Skip to content


Why is America getting a new $100 billion nuclear weapon? via The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

By Elizabeth Eaves

America is building a new weapon of mass destruction, a nuclear missile the length of a bowling lane. It will be able to travel some 6,000 miles, carrying a warhead more than 20 times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. It will be able to kill hundreds of thousands of people in a single shot.

The US Air Force plans to order more than 600 of them.

On September 8, the Air Force gave the defense company Northrop Grumman an initial contract of $13.3 billion to begin engineering and manufacturing the missile, but that will be just a fraction of the total bill. Based on a Pentagon report cited by the Arms Control Association Association and Bloomberg News, the government will spend roughly $100 billion to build the weapon, which will be ready to use around 2029.

To put that price tag in perspective, $100 billion could pay 1.24 million elementary school teacher salaries for a year, provide 2.84 million four-year university scholarships, or cover 3.3 million hospital stays for covid-19 patients. It’s enough to build a massive mechanical wall to protect New York City from sea level rise. It’s enough to get to Mars.

[…]

Deterrence is the main argument for having a nuclear arsenal at all. But America’s land-based missiles have another strategic purpose all their own. Housed in permanent silos spread across America’s high plains, they are intended to draw fire to the region in the event of a nuclear war, forcing Russia to use up a lot of atomic ammunition on a sparsely populated area. If that happened, and all three wings were destroyed, the attack would still kill more than 10 million people and turn the area into a charred wasteland, unfarmable and uninhabitable for centuries to come.

The GBSD’s detractors include long-time peace activists, as you’d expect. But many of the missile’s critics are former military leaders, and their criticism has to do with those immovable silos. Relative to nuclear missiles on submarines, which can slink around undetected, and nuclear bombs on airplanes—the two other legs of the nuclear triad, in defense jargon—America’s land-based nuclear missiles are easy marks.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English.

Tagged with .


3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. johncabot says

    Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is demanding “action, not words” from the United States if it is to revive the 2015 nuclear deal, President Joe Biden’s latest challenge.

    Iran sets a deadline next week for Biden to begin reversing the sanctions his predecessor Donald Trump imposed, or Iran will take its biggest step by banning unannounced inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. British State gives illegal BILLIONS to NUCLEAR WAR while health workers get pitiful 1% … – The Free linked to this post on 2021/03/19

    […] Why is America getting a new $100 billion nuclear weapon … […]

  2. Anarchist news from 300+ collectives 🏴 AnarchistFederation.net linked to this post on 2021/03/19

    […] Why is America getting a new $100 billion nuclear weapon … […]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.