Featured Topics / 特集
-

A nuclear power plant in Byron, Illinois. Taken by photographer Joseph Pobereskin (http://pobereskin.com). カレンダー
March 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Latest Posts / 最新記事
- Germany won’t return to nuclear power, chancellor says via DW 2026/03/12
- President Trump’s radical attack on radiation safety via Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2025/10/27
- ‘It’s Sellafield or nothing’: what life is like growing up in the shadow of Europe’s oldest nuclear site via The Guardian 2025/10/07
- Holtec’s announcement that Palisades has transitioned back to “operations status” via Beyond Nuclear 2025/08/27
- Israel attacks Iran: What we know so far via Aljazeera 2025/06/13
Discussion / 最新の議論
- Leonsz on Combating corrosion in the world’s aging nuclear reactors via c&en
- Mark Ultra on Special Report: Help wanted in Fukushima: Low pay, high risks and gangsters via Reuters
- Grom Montenegro on Duke Energy’s shell game via Beyond Nuclear International
- Jim Rice on Trinity: “The most significant hazard of the entire Manhattan Project” via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
- Barbarra BBonney on COVID-19 spreading among workers on Fukushima plant, related projects via The Mainichi
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- March 2026 (1)
- October 2025 (2)
- August 2025 (1)
- June 2025 (2)
- May 2025 (10)
- February 2025 (1)
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (4)
- June 2024 (3)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (6)
- January 2024 (4)
- November 2023 (8)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (7)
- August 2023 (5)
- July 2023 (10)
- June 2023 (12)
- May 2023 (15)
- April 2023 (17)
- March 2023 (20)
- February 2023 (19)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (11)
- November 2022 (12)
- October 2022 (7)
- September 2022 (6)
- August 2022 (22)
- July 2022 (29)
- June 2022 (15)
- May 2022 (46)
- April 2022 (36)
- March 2022 (47)
- February 2022 (24)
- January 2022 (57)
- December 2021 (27)
- November 2021 (32)
- October 2021 (48)
- September 2021 (56)
- August 2021 (53)
- July 2021 (60)
- June 2021 (55)
- May 2021 (48)
- April 2021 (64)
- March 2021 (93)
- February 2021 (69)
- January 2021 (91)
- December 2020 (104)
- November 2020 (126)
- October 2020 (122)
- September 2020 (66)
- August 2020 (63)
- July 2020 (56)
- June 2020 (70)
- May 2020 (54)
- April 2020 (85)
- March 2020 (88)
- February 2020 (97)
- January 2020 (130)
- December 2019 (75)
- November 2019 (106)
- October 2019 (138)
- September 2019 (102)
- August 2019 (99)
- July 2019 (76)
- June 2019 (52)
- May 2019 (92)
- April 2019 (121)
- March 2019 (174)
- February 2019 (146)
- January 2019 (149)
- December 2018 (38)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (89)
- September 2018 (118)
- August 2018 (194)
- July 2018 (22)
- June 2018 (96)
- May 2018 (240)
- April 2018 (185)
- March 2018 (106)
- February 2018 (165)
- January 2018 (241)
- December 2017 (113)
- November 2017 (198)
- October 2017 (198)
- September 2017 (226)
- August 2017 (219)
- July 2017 (258)
- June 2017 (240)
- May 2017 (195)
- April 2017 (176)
- March 2017 (115)
- February 2017 (195)
- January 2017 (180)
- December 2016 (116)
- November 2016 (115)
- October 2016 (177)
- September 2016 (178)
- August 2016 (158)
- July 2016 (201)
- June 2016 (73)
- May 2016 (195)
- April 2016 (183)
- March 2016 (201)
- February 2016 (154)
- January 2016 (161)
- December 2015 (141)
- November 2015 (153)
- October 2015 (212)
- September 2015 (163)
- August 2015 (189)
- July 2015 (178)
- June 2015 (150)
- May 2015 (175)
- April 2015 (155)
- March 2015 (153)
- February 2015 (132)
- January 2015 (158)
- December 2014 (109)
- November 2014 (192)
- October 2014 (206)
- September 2014 (206)
- August 2014 (208)
- July 2014 (178)
- June 2014 (155)
- May 2014 (209)
- April 2014 (242)
- March 2014 (190)
- February 2014 (170)
- January 2014 (227)
- December 2013 (137)
- November 2013 (164)
- October 2013 (200)
- September 2013 (255)
- August 2013 (198)
- July 2013 (208)
- June 2013 (231)
- May 2013 (174)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (230)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
Top Topics / TOPトピック
- anti-nuclear
- Atomic Age
- Capitalism
- East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
- energy policy
- EU
- France
- Hanford
- health
- Hiroshima/Nagasaki
- Inequality
- labor
- Nuclear power
- nuclear waste
- Nuclear Weapons
- Radiation exposure
- Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
- Safety
- TEPCO
- U.S.
- UK
- エネルギー政策
- メディア
- ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
- 健康
- 公正・共生
- 兵器
- 再稼働
- 労働における公正・平等
- 原子力規制委員会
- 原発推進
- 反原発運動
- 大飯原発
- 安全
- 広島・長崎
- 廃炉
- 東京電力
- 東日本大震災・福島原発
- 汚染水
- 米国
- 脱原発
- 被ばく
- 資本主義
- 除染
- 食の安全
Choose Language / 言語
Fukushima Mieruka Project: Hasegawa Kenichi, former dairy farmer/Ex-productor de lacteos/Ancien producteur laitier/Ein ehemaliger Molkereifachmann via Friends of Earth Japan
Posted in *English, *日本語, Deutsch, Español, Français, 中文, 仅汉语, 한국어
Tagged FoE Japan, Fukushima, Hasegawa Kenichi
Comments Off on Fukushima Mieruka Project: Hasegawa Kenichi, former dairy farmer/Ex-productor de lacteos/Ancien producteur laitier/Ein ehemaliger Molkereifachmann via Friends of Earth Japan
東京五輪の1年後開催は無理、中止を直ちに決めるべき理由 via Diamond Online
「いまでも東京オリンピックを歓迎しますか?」
東京都民、日本の国民にそれを問いかけたら、一体、どれほどの人が「歓迎する」「ぜひ開催するべきだ」と、手放しで賛成するだろうか?
IOC(国際オリンピック委員会)のトーマス・バッハ会長が公式ホームページで、「日本の安倍首相が、1年延期で必要な追加費用(約3000億円)の負担を了解している」旨の発信をし、日本で問題視された。日本の東京2020組織委員会の要請でこれは削除されたと報じられているが、バッハ会長がありもしない事実を公式ホームページででっちあげるだろうか? 急転直下、1年延期が決まり、日程まですぐに決まった経緯からしても、日本側から何らかの提示があったことは想像に難くない。
いずれにせよ、「3000億円の追加費用」を出すだけの予算があったら、「やってほしいことはほかにある」というのが、新型コロナウイルスの感染拡大がいまだに止まらず、緊急事態宣言の下、感染と生命の危険に怯え、生活を大幅に規制されている多くの人たちの実感ではないだろうか。
新型コロナウイルスの蔓延で、世界は一定程度の平和・平穏状態から、有事へと状況が変わった。人類の生命の危機、これまでの社会生活や国際交流が脅かされる危機に直面している。しかも、国や民族間の争いではなく、人とウイルスとの闘いである。
新型コロナウイルスの感染が始まる前と現在では、人々の判断基準が大幅に変わっていて当然だ。ここまで感染が長引き、収束の目途が立たない状況が続いている中、当初の安易な楽観論がもう通用しないことは多くの人々が感じているだろう。
[…]
4月22日、東京2020組織委員会の森喜朗会長は、記者会見で「新型コロナウイルスの感染拡大で1年延期となった東京大会の再延期は『絶対ない』との見方を示した」と報じられた。スポニチには、続いて次のように書かれている。
『「選手のことや大会運営上の問題を考えても2年延ばすことは技術的に困難」と説明。感染終息に懸念があり、安倍首相には「2年は考えなくていいんですか」と尋ねたが、「首相が1年でいい、と決断した」と明かした。』(スポニチ2020年4月23日付)
この発言に「よかった!」と快哉を叫んだ人がどれほどいただろうか? 現状とあまりにもずれていないか? 私が取材しているオリンピックに出場予定の人たちでさえ、戸惑っている。
[…]
Westminster bid to relaunch toxic plutonium reactors via The Ferret
By Rob Edwards
The UK government is trying to resurrect plutonium-powered reactors despite abandoning a multi-billion bid to make them work in Scotland.
Documents released by the UK Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) under freedom of information law reveal that fast reactors, which can burn and breed plutonium, are among “advanced nuclear technologies” being backed by UK ministers.
Two experimental fast reactors were built and tested at a cost of £4 billion over four decades at Dounreay in Caithness. But the programme was closed in 1994 as uneconomic after a series of accidents and leaks.
Now ONR has been funded by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) in London to boost its capacity to regulate new designs of fast reactors, along with other advanced nuclear technologies.
Campaigners have condemned the moves to rehabilitate plutonium as a nuclear fuel as “astronomically expensive”, “disastrous” and “mind-boggling”. They point out that it can be made into nuclear bombs and is highly toxic – and the UK has 140 tonnes of it.
But the nuclear industry says that plutonium-fuelled fast reactors can produce “safe, low-carbon power”. UK government nuclear scientists support the idea, arguing that plutonium reactors can “minimise waste volumes”.
[…]
Two companies have so far won funding under this heading to help develop fast reactors that can burn plutonium. The US power company, Westinghouse, is proposing lead-cooled fast reactors, while another US company called Advanced Reactor Concepts wants to build sodium-cooled fast reactors.
In November 2019 BEIS also announced an £18 million grant to a consortium led by reactor manufacturer, Rolls Royce, to develop a “small modular reactor designed and manufactured in the UK capable of producing cost effective electricity”.
According to Dr Lowry, fast reactors would require building a plutonium fuel fabrication plant. Such plants are “astronomically expensive” and have proved “technical and financial disasters” in the past, he said.
“Any such fabrication plant would be an inevitable target for terrorists wanting to create spectacular iconic disruption of such a high profile plutonium plant, with devastating human health and environmental hazards.”
Lowry was originally told by ONR that it held no documents on advanced nuclear technologies. As well as redacting the 23 documents that have now been released, the nuclear safety regulator is withholding a further 13 documents as commercially confidential – a claim that Lowry dismissed as “fatuous nonsense”.
The veteran nuclear critic and respected author, Walt Patterson, argued that no fast reactor programme in the world had worked since the 1950s. Even if it did, it would take “centuries” to burn the UK’s 140 tonne plutonium stockpile, and create more radioactive waste with nowhere to go, he said.
“Extraordinary – they never learn, do they? I remain perpetually gobsmacked at the lobbying power of the nuclear obsessives,” he told The Ferret. “The mind continue to boggle.”
The Edinburgh-based nuclear consultant, Pete Roche, suggested that renewable energy was the cheapest and most sustainable solution to climate change. “The UK government seems to be planning some kind of low carbon dystopia with nuclear reactors getting smaller, some of which at least will be fuelled by plutonium,” he said.
[…]
Read more.
Plant Vogtle confirms 130 employees tested positive for COVID-19 via 12 wrdw.com
By Tyria Goines
Friday, April 24, 2020
BURKE COUNTY, Ga. (WRDW/WAGT) — Plant Vogtle officials now say 130 of their employees have tested positive for COVID-19.
However, Georgia Power officials also say 29 workers are still awaiting results and 305 workers have tested negative.
22 workers who tested positive have recovered and received clearance by on-site medical professionals to return to work
On Wednesday Plant Vogtle surpassed 100 positive COVID-19 cases.
“With each person tested, we act quickly, self-isolating the individuals, along with the personnel who have been in close proximity to them, immediately after learning they have been tested for COVID-19.
[…]
Read more.
東電社員1人感染 県内66人に via NHK News Web/新潟News Web
新潟県は、東京電力の柏崎市内の事業所に勤める50代の男性社員が新たに新型コロナウイルスに感染したと発表しました。
これで県内の感染者は66人になりました。
[…]
新潟県内の東京電力社員の感染が家族も含めて5人目となり、柏崎市の桜井雅浩市長は「東電には新型コロナウイルス感染症対策について見直していただきたい。なぜこのような事態になっているのか、徹底的な検証を行い、結果と対策を速やかに公表してもらいたい」とコメントしました。
Chernobyl: How did the world’s worst nuclear accident happen? via Independent
Decades after the catastrophe, now a byword for state secrecy, crucial elements remain a mystery
For most residents of Pripyat, Saturday 26 April 1986 seemed a relatively unremarkable day.
Some would have been aware of an incident at the nearby Vladimir Ilyich Lenin Nuclear Power Plant, around which the town had sprouted up in the decade prior, but, in the words of one off-duty engineer: “There was no panic. The city lived a normal life. People were sunbathing on the beach.”
But the warning signs were there.
[…]
Decades after the world’s worst nuclear accident, crucial elements still remain a mystery.
The likely death toll from the catastrophe is continually being revised to this day, the impacts of the fallout upon populations caught up in the nuclear slipstream — from Andreyev and his family to those living hundreds of miles away — still an active area of academic research.
Furthermore, the profound extent to which the accident, and the Soviet Union’s infamous handling of it, impacted the course of global history will never truly be known.
For the leader of the USSR at the time, Mikhail Gorbachev, the disaster wrought history anew. Rather than the collapse of the Berlin Wall, Chernobyl was “perhaps the real cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union”, he would later lament.[…]
In the simplest sense, it began with a disastrous experiment during routine tests of reactor four. Technicians wished to see whether an emergency water-cooling system would work during a power outage and, shutting down the reactor’s emergency safety system, withdrew most of the control rods from its core while keeping the reactor running.
Moments after their re-insertion, at 1.23am, the resulting reaction caused a partial meltdown in the core, summoning a large fireball that blew the 1,200-tonne concrete and steel lid from the reactor, which would spew roughly 400 times more radioactive material into the atmosphere than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
Two workers were immediately killed in the blast, which bent the plant’s thick concrete walls “like rubber”. Another plant worker, Sasha Yuvchenko, would later recall standing to watch as a pillar of blue ionising radiation ascended into the sky, “flooding up into infinity from the reactor”, reflecting: “I remember thinking how beautiful it was”.
Several hundred staff members and firefighters then tackled an inferno that blazed for 10 days. According to Andreyev, who was working that night, their dosimeters were taken away and they were told told to wash their shoes in manganese solution before entering, suggesting the radiation on the streets of Pripyat was feared to be worse than inside the incinerated plant.
[…]
In those months, hundreds of thousands of emergency workers, troops, cleaners and miners were sent into the area during attempts to control the core meltdown and halt the spread of radioactive material, which would reach the US, China and northern Africa.
Dubbed “liquidators”, some 600,000 workers seeking to contain the spread were given special status that provided compensation in the form of fiscal benefits and additional health care.While these liquidators were offered some compensation for their sacrifice, it appeared that Soviet authorities had known all along that there could be “accidents” at the nuclear plant.
[…]
In January 1979, a KGB report on the plant said: “According to operational data, there were deviations from design and violations of technology procedures during building and assembling works. It may lead to accidents”.
The documents, released by the SBU in 2003, revealed that between 1977 and 1981 there were 29 accidents at the nuclear plant.
In 1982, another incident releasing what the documents described as “significant quantities of radiation” would lead officials to engage in a significant cover-up effort, but this relatively minor event merely foreshadowed the scale of the deception that would come four years later.
[…]
Some workers would defy orders, with Andreyev recalling how he and other colleagues, none of them wearing protective gear, shut off the other nuclear reactors in what he described as a lifesaving measure.
Approximately 36 hours later, as officials began to acknowledge the huge scale of the problem, the order was given for Pripyat to be evacuated for three days. Most residents would never return.[…]
It is believed that up to 200,000 women across western Europe chose to end wanted pregnancies on the mistaken advice of doctors who were mistrusting of the Soviet Union’s official line on radiation levels and who feared a possible rise in birth defects. There was no such increase in babies born with congenital defects, the World Health Organisation would conclude in 2005.
One estimate by Kiev’s National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine suggests that in the former Soviet Union alone, five million people have suffered as a result of Chernobyl.
More than 5,000 people who were children at the time living in the affected areas in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, have since developed thyroid cancers, which the UN attributes to radiation exposure.
While 330,000 people were moved out of the area, which now suffers far higher levels of poverty than other parts of the former Soviet Union, the upheaval proved “deeply traumatic” for many, according to the Chernobyl Forum.[…]
In 2007, a study of nearly 5,000 men involved in the cleanup effort between 1986 and 1991 found they suffered an increased risk of suicide, describing their findings as “concrete evidence that psychological consequences represent the largest public health problem caused by the accident to date”.
Read more at Chernobyl: How did the world’s worst nuclear accident happen?
「処理水」にも新型コロナ影響 国と地元・福島…一層深まる溝 via 福島民友新聞
東京電力福島第1原発で増え続ける、放射性物質トリチウムを含んだ処理水の扱いを巡り、新型コロナウイルス感染拡大の影響で国と地元の溝が一層深まっている。
2年後とされる処理水の貯蔵タンク容量の限界を見据え、国は今夏にも処分方針を決めたい意向で、今後、県外でも関係者の意見を聞く場を設ける考え。一方、地元は緊急事態宣言の対象地域が全国に拡大され、事態の収束も見通せない中、国民の関心は高まらないとして、結論を急ぐように映る国の姿勢を危ぶむ。
◆◇◇密集のリスク
対象地域の拡大に先立つ13日、国は福島市と富岡町で関係者から意見を聞く2回目の会合を開いた。座長の松本洋平経済産業副大臣らは感染拡大防止を理由に会場に現れず、東京都内からテレビ会議を使って2会場に集った浜通りの市町村長ら計12人から意見を聞いた。「延期の選択肢はなかったのか。地元に密集のリスクを負わせてまで開いた会合。スケジュールありきだと勘繰ってしまう」。双葉郡のある自治体関係者は苦言を呈した。東電の保管計画では2022年夏にも貯蔵タンクの容量が満杯になる。仮に海か大気中への処理水の放出が決まった場合、原子力規制委員会の許認可や準備工事に2年程度かかる見込みで、逆算すれば今夏が期限と想定される。報道陣から、感染拡大の中で会合を開いた理由を問われた松本氏は「タンク容量の問題もあり、どこかで一定の結論を得ないといけない状況」と強調した。その発言からは今夏を念頭にした処分方針の決定に向け、意見集約を急ぎたい思惑が透けて見えた。
◇◆◇視聴数伸びず
会合の様子は国民の関心を高める狙いで動画投稿サイト「ユーチューブ」で配信されたが視聴回数は23日までに福島市の会場が約800回台、富岡町の会場が600回台と伸びなかった。国の小委員会で処分方法を検討してきた福島大食農学類の小山良太教授は「関心の低さの表れ」と分析した。(略)
◇◇◆若い世代にも
また、テレビ会議を使った運営方法について「出席者が(事前にまとめた)意見を述べただけだった。国側の表情も反応も分からず、意見の背景を掘り下げるやりとりもない。アンケートを取るのと変わらない」と疑問視した。国民的な議論を深めるために「少なくとも緊急事態宣言の解除後、各組織の代表だけでなく将来を担う若い世代にも意見を聞く場を設けるべきだ。韓国など諸外国の理解を得る努力も重要」と提言した。
GE Avoids Japanese Plaintiffs’ Suit Over Fukushima Damages via Bloomberg Law
Julie Steinberg
- Japan adequate forum although plant operator solely liable
- Plaintiffs still can get full compensation
General Electric Co. won’t have to face Japanese plaintiffs’ suit stemming from the 2011 tsunami and Fukushima nuclear meltdown, the First Circuit said in affirming dismissal Friday.
A district court in Massachusetts properly found the plaintiffs have an adequate alternative forum in Japan, even though GE can’t be sued there because of a Japanese law that makes plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. solely liable, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit said.
Read more at GE Avoids Japanese Plaintiffs’ Suit Over Fukushima Damages (Subscription required)
福島第1原発事故で汚染 養生シート紛失 練馬区、公表遅れ /東京 via 毎日新聞
2011年の東京電力福島第1原発事故で汚染され、練馬区立小学校の校庭から撤去された芝生の養生シートが保管先の区役所倉庫から無くなった。区が23日に発表した。区は18年12月に紛失を把握していたが、公表していなかった。
区によると、紛失したシートは計3枚。区立中村小で使われ、11年12月時点の放射性セシウム濃度は1キロあたり8260~5万3400ベクレルだった。国基準(1キロあたり8000ベクレル)を超える指定廃棄物とされ、12年以降、区役所の地下1階倉庫で保管していた。
(略)
存在が最後に確認されたのは17年3月だったという。
発表の遅れについて、区は報告書をまとめて事前に区議会に報告するためとしている。牧山正和・学校施設課長は「調査結果を重く受け止め、再発防止に努める」と述べた。【川村咲平】
Chernobyl Still Burns via Greenpeace
The wildfires started on April 3rd, due to abnormally hot, dry and windy weather. They are now the biggest fires ever recorded in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. What is one of the largest wildlife areas in Europe will take years to recover.
With the Greenpeace Russia forest team and global mapping hub, I have been following these wildfires since they began. Satellite images show that an estimated 57 000 hectares of the Cherbobyl exclusion zone has burned so far. That is 22% of the total area of the exclusion zone.
As I am writing this, three weeks after the start of the fires, at least three of the largest fires continue burning. One of them is located close to the site of the old nuclear power plant, only 4 kilometers away from the sarcophagus. Hundreds of ill-equipped firefighters and foresters are currently trying to get the fires in Northern Ukraine under control.
The wind has carried some of the smoke over more populated areas. On the 16th of April, plumes of smoke caused smog in Kyiv, 250 kilometers away and although they did not exceed norms, higher levels of radioactivity than usual were detected. The smoke and ash have also crossed borders: the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority registereda small increase of caesium-137 concentrations in the air in Norway.
Increased activity of Caesium-137 and other radionuclides in the air can lead to a rise in levels of cancer. Whoever can smell the fire could also inhale these radioactive substances.
[…]
Fire releases these particles into the air where wind can transport them over long distances, eventually expanding the boundaries of radioactive contamination. There is currently no data on how much nuclear material has been brought into the atmosphere because of these fires, so we don’t know how far they have travelled. It is possible that most of the radionuclides will settle within the exclusion zone and nearest area, as these are heavy particles.
We know from previous (smaller) fires that happened in the area in 2015 that scientists found a release of 10.9 TBq caesium-137, 1.5 TBq of strontium-90, 7.8 GBq of plutonium-238 , 6.3 GBq of plutonium-239, 9.4 GBq of plutonium-239 and 29.7 GBq americium-241. It is clear that the numbers will be higher this year.
Close to the fires, firefighters and local people are exposed to risks from both smoke inhalation and radiation. Cities like Kyiv are exposed to the health impact of inhaling smoke in the short term and in the longer term, risk internal irradiation through contaminated berries, mushrooms and milk bought on the local markets. No-one is immune from radioactive products getting into their homes.
The consequences of Chernobyl are still here. People are still at risk; exposed and fighting on the frontlines. Forest fires in contaminated areas are a big problem for Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia where 5 million people still live in contaminated areas according to official data. These fires happen almost every year.
The Greenpeace Russia firefighting squad has helped several times to extinguish the fires on contaminated territories. This year, our firefighters have not been able to go on site to help due to the coronavirus pandemic.
These forest fires are burdening an emergency ministry already in the midst of a health crisis. This goes to show that other emergencies can be exacerbated by nuclear-related incidents – a situation that we have little or no control over.
Nuclear-related risks themselves are exacerbated by a lack of transparency: at the beginning of the fires, the first official accounts minimized the areas on fire by about 600 times. Secrecy was one of the reasons why the Chernobyl disaster was so severe in 1986: it was later confirmed in court that even the director of the Chernobyl power plant was not made aware of a disaster at the Leningrad nuclear power plant in 1975 that would have given clues to what happened in reactor 4.
Chernobyl will continue to pose a threat for many generations to come.
Rashid Alimov, is a nuclear campaigner at Greenpeace Russia.
Read more.

