by John Siciliano
Federal regulators are marking the eight-year anniversary of the horrendous tsunami and nuclear power plant disaster that rocked Fukushima, Japan, by issuing major new regulations this spring to harden the U.S. power plant fleet against multiple threats that could lead to similar disasters in the United States.
The new rules seek to codify individual actions taken by power plant operators at the behest of the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the wake of the March 11, 2011, disaster.[…]
Since 2012, the NRC has ordered most of the nation’s power plants to construct modifications based on that initial review, and the modifications have continued through the Trump administration.
The forthcoming post-Fukushima regulation, called the “Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events rule,” is slated to go into effect this spring, giving utilities and power plant operators a little more than two years to comply with new safety procedures to guard against an incident such as an earthquake, or other event, that could cause a radiation leak and environmental disaster.
The regulation is considered a “major rule” because its cost will exceed $100 million, according to the draft rule’s impact analysis.
The rule will require commercial reactors to do three things that include physically modifying the plants to protect reactor cores while adding new planning and monitoring practices.
First, power plant owners must put in place the resources and implement the procedures required to keep a reactor’s core cool in the event a power plant’s emergency electricity supply is knocked out. Similar procedures and resources must be adopted to keep fuel rod pools, where a power plant stores its radioactive waste, full of water, following any event that knocks out all of a plant’s emergency power supplies.
The inability to keep the reactor cores cool at Daiichi, once power was knocked out and emergency power packs drained, resulted in the meltdowns in Japan.
Second, the power plants must install equipment that can reliably measure the water levels at the pools used to house and cool a power plant’s spent fuel rods.
Fuel rods are used to generate heat and electricity at a nuclear power plant. When they are used up, but still highly radioactive, they have to be stored underwater until a permanent waste facility is built to house them indefinitely. No national site has been built to house commercial waste from any power plant, so most of the waste is stored locally at the power plant.
Third, the rule requires the power plants to “reserve the resources” required to protect the core and spent fuel pools from external hazards that may breach the plant’s walls and containment areas.
Two of the five NRC commissioners voted against the measure, saying they didn’t agree that the most current seismic data was used in issuing the regulation, which is meant to be the capstone on the commission’s response to Fukushima.Since 2012, the NRC has ordered most of the nation’s power plants to construct modifications based on that initial review, and the modifications have continued through the Trump administration.
The forthcoming post-Fukushima regulation, called the “Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events rule,” is slated to go into effect this spring, giving utilities and power plant operators a little more than two years to comply with new safety procedures to guard against an incident such as an earthquake, or other event, that could cause a radiation leak and environmental disaster.The regulation is considered a “major rule” because its cost will exceed $100 million, according to the draft rule’s impact analysis.
The rule will require commercial reactors to do three things that include physically modifying the plants to protect reactor cores while adding new planning and monitoring practices.First, power plant owners must put in place the resources and implement the procedures required to keep a reactor’s core cool in the event a power plant’s emergency electricity supply is knocked out. Similar procedures and resources must be adopted to keep fuel rod pools, where a power plant stores its radioactive waste, full of water, following any event that knocks out all of a plant’s emergency power supplies.
The inability to keep the reactor cores cool at Daiichi, once power was knocked out and emergency power packs drained, resulted in the meltdowns in Japan.
Second, the power plants must install equipment that can reliably measure the water levels at the pools used to house and cool a power plant’s spent fuel rods.
Fuel rods are used to generate heat and electricity at a nuclear power plant. When they are used up, but still highly radioactive, they have to be stored underwater until a permanent waste facility is built to house them indefinitely. No national site has been built to house commercial waste from any power plant, so most of the waste is stored locally at the power plant.
Third, the rule requires the power plants to “reserve the resources” required to protect the core and spent fuel pools from external hazards that may breach the plant’s walls and containment areas.
Two of the five NRC commissioners voted against the measure, saying they didn’t agree that the most current seismic data was used in issuing the regulation, which is meant to be the capstone on the commission’s response to Fukushima.
Featured Topics / 特集
Latest Posts / 最新記事
- 産学官民で浜通り復興 福島の教育機関など連携組織を設立 via 河北新報 2021/03/07
- 原子力災害伝承館、被災者「教訓分からぬ」批判 半年待たず展示替え via 毎日新聞 2021/03/07
- 地下800メートルの「迷宮」で考えた 人類が制御できないもの via 毎日新聞 2021/03/07
- FEATURE: Fukushima nuclear crisis evacuees face unresolved issues 10 years on via Kyodo News 2021/03/06
- 3/7『小さき声のカノン』オンライン上映+鎌仲ひとみZOOMトーク+3/12オレゴンからのトークライブ(同時通訳)視聴特典付き 2021/03/05
Discussion / 最新の議論
- hastalik belirtileri on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
- hastalik belirtileri on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
- Arc021 on 現場へ!)原発避難者たち:1 自死した息子、後を追いたい via 朝日新聞
- Apkarc on 現場へ!)原発避難者たち:1 自死した息子、後を追いたい via 朝日新聞
- İstanbul Şehirler Arası Nakliyat on US Nuclear Disaster Could Be Worse than Fukushima, Experts Warn via News wire
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- March 2021 (26)
- February 2021 (69)
- January 2021 (91)
- December 2020 (104)
- November 2020 (126)
- October 2020 (122)
- September 2020 (66)
- August 2020 (63)
- July 2020 (56)
- June 2020 (70)
- May 2020 (54)
- April 2020 (85)
- March 2020 (88)
- February 2020 (97)
- January 2020 (130)
- December 2019 (75)
- November 2019 (106)
- October 2019 (138)
- September 2019 (102)
- August 2019 (99)
- July 2019 (76)
- June 2019 (52)
- May 2019 (92)
- April 2019 (121)
- March 2019 (174)
- February 2019 (146)
- January 2019 (149)
- December 2018 (38)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (89)
- September 2018 (118)
- August 2018 (194)
- July 2018 (22)
- June 2018 (96)
- May 2018 (240)
- April 2018 (185)
- March 2018 (106)
- February 2018 (165)
- January 2018 (241)
- December 2017 (113)
- November 2017 (198)
- October 2017 (198)
- September 2017 (226)
- August 2017 (219)
- July 2017 (258)
- June 2017 (240)
- May 2017 (195)
- April 2017 (176)
- March 2017 (115)
- February 2017 (195)
- January 2017 (180)
- December 2016 (116)
- November 2016 (115)
- October 2016 (177)
- September 2016 (178)
- August 2016 (158)
- July 2016 (201)
- June 2016 (73)
- May 2016 (195)
- April 2016 (183)
- March 2016 (201)
- February 2016 (154)
- January 2016 (161)
- December 2015 (141)
- November 2015 (153)
- October 2015 (212)
- September 2015 (163)
- August 2015 (189)
- July 2015 (178)
- June 2015 (150)
- May 2015 (175)
- April 2015 (155)
- March 2015 (153)
- February 2015 (132)
- January 2015 (158)
- December 2014 (109)
- November 2014 (192)
- October 2014 (206)
- September 2014 (206)
- August 2014 (208)
- July 2014 (178)
- June 2014 (155)
- May 2014 (209)
- April 2014 (242)
- March 2014 (190)
- February 2014 (170)
- January 2014 (227)
- December 2013 (137)
- November 2013 (164)
- October 2013 (200)
- September 2013 (255)
- August 2013 (198)
- July 2013 (208)
- June 2013 (231)
- May 2013 (174)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (230)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
Top Topics / TOPトピック
anti-nuclear
Atomic Age
Capitalism
East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
energy policy
EU
Hanford
health
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
Inequality
labor
Nuclear power
nuclear waste
Nuclear Weapons
Radiation exposure
Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
Safety
TEPCO
U.S.
UK
エネルギー政策
メディア
ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
健康
公正・共生
兵器
再稼働
労働における公正・平等
原子力規制委員会
原発推進
反原発運動
大飯原発
安全
広島・長崎
廃炉
東京電力
東日本大震災・福島原発
汚染水
米国
脱原発
被ばく
資本主義
避難
除染
食の安全
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.