山木屋訴訟 6億賠償命じる判決 via NHK News Web

[…]

原発事故で避難指示が出された川俣町山木屋地区に住んでいた、およそ300人は、避難生活を余儀なくされたり、住み慣れたふるさとでの生活を奪われたりしたことによる慰謝料などとして、東京電力に147億円あまりの賠償を求めていました。
9日の判決で、福島地方裁判所いわき支部の名島亨卓裁判長は、「原発の敷地の高さを超える津波が到来する可能性は示唆されていたが、直ちに安全評価に取り込むべき知見になっていたとは言えず、具体的な対策を実施すべき義務があったとまでは認められない」と指摘し、原発事故に対する東京電力の責任を否定しました。
また、「国の中間指針には合理性が認められる」として、避難を余儀なくされたことに対する賠償の上積みも認めませんでした。
一方で、「地域コミュニティーや地域の生活環境などの生活基盤の中で、継続的かつ安定的に生活する利益は、人が人として健康で文化的な生活を営むための基礎となるものだ」と指摘し、東京電力に対し、ふるさとの喪失に伴う慰謝料として、原告1人あたり200万円、総額6億円あまりを支払うよう命じました。
原告は、原発事故に対する東京電力の責任が認められず、賠償額も十分ではないとして、控訴する方針です。

全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

処理水タンク1000基、廃炉を阻む 福島原発のいま via 日本経済新聞

事故から10年 現地ルポ

3月で事故から10年を迎える東京電力福島第1原子力発電所に9日、日本経済新聞の記者が入った。たまり続ける処理水を保管するタンクが林立し、廃炉作業を妨げる。原子炉建屋内にはなお多くの溶融燃料(デブリ)が残る。敷地の96%は防護服なしで行動できるようになったが、これから難作業が待ち受ける。

(略)

福島第1が突きつけるのは、先送りが許されない現実だ。汚染水から大半の放射性物質を取り除いた処理水が今もたまり続ける。現在の技術で十分取れない放射性物質トリチウムを含む。東電は137万トン分の新設を含む保管タンク約1000基を用意したが、既に9割が埋まる。大きな空き地もあるが、廃棄物置き場にする予定だ。タンク新設の余地は乏しい。

汚染水の発生は1日平均140トン(20年)と、この5年で3分の1以下に減ったが、22年秋にもタンクは満杯になる。政府は「いつまでも先送りはできない」(菅義偉首相)とし、海洋放出の決定に向けて関係者と調整中だ。デブリや核燃料の保管場所を確保するには、タンクの撤去が必要だ。

(略)

廃炉作業は原子炉を冷やし、汚染したがれきを撤去することから始まった。事故直後は敷地の端でも毎時200マイクロシーベルトという一般の人の年間被曝(ひばく)限度に約5時間で達する線量だった。今は1マイクロシーベルト未満。原子炉建屋などを除けば、ふつうの服でも立ち入れる。

だが現実は厳しい。1~4号機を見渡せる高台に立つと、測定器は毎時100マイクロシーベルトを超えた。

政府・東電がめざす廃炉完了まで残り20~30年。22年に2号機でデブリの取り出しを始める予定だが、1、3号機は不透明だ。デブリは推定で900トンあるが、状態が分からず手つかずだ。(福岡幸太郎)

全文は処理水タンク1000基、廃炉を阻む 福島原発のいま

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Decommissioned Crimea nuclear plant to be demolished: government via S&P Global

Moscow — The government of Crimea has decided to fully demolish the Crimean Atomic Energy station near Shcholkine, construction of which was halted after the Chernobyl accident in 1986, the government said in a statement on its website Feb. 5.

Construction of the plant and its one 1,000-MW VVER-1000 started in 1976, and by 1986 was nearly complete. However, a Soviet government inspection after the Chernobyl accident found the plant to be located on a geologically volatile site and construction was canceled in 1989.

By the end of 2021, the authorities plan to demolish two diesel generator stations, the turbine hall, machine block foundation, pumping station, and the nuclear power plant’s reactor compartment, the government said Feb. 5.

Read more at Decommissioned Crimea nuclear plant to be demolished: government

Posted in *English | Tagged , | Comments Off on Decommissioned Crimea nuclear plant to be demolished: government via S&P Global

福島・川俣町住民の原発事故集団訴訟、東電に原告271人への計6億円賠償命令 via 読売新聞

 東京電力福島第一原発事故で避難指示が出た福島県川俣町山木屋地区の住民ら297人が、東電に総額約147億5000万円の賠償を求めた訴訟の判決が9日、福島地裁いわき支部であった。名島亨卓ゆきたか裁判長は、原告271人に計約6億円を支払うよう東電に命じ、26人については地区に生活の本拠があったとは認められないなどとして棄却した。

(略)

 判決は古里喪失の被害を認め、1人200万円の慰謝料が相当とした。一方、賠償基準を定めた国の中間指針で1人月額10万円とした対象区域の避難慰謝料には「合理性が認められる」とし、基準以上の増額は認めなかった。東電の津波対策については「著しい結果回避義務違反があったと認めることは難しい」とした。

 原告団は「先行訴訟の高裁判決よりも古里喪失の慰謝料の水準が低い」などとして、仙台高裁に控訴する方針。

全文は福島・川俣町住民の原発事故集団訴訟、東電に原告271人への計6億円賠償命令

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Why is America getting a new $100 billion nuclear weapon? via The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

By Elizabeth Eaves

America is building a new weapon of mass destruction, a nuclear missile the length of a bowling lane. It will be able to travel some 6,000 miles, carrying a warhead more than 20 times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. It will be able to kill hundreds of thousands of people in a single shot.

The US Air Force plans to order more than 600 of them.

On September 8, the Air Force gave the defense company Northrop Grumman an initial contract of $13.3 billion to begin engineering and manufacturing the missile, but that will be just a fraction of the total bill. Based on a Pentagon report cited by the Arms Control Association Association and Bloomberg News, the government will spend roughly $100 billion to build the weapon, which will be ready to use around 2029.

To put that price tag in perspective, $100 billion could pay 1.24 million elementary school teacher salaries for a year, provide 2.84 million four-year university scholarships, or cover 3.3 million hospital stays for covid-19 patients. It’s enough to build a massive mechanical wall to protect New York City from sea level rise. It’s enough to get to Mars.

[…]

Deterrence is the main argument for having a nuclear arsenal at all. But America’s land-based missiles have another strategic purpose all their own. Housed in permanent silos spread across America’s high plains, they are intended to draw fire to the region in the event of a nuclear war, forcing Russia to use up a lot of atomic ammunition on a sparsely populated area. If that happened, and all three wings were destroyed, the attack would still kill more than 10 million people and turn the area into a charred wasteland, unfarmable and uninhabitable for centuries to come.

The GBSD’s detractors include long-time peace activists, as you’d expect. But many of the missile’s critics are former military leaders, and their criticism has to do with those immovable silos. Relative to nuclear missiles on submarines, which can slink around undetected, and nuclear bombs on airplanes—the two other legs of the nuclear triad, in defense jargon—America’s land-based nuclear missiles are easy marks.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged | Comments Off on Why is America getting a new $100 billion nuclear weapon? via The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

No nukes in Asia…or anywhere via Beyond Nuclear International

Groups call for a nuclear power ban and no radioactive water dump at Fukushima

By No Nukes Asia Forum Japan • Citizens’Nuclear Information Center • Friends of the Earth Japan

On the 10th Anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, groups in Japan have initiated an international signature campaign against the discharge of contaminated water and calling for the discontinuation of nuclear power plants now! Please join this campaign by signing the petition.

The Japanese government is planning to release Fukushima’s radioactive contaminated water into the ocean. Japanese citizens, from Fukushima Prefecture and beyond, are strongly opposed to this plan. 

The Fukushima Prefecture Fishermen’s Association, with the backing of the Fishermen’s Association from all over Japan, have submitted an opinion of opposition to the government. The Fukushima Prefecture Agricultural Cooperatives and Forestry Associations along with 43 local governments in Fukushima Prefecture also participated in this campaign, and 450,000 citizens from across Japan have signed a petition against the government plan. 

The threat of the release of contaminated water has triggered much concern and opposition among citizenry overseas as well, including those from neighboring countries. 

Contaminated water from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant has already exceeded 1.24 million tons. We are deeply concerned about the adverse effects the water will have on the human body by way of consuming fish and shellfish, which are staples in the region’s diet. 

We demand the Japanese government keep the contaminated water stored in the tanks until the water’s levels of radioactivity are significantly reduced. The government could also adopt mortar-induced radioactive waste solidification technology. 

Meanwhile, in neighboring South Korea, the government has advocated for denuclearization with its energy plan on paper but has not ceased to build new nuclear power plants (NPPs). Serious safety breaches have been reported repeatedly, including (but not limited to) the recent tritium leak at Wolsong NPP in Gyeongju and the disclosure of an air gap in the containment building at Yeonggwang Hanbit NPP. 

In Taiwan, the government is ostensibly advancing forward to become the first nuclear-free country in Asia under the slogan of “Zero nuclear power generation in 2025.” However, the Taiwanese government plans to hold a referendum on resuming the construction of the 4th NPP in August 2021. 

The construction of NPPs continues in Turkey and India while other countries, including the Philippines, seek new opportunities to build NPPs. 

Debates over safe storage and disposal of nuclear waste that will affect future generations for hundreds of thousands of years continue in Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Australia.

Ten years have passed since the Fukushima nuclear disaster yet attempts to maintain nuclear power linger on in Asia and other regions of the world. However, at a time the world is turning to renewable energy, we are becoming increasingly aware the time of nuclear power has expired. 

We demand that:

·The Japanese government stop its plan to discharge Fukushima NPP’s contaminated water into the ocean;

·The Korean government disclose information on the actual state of radioactive leakage at Wolseong NPP;

·All governments abandon plans to build new NPPs and instead focus on expanding renewable energy;

·All governments discontinue the operation of hazardous NPPs and drop plans to extend their life spans; and 

·Stop building nuclear waste facilities without explicit consent of residents. 

The petition was initiated by24 countries (255 organizations)

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged | Comments Off on No nukes in Asia…or anywhere via Beyond Nuclear International

New Mexico’s nuclear rush via Search Light New Mexico

A massive nuclear waste site near Carlsbad is seemingly on a fast track. Can the company behind it be trusted?

Sammy Feldblum and Tovah Strong

This article was reported in collaboration with the Institute of American Indian Arts’ journalism program.

For most New Mexico businesses, the arrival of COVID-19 wreaked havoc, caused shutdowns or threatened doom. But for one enterprise — potentially one of the world’s largest nuclear waste sites — the pandemic offered an unusual opportunity. 

A long-planned nuclear waste storage facility in the southeastern New Mexico desert was rushed through the approval process during the pandemic, according to New Mexico’s congressional delegation, environmentalists and other opponents. 

Typically, project foes would have been able to voice their disapproval at Nuclear Regulatory Commission hearings around the state. The coronavirus brought an end to such public gatherings, however, so New Mexico lawmakers asked the NRC to pause the hearings.

Instead, the agency switched to online meetings — and shut out dissenters in the process.

“There is a large population of individuals living in New Mexico without internet or phone access” — and the virtual hearings required both, said environmental activist Leona Morgan of the Nuclear Issues Study Group. A Diné woman who protests what she calls nuclear colonialism, Morgan said that many people couldn’t join the meetings because they didn’t have robust broadband connections, a common problem in tribal areas and remote parts of New Mexico.

[…]

The process in question involves Holtec International, the proposed builder and operator of the Consolidated Interim Storage Facility, a site between Hobbs and Carlsbad that could soon be licensed to store 8,680 metric tons of highly radioactive uranium from some 80 nuclear reactor sites around the country. Holtec, a company that has come under scrutiny for safety violations and other issues, could potentially be allowed to expand the site by nearly 20 fold. 

Touted by backers as a local economic boon, the project would transform New Mexico into America’s radioactive waste “destination,” as Holtec describes it. The proposal has met considerable opposition, particularly given its location within the oil-rich Permian Basin.

Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has categorically denounced the Holtec project and all other proposals to store nuclear waste in the area. 

[…]

U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich and Tom Udall, for their part, decried the switch to online hearings and asked for a pause in the licensing process. “There is no compelling public interest reason to justify this rush to replace meetings with virtual webinars,” they told the NRC in an August 18 letter. 

On September 15, after the last virtual hearing was concluded, the agency officially responded to the senators, declining their request. 

On Sept. 22, when the public comment period on the NRC’s draft environmental impact statement closed, the commission recommended green-lighting the Holtec facility.

[…]

Radioactive tons

New Jersey-based Holtec plans to build the New Mexico storage site on 1,040 acres of scrubland located halfway between Carlsbad and Hobbs. The two cities, along with Eddy and Lea counties, partnered with Holtec to build the project. All four municipalities would receive a share of Holtec’s revenues for storing the country’s dangerous detritus. 

If Holtec wins its NRC license — which could happen as soon as this summer — the company would be allowed to store 500 canisters at the site, buried some 30 feet underground. As many as 10,000 canisters could eventually be added during a series of expansions. Holtec and its supporters say the site would be state-of-the-art, safe and secure.

[…]

The company was formed in the 1980s to design spent-fuel storage technology for nuclear plants. By the early 2000s, Holtec had secured contracts to provide specialized dry storage casks for a never-built interim facility on the Skull Valley Goshute reservation in Utah and the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Sequoyah Nuclear and Browns Ferry Nuclear plants. By 2018, Holtec operated branches in seven countries, including Ukraine and Spain.

In 2019, Holtec began acquiring decommissioned nuclear power plants. (Such plants can bring large profits, including whatever decommissioning funds are left over after they’ve been cleaned up.) Holtec purchased New Jersey’s Oyster Creek Generating Station; Massachusetts’ Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; New York’s Indian Point Energy Center; and Michigan’s Palisades Nuclear Generating Station, as well as spent fuel from the former Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant. 

[…]

The most recent violation occurred in 2018 when Holtec modified its casks without notifying the NRC, as mandated. The change was only discovered when workers preparing to load a cask at San Onofre Generating Station in California noticed a four-inch pin, meant to hold the fuel basket, loose at the bottom of the cask — an obvious manufacturing flaw. When asked for comment on the incidents, a Holtec spokesman told Searchlight that the company is an industry leader in quality assurance.

Holtec has run into other problems as well. An investigation conducted in 2010 by the Tennessee Valley Authority into suspected overbilling revealed that the company had bribed a TVA employee in order to secure a contract. In 2007, the employee pleaded guilty to concealing more than $54,000 received from Holtec. In the wake of the investigation, the TVA ordered the company to pay a $2 million fine, open its operations to outside monitors and face a largely symbolic 60-day ban from doing federal business — the first debarment in TVA history.

[…]

The need for a protective facility is vast, supporters say. Radioactive waste from commercial reactors contains deadly byproducts like plutonium-239, with a half-life of 24,000 years, or iodine-129, with a half-life of 16 million years. The U.S. commercial nuclear power industry currently produces over four million pounds of spent nuclear fuel each year. More than 183 million pounds of spent fuel — roughly the weight of 600 blue whales — languish at nuclear power plants around the country. The waste is stored in deep pools of water or in concrete and metal casks. All of it is in need of a new home. 

From the nuclear industry’s early days, the federal government has known it would have to deal with high-level waste. “But their assumption all along, and what they proclaimed all along throughout the late 40s, 50s and 60s, was that that’s an issue which is down the road,” said Walker, the NRC historian.

Today, the road might lead to New Mexico.

Read more at New Mexico’s nuclear rush

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments

Nuclear Power Is Not a Climate Solution via NEIS

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Nuclear Power Is Not a Climate Solution via NEIS

Fukushima Thyroid Examination January 2021: 202 Surgically Confirmed as Thyroid Cancer Among 252 Cytology Suspected Cases via Fukushima Voice Version 2e

After a 4½-month hiatus, the 40th session of the Oversight Committee was held on January 15, 2021, releasing new data (as of June 30, 2020) from the fourth and fifth rounds of the Thyroid Ultrasound Examination (TUE). The pandemic restrictions have essentially stalled the school-based screening for the fifth round, and the only cancer data updated was that of the fourth round.   HighlightsThe fourth round: 6 new cases diagnosed as suspicious or malignant, and 3 new surgical cases. Total number of suspected/confirmed thyroid cancer has increased by 6 to 252: 116 in the first round (including a single case of benign tumor), 71 in the second round, 31 in the third round, 27 in the fourth round, and 7 in Age 25 Milestone Screening.Total number of surgically confirmed thyroid cancer cases has increased by 4 to 202 (101 in the first round, 54 in the second round, 27 in the third round, 16 in the fourth round, and 4 in Age 25 Milestone Screening)

  • Data reported is as of June 30, 2020. (Delayed reporting persists after the fourth quarterly session was skipped in 2019 and now also in 2020.)
  • A list of official English translation of the TUE results is available on the website for the Radiation Medical Science Center of the Fukushima Health Management Survey. No translation is available for the 2020 sessions at this time.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , | Comments Off on Fukushima Thyroid Examination January 2021: 202 Surgically Confirmed as Thyroid Cancer Among 252 Cytology Suspected Cases via Fukushima Voice Version 2e

<東海第二原発 再考再稼働>(25)被ばく情報の透明化を 映画監督・鎌仲ひとみさん(62)via 東京新聞

原子力防災をテーマに、ドキュメンタリーの新作を制作している。タイトルは、ずばり「原子力防災」。新型コロナウイルス禍で撮影は中断しているが、東海第二原発(東海村)の再稼働を目指す日本原子力発電(原電)の住民説明会や、東海村が原発事故を想定して実施した避難訓練などは既に取材した。 

原子力防災を考える上で鍵になるのは、情報の透明性だ。原電が開催する住民説明会に行っても、来ている人はごく少数。しかも技術的な話ばかりだ。東海第二の三十キロ圏に住む九十四万人に、必要な情報を届ける努力がなされているとは言えない。 

核燃料サイクル施設がある青森県六ケ所村を舞台にした映画「六ケ所村ラプソディー」(二〇〇六年)などで、核や原子力の問題を世に問うてきた。東京電力福島第一原発事故より前に、こういう映像作品を発表していたのは私くらいだろう。テレビではできなかった。 

それが3・11を境に、テレビも含めて一斉にやり出した。原発について語ることがマスコミのタブーでなくなったのは、福島事故がもたらした大きな変化と言える。だが、また新しいタブーが席巻している。被ばくの問題だ。 

メディアに原発の情報はあふれるようになったが、エネルギーとして必要かどうかの議論に矮小(わいしょう)化され、被ばくのリスクを伴う発電方法をなぜ選択し続けるのかという本質が抜け落ちている。 

被ばくがないなら、原発と他の発電方法は何が違うのか。被ばくがあるからこそダメなんですよ。そこを語らなくてはいけない。実際、福島では今も多くの人々が被ばくに苦しんでいる。そうした情報も欠落している。

福島の事故後、原子力ムラは公衆の被ばく限度を引き上げ、被ばくは大したことではないという情報を流した。被災者のふるさとを愛する気持ちを逆手に取り、避難者支援をどんどん打ち切った。「避難は悪いことだ」という心理作戦に成功してしまった。

(略)

東海第二のすぐ近くに(日本原子力研究開発機構の)再処理施設があるのも気掛かりだ。保管中の高レベル放射性廃液を全てガラス固化するには、まだ時間がかかる。その間に巨大な地震や津波が来て廃液が漏れたら、原発事故より悲惨なことになる。 

高レベル廃液がどれだけ放射能が強く危険なものか、九十四万人に情報が届いていない。東海第二について語るなら、必ず再処理施設にも言及しなければならない。 

東海村の人々自身は、二人の犠牲者を出したジェー・シー・オー(JCO)臨界事故(一九九九年)も経験し、被ばくの問題には敏感なはず。だが、村の中だけで閉じてしまって、周辺自治体の住民と当事者意識が共有されていない。情報が本当の意味で透明化されていないからだ。 (聞き手・宮尾幹成)

全文は<東海第二原発 再考再稼働>(25)被ばく情報の透明化を 映画監督・鎌仲ひとみさん(62)

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments