広島とオバマ大統領 守るべき一線 譲ったのか 神戸市外国語大准教授・繁沢敦子 via 中国新聞ヒロシマ平和メディアセンター

広島とオバマ大統領 守るべき一線 譲ったのか

オバマ大統領の勇気ある決断を支持したい。一方で、その記念碑的な瞬間を前に手放しでは喜べないのも事実だ。

謝罪抜きの訪問だからではない。原爆を投下したことについて米国は謝罪すべきだと私は思う。しかし、これまでの背景をいくらか知る一人としては、公式謝罪は期待できないことを理解している。

問題は「被爆者は謝罪を求めていない」という言葉が一人歩きしていることだ。  それを根拠に、広島市長や政府要人が謝罪を求めないことを明らかにし、結果的にその言葉がオバマ氏訪問の交換条件として機能してしまった。「謝罪」を巡って米国側と議論にもならないまま、いや、むしろそれを避けるために、日本国内で一方的に言説がつくられた感がある。

米国との駆け引きというより、国内の世論操作を通じた米国への協力だったのではないかという印象さえ受ける。

確かに、謝罪は求めないと明言する被爆者もいる。恩讐(おんしゅう)を超えてそうした心境に達した人の言葉には感動を覚える。一方で、米国に過ちを認めてほしいとする声や謝罪を求める声も存在する。しかし、憎しみや恨みといった負の感情は表に出したくないというのが人間のさがだろう。最も個人的な部分の感情であり、一見の取材者に露呈できるような話でもない。

盛り上がるばかりの歓迎ムードに水を差すことはしにくい。過去にこだわることを「前に進めない」「乗り越えられない」ことと同等に捉える風潮もある。こうした繊細な事情が考慮されないまま、一つの言説が集団の総意として演出されてしまったのではないか。

その下地は少し前からつくられていた。「被爆者は謝罪を求めていない」という言葉は2008年ごろから聞かれるようになった。全米原爆展を開催していた時期で、投下を巡る問題よりも、核拡散や核廃絶の問題に米市民と協調して取り組むことが優先されたということもあろう。それゆえに、守るべき一線を譲ってしまったのではなかったか。今回の言説の伏線になったように思えてならない。

「原爆と検閲」の研究をしていると、軍や行政機関による検閲と、書き手や編集者による自己検閲の違いを問われることがある。制度にのっとって行われたか、誰が行ったかという点を除くと、両者を区別するのは難しいことも少なくない。自己検閲といっても裏では権力による圧力が働いていることが多いからだ。  検閲ではないにしても、今回の問題では同様の力が働いた可能性がある。一定の立場にある人物の発言には、それに反する趣旨の発言を封印するだけの力がある。

集団の威を借りるレトリックも用いられた。恐らくは周囲の数人が述べた言葉が「多くの人」が言ったことになり、次には「大多数の人」が言ったことになる。それを政府の要人が「私たち」という主語で語ることで「日本人の総意」になってしまうのだろう。

安倍晋三首相は14日、「原爆や戦争を恨まず、人の中に巣くう『争う心』と決別する」訪問にしたいと述べた。しかし、原爆や戦争を恨む心と争う心はまったく違う次元のものだ。原爆と戦争を恨む心が、次の世代に自分たちと同じ目に遭わせたくないという反戦反核運動を育んできた。オバマ氏も唱える「核兵器のない世界」に向けて先駆けて活動してきたのは、こうした人々であることを忘れてはならないだろう。

続きは 『今を読む』 神戸市外国語大准教授・繁沢敦子

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Over Seventy Prominent Scholars and Activists Urge Obama to meet Hibakusha, Take Further Steps on Nuclear Disarmament via PEACE ACTION’S GROUNDSWELL

May 23, 2016

President Barack Obama

The White House

Washington, DC

 

Dear Mr. President,

We were happy to learn of your plans to be the first sitting president of the United States to visit Hiroshima this week, after the G-7 economic summit in Japan. Many of us have been to Hiroshima and Nagasaki and found it a profound, life-changing experience, as did Secretary of State John Kerry on his recent visit.

In particular, meeting and hearing the personal stories of A-bomb survivors, Hibakusha, has made a unique impact on our work for global peace and disarmament. Learning of the suffering of the Hibakusha, but also their wisdom, their awe-inspiring sense of humanity, and steadfast advocacy of nuclear abolition so the horror they experienced can never happen again to other human beings, is a precious gift that cannot help but strengthen anyone’s resolve to dispose of the nuclear menace.

Your 2009 Prague speech calling for a world free of nuclear weapons inspired hope around the world, and the New START pact with Russia, historic nuclear agreement with Iran and securing and reducing stocks of nuclear weapons-grade material globally have been significant achievements.

Yet, with more than 15,000 nuclear weapons (93% held by the U.S. and Russia) still threatening all the peoples of the planet, much more needs to be done. We believe you can still offer crucial leadership in your remaining time in office to move more boldly toward a world without nuclear weapons.

In this light, we strongly urge you to honor your promise in Prague to work for a nuclear weapons-free world by:

  • Meeting with all Hibakusha who are able to attend;
  • Announcing the end of U.S. plans to spend $1 trillion for the new generation of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems;
  • Reinvigorating nuclear disarmament negotiations to go beyond New START by announcing the unilateral reduction of the deployed U.S. arsenal to 1,000 nuclear weapons or fewer;
  • Calling on Russia to join with the United States in convening the “good faith negotiations” required by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty for the complete elimination of the world’s nuclear arsenals;
  • Reconsidering your refusal to apologize or discuss the history surrounding the A-bombings, which even President Eisenhower, Generals MacArthur, King, Arnold, and LeMay and Admirals Leahy and Nimitz stated were not necessary to end the war.

 

Sincerely,

Gar Alperowitz, Professor of Political Economy, University of Maryland

Christian Appy, Professor of History at the University of Massachusetts,

Amherst, author of American Reckoning: The Vietnam War and Our National Identity

Colin Archer, Secretary-General, International Peace Bureau

Charles K. Armstrong, Professor of History, Columbia University

Medea Benjamin, Co-founder, CODE PINK, Women for Peace and Global Exchange

Phyllis Bennis, Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies

Herbert Bix, Professor of History, State University of New York, Binghamton

Norman Birnbaum, University Professor Emeritus, Georgetown University Law Center

Reiner Braun, Co-President, International Peace Bureau

Philip Brenner, Professor of International Relations and Director of the Graduate Program in US Foreign Policy and National Security, American University

Jacqueline Cabasso, Executive Director, Western States Legal Foundation; National Co-convener, United for Peace and Justice

James Carroll, Author of An American Requiem

Noam Chomsky, Professor (emeritus), Massachusetts Institute of Technology

David Cortright, Director of Policy Studies, Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame and former Executive Director, SANE

Frank Costigliola, Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor, niversity of Connecticut

Bruce Cumings, Professor of History, University of Chicago

Alexis Dudden, Professor of History, University of Connecticut

Carolyn Eisenberg, Professor of U.S. Diplomatic History, Hofstra University

Daniel Ellsberg, Former State and Defense Department official

John Feffer, Director, Foreign Policy In Focus,  Institute for Policy Studies

Gordon Fellman,  Professor of Sociology and Peace Studies, Brandeis University.
Bill Fletcher, Jr., Talk Show Host, Writer & Activist.

Norma Field, professor emerita, University of Chicago

Carolyn Forché, University Professor, Georgetown University

Max Paul Friedman, Professor of History, American University.

Bruce Gagnon, Coordinator Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.

Lloyd Gardner, Professor of History Emeritus, Rutgers University, author Architects of Illusion and The Road to Baghdad.

Irene Gendzier Prof. Emeritus, Department of of History, Boston University

Joseph Gerson, Director, American Friends Service Committee Peace & Economic Security Program, author of With Hiroshima Eyes and Empire and the Bomb

Todd Gitlin, Professor of Sociology, Columbia University

Andrew Gordon. Professor of History, Harvard University

John Hallam, Human Survival Project, People for Nuclear Disarmament, Australia

Melvin Hardy, Heiwa Peace Committee, Washington, DC

Laura Hein, Professor of History, Northwestern University

Martin Hellman, Member, US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University

Kate Hudson, General Secretary, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (UK)

Paul Joseph, Professor of Sociology, Tufts University

Louis Kampf, Professor of Humanities Emeritus MIT

Michael Kazin, Professor of History, Georgetown University

Asaf Kfoury, Professor of Mathematics and Computer Science, Boston University

Peter King, Honorary Associate, Government & International Relations School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW

David Krieger, President Nuclear Age Peace Foundation

Peter Kuznick, Professor of History and Director of the Nuclear Studies Institute at American University, is author of Beyond the Laboratory

John W. Lamperti, Professor of Mathematics Emeritus, Dartmouth College

Steven Leeper, Co-founder PEACE Institute, Former Chairman, Hiroshima Peace Culture Foundation

Robert Jay Lifton, MD, Lecturer in Psychiatry Columbia University, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, The City University of New York

Elaine Tyler May, Regents Professor, University of Minnesota, Author of Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era

Kevin Martin, President, Peace Action and Peace Action Education Fund

Ray McGovern, Veterans For Peace, Former Head of CIA Soviet Desk and Presidential Daily Briefer

David McReynolds, Former Chair, War Resister International

Zia Mian, Professor, Program on Science and Global Security, Princeton University

Tetsuo Najita, Professor of Japanese History, Emeritus, University of Chicago, former  president of Association of Asian Studies

Sophie Quinn-Judge, Retired Professor, Center for Vietnamese Philosophy, Culture and Society, Temple University

Steve Rabson, Professor Emeritus of East Asian Studies, Brown University, Veteran, United States Army

Betty Reardon, Founding Director Emeritus of the International Institute on Peace Education, Teachers College, Columbia University

Terry Rockefeller, Founding Member, September 11 Families for Peaceful Tomorrows,

David Rothauser Filmmaker, Memory Productions, producer of “Hibakusha, Our Life to Live” and “Article 9 Comes to America

James C. Scott, Professor of Political Science and Anthropology, Yale University, ex-President of the Association of Asian Studies

Peter Dale Scott, Professor of English Emeritus, University of California, Berkleley and author of American War Machine

Mark Selden, Senior Research Associate Cornell University, editor, Asia-Pacific Journal, coauthor, The Atomic Bomb: Voices From Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Martin Sherwin, Professor of History, George Mason University, Pulitzer Prize for American Prometheus

John Steinbach, Hiroshima Nagasaki Committee

Oliver Stone, Academy Award-winning writer and director

David Swanson, director of World Beyond War

Max Tegmark, Professor of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology;  Founder, Future of Life Institute

Ellen Thomas, Proposition One Campaign Executive Director, Co-Chair, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (US) Disarm/End Wars Issue Committee

Michael True, Emeritus Professor, Assumption College, is co-founder of the Center for Nonviolent Solutions

David Vine, Professor, Department of Sociology, American University

Alyn Ware, Global Coordinator, Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament 2009 Laureate, Right Livelihood Award

Dave Webb, Chair, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (UK)

Jon Weiner, Professor Emeritus of History, University of California Irvine

Lawrence Wittner, Professor of History emeritus, SUNY/Albany

Col. Ann Wright, US Army Reserved (Ret.) & former US diplomat

Marilyn Young, Professor of History, New York University

Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics & Coordinator of Middle Eastern Studies, University of San Francisco

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Over Seventy Prominent Scholars and Activists Urge Obama to meet Hibakusha, Take Further Steps on Nuclear Disarmament via PEACE ACTION’S GROUNDSWELL

福島原発事故 南相馬市の避難指示を7月12日に解除 via 毎日新聞

住民1万人超の自治体で初めて

 政府の原子力災害現地対策本部は27日、東京電力福島第1原発事故に伴う福島県南相馬市の避難指示を7月12日に解除すると発表した。原発事故で避難指示が出された11市町村のうち、対象住民が1万人を超える自治体の避難指示が解除されるのは初めてとなる。

 同本部の高木陽介本部長(副経済産業相)と南相馬市の桜井勝延市長が27日、同市内で共同記者会見し、発表した。解除の対象は、避難指示解除準備区域と 居住制限区域の約1万1000人で、除染などで放射線量が健康に影響のない水準まで下がり、生活関連インフラがおおむね整ったと判断した。なお、放射線量 の高い帰還困難区域(1世帯2人)は解除しない。

続きは福島原発事故 南相馬市の避難指示を7月12日に解除 

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Text of President Obama’s Speech in Hiroshima, Japan via The New York Times

The following is a transcript of President Obama’s speech in Hiroshima, Japan, as recorded by The New York Times.

Seventy-one years ago, on a bright cloudless morning, death fell from the sky and the world was changed. A flash of light and a wall of fire destroyed a city and demonstrated that mankind possessed the means to destroy itself.

Why do we come to this place, to Hiroshima? We come to ponder a terrible force unleashed in a not-so-distant past. We come to mourn the dead, including over 100,000 Japanese men, women and children, thousands of Koreans, a dozen Americans held prisoner.

Their souls speak to us. They ask us to look inward, to take stock of who we are and what we might become.

[…]

Yet in the image of a mushroom cloud that rose into these skies, we are most starkly reminded of humanity’s core contradiction. How the very spark that marks us as a species, our thoughts, our imagination, our language, our toolmaking, our ability to set ourselves apart from nature and bend it to our will — those very things also give us the capacity for unmatched destruction.

How often does material advancement or social innovation blind us to this truth? How easily we learn to justify violence in the name of some higher cause.

Every great religion promises a pathway to love and peace and righteousness, and yet no religion has been spared from believers who have claimed their faith as a license to kill.

Nations arise telling a story that binds people together in sacrifice and cooperation, allowing for remarkable feats. But those same stories have so often been used to oppress and dehumanize those who are different.

Science allows us to communicate across the seas and fly above the clouds, to cure disease and understand the cosmos, but those same discoveries can be turned into ever more efficient killing machines.

The wars of the modern age teach us this truth. Hiroshima teaches this truth. Technological progress without an equivalent progress in human institutions can doom us. The scientific revolution that led to the splitting of an atom requires a moral revolution as well.

That is why we come to this place. We stand here in the middle of this city and force ourselves to imagine the moment the bomb fell. We force ourselves to feel the dread of children confused by what they see. We listen to a silent cry. We remember all the innocents killed across the arc of that terrible war and the wars that came before and the wars that would follow.

[…]

Some day, the voices of the hibakusha will no longer be with us to bear witness. But the memory of the morning of Aug. 6, 1945, must never fade. That memory allows us to fight complacency. It fuels our moral imagination. It allows us to change.

And since that fateful day, we have made choices that give us hope. The United States and Japan have forged not only an alliance but a friendship that has won far more for our people than we could ever claim through war. The nations of Europe built a union that replaced battlefields with bonds of commerce and democracy. Oppressed people and nations won liberation. An international community established institutions and treaties that work to avoid war and aspire to restrict and roll back and ultimately eliminate the existence of nuclear weapons.

Still, every act of aggression between nations, every act of terror and corruption and cruelty and oppression that we see around the world shows our work is never done. We may not be able to eliminate man’s capacity to do evil, so nations and the alliances that we form must possess the means to defend ourselves. But among those nations like my own that hold nuclear stockpiles, we must have the courage to escape the logic of fear and pursue a world without them.

Read more at Text of President Obama’s Speech in Hiroshima, Japan

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Text of President Obama’s Speech in Hiroshima, Japan via The New York Times

福島第一原発の作業休止 時間との闘いなのに via 東京新聞

主要国首脳会議(伊勢志摩サミット)に合わせ、東京電力福島第一原発では、25日から原子炉冷却などを除いて作業が原則休止になった。東電は「リスクを減らすため」という。判然としない理由で作業が止まった福島第一の状況を、上空と地上から追った。 (山川剛史、片山夏子)
 「リスクって何? 作業員たちの動向をチェックしきれないとでもいうのか?」。東電の言い分に疑問を感じつつ、午前10時半ごろ、本社ヘリ「あさづる」で上空に。1日延べ7000人が働く福島第一の異変はすぐ分かった。高度を変え、何度旋回してもらっても、作業をしている気配が感じられない。
 時間との闘いとなっているタンクの増設現場では、重機の多くがアームを畳んで並べられていた。3号機では、原子炉建屋の上部を鉄板などで覆う作業が大幅に遅れているが、作業員の姿はなかった。
[…]
ある作業員は、3日間の休止中は別の建設現場で働くため地元へ。「5月は10連休もあり、日給の人には3日の休みは大きい」と話した。別の作業員は「みんな給料が心配。3日間だけ別な所で働くのも難しい」と、子どもの世話などをするという。

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Protesters Blockade Planned Pipeline Site Near Nuclear Plant Outside NYC via EcoWatch

In Peekskill, New York, just about an hour north of New York City, residents have launched a blockade in efforts to stop the construction of a gas pipeline slated to run only hundreds of feet from the aging Indian Point nuclear power plant.

The proposed project has sparked concerns from residents and nuclear experts that a pipeline break could cause a catastrophic nuclear disaster that would threaten the entirety of New York City. The pipeline is being built by Spectra Energy and is officially known as the Algonquin Incremental Market Project or AIM pipeline.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Scientists still track health fallout of nuclear bombing of Japan via PBS

[…]
MILES O’BRIEN: When I met him in 2012, radiation biophysicist Evan Douple was the associate chief of research at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation. The joint Japanese and U.S. study has been following the survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for nearly 70 years.

[…]
MILES O’BRIEN: Ninety-four thousand irradiated bomb survivors volunteered to become subjects. Another 26,000 who lived in other Japanese cities during the bombings, but were not exposed to radiation, were included as a comparison or control group.

Today, about a third of the exposed and comparison subjects are still alive, many making routine pilgrimages up a hill overlooking the once devastated city of Hiroshima to undergo medical exams. Their blood is routinely analyzed, researchers on the lookout for damaged chromosomes and other signs of disease.

Over the years, they have frozen thousands of blood and tissue samples.
[…]
Among the findings over the years: Thyroid cancer and leukemia are the first to strike. Solid cancers come 10 to 30 years later. Young people are more susceptible to developing cancer than adults, and women are more susceptible than men. Perhaps the most important, a single exposure increases cancer risk for life.

The bottom line? Of 94,000 survivors studied over 70 years, about 1,000 additional cases of cancer can be attributed to radiation from the bombs.

[…]
MILES O’BRIEN: Radiation epidemiologist John Boice is hoping to address that limitation. He is spearheading a study of workers from the Manhattan Project, atomic veterans who witnessed atmospheric bomb tests, utility employees at nuclear power plants, and medical professionals, one million in all.

Radiation exposure data captured by the dosimeters routinely worn by these workers over the years is compared with their health history and cause of death.

JOHN BOICE: So, when we complete this study, that we will be able to say what the risks are from these various levels of radiation. Are they the same as Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Are they lower? Are they higher?

MILES O’BRIEN: Some studies suggest our bodies can fight back and repair damage caused by low-level, yet chronic, exposure to radiation. But no one is sure.
[…]DAVID BRENNER: What we want to do is to be able to expose a cell to radiation, but not expose all the neighbor cells to radiation, because that’s actually what — the real-life situation at very, very low doses.

MILES O’BRIEN: This isn’t just an academic pursuit. The atomic bomb survivors study is the basis of risk estimates for everything from doses in medical care, to work rules for radiation workers, to evacuation orders in the wake of a nuclear power plant meltdown.

But these rules, which can affect so many lives in so many devastating ways, are based solely on educated guesswork. In January 2015, the U.S. House passed the low-dose radiation bill which would provide funds to begin a large study. But the bill stalled in the Senate, frustrating scientists who believe the nation that unleashed the nuclear age is obligated to never stop trying to fully comprehend its long-term impact.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

原爆投下正当化論、米の若い世代に変化の兆しも via TBS

[…]
戦後50年の節目に、博物館はエノラ・ゲイとあわせて、被爆資料を展示する原爆展を企画します。しかし、退役軍人を中心に、日本は一方的な被害者ではないと批判が巻き起こり、結局、事実上の中止に追い込まれました。

「アメリカの人たちにとって、キノコ雲の下で何があったのかということが消えてしまう」(被爆者 沼田鈴子さん〔故人〕)
[…]
「日本では原爆の話が、炸裂した午前8時15分に始まる。原爆開発施設を保存することで、日本の人たちは、なぜアメリカが化け物のようなものをつくらざるを得なかったか、理解できるでしょう」(アトミックヘリテージ財団 シンディー・ケリーさん)

ただ財団は広島・長崎の被害に関する資料は、ほとんど収集できていないと言います。
「さまざまな見方があることを考えなければなりません。71年後の現在の見方に偏ることなく、私たちがどこに向かおうとしているか考えなければいけません」(アトミックヘリテージ財団 シンディー・ケリーさん)

アメリカで重視されてこなかった原爆による被害。しかし、ニューヨークで原爆投下について聞くと、意外な答えが返ってきました。
「米メディアは第二次世界大戦をロマンチックに語る傾向があります。メディアが伝えることを検証し、疑問をもつことが常に必要です。私は罪や責任が全くないとは思いません」(大学生)

去年、イギリスの調査機関が発表した世論調査では、原爆投下を正当だったとするアメリカ人は、誤りだったという人を大幅に上回っています。しかし、世代別に見ると、40代半ばより若い世代は、その割合が逆転しています。若い世代になるほど、誤りだったという認識が広がっていることがわかったのです。

シカゴにあるデュポール大学です。ここで学ぶ学生は、若い世代の原爆観の変化をどのように考えているのでしょうか。

「第二次世界大戦中、私の祖母は私と同じくらいの年齢で、そのころ、日本はアメリカの敵国でした。そしてメディアも、そういった報道をしていました。今の私たちはもう少し中立的な立場です。なぜなら、戦後世代の人たちとも話し合う機会があるからです」(学生)
「今ははるかにグローバルなコミュニティーがあります。インターネットでも調べられるし、さまざまな情報がYouTubeにもあります。上の世代は、『これが正しい』『こうしなければいけない』と言われてきました。私たちはもっとリベラルに育ち、広い視野をもって育てられています」(学生)

広島市出身の被ばく2世で、デュポール大学の宮本ゆき准教授は、就職など現在や将来に不安を抱えるアメリカの若い世代が、従来の固定概念に疑問を持ち始めていると指摘しています。
「原爆に対して懐疑的に見る。上から来る大きな物語に対して、懐疑的に見られるようになった」(宮本ゆき准教授)

もっと読む。

動画はこちら

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Colorado and nation face 70,000-ton nuclear waste burden via The Denver Post

The government has paid utilities $4 billion as court-ordered compensation for storing nuclear waste

The federal government stepped up efforts to deal with the nation’s growing, heavily guarded stockpiles of nuclear waste Tuesday, convening westerners in Denver to search for a path to a locally accepted site somewhere for deep burial.

That radioactive waste — 70,000 tons, increasing by 2,000 tons a year — comes from nuclear power plants that provide one-fifth of the electricity Americans use, twice the share the wind power industry expects to provide by 2020.  More nuclear waste comes from nuclear weapons. Decades of failure to find a central disposal site has backed up spent fuel at 99 commercial plants and 14 shut-down plants, including Fort St. Vrain north of Denver, and forced the government to pay utilities $4 billion as court-ordered compensation.

“It makes sense to deal with this now instead of kicking the can down the road,” acting Assistant Energy Secretary for Nuclear Energy John Kotek said in an interview before Tuesday’s session.

[…]

Tuesday’s forum in Denver, drawing about 50 participants ranging from former Wyoming Gov. Mike Sullivan to anti-nuclear group members, followed sessions in Chicago, Atlanta and Sacramento. After a final session July 21 in Minneapolis, energy officials said they will launch a process for winning community support.

Local resistance to nuclear waste remains fierce. The recent plans to drill an exploratory bore hole three miles deep under North Dakota were scuttled this year as residents objected. Federal energy officials say they’re now looking at bore hole sites in South Dakota to test geological conditions.

“There’s no waste involved. … It is just to determine if it would be feasible,” DOE spokeswoman Alisa Trunzo said.

[…]

Guarding the spent fuel at 113 locations is expensive. Energy officials said waste is stored in different ways at each site and eventually would have to be re-packaged for safety. Federal regulators have said the waste in Colorado can stay until at least 2030, or until a permanent disposal facility is built.

Read more at Colorado and nation face 70,000-ton nuclear waste burden

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Low-level nuclear waste to be buried 70 meters underground: NRA via Mainichi

A portion of low-level nuclear waste generated by nuclear reactors is to be buried at a depth of 70 meters underground until it is nearly no longer radioactive some 100,000 years from now, the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) said on May 25.

NRA officials announced the strategy as forming the organization’s key policy with respect to its regulatory standards.

The low-level nuclear waste materials to be buried are those with a high degree of contamination, including parts inside the reactor that are located close to the fuel rods.

According to the policy, reactor operators will be expected to oversee the waste for a total of 300 to 400 years after it is buried — at which time they will be expected to conduct regular inspections on potential leaks of radioactive materials into the groundwater.

In order to ensure that human beings do not come anywhere near the radioactive waste materials, the government also plans to implement policies restricting nearby excavations, as well as advising that the nuclear waste not be buried near spots that have the potential for large-scale damage — including volcanoes and active faults — for at least the next 100,000 years.

Continue reading at Low-level nuclear waste to be buried 70 meters underground: NRA

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments