South Korea’s biggest earthquake triggers nuclear safety concerns via Reuters

Two earthquakes that jolted South Korea on Monday night, including the largest ever recorded in the country, prompted concerns about the safety of nuclear plants clustered in the quake-prone southeast.

Korea’s Meteorological Agency said the two earthquakes, of magnitude of 5.1 and 5.8, occurred near the city of Gyeongju. They could be felt in the capital Seoul, over 300 km (186 miles) to the northwest.

Fourteen people were injured but there were no reports of serious damage, a Ministry of Public Safety and Security official said.

Nonetheless, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co shut down four nuclear reactors at the Wolsong complex in Gyeongju as a precaution.

[…]

South Korea’s 25 reactors supply about one-third of its electricity and make it the world’s fifth-largest user of nuclear power. It plans to add 9 more nuclear plants by 2027, according to the nuclear watchdog.

As in many countries, nuclear power is controversial in South Korea, especially after a 2012 scandal over parts being supplied with fake certificates prompted shutdowns.

Park Jong-kwon, head of an anti-nuclear civic group in South Gyeongsang Province, said no more nuclear reactors should be built in southeastern cities like Ulsan and Gyeongju as they are close to an active fault line.

[…]

About 70 percent of South Korea’s nuclear reactors are in the southeast, partly to locate them further away from North Korea, with which the country remains technically at war.

Greenpeace Korea filed a lawsuit against the nuclear watchdog on Monday, before the earthquakes, urging it to scrap a plan to add two more reactors in Ulsan.

Read more at South Korea’s biggest earthquake triggers nuclear safety concerns

Related article:

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

新電力も廃炉費用負担 原発事業者優遇は納得できないvia愛媛新聞

国民が電力会社を選ぶことができる小売り自由化の理念に反すると言わざるを得ない。東京電力福島第1原発の廃炉費用などを巡り、政府が原発を保有する大手電力だけでなく、新規参入した新電力にも負担を求める方向で検討しているという。
 徴収方法は、新電力が大手電力に支払う送電網利用料に上乗せする案が有力だ。政府はすでに、通常の原発の廃炉費用も同様の方法で全ての利用者に転嫁する方針を固めており、再生可能エネルギーに特化した新電力と契約しても原発関連の負担を強いられる。東電をはじめ大手電力の事実上の救済にほかならず、再考を強く求めたい。
 事故を起こした福島第1原発と他の原発を同列に扱うことに違和感が募る。収束や賠償の重要性は言うまでもないが、電気料金とは切り離して論じるべきだ。さらに、事故から5年半がたっても国や東電などの責任が曖昧なままであることを忘れてはならない。国民に痛みを強いるより、株主や社債を保有する投資家、取引金融機関など利害関係者を含め、責任の所在の明確化を急いでもらいたい。
[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 新電力も廃炉費用負担 原発事業者優遇は納得できないvia愛媛新聞

The Big Difference at Standing Rock Is Native Leadership All Around via YES! Magazine (Reader Supported News)

Dallas Goldtooth, a veteran organizer of the Keystone XL fight, is amazed at the historic support from tribes at Standing Rock–even tribes that rely on resource extraction.
[…]
This fight right now, it’s about the water. And because the messaging is that water is life, so many people can connect with that. Whether you’re native or non-Native, whether you’re from Chicago or Detroit or New Orleans or up in the Bakken, we all understand the importance of protecting the water. That brings us together.
[…]
van Gelder: How many different tribal governments have come here to take an official stand?

Goldtooth: One hundred eighty-nine have had resolutions or statements of solidarity with Standing Rock. That’s amazing, historic. The crazy part is a lot of tribes that are heavily dependent on resource extraction have also come out in support. Three Affiliated Tribes—30 percent of the Bakken oil shale is under their lands and they participate in. The Navajo Nation, who is heavily dependent on coal. The Crow Nation, which is all coal. All sent statements of solidarity and actually brought their presidents to this camp. It’s fascinating. It opens up a door for so more organizing to say, “Hey, you’re standing in solidarity with Standing Rock on this issue, can you stand in solidarity to keep fossil fuels in the ground, because that’s what really promotes projects like this.”

van Gelder: These issues around the destruction of the planet and the climate crisis affect everybody, and yet it’s Native people who have really been at the forefront of getting stuff done.

How do you think about that?

Goldtooth: The “Keep It in the Ground” narrative is nothing new for indigenous peoples. The language “keep it in the ground” we first encountered over 15 years ago from relatives in the Global South—in Central and South America—and relatives up in northern Alberta in Canada, who were saying: The only solution forward is to keep it in the ground; regulation is not going to work; a more sustainable method of extraction is not going to work. We indigenous people have been saying keep fossil fuels in the ground from the get-go. Although it has been frustrating to see the climate movement overall be slow to adopt that, it’s also amazing and welcome now.

It is indigenous people who are often – though not all the time –on the frontlines of climate change. It is oftentimes indigenous people, poor people, forest-dependent nations, water-dependent nations—they’re the first ones to feel the rapid sea-level rise. Those communities, those nations are still dependent on subsistence lifestyles; they’re living off the land. Our relatives in the Arctic are feeling it, their entire livelihoods. Even if they wanted to have absolutely traditional food diets, they can no longer do that because the animals’ life patterns are completely altered.

So we at the Indigenous Environmental Network stand in strong defense and support of those communities’ rights to self-determine what happens to the lands, water, to the world around them. And not only are the frontlines the source of the fight, but that’s where the solutions are going to come from.

van Gelder: Say more about those solutions?

Goldtooth: The best part of the work we do is that it’s not what we’re fighting against but what we’re fighting for. We advocate for localized, small-scale renewable energy production. The same with food production, localized and sustainable. That’s the path forward that we have to take. The process to achieve that is all housed under the concepts of a just transition: We have to be mindful that even if we transition to 100 percent renewables, it doesn’t necessarily mean that society is just, it doesn’t necessarily guarantee that poor communities will have access to basic needs. When we talk about this transition, we have to make sure it’s in line with the principles of social justice and environmental justice.

van
[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Big Difference at Standing Rock Is Native Leadership All Around via YES! Magazine (Reader Supported News)

福島県知事、子どもの帰還に課題 東日本大震災から5年半 via 福島民友

 内堀雅雄知事は12日の定例会見で、東日本大震災から5年半が経過した本県の現状について「復興へと着実に前進していると思う。ただ一部で帰還の見通しが立たないなど重い課題はたくさんある」と振り返った。

避難指示解除地域で子どもの帰還が進んでいないことについては「特に義務教育の子どもたちが震災前と比べ、なかなか戻り切らないと実感している」と述べた上で「住民の安全・安心確保はもちろん、自治体と協力して地域ならではの教育形態をつくることが重要」と指摘した。

続きは福島県知事、子どもの帰還に課題 東日本大震災から5年半

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

韓国南東部で地震、原発の運転を停止 via 東洋経済online

[ソウル 13日 ロイター] – 韓国の原発運営会社、韓国水力原子力(韓水原)は13日、同国南東部の慶州付近で12日夜に起きた2回の地震を受け、月城原発の1─4号機を停止したと発表した。

韓国気象庁によると、地震の規模はマグニチュード(M)5.1と5.8。気象庁によると、M5.8は韓国で観測された地震では最大規模。

続きは韓国南東部で地震、原発の運転を停止 

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

TEPCO switched off alarms at Fukushima No. 2 plant years ago via The Asahi Shimbun

Tokyo Electric Power Co. felt the wrath of the nation’s nuclear watchdog after it was discovered that entry alarms at the Fukushima No. 2 nuclear power plant don’t work even if sensors detect movement.

The Nuclear Regulation Authority issued a strong warning against a recurrence as TEPCO was in violation of the law, an official of the NRA said Sept. 12.

The matter came to the NRA’s attention last October during an on-site inspection to assess what precautions had been taken to protect the nuclear materials there. The intruder alarms were deactivated several years ago.

The sensors were installed at the perimeter of the facility and elsewhere.

[…]

The Fukushima No. 2 nuclear power plant still keeps spent nuclear fuel in cooling pools but does not produce electricity now. Fukushima prefectural authorities are demanding it be decommissioned.

Security at the site is poor compared with the situation at the nearby crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, which went into triple meltdown as a result of the 2011 earthquake and tsunami disaster, and the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata Prefecture, which TEPCO intends to bring back online.

A report by TEPCO to the NRA said the security official requested that the “environment of the area be improved,” including taking steps to bring the overgrown foliage under control. But the individual’s supervisor refused, citing “the need to start certain procedures.”

“Please be patient,” he was told.

Read more at TEPCO switched off alarms at Fukushima No. 2 plant years ago 

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Eight countries. 2,056 nuclear tests. 71 years via The Washington Post

In the name of national security, eight countries have tested nuclear weapons all over the world since 1945, frequently near populated places. Related: North Korea conducts fifth nuclear test, claims it has made warheads with ‘higher strike power’.

Eight countries have performed nuclear tests. The United States and U.S.S.R. have performed the most explosive tests in history.

“Yield,” a measure of how much energy an explosion releases, is measured in kilotons — one equalling about the power of 1,000 tons of TNT. Both nuclear superpowers have performed nuclear tests with yields of at least 10,000 kilotons (at scale above:).

[…]

Nuclear tests throughout history, per country

Most nuclear powers have not performed a nuclear test in decades. Only North Korea has tested in the 21st century.

The United States and Russia possess 93 percent of the global nuclear warheads arsenal, according to Federation of American Scientists estimates. Both countries each have several thousand “retired” warheads awaiting dismantlement.

Read more and diagram at Eight countries. 2,056 nuclear tests. 71 years

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Eight countries. 2,056 nuclear tests. 71 years via The Washington Post

政府、もんじゅ廃炉で最終調整 核燃料サイクル政策見直し必至 via 福井新聞

 政府は12日、原子力規制委員会が運営主体の変更を求めている日本原子力研究開発機構の高速増殖炉 もんじゅ(福井県敦賀市)を廃炉にする方向で最終調整に入った。政府関係者が明らかにした。再稼働には数千億円の追加費用が必要となり、国民の理解が得ら れないとの判断に傾いた。核燃料サイクル政策の枠組みの見直しは必至で、関係省庁で対応を急ぐ。

所管の文部科学省は、規制委から運営主 体の変更勧告を受け、原子力機構からもんじゅ関連部門を分離し、新法人を設置して存続させる案を今月に入り、内閣官房に伝えた。しかし、電力会社やプラン トメーカーは協力に難色を示しており、新たな受け皿の設立は困難な情勢。政府内では、通常の原発の再稼働を優先すべきだとの考えから経済産業省を中心に廃 炉論が強まっていた。

政府は、もんじゅ廃炉後も高速炉の研究開発は継続する方向。実験炉の常陽(茨城県)の活用やフランスとの共同研究などの案が浮上している。

原子力機構は2012年、もんじゅを廃炉にする場合、原子炉の解体など30年間で約3千億円の費用がかかるとの試算をまとめている。もんじゅは核燃料の冷却にナトリウムを利用する特殊な原子炉のため、一般の原発の廃炉費用より割高となる。

一方、再稼働するには、長期の運転停止中に変質した燃料を新しいものに交換する必要がある。

もんじゅ本体の施設の維持管理に年間約200億円かかり、茨城県東海村にある燃料製造工場を新規制基準に対応させる工事費も大幅に必要となる。もんじゅ本体の新基準対応費も含めると、再稼働させるためには数千億円の追加負担が見込まれる。

(略)

 ■もんじゅ プルトニウム・ウラン混合酸化物(MOX)燃料を使い、高速中性子による核分裂反応を 用いる原子炉で、燃料として消費する以上のプルトニウムを生み出すため高速増殖炉と呼ばれる。開発第2段階の原型炉で出力は28万キロワット。1994年 に初めて臨界に達したが、95年にナトリウム漏えい事故を起こすなどトラブルが続き、運転実績はほとんどない。2012年に大量の機器点検漏れが発覚し、 原子力規制委員会が13年5月、事実上の運転禁止を命令した。

全文は政府、もんじゅ廃炉で最終調整 核燃料サイクル政策見直し必至 

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on 政府、もんじゅ廃炉で最終調整 核燃料サイクル政策見直し必至 via 福井新聞

Unfinished Nuclear Plant, 4 Decades and $5 Billion Later, Will Be Sold via The New York Times

HOLLYWOOD, Ala. — After spending more than 40 years and $5 billion on an unfinished nuclear power plant in northeastern Alabama, the nation’s largest federal utility is preparing to sell the property at a fraction of its cost.

The utility, the Tennessee Valley Authority, has set a minimum bid of $36.4 million for its Bellefonte Nuclear Plant and 1,600 surrounding acres of waterfront property on the Tennessee River. The deal includes two unfinished nuclear reactors, transmission lines, office and warehouse buildings, eight miles of roads and a 1,000-space parking lot.

Initial bids are due Monday, and at least one company has expressed interest in the site, with plans to use it for alternative energy production. But the utility is not particular about what the buyer does — using the site for power production, industrial manufacturing, recreation or even residences would all be fine, said Scott Fiedler, an agency spokesman.

“It’s all about jobs and investment, and that’s our primary goal for selling this property,” Mr. Fiedler said. The utility hopes to close the deal in October.

The interested buyer, Phoenix Energy, based in Nevada, has said it will offer $38 million for Bellefonte in hopes of using it for a non-nuclear technology to generate power.
[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

「脱原発あきらめない」 経産省前でテント撤去後初集会via東京新聞

国の原子力政策に反対する市民団体の集会が十一日夕、東京・霞が関の経済産業省前で開かれた。脱原発運動の象徴だったテントが八月に強制撤去されたため、庁舎前の沿道に約五百人の支援者が集まった。「テントは撤去されたが、運動を続けないと負けてしまう。しぶとく、諦めずに戦おう」と誓い合った。
 テントは八月二十一日未明、強制執行で撤去され、現在は「国有地 関係者以外立ち入り禁止」の看板とフェンスで囲われている。
 テントは東京電力福島第一原発事故から半年後の二〇一一年九月、市民団体代表の淵上太郎さん(74)ら有志十数人で設置した。
 集会で淵上さんは「この五年間、国は何もしていないのと同じ。いまだ十万人の人々が避難生活を余儀なくされており、もっと被災者の声を聞いてほしい」と話した。もう一人の代表、正清(まさきよ)太一さん(78)は「私が生きている間に原発をやめさせたい」と訴えた。福島県郡山市の黒田節子さん(65)は「甲状腺がんの子どもが増えているのに県は原発事故の影響を認めない」と怒りを口にした。
[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 1 Comment