35 YEARS AFTER CHERNOBYL’S MELTDOWN, THE FALLOUT OF RADIATION CONTINUES via Inverse

THE FALLOUT FROM CHERNOBYL IS BOTH VAST AND ONGOING. In 1986, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident killed two workers at the plant immediately, and in the following days and weeks, the fatalities rose. Today, two studies show how the accident’s effects continue to manifest in ripples of illness and death.

In one study, researchers based in the United States and Ukraine looked at genetic mutations in the children of people who had been exposed to radiation; in the other, scientists evaluated the genomic profile of cancerous tumors removed from people exposed to the blast’s radiation.

[…]

WHAT DOES CHERNOBYL RADIATION DO TO YOUR BODY?

Exposure to even low doses of ionizing radiation can damage the body in any number of ways, but one of the biggest concerns is cancer. This happens because ionizing radiation damages DNA. It is why Marie Curie, the famous scientist who discovered both polonium and radium, two radioactive elements, died of cancer. It is also why you need to wear a lead apron when you get an X-Ray to protect your body.

The severity and kind of illness people develop from ionizing radiation depends on several factors, including:

  • How much radiation they were exposed to
  • What tissue in the body was exposed to the radiation
  • Length of exposure (and/or the number of times exposed)
  • Vehicle for exposure — in other words, eating contaminated food, breathing it in, touching a radioactive element, etc)

Two studies provide new insight into the effects of ionizing radiation.

THE FALLOUT FROM CHERNOBYL IS BOTH VAST AND ONGOING. In 1986, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident killed two workers at the plant immediately, and in the following days and weeks, the fatalities rose. Today, two studies show how the accident’s effects continue to manifest in ripples of illness and death.

The reason why the scientists are looking again at the fallout from the explosion today is not out of morbid curiosity. Rather, these studies are a bid to better understand how genetic material may be changed by radiation — and how exposure manifests in the genetics of future generations, too. With ongoing threats to staff and residents around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, and 440 active nuclear reactors around the globe, it’s crucial to understand the long-term, and generational effects, of ionizing radiation.

WHAT HAPPENED AT THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT?

Shortly after midnight on April 26, 1986, a nuclear power plant 2 miles from the city of Pripyat, in what was then the Soviet Union (now Ukraine), started to malfunction. Reactor 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant was in trouble. The reactor and its emergency cooling core had been shut down the day before for routine maintenance and tests. But the test had to be postponed. Despite the delay, communication and safety protocols lapsed, and, the cooling core was kept offline. Steam started to build in the cooling pipes, causing a power surge the plant’s engineers couldn’t shut down.

The explosions began at 1:23 am, spreading a toxic cloud full of radioactive debris into the air above the plant. The explosion also caused a fire, which tore through another building and further spread the radioactive cloud across the surrounding communities. Over the next several hours, two plant workers died of acute radiation poisoning. The people of Pripyat, meanwhile, started vomiting and reporting a metallic taste in their mouths. They weren’t evacuated until more than 24 hours after the planet blew up.

WHAT DOES CHERNOBYL RADIATION DO TO YOUR BODY?

Exposure to even low doses of ionizing radiation can damage the body in any number of ways, but one of the biggest concerns is cancer. This happens because ionizing radiation damages DNA. It is why Marie Curie, the famous scientist who discovered both polonium and radium, two radioactive elements, died of cancer. It is also why you need to wear a lead apron when you get an X-Ray to protect your body.

The severity and kind of illness people develop from ionizing radiation depends on several factors, including:

  • How much radiation they were exposed to
  • What tissue in the body was exposed to the radiation
  • Length of exposure (and/or the number of times exposed)
  • Vehicle for exposure — in other words, eating contaminated food, breathing it in, touching a radioactive element, etc)

WHAT DISEASES DID CHERNOBYL CAUSE?

The World Health Organization estimates that the health of 5 million people in the former USSR was affected by the disaster in some way By other estimates, as many as 800,000 people in Belarus, a neighboring state, were affected by the radiation alone.

Some of the workers drafted to do the initial cleanup later developed leukemiaLindsay Morton is a Senior Investigator with the National Institute of Health and an author on one of the new studies examining Chernobyl. She tells Inverse that people in the surrounding areas were likely exposed to radiation from Chernobylthrough “leafy greens and milk.” The radiation-contaminated plants, including the plants farm animals ate, and therefore any animal products those animals produced were contaminated, too.

In the years after the explosion, incidences of thyroid cancer skyrocketed in the surrounding areas. “Iodine is one of the building blocks in thyroid hormones,” Morton explains, “and the body can’t distinguish between iodine and radioactive iodine. So when a person ingests radioactive iodine, it concentrates in the thyroid.”

The rates of thyroid cancer increased the most in children, a morbid finding that suggests, according to one study, that children under the age of five are “particularly vulnerable to the effects of radiation.”

DO MUTATIONS FROM RADIATION EXPOSURE PASS DOWN?

There is some good news from the new studies. The first study, published Thursday in Science, found that parents who had been exposed to radiation from the accident were no more likely to have children with so-called de novo genetic mutations than parents who experienced no radiation exposure.

De novo mutations are genetic alterations that happen after conception and are not inherited directly from one’s parents; rather, they may be the result of other factors, like age, environment, health, and other things that affect the biology of cells.

Stephen Chanock, one of the researchers on the new papers, tells Inverse that typically, you expect to see between 50 and 100 de novo mutations occur in any conception. Chanock is the Director of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics at the National Institute of Health. In this study, Chanock and his colleagues couldn’t find any significant difference in the germline of parents who had been exposed to radiation and those who hadn’t.

“In science, it’s very difficult to prove a negative,” he says. “We modeled it many, many different ways, and we didn’t find any significant differences.”

Chanock and his colleagues note in the study that the children were conceived “months or years” after their parents had been exposed. As a result, the findings may not apply to children conceived closer to the moment when their parents are exposed to ionizing radiation.

HOW DOES RADIATION CAUSE TUMORS?

The second study analyzed thyroid tumors, thyroid tissue, and blood collected from people who were exposed to radiation from Chernobyl, and then compared these samples to equivalent issues and blood taken from people who were not exposed to radiation. The comparison reveals a significant dose-dependent increase in double-strand DNA breaks among the exposed group.

Why it matters — Sometimes, when there’s a clean, double-strand DNA break, the cell can repair it quickly, Morton says. Other times, the repair job is less clean and efficient. When something like ionizing radiation is responsible for a double-strand DNA break, she says, there can be multiple double-strand DNA breaks.

[…]

“We measured DNA double-strand breaks in multiple ways. And all of them showed consistent, clear, strong associations with radiation.”

Previous studies have shown double-strand DNA breaks in the blood of people recently exposed to ionizing radiation. But “double-strand DNA breaks have never actually been linked to a human tumor before,” Morton says.

Taken together, these findings have important consequences for how we understand ionizing radiation and how to protect ourselves from it.

“There’s a bit of a debate in radiation science about whether very low doses of ionizing would cause damage,” Morton says. The linear relationship between dose-dependent exposure and double-strand DNA breaks puts that question to rest.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on 35 YEARS AFTER CHERNOBYL’S MELTDOWN, THE FALLOUT OF RADIATION CONTINUES via Inverse

Chernobyl is now a war zone via The Ecologist

By Jim Green

The next Chernobyl scale nuclear disaster could happen in Chernobyl as the Ukraine conflict intensifies.

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia poses several nuclear threats, including the possibility of deliberate or inadvertent military strikes or cyber-strikes on nuclear facilities.

There is also the obvious difficulty of safely operating nuclear reactors in a time of war, including the impossibility of carrying out safeguards inspections. Last but not least, there remains the possibility that the conflict will escalate into nuclear warfare.

We are about to learn what happens when nuclear-powered nations go to war, putting nuclear power plants at risk of deliberate or accidental military strikes and thus risking a Chernobyl scale catastrophe.

[…]

Nuclear power plants are pre-deployed radiological weapons. 

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Chernobyl is now a war zone via The Ecologist

Time is running out: Coalition is fighting urgent battle to stop latest radioactive mud dump by EdF via Beyond Nuclear International

By Linda Pentz Gunter

An urgent campaign is underway in the UK to save the Severn Estuary from the prospect of more dredging and dumping of radioactive mud from the Hinkley C two-reactor construction site. The Severn Estuary is a marine protected area that lies between the Somerset coast in England and south Wales.

Hinkley C is a project of the French energy giant, Électricité de France (EdF), which has scored an electricity strike price guarantee from the UK government to get the project done that will gouge British ratepayers at rates three times the current costs.

EdF say the dredge and dump operations are needed in order to make way for a water-cooling system for the two unneeded, expensive and dangerous Hinkley C reactors — the flawed Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR) design now suffering massive delays and cost-overruns at sites in France and Finland, and dangerous technical flaws that caused the shutdown of an operating EPR in China.

The water-cooling system, already banned in other countries, would draw seawater into a 7-metre diameter tunnel, destroying billions of fish in the process each year. These include eels, for which the Severn is an internationally important breeding ground. The system has already been vigorously opposed by wildlife and marine conservation groups. However, EdF has refused to install a fish deterrent system to reduce these impacts, citing cost issues.

In 2018, EdF dumped radioactively contaminated mud and sediment off the coast of Cardiff in Wales against wide and vigorous objection and a legal challenge in court. The mud was dumped into the “Cardiff Grounds” disposal site less than two miles from the Welsh coast in Cardiff Bay, quickly nicknamed “Geiger Bay” (a play on the old local name, Tiger Bay).

The 2018 opposition created significant media coverage and intense opposition, eventually driving EdF to reconsider. Perhaps hoping to avoid further opposition and negative media attention, the company is now looking to dump the mud off Portishead, Bristol, considering it a new, ‘soft touch’ location. Portishead is about 40 miles up the coast from the Hinkley site, close to the mouth of the storied River Avon.

Such a move would send millions of tonnes of contaminated mud and sediment on their way to the waters and beaches used by local communities and where children play, threatening the health of families and animal life. It would also potentially harm a protected marine environment, dispersing and depositing radioactive isotopes around the shores and beaches of the Severn.

As EdF continues to ignore legal safeguards, an independent and scientifically-led coalition — Save The Severn (Cofiwch Môr Hafren) – has secured a day in court, aiming to stop the mud dumping. On Thursday, March 8, 2022, Save The Severn will challenge the legality of the license granted by the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) in a Judicial Review hearing. 

[…]

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Time is running out: Coalition is fighting urgent battle to stop latest radioactive mud dump by EdF via Beyond Nuclear International

Russia Just Seized Chernobyl: Here’s Why It Matters via Mother Jones

“A nuclear reactor is a vulnerable source of energy because it relies on peace and stability.” Kate Brown [interview]

By Isabella Dias

[…]

Can you remind readers why was the Chernobyl nuclear accident is such a big deal and what it meant for Ukraine and the Soviet Union?

[…]

It’s also a big deal in terms of the public health impact: 33 people died immediately of acute radiation poisoning. But then other health problems emerged in the wake of the disaster. Working through the archives, I counted just in the summer after the accident, 40,000 people hospitalized from Chernobyl exposures, 11,000 of whom were kids. That is the number of people who have died just in Ukraine alone, and Ukraine only received a portion, 20 percent, of the radioactive fallout. Between 35,000 and 150,000 people died from cancers, heart problems, autoimmune disorders. It caused a real epidemic in thyroid cancer among kids that’s well documented. So Ukraine has been left to deal with this legacy, a country that hasn’t really had the financial means or the political organization to do it very well. That was their inheritance, an ugly offspring of the Soviet Union. And that is another reason why many Ukrainians are really not interested in having Russia rule them again.

[…]

There are reports of Russian forces seizing the Chernobyl plant this week. Why is that and what are the implications?

I’m not a military strategist. I’m just a simple environmental historian. But they have all these troops in Belarus and the shortest way to get to Kyiv is through the Chernobyl zone. Belarus, the border, is located 6 kilometers from the Chernobyl plant. It looks as if from the Ukrainian press, they’re being met by forces of the Ukrainian National Guard who are fighting against these arriving Russian forces. The question is what might happen if they’re fighting there. A fire in the Chernobyl zone would be bad. The last couple of years have been hot, with dry summers, and we have seen forest fires rage. The leaf litter and trees have a great deal of radioactivity stored in them. In fact, a majority of the plutonium and a lot of the other radionuclides that were released in the accident in 1986 are still around inside that zone. They are in the top 10 centimeters of the soil. When they go up in smoke, that’s troubling. Last June 2020, forest fire scientists calculated that radionuclides were detected in the Netherlands and in Belgium. They were directly harmful to the firefighters.

The carcass of that nuclear power plant has a cover over it and it’s supposed to be sealed off for the next 100 years. But if something, God forbid, should fall on that cover, it could cause some kind of fire of the materials that are still in there and that would create another nuclear excursion with radioactive smoke. That’s a problem we have with these sacrificed lands. We can kind of manage them during times of peace and stability, but when war comes, they’re extremely vulnerable. If somebody gets in their head to create a big dirty bomb, the Chernobyl zone would be a good place to devise it.

[…]

https://1bc84ffebd90bb6479936dc143c6c46b.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html#xpc=sf-gdn-exp-2&p=https%3A//www.motherjones.comAdvertise with Mother Jones

A Chernobyl nuclear power plant worker holding a dosimeter to measure radiation levelVolodymyr Repik/APFight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

More than 35 years after the worst nuclear accident in history, Russian troops advancing into Ukraine have seized control of the Chernobyl plant. Calling Putin’s invasion of the country “a declaration of war against the whole of Europe,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Twitter that “our defenders are giving their lives so that the tragedy of 1986 will not be repeated.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine has also issued an ominous warning that if the full-scale war Russian President Vladimir Putin has launched against Ukraine continues, “Chernobyl can happen again in 2022.”

But what does this mean? Is the former site of the accident still potentially dangerous? What about the 15 nuclear reactors in Ukraine that might be at risk? And what is the legacy of Chernobyl in Ukrainian history and society?

MOTHER JONES TOP STORIES

In 1871, Congress Crafted a Law to Break the Klan. Today, It’s Targeting Trump.Anti-Vaxxers Have a New Obsession: Keeping Your Kids From Seeing Their Doctors“Vitally Important” SCOTUS Case Could Make or Break Biden’s Climate EffortsThe Reason Sweden Isn’t Vaccinating Kids 5-11 Against Covid, ExplainedThe World’s Next Great Humanitarian Crisis Is Unfolding Before Our EyesRead MoreDerek Chauvin’s Colleagues Found Guilty of Violating George Floyd’s Civil RightsThe world’s next great humanitarian crisis isunfolding before our eyeshttps://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.502.0_en.html#goog_1720569215https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.502.0_en.html#goog_1603736118https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.502.0_en.html#goog_418854069The World’s Next Great Humanitarian Crisis Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes

To answer some of these questions, Mother Jones spoke with Kate Brown, distinguished professor in the history of science at MIT and the award-winning author of several books. One of them is Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide to the Future—a nonfiction finalist for the 2019 National Book Critics Circle Award—about the legacy of Chernobyl, the risk of a nuclear fallout, and what that could mean for Europe and the rest of the world. We caught up with Brown, who was in Cambridge, by phone. Our discussion has been edited and condensed.

Can you remind readers why was the Chernobyl nuclear accident is such a big deal and what it meant for Ukraine and the Soviet Union?

The Soviet party couldn’t deliver to their citizens luxurious consumer goods or an American-style standard of living, but they did sell themselves as promoters of health and science and technology. In 1957, they were the first ones to send a rocket, Sputnik, into outer space and they built these nuclear power plants saying they were perfectly safe. When that plant blew, that greatly discredited the Communist Party leadership, and then as they tried to minimize and cover up the accident, they got themselves into bigger trouble. They were fumbling with the technology, and the science didn’t appear to be very good. That really was one of the nails that went into the coffin of the Soviet Union.“When that plant blew, that greatly discredited the Communist Party leadership, and then as they tried to minimize and cover up the accident, they got themselves into bigger trouble.”

It’s also a big deal in terms of the public health impact: 33 people died immediately of acute radiation poisoning. But then other health problems emerged in the wake of the disaster. Working through the archives, I counted just in the summer after the accident, 40,000 people hospitalized from Chernobyl exposures, 11,000 of whom were kids. That is the number of people who have died just in Ukraine alone, and Ukraine only received a portion, 20 percent, of the radioactive fallout. Between 35,000 and 150,000 people died from cancers, heart problems, autoimmune disorders. It caused a real epidemic in thyroid cancer among kids that’s well documented. So Ukraine has been left to deal with this legacy, a country that hasn’t really had the financial means or the political organization to do it very well. That was their inheritance, an ugly offspring of the Soviet Union. And that is another reason why many Ukrainians are really not interested in having Russia rule them again.

 SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.Email

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from Mother Jones and our partners.

How has the legacy of Chernobyl shaped Ukrainian nationalism and Ukrainians’ views on Russia?

It was a real driver for the end of the Soviet Union, and the Ukrainian nationalism that emerged demanding independence. Ukrainians were sacrificed over and over again at the hands of Moscow, whether it was the Great Famine in the 1930s or the Chernobyl accident. But in the last 10 to 15 years it has not been as much an issue as Ukrainians have been struggling just to pay the bills, stay sovereign, have independence, and fight corruption. They say now Chernobyl is something that people in the West worry about, but they have too many other concerns.

There are reports of Russian forces seizing the Chernobyl plant this week. Why is that and what are the implications?

I’m not a military strategist. I’m just a simple environmental historian. But they have all these troops in Belarus and the shortest way to get to Kyiv is through the Chernobyl zone. Belarus, the border, is located 6 kilometers from the Chernobyl plant. It looks as if from the Ukrainian press, they’re being met by forces of the Ukrainian National Guard who are fighting against these arriving Russian forces. The question is what might happen if they’re fighting there. A fire in the Chernobyl zone would be bad. The last couple of years have been hot, with dry summers, and we have seen forest fires rage. The leaf litter and trees have a great deal of radioactivity stored in them. In fact, a majority of the plutonium and a lot of the other radionuclides that were released in the accident in 1986 are still around inside that zone. They are in the top 10 centimeters of the soil. When they go up in smoke, that’s troubling. Last June 2020, forest fire scientists calculated that radionuclides were detected in the Netherlands and in Belgium. They were directly harmful to the firefighters.https://1bc84ffebd90bb6479936dc143c6c46b.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.htmlAdvertise with Mother Jones

The carcass of that nuclear power plant has a cover over it and it’s supposed to be sealed off for the next 100 years. But if something, God forbid, should fall on that cover, it could cause some kind of fire of the materials that are still in there and that would create another nuclear excursion with radioactive smoke. That’s a problem we have with these sacrificed lands. We can kind of manage them during times of peace and stability, but when war comes, they’re extremely vulnerable. If somebody gets in their head to create a big dirty bomb, the Chernobyl zone would be a good place to devise it.“If somebody gets in their head to create a big dirty bomb, the Chernobyl zone would be a good place to devise it.”

What have you been watching in terms of the 15 nuclear power reactors in Ukraine and what are your concerns about possible knock-on effects?

I hope the Russians would not send a nuclear missile on the Ukrainian territory. The blowback from that is pretty serious and it would make parts of this territory that they want to occupy uninhabitable. I don’t think it’s a very practical thing. I also don’t think it would be very palatable in Russia to have a bomb go off. It’s one thing to send a missile to Washington, DC, from Moscow, but not to Kyiv. It’s too familiar for the Russian populace. It’s too close to home. And they’re supposed to defend the Russian-speaking populations of eastern Ukraine.

Ukraine was one of the biggest nuclear powers in the world until 1994, when Ukraine was asked to give up its arsenal. They had nuclear missiles along the western border of Ukraine from the Cold War period, and the Clinton administration negotiated that those bombs go to Russia. They were given some financial aid at the time to make that happen, and they were given a promise that all the parties, which included Russia and the United States, would protect Ukraine’s national sovereignty. I think this would be a very different scenario if Ukraine still had those weapons.

 GET OUR AWARD-WINNING MAGAZINE

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.Subscribehttps://1bc84ffebd90bb6479936dc143c6c46b.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.htmlAdvertise with Mother Jones

Is it possible to assess how much risk from potential radiation the troops on the ground might be exposed to?

There are so many scenarios, it’s really hard. Something starts to burn and people don’t have protection, and they start to breathe things in or gamma rays are released, and you don’t have lead suits on. There are vulnerabilities for soldiers on both sides of the conflict. But certainly, Russia doesn’t need nuclear material. They have lots of their own nuclear waste, which is pretty much what that Chernobyl plant represents. It is a big pile of nuclear waste that extends far and wide with buried hard radioactive materials, and some water sources with radioactive materials. The whole problem of the soils and the leaf litter is that they all contained radioactive isotopes. And then there’s the sarcophagus itself. I don’t think the Russians would be there to weaponize it because they are a nuclear power, they’ve got all those materials.

Do you think nuclear energy proponents keep those risks in mind or is the prospect of war just too far-fetched?

You don’t hear much about wars when they talk about new nuclear reactors and how safe they’re gonna be and how great they’ll be. A nuclear reactor is a vulnerable source of energy because it relies on peace and stability and wages getting paid and workers not going on strike and reactors not being under siege. Nuclear power as a response to climate change—when we know climate change is gonna cause a lot of instability, mass migrations, and probably more local and maybe more extra local wars—I don’t see how nuclear power safely fits into that picture.

The thing with any of these nuclear events is that they’re not isolated within sovereign borders. Once things are nuclear, it’s no longer a local skirmish that’s happening just in Ukraine. It heightens the stakes, especially for Europe, but really for pretty much everybody. I’m not quite sure what the volume of radioactive waste buried in that Chernobyl sarcophagus is, and I think they don’t really know. But if it were to be hit by some kind of bomb and just go up in smoke, then that would really be dire.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Russia Just Seized Chernobyl: Here’s Why It Matters via Mother Jones

【検証・女川原発訓練】政府と宮城県に「命守る責任感」なく 住民不参加、残る疑問 via 河北新報

東北電力女川原発(宮城県女川町、石巻市)の重大事故を想定した政府と宮城県の原子力総合防災訓練が10~12日に行われた。原発30キロ圏の約20万人が県内31市町村に逃れる避難計画の実効性が疑問視される中、新型コロナウイルスの感染拡大で、当事者となる肝心の地元住民が不参加に。開催までの経緯や当日を振り返ると、政府も県も「何があっても県民の命を守る」という主体的な責任感を欠いていた。(報道部・高橋一樹)

[…]

新型コロナの感染が急拡大する中での開催可否を巡り、村井嘉浩知事は「最終的に判断するのは国」と強調。原発30キロ圏の複数市町の要請に応じて住民参加の見送りが決まった後も「国がやると言った以上はしっかりやる」と、どこか人ごとのようだった。

 政府は政府で、県の意向に沿う振る舞いを装った。住民不参加について、山口壮原子力防災担当相は「県の方針で決めた」「県の判断」と繰り返した。

 「道路の混み具合はいかようにでもチェックできる」(4日)「避難計画の実効性は十分確かめられた。車両の滞りなどは細部にわたることだ」(15日)

 原子力防災を預かる責任者の発言には、政府が住民の避難訓練を重要視していない意識が透けて見えた。

 30キロ圏に一部入る美里町の前町長で、「脱原発をめざす宮城県議の会」の佐々木功悦会長は訓練を視察し、その成果を疑問視。「実際の避難は高齢者や子ども、障害者などさまざまな人を受け入れ、相当な困難が伴う。住民の参加抜きに、計画の実効性担保はあり得ない」と断言する。

 女川2号機の再稼働は安全対策工事が終わる来年度以降。今回の訓練を「実績づくり」とする見方を政府も県も否定するが、避難計画を最大限検証し、課題をつぶしてからの再稼働でなければ、多くの県民の安心は確保されない。

[…]

全文

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 【検証・女川原発訓練】政府と宮城県に「命守る責任感」なく 住民不参加、残る疑問 via 河北新報

Voices of plaintiffs suffering from thyroid cancer in Fukushima via OurPlanet-TV

The voices of six Fukushima youth plaintiffs who spent the last 10 years without telling anyone about their thyroid cancer

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Voices of plaintiffs suffering from thyroid cancer in Fukushima via OurPlanet-TV

六ケ所再処理工場 22年度上期完工難しく via Web 東奥

日本原燃が掲げる六ケ所再処理工場の「2022年度上期(4~9月)」の完工目標が目前に迫る。完工までには、安全対策の追加工事など各種手続きを終えなければならないが、工事に必要な詳細設計の認可(設工認)の審査が、申請から1年以上たった今も続いている。増田尚宏社長が表明した申請書の「2月中の補正」も困難な状況で、完工目標の達成は厳しい状況に追い込まれている。

原文

Posted in *English | Tagged , | Comments Off on 六ケ所再処理工場 22年度上期完工難しく via Web 東奥

Learning material about the nuclear disaster and TPNW

Supplementary material (English PDF)

キニ教材資料 (Japanese PDF)

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Learning material about the nuclear disaster and TPNW

MPs and groups oppose hearings to license Canada’s first permanent radioactive waste dump via Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County and Area

OTTAWA, February 16, 2022 – Members of Parliament and 50 environmental and citizen groups are opposed to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)’s forthcoming hearings to license Canada’s first permanent “disposal” facility for radioactive waste.

statement calling for suspension of the hearings is signed by three MPs: Laurel Collins, NDP environment critic; Elizabeth May, Parliamentary Leader of the Green Party of Canada; and Monique Pauzé, environment spokesperson for the Bloc Québécois. 

[…]

On January 31, the Kebaowek First Nation asked that the hearings be halted until a consultation framework between them and the CNSC is in place. The hearings are for authorization to build a “Near Surface Disposal Facility” for nuclear waste at Chalk River, Ontario, on unceded Algonquin Anishinaabeg lands alongside the Ottawa River.

The CNSC staff report recommends licensing the construction of the mound for 1 million cubic metres of radioactive and toxic wastes accumulated by the federal government since 1945. The CNSC has scheduled licensing hearings on February 22 and May 31. No separate environmental assessment hearing is scheduled.

The proposed facility would be an aboveground mound a kilometre from the Ottawa River, upstream from Ottawa and Montréal. 140 municipalities have opposed the project and fear contamination of drinking water and the watershed.

Read more at MPs and groups oppose hearings to license Canada’s first permanent radioactive waste dump

Posted in *English | Tagged , | Comments Off on MPs and groups oppose hearings to license Canada’s first permanent radioactive waste dump via Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County and Area

Daily Inspiration: Meet Karen Nickel and Dawn Chapman via Voyage STL

[…]

Hi Karen and Dawn, we’d love for you to start by introducing yourself
Just Moms STL was formed after learning we were living less than 2 miles from an underground burning landfill containing radioactive waste from the Manhattan Project known as West Lake Landfill. Unfortunately, the story doesn’t start there. Karen and so many more we were exposed to these same materials as a child growing up in North County.

This radioactive waste was moved around St. Louis like a nuclear hot potato. It was left out two and three stories high to blow all over North County, as well as seep into Coldwater creek for decades. Coldwater Creek floods into people’s yards and homes, kids have used the creek as recreation for years. Karen has several auto-immune diseases, and other illnesses that have affected her and her family and thousands and thousands of others she feels have been a result of exposure to the radioactive materials year after year. The goal of Just Moms STL is to provide education and outreach to alert others of their potential exposures, so they can take early precautions as it pertains to symptoms impacting their health.

While the federal government is cleaning up radioactive materials in Coldwater Creek, and surrounding areas… The materials have sat out on the surface of West Lake for 40 plus years with no clean-up plan. We have fought very hard for the last 8 years to get the Environmental Protection Agency to come forward with a Record of Decision for a clean-up for the materials at West Lake Landfill as they have and do pose a potential risk to our communities health and safety.

[…]

The clean-up process at Coldwater Creek has been very slow, and the decision to clean up West Lake had been moving slower than a snail’s pace. Our community has been physically, emotionally, mentally, and socially abused for years. The landfill owner funded a fake coalition of moms to fight against Just Moms STL, producing hit pieces full of lies over the years.

[…]

That being said, we would do it all over again, because it is the right thing to be doing. We couldn’t unlearn what we learned about St. Louis and the role it played in processing the very first teaspoon of Uranium that went into the Atomic Bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

We couldn’t stand by like so many others over the years and NOT say something… We are proud of our integrity, and the excruciating work we have done in order to obtain a small level of trust with EPA and this community. We are proud of the relationships we have made with our allies. We specialize in education and outreach. We aren’t afraid to have the HARD conversations.

Read more at Daily Inspiration: Meet Karen Nickel and Dawn Chapman

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Daily Inspiration: Meet Karen Nickel and Dawn Chapman via Voyage STL