汚染水を海に流さないで!「私たちの声を届けよう」アクションへのご協力をお願いします!via NPOはっぴーあいらんど☆ネットワーク

福島第一原発事故によるトリチウム等タンク貯蔵汚染水の処分方法について、これまで行われた意見聴取会やパブリックコメントでは多くの関係者や市民が「海洋放出には反対」「これ以上海を汚さないで」という声をあげ、福島県内約7割の自治体議会からも反対または慎重な対応を求める意見書が国に提出されました。

それにも関わらず、政府は10月27日の関係閣僚会議で海洋放出決定の発表を行うという報道がされました。

「信じられない・・・。そんなの、あまりにも強行すぎる」と、市民も関係者たちも更なる声をあげ、署名を集め、アクションを起こし、必死にその動きを止めようとしています。

梶山経済産業大臣は26日の記者会見で「発表をするなど言っていない。方針決定は来月以降に行う」と話しましたが、方針決定は先延ばしになっただけで、私たちの未来はいまだ脅かされたままです。

今、とても重大なことが決められようとしています。
原発事故という未曽有の事態を経験した私たちは、「もう二度と過ちを繰り返したくはない、未来にこれ以上の負の遺産を押し付けたくはない」と願っているのに、なぜ、その願いは一向に叶わないままなのでしょうか・・・。

この汚染水海洋放出は、原発事故の被災県に住む私たちだけの問題のように扱われていますが、遠く離れたところに住む人々や、未来の子どもたちにも大きな影響を及ぼす地球全体の問題です。
汚染水の海洋放出案が撤回されるよう、今、共に声をあげませんか?

これ以上の環境汚染を食い止めるため、「汚染水を海に流さないで!」という声を全国各地でつなげていく
汚染水を海に流さないで!「私たちの声を届けよう」アクション
を立ち上げましたので、以下をダウンロードしてプラカードなどを作り、アピール用にお使いください。
*PC→右クリック保存 スマホ→長押し保存

こちらは、イラストや文字を自分で書きたい!という方用です。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged | 3 Comments

女川原発周辺5市町、再稼働へ「事前了解権」求めず via 日本経済新聞

東北電力女川原子力発電所(宮城県女川町、石巻市)から30キロ圏の緊急防護措置区域(UPZ)内の5市町は2日、事故時の避難計画などを議論する「UPZ関係自治体首長懇談会」を開いた。東北電に対して再稼働に向けた「事前了解権」を求めず、意見集約を見送った。各首長は9日の市町村長会議で村井嘉浩知事に女川2号機の再稼働について意見を述べる。

懇談会は登米市と東松島市、美里町、涌谷町、南三陸町で構成する。非公開の懇談会では、避難計画の実効性を担保することが重要との方向性で一致した。5市町で唯一再稼働に反対する美里町の相沢清一町長は、東北電に対して「事前了解権」を求めるよう訴えたが採用されなかった。

[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Nuclear Radiation Alert: Could You Have A Dirty Bomb Next Door? via Fairewinds Energy Education

By Arnie Gundersen

October 27, 2020

[…]

Unfortunately, my takeaway from these events and other small explosive events all over the United States is that it is relatively easy for a lone-wolf militant or several militia-type American citizens to build and detonate explosive devices in populated areas.

Now imagine if someone laced those same devices with radioactive isotopes! When a detonation device explodes and releases radioactivity, it is known as a ‘dirty bomb’. It is not like a nuclear bomb that creates radioactivity from its atomic chain reaction and its ensuing explosions, like the atomic bombs used against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or all the atomic bombs tested over the Pacific Ocean or rural areas of the western United States. Instead, a dirty bomb is a traditional explosive device laced with radioactivity obtained elsewhere, usually stolen.

Depending upon the explosives used, a dirty bomb may destroy a single building or many buildings when it explodes. However, the real damage is from its release of radioactive material. When a dirty bomb explodes, the radioactivity moves outward, landing on the surrounding area, the first responders, civilians, adjoining buildings, streets, and cars that are blocks away. The microparticles of radioactivity that cannot be seen or smelled, and usually not tasted, travel on the wind and weather as it blows through the area.

In theory, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) carefully monitors all radioactive material allegedly controlled at manufacturing facilities, power plants, hospitals, testing labs, and nuclear research labs.

Last week, I found myself rudely awakened from my belief that the NRC, the federal regulatory agency that controls most commercial nuclear facilities, really had control of our nation’s nuclear materials. I was shocked when I learned that officials in Pennsylvania had uncovered two empty houses loaded with radioactive materials that did not belong to the people who had lived there and for which no protections for individuals or the nearby community had ever been in place.

The homeowners had died, and their houses were being prepared for auction when workers uncovered the toxic radioactivity. Forty-five containers filled with radioactive material, including Radium-226 and Strontium-90 previously stolen from a radioactive Superfund site, were discovered at these two adjoining homes. We have looked at media everywhere since the NRC issued the Event Notification Report #54936 detailing this chilling discovery. It appears that thus far, there has been no press coverage at all.

[…]

The Strontium-90 (Sr90) found at this site is called a bone seeker, which means that if inhaled or ingested, it is absorbed in peoples’ bones just like calcium is. Sr90 is known to cause leukemia. In the environment, Strontium-90 lingers for as long as 300 years and emits beta particles with an energy of 500,000 electron volts.

There are so many questions that the NRC and the local officials need to answer to investigate this incident. Will we learn the truth, or will it all be swept under the NRC rug and associated agencies in this investigation?

For example:

  • How were 45 containers of radioactive material stolen, and when?
  • Who stole the 45 containers, and for what purpose?
  • Was anyone in the public overexposed, and for how many years?
  • How did the owners of the two houses die?
  • For what purpose would someone take these highly radioactive isotopes?
  • Are there more materials out there from the same site?
  • And, when will the public be informed?

It appears that no one knew that a lot of radioactive material was even missing, and luckily it has now been recovered. The two houses contained hazardous types of radiation (Ra226 and Sr90). In the wrong hands, this material would easily have made a very horrible dirty bomb. Uncovering this hazard was a lucky discovery.

[…]

To quote Pippin, “It is smarter to be lucky than it’s lucky to be smart!” We were lucky this time. Piles of radioactivity lie in many places all over the country, and most disturbingly, it is not well-monitored. Most of all, during the last four years, the current administration has continued to relax NRC and EPA regulations that protect our communities, our neighborhoods, and workers from such unyielding hazards. We must stop looking away and work together to protect all Americans from the radioactive dangers located in almost every state in the country. Radioactivity is not a little spill that can be easily dug up and contained. Quite simply, it contaminates everything around it and migrates in microparticles of dust and dirt.

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Losing paradise via Beyond Nuclear International

Atomic racism decimated Kiribati and the Marshall Islands; now climate change is sinking them

This is an extract from the Don’t Bank on the Bomb Scotland report “Nuclear Weapons, the Climate and Our Environment”.

Kiribati

In 1954, the government of Winston Churchill decided that the UK needed to develop a hydrogen bomb (a more sophisticated and destructive type of nuclear weapon). The US and Russia had already developed an H-bomb and Churchill argued that the UK “could not expect to maintain our influence as a world power unless we possessed the most up-to-date nuclear weapons”.

The governments of Australia and New Zealand refused to allow a hydrogen bomb test to be conducted on their territories so the British government searched for an alternative site. Kiritimati Island and Malden Island in the British Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony in the central Pacific Ocean (now the Republic of Kiribati) were chosen. Nine nuclear weapons tests – including the first hydrogen bomb tests – were carried out there as part of “Operation Grapple” between 1957 and 1958.

[…]

After Grapple X, the UK’s first megaton hydrogen bomb test in November 1957, dead fish washed ashore and “birds were observed to have their feathers burnt off, to the extent that they could not fly”. The larger Grapple Y test in 1958 spread fallout over Kiritimati Island and destroyed large areas of vegetation.

Despite evidence that military personnel and local people suffered serious health problems as a result of the tests, including blindness, cancers, leukaemia and reproductive difficulties, the British government has consistently denied that they were exposed to dangerous levels of radiation and has resisted claims for compensation.

Like the Marshall Islands, the low-lying Republic of Kiribati is now bearing the brunt of the effects of climate change. Salt water washed in on king tides has contaminated the islands’ scarce freshwater resources. Pits that are used to grow taro plants have been ruined and the healthy subsistence lifestyle of local people is under threat.

[…]

The UK is set to spend £3.4 billion a year on Trident nuclear weapons system between 2019 and 2070. If Trident were scrapped, a portion of the savings could be provide to the Republic of Kiribati in the form of climate finance (see section 1.2.1). Scrapping Trident would also allow money and skills to be redirected towards measures aimed at drastically cutting the UK’s carbon emissions (see section 1.2.2) – action that Pacific island nations are urgently demanding.

The Marshall Islands

The most devasting incident of radioactive contamination took place 8,000 km from the US mainland during the Castle Bravo test in 1954. The US detonated the largest nuclear weapon in its history at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands, causing fallout to spread over an area of more than 11,000km. Residents of nearby atolls, Rongelap and Utirik, were exposed to high levels of radiation, suffering burns, radiation sickness, skin lesions and hair loss as a result.

[…]

Compounding the injustice of nuclear weapons testing, the Republic of the Marshall Islands is now on the frontline of the climate emergency. The government declared a national climate crisis in 2019, citing the nation’s extreme vulnerability to rising sea levels and the “implications for the security, human rights and wellbeing of the Marshallese people”.

[…]

At Runit Island, one of 40 islands in the Enewetak Atoll, rising sea levels are threatening to release radioactive materials into an already contaminated lagoon. In the late 1970s, the US army dumped 90,000 cubic metres of radioactive waste, including plutonium, into a nuclear blast crater and covered it with a concrete cap. Radioactive materials are leaking out of the crater and cracks have appeared on the concrete cap. Encroaching salt water caused by rising sea levels could collapse the structure altogether. The Marshallese government has asked the US for help to prevent an environmental catastrophe but the US maintains that the dome is the Marshall Islands’ responsibility. Hilda Heine, then President of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, said of the dome in 2019: “We don’t want it. We didn’t build it. The garbage inside is not ours. It’s theirs.”

[…]

The nations that contributed most to the crisis are failing to cut their emissions quickly enough to limit further global heating, leaving the Marshallese at the mercy of droughts, cyclones and rising seas. A recent study found that if current rates of greenhouse gas emissions are maintained, the Marshall Islands will be flooded with sea water annually from 2050. The resulting damage to infrastructure and contamination of freshwater supplies will render the islands uninhabitable.

If the US scrapped its nuclear weapons programme, it could give a portion of the billions of dollars that would be saved to the Republic of the Marshall Islands to help the country mitigate and adapt to climate disruption (see section 1.2.1 on international climate finance). The US could also use the freed-up funds to invest in its own Just Transition away from a fossil-fuel powered economy.

Read the full report.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

Nuclear waste shipment arrives in Germany, protests likely via KOIN.com

BERLIN (AP) — A shipment of reprocessed nuclear waste arrived Monday at a port in northern Germany, and authorities were braced for likely protests as it is transported across the country to a storage site.

A ship carrying six containers of waste from the Sellafield reprocessing plant in England docked in the early morning in Nordenham, news agency dpa reported. From there, it is to be transported by train to the now-closed Biblis nuclear power plant south of Frankfurt, several hundred kilometers (miles) away.

Germany has a strong anti-nuclear movement and waste transports have often drawn large protests. Activists question the safety of the waste containers and storage sites.

[…]

Germany recently launched a new search for a permanent site to store its most radioactive waste. A final decision is slated for 2031 and the aim is to start using the selected site in 2050.

Read more at Nuclear waste shipment arrives in Germany, protests likely

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 6 Comments

原発事故の教訓訴える 当時の南相馬市長・桜井氏が仙台で講演 via 河北新報

東京電力福島第1原発事故当時、福島県南相馬市長だった桜井勝延氏(64)が1日、仙台市内で講演し、東北電力女川原発(宮城県女川町、石巻市)について「再稼働させてはいけない。政治家の決断は市民を守り、安心を確保するためにある」と強調した。

 桜井氏は原発事故で6万人超の南相馬市民が避難を強いられ、地元企業からは「会社の生き死にが懸かっている」と事業再開の必要性を訴えられた現実に言及。「地域を奪われ家族もバラバラにされた。こういう経験は二度としたくない」と述べた。

(略)

女川2号機は再稼働の前提となる地元自治体の同意手続きが進んでいるが、桜井氏は「避難計画を作らなければいけないようなエネルギー政策は間違いだ」と断じた。

 講演は宮城県保険医協会の主催。会員や一般の県民ら約90人が参加した。

全文は原発事故の教訓訴える 当時の南相馬市長・桜井氏が仙台で講演

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 3 Comments

福島第一原発 放射性物質付着の“木” 焼却施設がほぼ完成 via NHK News Web

廃炉が進む東京電力福島第一原子力発電所で、放射性物質が付着した敷地内の木を処分するための焼却施設がほぼ完成し、11月、国の最終的な検査を受ける見通しとなりました。

福島第一原発の事故では広く放射性物質が拡散したため、核燃料がある原子炉建屋だけでなく、敷地の建物や道路などにも放射性物質が付着して汚染されました。

レベルは低いものの、敷地の木々もその1つで、このほどタンクの増設などで伐採した木を処分するための焼却施設がほぼ完成し、11月、国の最終的な検査を受ける見通しとなりました。

施設は地上5階建てで、放射性物質を取るフィルターを備えていて、来年3月から稼働する予定です。

焼却する木は10万立方メートル余りになるということです。

このほか金属やコンクリートなど放射性物質が付着した廃棄物が廃炉作業の中で増える見通しで、東京電力は減容処分や再利用をすすめ、体積を3分の1程度に減らす計画です。

続きは福島第一原発 放射性物質付着の“木” 焼却施設がほぼ完成

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 福島第一原発 放射性物質付着の“木” 焼却施設がほぼ完成 via NHK News Web

Senate Unanimously Passes Udall, Heinrich Resolution Honoring Nation’s Nuclear Weapons Workers, Declares National Day of Remembrance via Los Alamos Daily Post

Submitted by Carol A. Clark

WASHINGTON D.C. – U.S. Senators Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) announced Thursday that the Senate unanimously passed a bipartisan resolution to designate Oct. 30, 2020, as National Day of Remembrance for workers who helped develop and support the nation’s nuclear weapons program.

The Day of Remembrance honors American workers who supported the nation’s nuclear weapons efforts from World War II through the Cold War, as well as nuclear program workers today who continue this heroic legacy to advance nuclear power, nuclear medicine, scientific innovation, and other technology that keeps our country safe.

[…]

Tens of thousands of Americans have worked in the nuclear weapons programs since World War II at the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs in New Mexico. Many of these workers became sick due to exposure from toxic or radioactive materials before proper workplace protections and scientific understanding were established. Congress has since enacted the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) in October 2000. 

This resolution additionally provides compensation to those who were exposed in uranium mines and mills during the Cold War, some of whom are covered separately by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). Udall and Heinrich have long pushed to expand the RECA law to compensate not only the workers affected, but those suffering from the effects of radiation during the Cold War by these nuclear weapons facilities.

Read more at Senate Unanimously Passes Udall, Heinrich Resolution Honoring Nation’s Nuclear Weapons Workers, Declares National Day of Remembrance

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 6 Comments

柏崎原発7号機、全審査終了今後は地元の同意焦点にvia 新潟日報

 原子力規制委員会は30日、東京電力が原発の安全確保に向けた「決意」などを盛り込んで変更した、東電柏崎刈羽原発の保安規定を認可した。東電が再稼働を目指す同原発7号機については既に、新規制基準への適合性と、工事計画も認めており、再稼働に必要な三つの審査が全て終了した。今後は、7号機の再稼働に対する地元の同意が焦点となる。

[…]

ただ、花角英世知事は、原発の安全性に関する県独自の「三つの検証」や、県技術委員会による柏崎刈羽原発の安全性確認などが終わらない限り、再稼働の議論をしないとの姿勢を示している。

 三つの検証の一つ、東電福島第1原発事故の原因に関する検証は26日に報告書がまとまったが、ほかの二つの検証や柏崎刈羽の安全確認はまだ途上にある。本県では再稼働問題について議論する環境が整っていないのが実情だ。

 30日に認可された保安規定は、原発の安全管理のルールを定めたもの。新たに「安全性より経済性を優先しない」など7項目の決意を「順守する」とした。

 また、事故が起きた際の東電社長の責任を明記。社長自らが安全上のリスクを把握し、安全最優先の判断や対応をした上で、その内容を速やかに社会に発信することや、そうした対応の記録を原子炉の廃止まで保管することなどを盛り込んだ。

 保安規定の認可を受け、東電の小早川智明社長は「私自らが先頭に立ち、安全最優先で取り組んでいく」とのコメントを出した。

 一方、花角氏は「規制委による審査の結果であり、県としてのコメントは控える。審査内容に疑問が残る点などについて、技術委員会で確認していく」とのコメントを発表した。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 柏崎原発7号機、全審査終了今後は地元の同意焦点にvia 新潟日報

トリチウム等放射能汚染水を海に流すな!院内ヒアリング集会via 再稼働阻止全国ネットワーク(UPLAN)

本年7月22日に院内ヒアリング集会「放射能汚染水の海洋放出(イチエフと六ヶ所)」を開催、経産省・原子力規制庁・外務省の担当に要請・質疑応答をしました。多くの訴えをすることができましたが、質疑応答は時間切れで十分な確認・追及ができませんでした。特にロンドン条約と国内法との関係について不十分でした。また、環境法の対象外とされていた放射性物質を東電福島第一原発(以下イチエフ)事故後の2012年に対象とし、環境基本法・原子力基本法が改訂された事実を新たに確認しました。 一方で経産省(資源エネルギー庁)は「関係者の御意見を伺う場」を続けて地元などから「風評被害」について多くの厳しい反対の声を聞きながらも、パブコメの結果も公表せず、梶山経産相は「国はしっかりとした決断をしていく」と、そろそろ「海洋放出」を決めそうな状況です。そこで、7月22日の質疑に続けて、イチエフ「ALPS処理水」に的を絞って院内ヒアリング集会を開催し、政府決定前にトリチウム等放射能汚染水を海に流さないように訴えます。

質問者:

山崎久隆、木村雅英、再稼働阻止全国ネットワーク、

他 質問項目:

1原子力基本法と環境基本法

2トリチウムの危険性

3ロンドン条約と海洋投棄

4イチエフ廃炉とタンク保管との関係

5世界から反対の声

原文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 10 Comments