Judge issues tentative order rejecting lawsuit to stop San Onofre nuclear plant dismantlement via The San Diego Union-Tribune

Del Mar advocacy group says Coastal Commission should not have OK’d permit



Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff issued a tentative decision rejecting a lawsuit by the Samuel Lawrence Foundation, an advocacy group based in Del Mar, that argued the California Coastal Commission “abused its discretion” when it issued a permit allowing Southern California Edison to take down buildings and other infrastructure at the now-shuttered plant.

Beckloff has 60 to 90 days to issue a final ruling but in his 12-page tentative decision, the judge said the commission did not violate its own regulations when it OK’d the permit.


Coastal Commission spokeswoman Noaki Schwartz said the commission shares the “significant concerns” raised by the foundation and urges the federal government to find a permanent repository to store nuclear waste from the plant, known as SONGS for short. “The Commission does not have jurisdiction to regulate this federal issue, however, and agrees with the court’s tentative ruling.” 

Edison spokesman John Dobken said the commission made the correct decision when it approved the permit and the dismantlement at SONGS continues to progress in a safe and timely manner. We look forward to the court’s final ruling on this matter.”

The heart of the complaint centers on a pair of spent fuel pools that are scheduled to be torn down.

At commercial nuclear power plants, when the highly radioactive fuel rods used to generate electricity lose their effectiveness, operators place the assemblies in a metal rack that is lowered about 40 feet into a “wet storage” pool, typically for about five years, to cool.

Edison has since taken the assemblies, placed them into stainless steel canisters and moved them in two “dry storage” facilities on the north end of the plant. One facility holds 50 canisters and another, more recently constructed site, holds 73 canisters.

Edison says the pools are unnecessary now that the spent fuel, or nuclear waste, sits in dry storage.

The Samuel Lawrence Foundation suit argues Edison should keep the pools in place in case the canisters ever get damaged or degrade over time.


The Samuel Lawrence Foundation argued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission provides leeway for Edison to determine how to decommission the plant and the Coastal Commission should go back and conduct its own analysis.


All told, there are 3.55 million pounds of used-up fuel in the canisters at SONGS, which is located between the Pacific and Interstate 5. The waste remains on SONGS premises because, just as seen at 121 commercial nuclear sites in 35 states, the federal government has not opened a facility to deposit it.


SONGS has not produced electricity since 2012 after a leak in a steam generator tube led to the closing of the plant.

SONGS dismantlement operations began in March 2020 and, if they proceed, are expected to take about eight years to complete. About 2 billion pounds of equipment, components, concrete and steel will be removed from the plant, which has not produced power since 2012. 

The two distinctive containment domes, each nearly 200 feet high, are scheduled to come down around 2027. 

About 450,000 tons of material labeled low-level nuclear waste will be shipped — mostly by rail — to a disposal facility in Clive, Utah. Another 35 tons of low-level waste will get shipped by truck to a facility in the West Texas town of Andrews.

Read more at Judge issues tentative order rejecting lawsuit to stop San Onofre nuclear plant dismantlement

This entry was posted in *English and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply