Assaulted by massacres, smallpox, uranium mining, and pipelines Native Tribes are standing up for their rights on Covid-19 protection via Beyond Nuclear International

By Linda Pentz Gunter

Native Americans have largely been left out of the conversation about Covid-19 even though they have some of the highest infection rates in the country. They’ve been here before; with massacres, smallpox, pipelines, and the ravages of uranium mining whose radioactive releases compromise immune systems.

“We have an 80% unemployment rate,” said Milo Yellow Hair, who lives on the Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota, one of nine which make up the Lakota Nation.

I made him repeat it. That was eight zero. Not one eight. Eighty. In America. Today.

[…]

Gradually that has begun to change as a handful of reporters and broadcasters — mainly from overseas-based media outlets — are covering the Native American story. One such investigation revealed that coronavirus infection rates were so high on the Navajo Nation, even as early as mid-April, that it could have been ranked third in the country for confirmed cases per 100,000 population.

In response, the Navajo Nation has set up a relief fund to cope with the impact of the pandemic and address immediate medical and community needs.

Guardian story also revealed how Native American Covid-19 cases were being buried under the label of “other” in official counts, while African Americans and Latinx received their own categories.  This effectively under-counted the population, or failed to count them at all as an identifiable group, limiting an appropriate response and access to resources.

But when media attention turned to South Dakota, it focused on a familiar trope: The uppity Indian. As members of the Cheyenne River Sioux and the Oglala Sioux each attempted to enforce Covid-19 health check points at their reservation boundaries, they were met with ultimata challenging their right to protect their own people. It was just another standoff with Indians. 

As Yellow Hair put it, Indian activism is seen as a threat; an attempt to exercise rightful sovereignty; not knowing your place.

Trying to keep them in that place of submission is the South Dakota governor, Republican Kristi Noem, who has threatened to go to court to force the Sioux to drop their coronavirus checkpoints.

On May 20, Governor Noem announced that she had “directed South Dakota Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg to collect evidence about the tribes’ ‘unlawful checkpoints’ and turned that evidence over to the U.S. Department of Justice,” according to the Argus LeaderNoem also appealed directly to the Trump White House for help in stopping the checkpoints.

Unsurprisingly, Noem is also a staunch supporter of the Dakota Access Pipeline, scene of a months-long standoff at Standing Rock, including through bitter winter conditions, as Indigenous peoples and supporters from across the country and the world endeavored to block the pipeline plan. The encampments at Standing Rock were met with armed soldiers, police in riot gear, and the use of water cannons in freezing weather.  The pipeline began operating in May 2017.

Yellow Hair recalled the menacing response of a previous South Dakota governor, Bill Janklow, when he was still the state Attorney General, saying of American Indian Movement leader, Dennis Banks, “The way to deal with Dennis Banks is with a bullet between the eyes.”

No bullets have been fired, yet, but, as Yellow Hair points out, Governor Noem appears not to know that the state of South Dakota rejected Public Law 280, which would have allowed South Dakota criminal jurisdiction over Indian reservations. Public Law 280, which handed federal jurisdiction over to states, did not, when enacted, include tribal consent.

With Public Law 280 unadopted by South Dakota, the Lakota Nation leadership views itself as acting fully within its sovereign rights in establishing, and enforcing, border checkpoints. And essential.

Cheyenne River Sioux chairman, Harold Frazier, issued a statement to Governor Noem on May 8 in which he stated; “We will not apologize for being an island of safety in a sea of uncertainty and death.”

[…]

Yellow Hair and other Native American leaders, recognize that their communities embody almost every vulnerability factor listed by medical authorities identifying those sectors of society likely to be most susceptible to — and least able to survive — Covid-19. 

But unlike other sensitive populations, the one big overlooked factor for Native Americans may well be those decades of exposure to the toxins released by uranium mining. 

These, of course, include uranium itself, and its decay products, all of which have known negative health impacts, ranging from leukemia, kidney disease and lung cancer to low birth weights. These latter can lead, later in life, to higher rates of diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure and obesity. 

All of which afflict Native Americans at disproportionately high rates compared to other sectors of society. Immunodeficiency in particular, a significant outcome of these exposures, may well have contributed to the rapid rise of Covid-19 infections in the Navajo Nation.

But without a hint of shame, as the Phoenix New Times reported, “At the end of March, two uranium companies penned a letter to President Donald Trump asking for a $150 million bailout, citing the economic impacts of COVID-19. One of them was Energy Fuels Resources, which hopes to open a uranium mine south of the Grand Canyon and whose exploratory operations already have led to it trucking radioactive water across the Navajo Nation.”

Uranium mining, and the forcible imposition of pipelines, are manifestations of the historic and ongoing disregard for Native American rights, sovereignty and dignity. Riding roughshod over Native Americans, physically and legislatively, exemplifies what Yellow Hair describes as a “painful relationship from the past until now.” Native Americans are, on the one hand, treated as subhuman, but at the same time there is this sense of White entitlement, “that they can exploit our resources,” he said.

And disregard their safety and well-being. During a recent incident at a health checkpoint, a non-Native truck driver demanded he be allowed through because, as he reportedly yelled, “I’m an American!”

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Assaulted by massacres, smallpox, uranium mining, and pipelines Native Tribes are standing up for their rights on Covid-19 protection via Beyond Nuclear International

除染なし解除 住民から異論 via TUFchannel

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

佐賀県と玄海町、玄海原発2号機の廃炉計画を事前了解…作業着手へ via 読売新聞

九州電力玄海原子力発電所2号機(佐賀県玄海町)の廃炉計画について、佐賀県と玄海町は8日、安全協定に基づき、事前了解することを九電に伝えた。九電は準備が整い次第、廃炉作業に着手する。2054年度までの35年で作業完了を目指す。

 県と町は、既に廃炉作業が始まっている玄海1号機の計画変更も事前了解した。2号機と同時に作業を進めるためで、1号機の完了時期は、当初の43年度から11年延びた。

(略)

2号機については、原子力規制委員会が今年3月、廃炉計画を認可していた。廃炉に必要な費用は1号機が約385億円、2号機が約365億円を見込んでいる。

全文は佐賀県と玄海町、玄海原発2号機の廃炉計画を事前了解…作業着手へ

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Trump apparently wants a nuclear test. It could be bad for your health via Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

By Sara Z. Kutchesfahani

In recent weeks, the Trump administration reportedly discussed the possibility of doing something the United States has not done since 1992: resuming explosive testing of nuclear weapons. Since the creation of the nuclear bomb, at least eight nations have detonated 2,056 nuclear test explosions at test sites around the world. Ten years ago, Japanese artist Isao Hashimoto created an informative but scary time-lapse map depicting all of these explosions. In it, each nation gets a flashing dot on the map whenever it detonates a nuclear weapon, with a running tally kept on the top and bottom bars of the screen. While the story begins in 1945 with the first ever nuclear weapon test (code-named Trinity), the real action comes in 1962, when there were 178 tests globally, more than in any other year. Not only is the rapid rate alarming, but where they happened—mainly on the lands of indigenous people—is also shocking.

[…]

Half of the 2,056 nuclear tests were conducted by one country alone: the United States. Yes, that’s right: the total number of US-conducted tests stands at 1,030, which is more than the number of tests done by the other seven nuclear testing countries combined. Most of the explosions took place at the height of the Cold War in a series of tit-for-tat exchanges between the United States and the Soviet Union.

[…]

Why should the average person care about all this? Well, because there was and is an enormous human cost of nuclear weapons testing. If you go back and watch the Hashimoto video, you’ll notice none of the 1,030 US tests were conducted anywhere near Washington, DC. Likewise, none of the Soviet, French, or British tests were carried out around Moscow, Paris, or London. Instead, the explosions took place mainly on the lands of indigenous people, such as in the Marshall Islands, or in some cases, in the country’s own backyard, such as in New Mexico, Colorado, and Nevada.

[…]

If that was the effect on sheep, imagine the effect on humans. Cancers associated with radiation exposure (including leukemia and thyroid cancer) were all too common. Women suffered from miscarriages. Those who didn’t miscarry gave birth to babies with severe birth defects, some of which were so severe that the infants didn’t look human. In 1990, US Congress created the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to help rectify these injustices. To date, over 36,000 people have claimed benefits from the fund, giving a sense of the scale of the harm. But this is a lower limit. An independent study has estimated that radiation from testing caused more than 340,000 excess American deaths between 1951 and 1973.
The harms are not just a thing of the past: Utah “downwinders” are still suffering and dying as a result of health effects from nuclear tests conducted upwind in Nevada decades ago. One such downwinder is Mary Dickson, who has seen friends and family die of cancer, and has even had her own battles with it. In 2007, she wrote Exposed—an unpublished screenplay based on a true story about her sister, a fellow downwinder, and her deteriorating health due to the effects of the above-ground nuclear tests.

Read more at Trump apparently wants a nuclear test. It could be bad for your health

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Japan extends 2011 disaster recovery agency’s work by 10 years via Kyodo News

[…]

The Reconstruction Agency will now continue to promote recovery in the northeastern prefecture of Fukushima, and provide support to residents there and in other northeastern regions, until March 2031. The agency said there were still more than 46,000 displaced residents as of March 11, the ninth anniversary of the triple disaster.

However, the scope of tax breaks and other special deregulatory measures will be scaled down, and resources allocated more selectively to areas where rebuilding efforts are still under way, and to businesses struggling to overcome public fears and false rumors about radiation.

Government grants for infrastructure rebuilding will be terminated at the end of the current fiscal year to March 2021, as reconstruction of roads and houses is deemed to be sufficiently complete.

The agency will continue to be headed by a full-time minister, and its budget will remain separate from the general account. Reconstruction bonds, which help finance rebuilding, will continue to be issued by the government.

Under the basic policy on 2011 quake disaster reconstruction, approved by the Cabinet in December, the government aims to complete recovery in hard-hit Fukushima, Iwate, and Miyagi prefectures in northeastern Japan in the five fiscal years through March 2026, while sustaining support for nuclear disaster-stricken areas.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Japan extends 2011 disaster recovery agency’s work by 10 years via Kyodo News

Anti–nuclear resistance in Russia: problems, protests, reprisals via Russian Social Ecological Union/Friends of the Earth Russia

Table of Contents:

Introduction

Nuclear energy: failures and lies

Expired reactors

Decommissioning problems

Uranium mining protest

Rosatom Importing uranium waste

The Mayak plant: Rosatom’s dirty face

Struggle against nuclear repository

Rosatom’s ‘death plants’

A road through a radioactive graveyard

Conclusion: nuclear power is a problem, not a solution

References

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

What the protests tell us: Invest in social equity, not nuclear weapons via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

Rachel Bronson

[…]

The United States’ approach to international relations may work if the country ever finds itself in the two simultaneous and unlikely land wars in Asia and Europe that our military planners have envisioned in their budget requests. But that approach seems wildly ill-conceived, if the goal is to lessen the human toll that will be caused by an array of new threats—from climate change and fast-spreading viruses to the technologies behind cyber hacking and information warfare—that are undermining trust in institutions and have the potential to stop whole societies in their tracks.

[…]

Today, the United States is on the cusp of spending somewhere between $1.2 and $1.8 trillion over the next 30 years on new nuclear weapons, a large portion of which is unnecessary from a military security point of view and could be better invested elsewhere.

[…]

Back in the 1960s, African American leaders recognized that money spent on weapons reduced resources that could be distributed domestically. In 1967, Martin Luther King pointed out that “a nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.” It is the same argument that has compelled many African American leaders to advocate for nuclear disarmament.

Today, well into a new century, the United States government appears to be deaf to such common-sense arguments. But citizens could demand a different path. The pandemic provides important lessons that we would do well to heed. These include: inequities in public health make societies less, not more stable; prevention is always cheaper than reaction; science matters, and just because you can’t see a problem—germs in the air, say, or increasing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere—doesn’t mean it is inconsequential; and individual action can make a big difference, whether the action be social distancing, demonstrating for social justice, reducing one’s carbon footprint, or demanding a rethink of our current nuclear strategy. As we deal with the COVID pandemic, breadcrumbs are being laid out for us, showing the way toward better decisions about how to use our resources in this no-longer-new 21st century. Shouldn’t we follow them?

A placard carried by a woman walking by my house just now reads “Disarm Dismantle Defund.” I suspect it was written with the police department in mind, but it is equally applicable to our broader national security paradigm, especially as it applies to nuclear weapons and their limited ability to combat a growing set of global challenges. Our current strategies and investments are anachronistic and do not seem to be making us safer. Twenty years in, isn’t it time to acknowledge the century we live in?

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on What the protests tell us: Invest in social equity, not nuclear weapons via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

福島原発の避難指示、未除染でも解除へ 国の責務に例外 via 朝日新聞

[…]

 除染して再び人が住める地域に戻す政策に、初めて例外を設けることになる。除染を「国の責務」とした放射性物質汚染対処特措法と矛盾することにもなりかねない。

 政府関係者によると、経済産業、環境、復興の3省庁は、除染抜きでも解除できるようにすることで一致。近く原子力規制委員会に未除染で解除した場合の安全性について諮る。その結果を受け、今夏にも原子力災害対策本部(本部長・安倍晋三首相)を開いて従来の解除要件を見直す方向で調整している。

 原発事故の避難指示は、空間の放射線量が年間20ミリシーベルトを超えた地域などが対象とされた。指示を解除する要件は、①線量が年20ミリ以下に低下する②水道などのインフラ整備や除染が十分進む③地元と十分な協議をする、と現在の政府方針で決まっている。

 今回の見直しでも、この3要件に基づく解除方式は維持する。そのうえで除染しなくても解除できる新たな方式を設ける。具体的には、放射性物質の自然減衰などで線量が20ミリ以下になった地域は、住民や作業員らが将来も住まない▽未除染でも早期の解除を地元が求めている――といった要件を満たせば、避難指示を解除できるよう検討している。このほか、公園整備や無人工場の誘致など地元に土地の活用計画があることを要件に加える案もある。

 除染後に解除する従来方式と除染なしの新方式のどちらを選ぶかは、地元自治体の判断に委ねる。

 原発から40キロ離れた福島県飯舘村では、線量がほぼ20ミリ以下となり、除染抜きでも避難指示を全面解除してほしいと国に要望していた。与党も新たな解除の仕組みをつくるよう政府に求めていた。一方、ほかの地元自治体には国による除染を求める意見が根強く、どこまで新たな方式による解除が進むかは分からない。

 避難指示は、線量による区域分けが確定した2013年8月時点で、福島県の11市町村におよび、琵琶湖の2倍弱の計11万4900ヘクタール、住民約8万4千人が対象だった。現在はその約7割の地域で解除され、いまも避難指示が続くのは、事故当初年50ミリを超えた「帰還困難区域」の7市町村、計2万2千人だけになっている。(編集委員・大月規義

全文

◇ 原発事故で設けられた空間放射線量が比較的高い「帰還困難区域」。双葉、大熊、富岡の3町の一部で来月、同区域で初の避難指示解除を迎える。ただ、政府は先月、大熊町の一部で空間線量が解除要件の値を下回ったか確認しないまま、解除を決めていた。その後、空間線量が要件の値を下回ったことを確かめたが、異例の決定の背景を検証すると、JR常磐線の全線再開が迫る中での判断だったことが浮かんだ。(避難指示解除、事後に線量確認 異例の決定の背景に何が

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Plunging cost of wind and solar marks turning point in energy transition: IRENA via Reuters

By Matthew Green

LONDON (Reuters) – Plunging costs of renewables mark a turning point in a global transition to low-carbon energy, with new solar or wind farms increasingly cheaper to build than running existing coal plants, according to a report published on Tuesday.

The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) said the attractive prices of renewables relative to fossil fuel power generation could help governments embrace green economic recoveries from the shock of the coronavirus pandemic.

[…]

Although scientists say the world needs to stage a much faster transition to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change, the annual report by the Abu Dhabi-based agency shows that wind and solar are increasingly competitive on price alone.

More than half of the renewable capacity added in 2019 achieved lower power costs than the cheapest new coal plants, the report found.

Auction results also suggest that the average cost of building new solar photovoltaic (PV) and onshore wind power now costs less than keeping many existing coal plants running, reinforcing the case for phasing out coal, the report said.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , | Comments Off on Plunging cost of wind and solar marks turning point in energy transition: IRENA via Reuters

Radiophobia? Schmadiophobia! Nuclear Industry Propaganda Lie: Prof. Majia Nadesan + Covid/Nuclear UPDATE – #467 via Nuclear Hotseat


Listen Here:

Audio Player00:0000:00Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.

Podcast: Download

This Week’s Featured Interview:

  • RADIOPHOBIAMajia Nadesan rips this nuclear industry propaganda talking point to shreds and shows how “radiophobia” has been used against the people of Japan after Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and now Fukushima. She is a professor at Arizona State University and a researcher on a wide range of interconnected topics including Governmentality, Biopolitics, and Risk Cultural Studies; Autism and Bioethics, Globalization, and Political Economy, Energy Politics, and Organizational Communication.  Her books include: Fukushima: Dispossession or Denuclearization, Fukushima and the Privatization of Risk.  She recently provided a chapter on “Radiophobia and the Politics of Social Contagion” for the book, Transforming Contagion: Risky Contacts among Bodies, Disciplines, and Nations – and that’s what we’re focusing on today – Radiophobia. 

[…]

Numnutz of the Week (for Outstanding Nuclear Boneheadedness):

Oh, oh, AOC – what do you think you’re doing to me?  Nukes ARE NOT GREEN! Nuclear reactors do not belong as part of the Green New Deal – puleeeeeeeze!

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Radiophobia? Schmadiophobia! Nuclear Industry Propaganda Lie: Prof. Majia Nadesan + Covid/Nuclear UPDATE – #467 via Nuclear Hotseat