著名科学者が警告する核燃料サイクルの不合理via東洋経済

岡田広行

自民党総裁選でにわかに注目を集めている核燃料サイクル政策の是非。核物質問題の世界的権威に聞いた。

[…]

核燃料再処理やプルトニウムなど核物質の問題に詳しいプリンストン大学のフランク・フォンヒッペル名誉教授に、日本の核燃料サイクル政策の是非についてインタビューした(書面インタビュー。インタビューに際しては、インターネット情報サイト「核情報」主宰者の田窪雅文氏の協力を得た)。

河野氏の「再検討発言」は大歓迎

――自民党総裁選で河野氏が核燃料サイクル政策の見直しを訴えています。六ヶ所再処理工場(青森県六ヶ所村)の稼働を前に、与党の有力者からこうした発言が出てきたことについてどう受け止めていますか。

私は、この問題について河野氏と話をしたことがある。河野氏が日本の核燃料サイクル政策について再検討すべきだと述べていることは大歓迎だ。

――河野氏は新著『日本を前に進める』の中で、「高速増殖炉の開発が頓挫し、核燃料サイクルは行き詰まっている」「使用済み核燃料を再処理して余分なプルトニウムを取り出す必要はない」「再処理で取り出したプルトニウムは、核拡散の危険性を高める」などと述べています。これらの主張の当否についてどのようにお考えですか。

これらすべての点において河野氏に同意する。

――世界における再処理の現状は。

今日、使用済み核燃料の再処理を実施している国は、6カ国まで減っている。中国、フランス、インド、日本、ロシア、そしてイギリスだ。

イギリスは2022年に再処理の完全中止を予定している。再処理ビジネスの顧客である国内外の電力会社が契約更新を拒否したためだ。中国、インド、ロシアは、高速増殖炉計画に必要なプルトニウムを生産するために再処理をしていると説明している。

しかし、ロシアの原子力複合企業ロスアトムは、同社の3基目の高速増殖原型炉の運転開始を早くても2030年代まで延期するとしている。中国とインドは、核兵器用にプルトニウムを生産すると同時に、発電もする原子炉として原型炉を建設しているとみられる。

フランスと日本は、再処理で取り出したプルトニウムをウラン・プルトニウム混合酸化物(MOX)燃料に加工し、通常の原発(軽水炉)で利用している。日本でもフランスでも再処理コストを含めると、MOX燃料の製造コストは通常の原発で使う低濃縮ウラン燃料の10倍レベルとなると推定されている。

(IPFM)」の共同議長などを歴任。カーター政権以来、アメリカの政権や議会に対して核セキュリティー問題に関して助言。1993年~1994年、ホワイトハウス科学・技術政策局国家安全保障担当次官として核脅威削減のための米ロ共同イニシアティブ策定に寄与。2021年10月に共著『プルトニウムー原子力の夢の燃料が悪夢に』(邦訳版)を出版予定(写真は2016年撮影、撮影:尾形文繁)

インドの核実験と再処理政策の見直し

――アメリカは最初は再処理推進の先頭に立っていましたね。

再処理のもともとの目的は、通常の原発の使用済み核燃料からプルトニウムを取り出して「増殖炉」の燃料にすることにあった。プルトニウムを燃料として使いながら、使った以上のプルトニウムを生産するというものだ。

天然ウランの中に豊富に含まれている連鎖反応をしないウラン238に中性子を当てて核変換させ、プルトニウムにするための原子炉だ。背景にあったのは、連鎖反応を起こすウラン235は天然ウランの中に0.7%しか含まれておらず、これを利用するだけでは原子力発電は維持できないという資源制約上の心配だ。

――フォンヒッペルさんはアメリカが1970年代に再処理政策を取りやめる際の政策決定に関わりました。

私は、1977年にカーター政権がアメリカの核燃料政策について再検討した際、アドバイザーの1人だった。当時のアメリカの政策は現在の日本と同じだった。カーター大統領は、再処理には経済的合理性がないし、プルトニウムは核兵器に使えるため、再処理でプルトニウムを取り出すことは他の国々にとって危険な手本となってしまうとの結論に達した。[…]

全文

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 31 Comments

「これで改善できるのか」規制委員長が東電を批判 柏崎刈羽原発のテロ対策不備を巡る報告書巡り  via 東京新聞

原子力規制委員会の更田ふけた豊志委員長は29日の記者会見で、東京電力が柏崎刈羽原発(新潟県)のテロ対策不備の原因分析と改善策をまとめた報告書について「具体性が読み取れず、これで本当に改善できるのか分からない」と述べ、東電の姿勢を批判した。 柏崎刈羽原発では2015年ごろから、侵入検知装置が多数故障し、監視カメラなどによる代わりの対応も不十分な状況が常態化。東電は22日公表の報告書で、テロの脅威について現場担当者の理解が足りず、発電所長や本社側も実態を把握していなかったなどの問題点を挙げた。 更田委員長は「世界最大級の原発でテロ対策が重視されてしかるべきなのに、どうして軽視されたのか。他の発電所に比べ、経営層の関与や意識が低すぎた」と話した。

[…]

全文

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 「これで改善できるのか」規制委員長が東電を批判 柏崎刈羽原発のテロ対策不備を巡る報告書巡り  via 東京新聞

「黒い雨」救済拡大、具体策を 岸田氏の地元・広島で被爆者が訴え via 毎日新聞

自民党新総裁に選出された岸田文雄氏の地元・広島では、原爆の「黒い雨」を浴びた人たちが被爆者認定を求めた訴訟で原告側全面勝訴とした広島高裁判決が7月に確定し、原告以外への救済拡大が課題となっている。判決を受け菅義偉首相が救済拡大方針を示したものの具体化には至っておらず、被爆地から誕生した新総裁がどう実現するかに注目が集まる。  「放っておかれた年月が長すぎるの。せめて早く助けてください」。切実な願いを明かしたのは、広島市佐伯区の小川泰子さん(80)。訴訟には加われなかったが、被爆者健康手帳の申請に向けて準備を進めている。肝硬変や胃潰瘍で体調は悪く、新型コロナウイルスによる自粛生活で精神的にも落ち込む毎日だ。「『死んだ方がいい』とさえ思っていた時に、救済の方針が示された。(岸田氏は)広島の人じゃけえ、ええ方に転ぶかな。いつまで生きとれるかわからんのです」と、一刻も早い救済を願った。  「岸田さんはこれまで、黒い雨のためには、全然動いてくれんかった。今後が心配」。原告の本毛稔さん(81)=同区=も不安を口にした。原告の母体となった「広島県『黒い雨』原爆被害者の会連絡協議会」に加わり運動を続けてきたが、会によると、岸田氏への直接の陳情が実現したことはないという。[…]

小山美砂

全文

Posted in *English | Tagged | Comments Off on 「黒い雨」救済拡大、具体策を 岸田氏の地元・広島で被爆者が訴え via 毎日新聞

U.S. lawmakers move urgently to recognize survivors of the first atomic bomb test via National Geographic

By Lesley M.M. Blume

[…]

The flakes were fallout from the Manhattan Project’s Trinity test, the world’s first atomic bomb detonation. It took place at 5:29 a.m. local time atop a hundred-foot steel tower 40 miles away at the Alamogordo Bombing and Gunnery Range, in Jornada del Muerto valley.

The site had been selected in part for its supposed isolation. In reality, thousands of people were within a 40-mile radius, some as close as 12 miles away. Yet all those living near the bomb site weren’t warned that the test would take place. Nor were they evacuated beforehand or afterward, even as radioactive fallout continued to drop for days.

In 1990, the U.S. Congress passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), which has since dispensed over two billion dollars to more than 45,000 nuclear workers and “downwinders”—a term describing people who have lived near nuclear test sites conducted since World War II and may have been exposed to deadly radioactive fallout.

But those exposed during the Trinity test and its aftermath have never been eligible.

For years, Senator Ben Ray Lujan, a Democrat from New Mexico, and other members of Congress have attempted to amend RECA, due to expire on July 11, 2022. In light of this looming deadline, on September 22, Lujan, along with Senator Mike Crapo, Republican of Idaho, and eight co-sponsors introduced Senate bill S. 2798 to extend RECA and expand it to make those in the estimated Trinity fallout zone eligible, as well as other downwinder communities in Colorado, Idaho, and Montana. The proposed legislation also would expand eligibility for people who have worked in uranium mines and mills or transported uranium ore. Also on September 22, Representative Teresa Leger Fernandez and 15 co-sponsors introduced a similar bill, H.R. 5338, in the House.  

[…]

Right after detonation, the cloud divided into three parts. One part drifted east, another to the west and northwest, and the rest to the northeast, across a region a hundred miles long and 30 miles wide, “dropping its trail of fission products” the entire way, according to a 2010 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The fallout eventually spread over thousands of square miles and was detected as far away as Rochester, New York

[…]

Nineteen counties in New Mexico were in the downwind area, including 78 towns and cities, and dozens of ranches and pueblos. Radiation levels near homes in some “hot spots” reached levels “almost 10,000 times what is currently allowed in public areas,” according to the CDC.

“There is still a tremendous quantity of radioactive dust floating in the air,” wrote Stafford Warren to U.S. Army General Leslie R. Groves, head of the Manhattan Project, five days after the blast. Warren, the project’s chief medical officer, added that “a very serious [radiation] hazard” existed within a 2,700-square-mile area downwind of the test.

He also advised that future atomic tests be done only where there were no people within a radius of 150 miles. (Nearly half a million people in New Mexico, Texas, and Mexico lived within a 150-mile radius of the Trinity test.)

[…]

“When I was a child, the government fed us propaganda about how much pride we should take in the part we played in ending World War Two,” Cordova says. “We still did not know what that meant from a health consequence perspective. Our mom actually took us to the [Trinity] site for a picnic. We brought home as much Trinitite as we could and played with it.” (The Trinity Site is now a National Historic Landmark, open to visitors twice a year, and anyone can go online and buy radioactive fragments of Trinitite—a green glass created from sand and other materials that melted in the immediate blast zone.)

[…]

At that time, she recalls, they weren’t aware that the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act had been in place for 15 years and already had provided onetime, $50,000 compensation to other downwinders who “may have developed cancer or other specified diseases after being exposed to radiation from atomic weapons testing or uranium mining, milling, or transporting.” Downwinder eligibility initially was limited to those within specified areas around the Nevada Test Site, 65 miles north of Las Vegas, where a hundred aboveground tests were conducted before a moratorium on atomic testing took effect in 1992.

In 2000, an amendment to RECA expanded eligibility to include some uranium miners and millers in New Mexico. Military and government workers who were “on-site participants” in the Trinity test were also eligible for compensation, but civilian downwinders remained ineligible.

Cordova, like Senator Lujan, says she has “never been able to get a straight answer” about why civilian downwinders were excluded from the legislation: “Even from people who were serving in Congress at the time, I’ve been told, ‘Well, no one was connecting the dots that anybody was harmed.’ ”

[…]

Fernandez and Lujan say they’re also going to push for new epidemiological and environmental studies of the Trinity test’s aftermath and possible long-term effects.

Assessing Trinity’s exact “fingerprint” based on current fallout levels is “complicated and subject to large uncertainties,” says health physicist Joseph Shonka, co-author of the 2010 CDC report. He notes that residents of New Mexico have higher positive plutonium levels in their tissues than residents of any other state but says that tracing those levels back specifically to Trinity fallout might be difficult.

New Mexicans also may have internalized plutonium from various additional sources, he says, including general global fallout, releases from New Mexico’s Los Alamos plutonium operations, and fallout that drifted down from Nevada’s Test Site. The CDC recommended prioritizing Trinity’s aftermath for future studies.

Last year, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) released its findings from a nearly seven-year study of the Trinity nuclear test. The study’s lead investigator, Steven Simon, calls it the “most comprehensive study conducted on the Trinity test and its possible ramifications for cancer risks in the estimated fallout area.” 

The researchers concluded that up to a thousand people may have developed cancer from the Trinity test fallout and that “only small geographic areas immediately downwind to the northeast received exposures of any significance.” They also said that the “plutonium deposited as a result of the Trinity test was unlikely to have resulted in significant health risks to the downwind population.”

The researchers also acknowledged their study’s limitations. Calculating exposure for those alive at the time of the detonation is “complex and is subject to uncertainties,” Simon explains, “because all of the needed data is not available.”

Shonka says the new NCI study “failed to address early fallout adequately.” He says he questions some of the methodology and is preparing a counter-article addressing what he says are inconsistencies with previous findings. Other critics of the NCI study say it doesn’t address ongoing family cancer clusters and the reported 1945 spike in infant deaths in the region, documented in a 2019 paper in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, co-authored by Robert Alvarez.

The NCI responds that its researchers focused on exposures received among “New Mexico residents alive at the time of the test,” and that they didn’t investigate the infant mortality because it was “not a cancer effect.”

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on U.S. lawmakers move urgently to recognize survivors of the first atomic bomb test via National Geographic

The history of nuclear power’s imagined future: Plutonium’s journey from asset to waste via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

By William Walker

Two histories of nuclear power can be recounted. The first is the history of the active present.  It tells, amongst other things, of the technology’s evolution and role in electricity production, its military connections, installed types, capacities and performance of reactors, their fuelling and spent fuel discharges, their accidents, the supplying, operating and regulating institutions, and the involvement of states. The second is the history of the imagined future. It tells of how, at particular moments, nuclear power and much connected with it have been imagined playing out in years, decades, and even centuries ahead.

Plutonium’s history, of each kind, and its legacies are the subject of a recent book by Frank von Hippel, Masafumi Takubo and Jungmin Kang.[1] It is an impressive study of technological struggle and ultimate failure, and of plutonium’s journey from regard as a vital energy asset to an eternally troublesome waste.

[…]

The argument over nuclear futures became an international storm when the United States—champion of civil nuclear expansionism and main provider of nuclear technologies and materials—reversed course and mounted a campaign to halt reprocessing and the development of fast breeder reactors. 

[…]

The US government’s aggressive discouragement of reprocessing and fast breeder reactor programs was fiercely criticized abroad.  The Ford and then Carter administrations, backed by Congress, were accused of striving to kill the nuclear future by imposing constraints, often by extraterritorial means, on civil production, trade, and development in the nuclear sphere, and by encouraging anti-nuclear movements across the world.

In defiance, France and the UK launched ambitious programs to build large-scale reprocessing plants to supply plutonium for fast breeder reactors at home and in other Western industrial countries—notably Germany and Japan—that needed time to establish their own capabilities.[4] By the early 1980s, binding contracts and intergovernmental agreements had been signed. A circulatory system was envisaged in which spent fuels would be reprocessed in France and the UK and their products returned to the countries of origin, enabling the steady distribution of plutonium for the launch of fast reactors.

Unable to prevent this from happening, the United States shifted to a policy of, in effect, containment by gaining agreement on the reprocessing system’s scope and regulation. Being nuclear weapon states, France and the UK were granted de facto recognition as nuclear-reprocessing-states, to coin a term, with Germany and Japan, uniquely among non-nuclear weapon states, granted rights as nuclear-reprocessing-states-in-waiting. Rigorous safeguards and physical protection measures would be applied, no transfers of reprocessing technology would occur to states outside the Western alliance (and some within it, including South Korea), and the US would retain consent rights over the reprocessing of certain spent fuels delivered to France and the UK. France’s agreement to apply strict export controls, including cancellation of plans to transfer reprocessing technology to Pakistan and other “countries of concern,” and to act “as if” it were a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (France did not join until 1992) helped to calm US nerves.[5]

A binary nuclear system was thus instituted in the late 1970s and early 1980s. One entailed the “total reprocessing” of spent nuclear fuels from installed thermal reactors. It was dedicated to realization of a plutonium-fueled future, albeit restricted to a limited set of industrial countries with two nuclear-weapons-states/nuclear-reprocessing-states at its hub.  The Soviet Union provided another hub in the Eastern Bloc, reprocessing spent fuels from satellite countries while keeping separated plutonium and fast breeder reactor development within the Russian heartland. The other system entailed the end of reprocessing and plutonium usage for civil purposes and the adoption of spent fuel storage and disposal as the standard, in effect creating a voluntary and involuntary community of “nuclear-non-reprocessing-states,” marshalled by the United States.

[…]

From creation of a future to preservation of the present

Construction of the British and French reprocessing plants at Sellafield and Cap de la Hague proceeded throughout the 1980s.[6] Their primary justification—preparing for the introduction of fast breeder reactors—had lost all credibility by the time of their completion. The German, British and French breeder programs had been cut back, soon to be abandoned, and in 1988 Germany cancelled plans to build its own bulk reprocessing plant at Wackersorf. Although Japan’s confidence in its fast breeder reactor program also waned, it was kept alive to avoid disrupting construction of the reprocessing plant at Rokkasho-mura.

Faced by the plutonium economy’s demise, reprocessing was re-purposed by its supporters to provide the industry and its governmental backers with reason not to do the obvious—abandon ship. Creating an essential future was replaced by a rationale designed to preserve and activate the newly established reprocessing infrastructures. 

[…]

Utilities became casualties of this shift in approach. Japanese utilities spoke of the “plutonium pressure” to which they would be subjected as plutonium extracted from their spent fuel was returned for insertion in operating thermal reactors, rather than being held in store for future fast breeder reactors. Reprocessing contracts had been entered into partly to relieve the spent fuel pressures building up at reactor sites and to avert the need to expand storage capacities there. They found themselves compelled by contractual obligation, threat of spent fuel’s return, and state-backed arm-twisting to shoulder the increasingly severe costs of reprocessing and engagement with plutonium recycling.

Thirty years after the Euro-Japanese reprocessing/recycling system’s launch, the experiment can only be judged a failure. 

[…]

Despite Europe’s retreat from reprocessing, von Hippel, Takubo, and Kang express worry that it remains alive, with its centre moving to Asia where investment in nuclear generating capacity is strongest.  Reprocessing continues in India and Russia, if fitfully, where fast reactor programmes are still being funded. Japan’s commitment remains.  Although none of these programs has significant momentum, they drag on. South Korea has also long expressed a desire, against US and other foreign objection, to embark on pyroprocessing of its spent fuel, a novel technique.

There is particular concern about China’s engagement with reprocessing and its dual civil and military purposes.

[…]

Even if all civil reprocessing ceased tomorrow, the experiment would have bequeathed the onerous task of guarding and disposing of over 300 tons of plutonium waste, and considerably more when US and Russia’s military excess is added in. Proposals come and go.  Burn it in specially designed reactors? Blend it with other radioactive wastes? Bury it underground after some form of immobilization? Send it into space? All options are costly and hard to implement. Lacking ready solutions, most plutonium waste will probably remain in store above ground for decades to come, risking neglect. How to render this dangerous waste eternally safe and secure is now the question.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The history of nuclear power’s imagined future: Plutonium’s journey from asset to waste via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

汚染水浄化設備のフィルター損傷は計32基に 東京電力福島第一原発 via 東京新聞

東京電力は27日、福島第一原発(福島県大熊町、双葉町)の汚染水を浄化処理する多核種除去設備(ALPS)で、放射性物質の漏出を防ぐ排気フィルター計76基のうち、32基が損傷していたと発表した。汚染水の浄化処理に影響はないとしている。

(略)

ALPSのフィルターを巡っては、2年前に汚泥タンクの排気フィルター25基全ての損傷が判明した際、交換だけして原因を調べなかった。東電の広報担当者は27日の記者会見で「2年前にしっかり分析し対策していれば、防げた可能性が高い」と話した。(小川慎一)

全文は汚染水浄化設備のフィルター損傷は計32基に 東京電力福島第一原発

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on 汚染水浄化設備のフィルター損傷は計32基に 東京電力福島第一原発 via 東京新聞

福島原発の処理水放出、台湾が専門家を派遣し調査へ 年内で調整 via フォーカス台湾

(台北中央社)東京電力福島第1原子力発電所の処理水の海洋放出について、行政院(内閣)原子能委員会(原子力委員会)の謝暁星(しゃぎょうせい)主任委員(閣僚)は27日、調査のため専門家を日本に派遣する方向で準備を進めていると明らかにした。日本側も専門家の派遣には同意しており、日程の調整が必要だとし、年内の派遣となる見通しを示した。 

国際原子力機関(IAEA)が年内に調査団を日本に派遣する方針だ。謝氏は27日、立法院(国会)で答弁に立ち、台湾はIAEAの調査団に参加していないが、これに類似した形式で調査を行うと説明。派遣する専門家の選出はほぼ完了していると述べた。 

(略)

立法院では、福島を含めた5県産食品の禁輸措置に関する質疑も立法委員(国会議員)から寄せられた。解除に向けて日本と交渉するに当たり、十分な検査体制は整っているかとの質疑に対し、謝氏は過去数年にわたって準備を進めており、器具や実験室の拡充を図ってきたと回答。十分な検査ができるとの見方を示した。 

(林育瑄/編集:楊千慧)

全文は福島原発の処理水放出、台湾が専門家を派遣し調査へ 年内で調整

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 福島原発の処理水放出、台湾が専門家を派遣し調査へ 年内で調整 via フォーカス台湾

In fight over Holtec nuclear storage site, Native Americans appeal to one of their own via lohud

Nuclear waste canisters would come to New Mexico by barge and rail from shuttered nuclear plants like Indian Point in Buchanan and Oyster Creek in New Jersey and others where nuclear waste is housed.

Adrian HeddenThomas C. Zambito

  • Holtec International wants to build a temporary storage site in the New Mexico desert to hold nuclear waste from power plants in New York, New Jersey and across the U.S.
  • Holtec’s plan is running into opposition from Native American groups who don’t want New Mexico to be a ‘dumping ground’ for the nation’s nuclear waste
  • Native American groups have appealed for help to Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, a Native American and former congresswoman in New Mexico.
  • Buchanan Mayor Theresa Knickerbocker, whose village is home to Indian Point, sympathized with the concerns expressed by Native American groups, saying the federal government needs to settle on a permanent home for the nation’s nuclear waste

For Leona Morgan, Holtec International’s plan to deliver the nation’s nuclear waste to a desert region in southeast New Mexico is the latest affront to Native Americans in a centuries-long struggle over land they once called their own.

[…]

To Morgan, the battle over Holtec’s plan shares a history with the bloody campaign to wrest land away from Native American tribes as the country expanded westward. And it continued into the last century when New Mexico welcomed sites for testing and developing nuclear weapons, in what’s been dubbed “nuclear colonialism.”

The nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan during World War II were secretly tested at the Los Alamos laboratories in northern New Mexico during the Manhattan Project. The state is home to a uranium enrichment plant, two nuclear research laboratories and a storage facility for low-level nuclear waste.

[…]

Holtec, which is based in Camden, NJ, wants to store some 8,680 metric tons of uranium in 500 cement and steel canisters in underground silos at a 1,000-acre site located between Carlsbad and Hobbs. The site would be temporary until the federal government designates a permanent repository for the 83,000 metric tons of uranium, enough to fill a football field 30 feet high, stranded at 75 operating or shuttered power plants in 33 states.

[…]

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has given preliminary approval for the project, with a final decision on Holtec’s license bid due in January. And the New Mexico counties of Eddy and Lea have been touting the economic benefits of a project that will create jobs and diversify a local economy whose fortunes are tied to the boom and bust of the oil and gas industry.

And so, with few other places to go, New Mexico’s Native American activists have turned their attention to Washington where they see an ally in Deb Haaland, who heads the U.S. Department of the Interior.

Haaland is the first Native American appointed to the cabinet, a member of the Navajo Nation and the Laguna Pueblo in northern New Mexico.

As the head of an agency that oversees the nation’s natural resources and public land, Haaland could play a pivotal role in the project’s future.

[…]

Native American groups say the fate of the Holtec project could come down to a test of Haaland’s loyalty to the people of her pueblo.

These groups have appealed to the history they share and to Haaland’s connection to the 35 generations of Navajo people who came before her.

[…]

Buchanan mayor shares concern

Buchanan Mayor Theresa Knickerbocker empathizes with the concerns expressed by Morgan and others. Her village on the shores of the Hudson River is home to Indian Point, which shut down in April after generating electricity for Westchester County and New York City for nearly 60 years.

Holtec took over the site in May with a promise to dismantle and demolish the site’s three reactors over the next 15 years.

But dozens of canisters of spent fuel will remain at the 240-acre site, hindering redevelopment efforts, which Buchanan could use to recoup the roughly $3.5 million in annual tax dollars it will  be losing. And the canisters will remain there until there’s someplace to send them.

[…]

But in 2019, Haaland called the Holtec project “a risk to the health and safety of New Mexicans, our economy and our environment.” At the time she was representing New Mexico’s First Congressional District, which encompasses most of the state’s major urban centers surrounding Albuquerque.

She was joined by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a fellow Democrat who said giving Holtec the 40-year license it’s seeking to operate the plant would be “economic malpractice.”

In March, the state’s attorney general sued to block Holtec’s plan, citing the impact it would have on the state’s agricultural economy as well as the oil and gas industry.

[…]

Over 20 years, Holtec said it will invest $3 billion in the local economy, and create hundreds of jobs.

“Each community has a different concern,” said Holtec spokesman Gerges Scott, who’s spent the last two years traveling to communities throughout the state.

“We just want to address each one of those,” he said. “A lot of the communities that we met with were concerned with emergency management. There was a lot of open communication and we didn’t get any push back. We were telling them what the project is, and they were telling us what they’re capable of.”

[…]

Spent fuel near Carlsbad Caverns

The location of the storage facility could also stymie future development of industries like outdoor recreation, Kenney said, which the state hopes could diversity its economy.

“When people understand that this is the spent nuclear capital of the U.S., next to the (Carlsbad) Caverns, what’s that going to do for outdoor and tourism and for the state as a whole?” Kenney said.

[…]

Knickerbocker said the federal government should abide by its promise to build a permanent repository.

“The focus has to be on a permanent repository,” Knickerbocker said. “You can’t just have it all over the country. The federal government needs to step up to the plate and make it happen.”

Read more at In fight over Holtec nuclear storage site, Native Americans appeal to one of their own

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on In fight over Holtec nuclear storage site, Native Americans appeal to one of their own via lohud

New push on to expand nuclear radiation compensation via The Santa Fe New Mexican

By Susan Montoya Bryan

ALBUQUERQUE — A bipartisan group of lawmakers is renewing a push to expand a U.S. compensation program for people who were exposed to radiation following uranium mining and nuclear testing carried out during the Cold War.

Advocates have been trying for years to bring awareness to the lingering effects of nuclear fallout surrounding the Trinity Site in Southern New Mexico, where the U.S. military detonated the first atomic bomb, and on the Navajo Nation, where more than 30 million tons of uranium ore were extracted over decades to support U.S. nuclear activities.

Under legislation introduced Wednesday by U.S. Sens. Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico, and Mike Crapo, a Republican from Idaho, other sites across the American West would be added to the list of places affected by fallout and radiation exposure. Eligibility also would be expanded to include certain workers in the industry after 1971, such as miners.

The legislation also would increase the amount of compensation someone can receive to $150,000 and provide coverage for additional forms of cancer.

A multibillion-dollar defense spending package approved last year included an apology to New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and other states affected by radiation from nuclear testing, but no action was taken on legislation that sought to change and broaden the compensation program.

Advocates, including those who testified before Congress earlier this year, say it’s time to do so, especially because the existing provisions are set to expire in July. The legislation would extend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act another 19 years.

Tina Cordova, a cancer survivor and co-founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, said she has been working on the legislation for months with other residents of places affected by radiation, from Indigenous communities in New Mexico to Gaum.

“We put forth language to make certain the bill went far enough to help as many people as possible,” she said. “This is a make-or-break time for all the downwinders and post-71 uranium workers that have been left out of the original RECA bill.”

While efforts to expand the program have been years in the making, advocates say there is broader interest now because more people would stand to lose access to compensation funds if the law expires. They also acknowledge that some members of Congress might argue that there’s not enough money to bankroll the proposal.

“We won’t settle for that answer any longer. Imagine the insult added to our injury of such a statement,” Cordova said. “There is always money when there’s political will. This is a social, environmental and restorative justice issue that we, as a nation, can no longer look away from.”

On the Navajo Nation, uranium mining has left a legacy of death, disease and environmental contamination. That includes the largest spill of radioactive material in the United States, when 94 million gallons of radioactive tailings and wastewater spewed onto tribal lands in the Church Rock area in Western New Mexico in 1979. It happened just three months after the partial meltdown of a nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, which got far more attention at the time.

With hundreds of abandoned uranium mines and radioactive waste still to be cleaned up, Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez said residents of the nation’s largest Indigenous reservation have been exposed to dangerous levels of radiation for years and have endured a wide range of illnesses as a result, with some dying prematurely.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on New push on to expand nuclear radiation compensation via The Santa Fe New Mexican

Support for Nuclear Ban Treaty Is Rising. Nuclear Nations Are on the Defensive. via Truthout

By Jon Letman

Nuclear tensions and nuclear spending are on the rise, but the elevated danger of nuclear weapons is overshadowed as other urgent global threats from the COVID pandemic, climate and environmental emergencies, and other urgent crises dominate news headlines. The United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which entered into force in January, receives scant media attention, even as the United Nations prepares to mark September 26 as the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.

Unlike other nuclear treaties and agreements, the TPNW, or nuclear ban treaty as it is also known, prohibits all activity including development, testing, production, acquisition, possession, stockpiling, and the use or threat to use nuclear weapons. The treaty also has provisions to assist victims of nuclear weapons use or testing, and for environmental remediation.

[…]

Yuriy Kryvonos, director of UNRCPD, said nuclear-armed states often claim their arsenals serve as a deterrence tool. “Against whom [does] this deterrence tool exist? Against other nuclear-armed states.” The argument, he said, is “nonsense” because a nuclear war cannot be won; claiming protection from nuclear weapons is an illusion. Arguments that the TPNW undermines the NPT, Kryvonos insisted, do not hold water.

[…]

Support for the TPNW stems in part from the lack of progress after 50 years since the adoption of the NPT, as “nuclear weapon states have not participated in, or supported” negotiations on effective measures for nuclear disarmament, according to New Zealand’s Minister of Disarmament and Arms Control Phil Twyford.

“The nuclear weapons states have not kept their part of the deal,” Twyford told Truthout in a written exchange, adding, “frustration at this situation, and our desire to implement our own [NPT] obligations, was a key driver behind New Zealand’s support for the TPNW.”

[…]

The Republic of Ireland is one of five European state parties that have ratified the ban treaty. In an address on the 75th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima, Ireland’s minister for foreign affairs and defense, Simon Coveney, said, “I am proud that Ireland today ratifies the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons,” adding that the treaty “sets a global norm prohibiting all nuclear weapons.”

Nuclear disarmament, Coveney said, has long been a feature of Irish foreign policy, adding, “the only guarantee of protection from nuclear weapons use is their complete elimination.”

[…]

Few countries have suffered the effects of nuclear weapons as the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI). The 67 nuclear tests conducted between 1946-58 by the U.S. at Bikini and Enewetak atolls caused health, environmental, social and economic impacts that persist. Yet despite its leading role in negotiating the TPNW, the Micronesian nation has yet to ratify the treaty.

Speaking from New York, the Marshall Islands ambassador to the United Nations, Amatlain Kabua, asked how her country can ratify the treaty when nuclear nations are unwilling to engage. “How do we in good faith sign up [for] something that we don’t see any commitment from the countries that really are the powerful ones that should come to the table?”

“Those countries with the nuclear weapons, they now [do] not even show up for this kind of debate at the UN. They should be there so we can see what’s the importance of having all these weapons that kill humankind,” Kabua said.

While the RMI strongly supports the treaty’s ultimate goal of eliminating all nuclear weapons, she said, “it requires partnership and commitment, especially from those countries that possess nuclear weapons.”

Chief among RMI concerns is whether treaty ratification will force the Marshall Islands to accept sole responsibility for environmental remediation and assistance for the victims of U.S. nuclear tests. Additional questions remain about how ratification would affect a bilateral compact of free association (COFA) between the RMI and the U.S. The compact allows Marshallese citizens to live and work in the United States and also for the operation of a U.S. missile-testing range at Kwajalein Atoll. Under COFA, which was first negotiated in the 1980s, the U.S. tests nuclear capable intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) under a lease agreement through at least 2066 (with a 20-year option to extend).

The amount the U.S. pays local landowners (not the RMI government) to use the atoll is adjusted annually for inflation, with the U.S. paying over $22.6 million this year, according to the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Majuro. If the RMI were to ratify the ban treaty, continued ICBM testing at Kwajalein could raise questions of compliance, specifically under the Article 1 obligation to never “assist, encourage or induce” prohibited activity.

A 2018 study by the Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic examined compatibility of the TPNW with COFA and suggests the compact does not preclude the Marshall Islands from ratifying the ban treaty.

But asked if she sees treaty ratification posing a specific conflict with COFA, Kabua said, “Of course. Because we would like to extend hosting the base [at] Kwajalein and also our ability to come and live and work [in the U.S.] without a visa.”

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Support for Nuclear Ban Treaty Is Rising. Nuclear Nations Are on the Defensive. via Truthout