

“An independent regulator is one who is free from industry and political influence…Once you insert the White House into the process, you don’t have an independent regulator anymore.”

“If you aren’t independent of political and industry influence, then you are at risk of an accident,” Macfarlane warned.

Statement by Dr. Gregory Jaczko, former Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

Gregory Jaczko, who led the NRC under President Obama, said Trump’s executive orders look like someone asked an AI chatbot, “How do we make the nuclear industry worse in this country?”

He called the orders a “guillotine to the nation’s nuclear safety system” that will make the country less safe, the industry less reliable and the climate crisis more severe.

Statement by Joseph Romm, a senior research fellow at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Science, Sustainability and the Media:

…any reduction in capacity at the NRC would be ill-timed with the administration’s proposed ramp-up of nuclear projects.

“This is not the time to be weakening oversight,” said Romm, who was a senior official at the Department of Energy in the 1990s. “It’s very dangerous to be weakening and undermining and politicizing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s oversight at a time when it’s not going to be having to do less work.”

Speeding up the permitting process while accepting proposals for new reactor designs would be “ridiculous and very dangerous,” he added.

Statement by Johanna Neumann, Environment America Research & Policy Center’s senior director of the Campaign for 100% Renewable Energy:

“Do we really want to create more radioactive waste to power the often dubious and questionable uses of AI?”

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Trump Administration Gutting Regulatory Agency, Recent Nuclear Incidents, Coverup: No Time to Open Illinois for More Nuclear Power, Nuclear Watchdog Group Asserts via Nuclear Energy Information Service Illinois

Fukushima soil headed to Japan PM’s flower beds to allay nuclear safety fears via The Guardian

Slightly radioactive soil from near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant will be transported to Tokyo and used in flower beds in the prime minister’s garden, in an attempt to prove to a skeptical public that the material is safe.

The decision comes 14 years after the plant suffered a triple meltdown in the world’s worst nuclear accident since Chornobyl.

The sample will be taken from 14 million cubic metres of soil – enough to fill 10 baseball stadiums – that has been removed from near the plant during work to make local neighbourhoods fit for the return of evacuated residents.

The soil is in temporary storage at a vast site near the plant, but authorities have struggled to make progress on a legal obligation to find permanent homes for the material outside Fukushima by 2045.

The government has suggested the material, which it describes as low risk, could be used to build roads and other infrastructure in other parts of Japan. It would be used as foundation material and covered with topsoil thick enough to keep radiation at negligible levels.

[…]

“The government will take the lead in setting an example, and we will do so at the prime minister’s office,” the chief cabinet secretary, Yoshimasa Hayashi, said at a meeting held to discuss the issue.

The Fukushima Daiichi plant released large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere after it was struck by a powerful earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011. The disaster knocked out the facility’s backup power supply, sending three of its reactors into meltdown.

Although most of neighbourhoods that were evacuated after the disaster have been declared safe, many residents are reluctant to return. Some are concerned about the potential health effects – particularly on children – of living in former no-go zones, while others have built new lives elsewhere.

Work to remove 880 tonnes of highly dangerous damaged fuel from reactor containment vessels has barely begun. So far, specially designed devices have successfully retrieved two tiny samples of fuel, but removing all of it is expected to take decades and cost trillions of yen.

The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power, has also had to contend with huge quantities of water that becomes contaminated when it is used to cool the damaged reactors. In 2023, the utility started pumping treated water – with all but one radioactive element removed – into the Pacific Ocean, triggering an angry response from China and South Korea.

The removal of topsoil, trees and other debris from near homes, schools, medical facilities and other public buildings created a stockpile of contaminated waste that now fills a site straddling the towns of Futaba and Okuma, located close to the plant. The material does not include any debris from inside Fukushima Daiichi.

In its final report on the recycling and disposal of the soil last year, the International Atomic Energy Agency said the work had been consistent with its safety standards.

But the public is yet to be convinced. Last month, local opposition forced the environment ministry to abandon a pilot project to use some of the Fukushima soil as landfill for flower beds and lawns at public parks in and around Tokyo.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Fukushima soil headed to Japan PM’s flower beds to allay nuclear safety fears via The Guardian

US East Coast faces rising seas as crucial Atlantic current slows via New Scientist

The weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is boosting the sea level along the New England coast on top of sea level rise from melting ice, adding to flooding

By James Dinneen

16 May 2025

The slowdown of a major current in the Atlantic Ocean is boosting the sea level and associated flooding in the Northeast US, on top of the already-rising sea level due to climate change. A total collapse of this Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) as the planet warms could raise the sea level even further.

“If the AMOC collapsed, this would dramatically increase the flood frequency along the US coast, even in the absence of strong storms,” says Liping Zhang at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in New Jersey. “Even partial weakening [of the current] can already have substantial impacts.”

Melting ice sheets and warmer water due to human-caused climate change are leading to a rise in average sea level, but the rate of sea-level rise isn’t the same everywhere. For instance, some coastal land is sinking, speeding the relative rate of sea-level rise in those areas. Local sea level is also shaped by how heat, water and salt circulate in the ocean, with warmer and fresher water taking up more space than colder, saltier water.

The US north-east coast has seen sea levels rising faster than the global average in recent decades. In addition to sinking land, a slowdown in the AMOC – which transports warm water from lower latitudes to the North Atlantic, where it cools, gets saltier and sinks – has long been proposed as a possible driver for this. When this overturning circulation weakens, deep water along the path of the current is expected to warm and expand, sloshing more water onto the shallow continental shelf.

The AMOC naturally varies in strength on different timescales, and climate change has contributed to a slowdown in recent decades as melting ice freshens the North Atlantic and its waters warm. But it wasn’t clear whether this slowdown was making a big difference to sea level.

Zhang and her colleagues used tide gauge measurements along the New England coast to reconstruct the local sea level stretching back more than a century. On top of a steady rise due to climate change, they found a marked pattern of fluctuation between low and high sea levels every few decades. Years with a high sea level aligned closely with years when the AMOC was weak, and these years also had more frequent coastal flooding.

The researchers then used two different ocean models to quantify how much fluctuations in the AMOC’s strength influenced the local sea level. While the main driver of changes was the steady rise due to climate change, they found the weakening AMOC substantially boosted the sea level and associated flooding. In different parts of the coast, they found that a slowdown in the AMOC was behind 20 to 50 per cent of flooding since 2005.

Because the natural cycles in the AMOC’s strength are largely predictable, the findings could enable researchers to forecast which years will see lots of flooding up to three years in advance, says Zhang. This could help make long-term decisions about infrastructure and emergency preparedness.

“It demonstrates that the AMOC really does matter to [sea level rise],” says Chris Hughes at the University of Liverpool, UK, who wasn’t involved in the research. “It’s not just there in models or theory, it’s actually there in the real world.”

It isn’t clear how much of the recent weakening of the AMOC is due to climate change and how much is due to natural variations. […]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on US East Coast faces rising seas as crucial Atlantic current slows via New Scientist

過酷事故ないと言えるなら、原発は首都圏でも…新潟県発表のシミュレーション受け、長岡市長が見解via新潟日報

 県が公表した東京電力柏崎刈羽原発事故時の被ばく線量シミュレーションが、福島第1原発事故並みの過酷事故を想定していないことに関連し、長岡市の磯田達伸市長は22日の記者会見で「国や東電が福島のような過酷事故があり得ないと断言できるなら、あえて柏崎刈羽に原発を造る必要はなくなる。首都圏でもよいのではないか」と述べた。

 会見後、発言の趣旨について新潟日報社の取材に、「今後、柏崎刈羽原発のリプレース(建て替え)の議論は当然出てくる。その時は関東圏に近い所に造れば送電ロスもなく合理的だ」とし、柏崎刈羽原発の耐用年数を踏まえた論点の一つだと説明。「新潟県で原発ゼロが実現できれば、県民、市民にとって悪い話ではない」とも語った。  会見では、県のシミュレーション結果について「安全性に関する情報は全て開示した方がよい。万一でも福島事故並みの過酷事故が起きる可能性があるのなら、それも想定した第2段階のシミュレーションとして公表されるべきだと思う」との認識を示した。

原文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 過酷事故ないと言えるなら、原発は首都圏でも…新潟県発表のシミュレーション受け、長岡市長が見解via新潟日報

Pacific

20 May 2025

Japan’s Fukushima nuclear wastewater ‘pose major environmental, human rights risks’ – UN experts via RNZ

[…]

In August 2023, Japan began discharging wastewaster from about 1000 storage tanks of contaminated water collected after the earthquake and tsunami in 2011 that caused the meltdown of its Fukushima nuclear plant.

In the formal communication, available publicly, UN Human Rights Council special rappoteurs addressed the the management of Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS)-treated wastewater from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (NPS) by the Japan government and TEPCO (Tokio Electric Power), and the ongoing discharge of such waters into the Pacific Ocean.

They said “we are alarmed that the implementation of contaminated water release operations of into the ocean may pose major environmental and human rights risks, exposing people, especially children, to threats of further contamination in Japan and beyond.”

“We wish to raise our concern about the allegations of the failure to assess the consequences on health of the release of wastewater against the best available scientific evidence,” the special rappoteurs write.

“Against this backdrop, we would like to highlight that the threats to the enjoyment of the right to adequate food do not concern only local people within the borders of Japan.

“Given the migratory nature of fish, their contamination represents a risk also for people living beyond the Japanese borders, including Indigenous Peoples across the Pacific Ocean which, according to their culture and traditions, mainly rely on seafood as their primary livelihood.”

The letter follows a complaint submitted by Ocean Vision Legal in August 2023 on behalf of the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG) and endorsed by over 50 civil society groups in the Pacific and beyond.

In a statement on Tuesday, PANG hailed it as “a landmark move for ocean justice and human rights”.

The organisation said that the destructive legacy of nuclear contamination through nuclear testing is still strongly felt across the region.

It said this legacy is marked by severe health impacts across generations and the ongoing failure to properly clean up test sites, which continue to contaminate the islands and waterways that Pacific peoples depend on.

“As Pacific groups, we remain disappointed in the Japanese Government and TEPCO’s shameless disregard of the calls by numerous Pacific leaders and civil society groups to hold off on any further release,” PANG’s coordinator Joey Tau said.

“Their ignorance constitutes a brazen threat to Pacific peoples’ livelihoods, safety, health and well-being, and the sovereignty of Pacific nations,” he added.

Japan has consistently maintained that the release is safe.

The UN human rights experts have asked for further information from Japan, including on the allegations raised, and on how the Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment has been conducted according to the best available scientific evidence.

This communication sends a clear message: Ocean issues must be understood as human rights issues, requiring precautionary and informed action aligned with international environmental law to safeguard both people and the marine environment.

Ocean Vision Legal founder and CEO Anna von Rebay said while the communication is not legally binding, it is a crucial milestone.

“It informs the interpretation of human rights and environmental law in response to contemporary threats, contributing to the development of customary international law and strengthens accountability for any actor harming the Ocean,” she said.

“Ultimately, it paves the way towards a future where the Ocean’s health is fully recognised as fundamental to human dignity, justice, and intergenerational equity.”

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Pacific

A new study from the Boston University Institute for Global Sustainability finds that construction costs run over budget for more than 60% of energy infrastructure projects worldwide via BU Institute for Global Sustainabililty

By Laura Hurley

Between now and 2050, the International Energy Agency projects that more than $100 trillion will be spent on building net-zero energy infrastructure globally. Yet every single one of these projects runs the risk of higher-than-expected construction costs or time delays. Newer technologies introduced in the past decade, such as hydrogen or geothermal energy, are even more difficult to evaluate as government agencies, energy developers, utilities, investors, and other stakeholders decide which sustainable energy systems are best for future projects.

In a new state-of-the-art study, published in the journal Energy Research & Social Science, researchers at the Boston University Institute for Global Sustainability (IGS) found that runaway construction costs and delayed timelines stymie many energy projects. In fact, the average project costs 40% more than expected for construction and takes almost two years longer than planned, as the study showed.

Nuclear power plants are the worst offenders, with an average construction cost overrun typically twice as much as expected or more, and the most extreme time delays. To be exact, the average nuclear power plant has a construction cost overrun of 102.5% and ends up costing $1.56 billion more than expected.

Looking at newer net-zero options reveals higher risk as well. Hydrogen infrastructure and carbon capture and storage both exhibit significant average time and cost overruns for construction, along with thermal power plants relying on natural gas, calling into question whether these can be scaled up quickly to meet emission reduction goals for climate mitigation.

“Worryingly, these findings raise a legitimate red flag concerning efforts to substantially push forward a hydrogen economy,” says Benjamin Sovacool, lead and first author of the study, director of IGS, and professor of earth and environment.

By contrast, solar energy and electricity grid transmission projects have the best construction track record and are often completed ahead of schedule or below expected cost. Wind farms also performed favorably in the financial risk assessment.

For Sovacool, the evidence is clear: “Low-carbon sources of energy such as wind and solar not only have huge climatic and energy security benefits, but also financial advantages related to less construction risk and less chance of delays,” he says. “It’s further evidence that such technologies have an array of underrated and underappreciated social and economic value.”

Using an original dataset significantly larger and more comprehensive than existing sources, the study provides the most rigorous comparative analysis of construction cost overrun risks and time delays for energy infrastructure projects globally.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A new study from the Boston University Institute for Global Sustainability finds that construction costs run over budget for more than 60% of energy infrastructure projects worldwide via BU Institute for Global Sustainabililty

Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster/チェルノブイリ原子力発電所事故39周年に関する声明via Ecohome (Belarus) /エコホーム(ベラルーシ)

Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster

On April 26, 2025, we mark 39 years since the largest man-made disaster of the 20th century — the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. This tragedy cast a dark shadow over Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, and many other European countries.

Belarus became the country with the most contaminated territory (23%) and, as a result, the gravest long-term consequences. For our country, Chernobyl is not just a technological disaster — it is a national wound: poisoned land, water, and air; the nation’s compromised health; sick children — all of this has become part of Belarusian reality. This catastrophe will remain with us for hundreds of thousands of years — until all toxic radionuclides decay.

On this dark day, Belarusians around the world hold mourning marches known as the “Chernobyl Way” to honor the memory of the disaster’s victims. For many years, civil society in Minsk carried this event forward, defying the constraints of a totalitarian regime.

The totalitarian USSR enabled the conditions that made the Chernobyl catastrophe possible. The dictatorship of Lukashenka continues to exacerbate its consequences by:

·       silencing facts and downplaying risks,

·       putting contaminated land back into economic use,

·       depriving Chernobyl victims and affected people of social benefits,

·       repressing scientists, activists, and organizations speaking the truth about Chernobyl, many of whom have been imprisoned or are currently behind bars,

·       promoting dangerous Russian nuclear technologies in Belarus, at the doorstep of neighboring countries: both nuclear weapons and the Astravets NPP, which had been erected with violations of European safety standards and national legislation, in a non-transparent and undemocratic way,

·       discussing the construction of a second NPP while the first is underutilized for half of its operational time and the energy system has no need for its electricity.

Nuclear disasters do not occur only in authoritarian countries — democracies are not immune either. We learned this from the example of Fukushima. Moreover, even democratic nations can exhibit authoritarian tendencies, as we have seen in the past decade.

Democratic countries with nuclear plants may become targets of nuclear terrorism and military aggression, as demonstrated by Russia’s attacks on Ukraine and on Chernobyl and Zaporizhzhya NPP in 2022 and 2025.

At the same time, the international democratic community and the IAEA have proven incapable of effectively addressing the problems of nuclear blackmail, military attacks on nuclear facilities, or dealing with the consequences of nuclear disasters.

Sadly, the lessons of Chernobyl remain unlearned. Countries are not abandoning nuclear energy — instead, they present it as climate-friendly and conditionally “green,” using calculations that ignore technological realities and associated risks, as well as the full nuclear fuel cycle. The issue of spent nuclear fuel, which remains toxic for up to a million years (according to the IAEA), remains unresolved.

The world’s fleet of operating nuclear power plants is aging. Yet instead of transitioning to cheaper, more accessible energy generation technologies — including renewables — many countries are extending the life of existing plants and attempting to restart shut-down reactors, creating significant safety risks.

Nuclear materials continue to spread globally, and the threat of nuclear conflict is growing.

On this day, we address the authorities of Belarus with the following demands:

·       Immediately shut down and decommission the Astravets NPP, which is unsafe and unnecessary.

·       Return Belarus to its nuclear-free and neutral status.

·       Remove Chernobyl-contaminated areas from economic use.

·       Restore social support for people affected by the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster.

·       Resume scientific research on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident and reestablish cooperation with the global scientific community for this purpose.

·       Release environmental activists and all other political prisoners, including participants in the anti-nuclear movement.

·       Support Belarus’ transition to a sustainable energy system based primarily on renewable and decentralized sources.

We call on the international community to:

·       Consider the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus as a violation of the principles of collective security.

·       Strip nuclear energy from green agendas (such as ESG frameworks and climate finance mechanisms).

·       Prioritize conventional deterrence means and strategies over nuclear weapons.

·       Ban the trade of uranium and nuclear technologies with aggressor states (such as the Russian Federation).

·       Prevent the militarization of nuclear facilities by strengthening international legal frameworks and undertaking coordinated action within the global community.

·       Honor the memory of the victims of the Chernobyl disaster and continue supporting liquidators and those affected.

·       Express solidarity with the people of Ukraine, who faced nuclear threats during acts of military aggression.

We also appeal to the member states of the IAEA with a proposal to reconsider the organization’s core priorities and put human safety above profits and the ambitions of individual states. We call on the IAEA to take the risks associated with nuclear technology use and proliferation seriously. To that end, we urge the IAEA to revise its guarantees, protocols, and mechanisms in such a way that the organization, which is promoting a so-called “nuclear renaissance,” bears legal and financial responsibility for the consequences of nuclear accidents and nuclear terrorism.

The resolution was adopted by NGO Ecohome, Green Network, Belarusian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, Dapamoga, Solidarity Movement “Together,” Narodnaya Hramada, the United Civic Party, Our House, and the RE:Belarus Association of Belarusian Political Prisoners, Association of Belarusian Political Prisoners “Da Voli,” and supported by the United Transitional Cabinet of Belarus, the Office of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.

チェルノブイリ原子力発電所事故39周年に関する声明

2025年4月26日、私たちは20世紀最大の人為的災害—チェルノブイリ原子力発電所事故—から39年を迎えます。この悲劇はウクライナ、リトアニア、ポーランド、そして多くの他のヨーロッパ諸国に暗い影を落としました。

ベラルーシは最も汚染された領土(23%)を持つ国となり、その結果、最も深刻な長期的影響を受けることになりました。私たちの国にとって、チェルノブイリは単なる技術的災害ではなく—国民の傷:汚染された土地、水、空気;国民の健康被害;病気の子どもたち—これらすべてがベラルーシの現実の一部となりました。この大惨事は、すべての有毒な放射性核種が崩壊するまで、何十万年もの間私たちと共にあり続けるでしょう。

この暗い日に、世界中のベラルーシ人は「チェルノブイリの道」として知られる追悼行進を行い、災害の犠牲者の記憶を称えます。長年にわたり、ミンスクの市民社会は全体主義体制の制約に立ち向かいながら、この行事を前進させてきました。

全体主義的なソビエト連邦は、チェルノブイリの大惨事を可能にした条件を作り出しました。ルカシェンコの独裁政権は、以下のようにその結果をさらに悪化させ続けています:

事実を闇に葬り、リスクを過小評価する

• 汚染された土地を経済利用に戻す

•チェルノブイリの被害者や影響を受けた人々から社会的恩恵を奪う

•チェルノブイリについて真実を語る科学者、活動家、組織を弾圧し、その多くが投獄され、現在も刑務所にいる

• 隣国の玄関口で危険なロシアの核技術をベラルーシで推進:核兵器とアストラヴェツ原発の両方を、欧州の安全基準や国内法に違反して、非透明かつ非民主的な方法で建設

•一号機が運転時間の半分も稼働しておらず、エネルギーシステムがその電力を必要としていないにもかかわらず、二号機の建設について議論している。

核災害は権威主義国だけで起こるわけではありません—民主主義国も免れないことを福島の例から学びました。さらに、民主主義国でさえ、過去10年間に見られたように、権威主義的傾向を示すことがあります。

原子力発電所を持つ民主主義国は、2022年と2025年のロシアによるウクライナやチェルノブイリ、ザポリージャ原発への攻撃が示すように、核テロや軍事的侵略の標的になる可能性があります。

同時に、国際民主主義コミュニティとIAEAは、核による脅迫、核施設への軍事攻撃、または核災害の結果に効果的に対処する能力がないことが証明されています。

残念ながら、チェルノブイリの教訓は学ばれていません。各国は原子力発電を放棄するどころか、技術的現実や関連リスク、さらには核燃料サイクル全体を無視した計算を用いて、気候に優しく条件付きで「グリーン」であるとして提示しています。IAEAによれば最大100万年間有毒であり続ける使用済み核燃料の問題は未解決のままです。

世界の稼働中の原子力発電所は老朽化しています。しかし、より安価で、より利用しやすいエネルギー生産技術—再生可能エネルギーを含む—への移行の代わりに、多くの国々は既存の発電所の寿命を延長し、閉鎖された原子炉を再稼働させようとして、重大な安全リスクを生み出しています。

核物質は世界中に広がり続け、核紛争の脅威が高まっています。

この日、私たちはベラルーシ当局に以下の要求を提出します:

• 安全でなく、不必要なアストラヴェツ原発を直ちに停止し、廃炉にすること。

•ベラルーシを非核・中立の地位に戻すこと。

•チェルノブイリ汚染地域を経済利用から除外すること。

•チェルノブイリ災害の影響を受けた人々への社会的支援を回復すること。

• チェルノブイリ事故の影響に関する科学的研究を再開し、この目的のためにグローバルな科学コミュニティとの協力を再確立すること。

• 環境活動家および反原発運動の参加者を含むすべての政治囚を解放すること。

 • 主に再生可能で分散型のエネルギー源に基づく持続可能なエネルギーシステムへのベラルーシの移行を支援すること。

私たちは国際社会に以下を呼びかけます:

• ベラルーシにおける核兵器の配備を集団安全保障の原則違反とみなすこと。

• 核エネルギーをグリーンアジェンダ(ESGフレームワークや気候金融メカニズムなど)から除外すること。

核兵器よりも従来型の抑止手段と戦略を優先すること。

•侵略国(ロシア連邦など)とのウランや核技術の取引を禁止すること。

•国際的法的枠組みを強化し、グローバルコミュニティ内での協調行動を通じて、核施設の軍事化を防止すること。

• チェルノブイリ災害の犠牲者の記憶を称え、除染作業者や被害者への支援を継続すること。

• 軍事侵略の間に核の脅威に直面したウクライナの人々との連帯を表明すること。

また、IAEA加盟国に対しても、組織の中核的優先事項を再考し、個別国家の利益や野心より人間の安全を優先するよう提案します。私たちはIAEAに対し、核技術の使用と拡散に関連するリスクを真剣に受け止めるよう求めます。そのために、いわゆる「原子力ルネサンス」を推進している組織が、原子力事故や核テロの影響に対して法的および財政的責任を負うよう、その保証、議定書、メカニズムを改訂するよう促します。

この決議は、NGOエコホーム、グリーンネットワーク、東方パートナーシップ市民社会フォーラムのベラルーシ国家プラットフォーム、ダパモーガ、連帯運動「トゥギャザー」、ナロードナヤ・フラマダ、統一市民党、アワー・ハウス、RE:ベラルーシ政治囚協会、ベラルーシ政治囚協会「ダ・ヴォーリ」によって採択され、ベラルーシ統一暫定内閣、スヴャトラーナ・ツィハノウスカヤ事務所によって支持されました。

Posted in *English, *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster/チェルノブイリ原子力発電所事故39周年に関する声明via Ecohome (Belarus) /エコホーム(ベラルーシ)

元東大全共闘代表・山本義隆さんが都内で講演 「反核兵器の運動と反原発の運動は別のものじゃなくて一緒に考えなきゃいけない」via YAHOO!ニュースJAPAN

きょう、1960年代の学生運動で「東大全共闘」の代表だった山本義隆さんが都内で講演し、日本の原発政策を批判しました。 きょう、都内で、反原発運動を続ける市民団体が主催する講演会が行われました。講演は「核発電の根本問題」をテーマに、1960年代の学生運動で「東大全共闘」の代表だった、科学史家の山本義隆さんが行いました。 山本さんは、戦前戦中の日本がエネルギーをどのように戦争に利用しようとしてきたかを解説。戦後、中曽根康弘元総理が原発を導入した理由はエネルギーではなく、将来的な「軍事利用」のためではないかと批判しました。 その上で、山本さんは「反核兵器の運動と反原発の運動は別のものじゃなくて、一緒に考えなきゃいけない」と訴えました。

原文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 元東大全共闘代表・山本義隆さんが都内で講演 「反核兵器の運動と反原発の運動は別のものじゃなくて一緒に考えなきゃいけない」via YAHOO!ニュースJAPAN