A year after Fukushima, the future for nuclear power is not bright—for reasons of cost as much as safety
…..
In any country independent regulation is harder when the industry being regulated exists largely by government fiat. Yet, as our special report this week explains, without governments private companies would simply not choose to build nuclear-power plants. This is in part because of the risks they face from local opposition and changes in government policy (seeing Germany’s nuclear-power stations, which the government had until then seen as safe, shut down after Fukushima sent a chilling message to the industry). But it is mostly because reactors are very expensive indeed. Lower capital costs once claimed for modern post-Chernobyl designs have not materialised. The few new reactors being built in Europe are far over their already big budgets. And in America, home to the world’s largest nuclear fleet, shale gas has slashed the costs of one of the alternatives; new nuclear plants are likely only in still-regulated electricity markets such as those of the south-east.
A technology for a more expensive world
For nuclear to play a greater role, either it must get cheaper or other ways of generating electricity must get more expensive. In theory, the second option looks promising: the damage done to the environment by fossil fuels is currently not paid for. Putting a price on carbon emissions that recognises the risk to the climate would drive up fossil-fuel costs. We have long argued for introducing a carbon tax (and getting rid of energy subsidies). But in practice carbon prices are unlikely to justify nuclear. Britain’s proposed carbon floor price—the equivalent in 2020 of €30 ($42) a tonne in 2009 prices, roughly four times the current price in Europe’s carbon market—is designed to make nuclear investment enticing enough for a couple of new plants to be built. Even so, it appears that other inducements will be needed. There is little sign, as yet, that a price high enough to matter can be set and sustained anywhere.
Read the entire article at The dream that failed
Choose Language / 言語
Updates / 最新記事
- 281_Anti Nuke: The Japanese street artist taking on Tokyo, TEPCO and the nation’s right-wing extremists via
- Pandora’s False Promise by Kennette Benedict via the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
- 高市早苗議員の原発関連発言を田母神俊雄氏が擁護する via アメーバニュース
- Japan Moves Toward Restarting Nuclear Reactors via The New York Times
- 東海村放射能漏れ、換気扇65時間半も回し放し via Yomiuri online
- High levels of strontium, tritium found in well water at Fukushima plant via The Asahi Shimbun
- 2号機海側、地下水が高濃度汚染=トリチウムなど検出—東電福島第1via ウォール・ストリート・ジャーナル
- GOP bill would feed new funding to stalled Yucca Mountain project via the Las Vegas Sun
- 原発の活用は経済成長につながるか・金子勝 via 報道するラジオ
- 【6/19】緊急提言「原発再稼働を3年間凍結し、原子力災害を二度と起こさない体系的政策を構築せよ」に関する記者会見のお知らせ via 原子力市民委員会
カレンダー
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- June 2013 (141)
- May 2013 (175)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (231)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
By Topic / トピック一覧
anti-nuclear energy movement
Atomic Age
Capitalism
East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
energy policy
EU
food
France
health
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
IAEA
India
Inequality
labor
NRC
nuclear waste
Nuclear Weapons
Radiation exposure
restart
Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
TEPCO
U.S.
UK
エネルギー政策
メディア
ヨーロッパ
ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
上関
健康
公正・共生
兵器
再稼働
労働における公正・平等
原発推進
反原発運動
大飯原発
女性・フェミニズム
広島・長崎
教育
東京電力
東日本大震災・福島原発
米国
脱原発
被ばく
資本主義



0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.