‘Los Alamos will never be clean’ via The Santa Fe New Mexican

ID CANYON — A dirt trail shaded by ponderosa pines drops down the slope of this small canyon below the Los Alamos Nature Center and a recreation center.

The canyon became a dumping ground during the Manhattan Project. Old pipes, washing machines, culverts and other debris from the era were tossed into the canyon by nearby homeowners and Los Alamos National Laboratory staff.

The nature center, graced by new gardens and an expansive view of the Jemez Mountains, sits near the site of a chemical waste treatment plant used by scientists who built the first nuclear weapons. From 1943 to 1964, the treatment plant shed into the canyon more than 30 million gallons of treated and untreated liquid radioactive and chemical waste laced with tritium, strontium, plutonium and other radioactive materials that settled on rocks and soil. It was one of several canyons around Los Alamos used as dumping grounds by the lab during the Manhattan Project and the subsequent Cold War.

“The scientists knew this canyon was contaminated back in the 1950s and ’60s,” said Greg Mello, a former inspector with the state Environment Department and now a partner in the nuclear watchdog Los Alamos Study Group with his wife, Trish. “Their children played here.”
[…]
Air, land, water and people all were exposed to hazardous and radioactive waste products while scientists and engineers were producing the Trinity test bomb and subsequent nuclear weapons.

Uranium miners, scientists, lab technicians and people living near research facilities or test sites around the United States during the heyday of the Manhattan Project were exposed to the highest immediate levels of radiation. They’ve sought compensation from the federal government for a litany of maladies and cancers related to their work on nuclear weapons.

[…]
At Los Alamos, lab workers dumped waste in trenches and pits, including those at Area G, a 63-acre dumpsite that opened in 1957. This includes thousands of cubic feet of low-level and mixed transuranic waste such as old lab coats, tools and other debris.

Nuclear waste is exempt from many federal environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act. The New Mexico Environment Department, after a court battle, gained some measure of regulatory control over the lab’s legacy waste only because it is mixed with other hazardous chemical waste. Under an agreement with the state, the lab in 2014 was on track to remove 3,706 cubic meters of hazardous and radioactive waste stored in above-ground containers and ship it to the nation’s only underground nuclear waste repository near Carlsbad when a lab container ruptured at the underground facility, halting operations.

A lab official said last year LANL still had thousands of cubic feet of contaminated waste left in 35 pits and 200 shafts at Area G. “The main concern is that Area G is smack dab over the regional aquifer,” said Scott Kovac, of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, noting the groundwater table is between 900 and 1,000 feet below the surface.

[…]
Uranium miners and millers developed lung cancer and kidney cancers, among other illnesses. Scientists and other workers exposed to radiation from above-ground tests developed cancers of the lung, thyroid, esophagus, stomach and pancreas, as well as leukemia and other maladies.

More than 107,141 nuclear research workers and their families have received some of more than $11.6 billion in compensation and medical coverage as of July 5, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. More than a fourth of workers filing claims have cancer types recognized by the federal government as ones that can be caused by exposure to radioactive materials.

More than 4,900 former Los Alamos National Laboratory workers from World War II to the present have received $566 million for health problems related to their work at the lab.

[…]
Still, the costs of cleaning up legacy waste continue to climb. The Department of Energy’s life-cycle environmental liability for thousands of contaminated facilities and management of massive quantities of radioactive waste rose to $427 billion in 2014 from $297 billion in 2006, according to the agency’s fiscal report. The life cycle includes all of the department’s liabilities until the waste is finally cleaned up to federal standards — a process still years away in some locations.

The estimated liability for the legacy waste is higher than the combined state budgets of New Mexico, Texas, California, Arizona and Colorado.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on  ‘Los Alamos will never be clean’ via The Santa Fe New Mexican

東京電力、福島第一原発2号機の内部調査に遅れ-放射線遮蔽ブロック撤去できずvia 日刊工業新聞

東京電力は13日、8月中に予定していた福島第一原子力発電所2号機の内部調査が遅れると発表した。東芝が開発したサソリ型調査ロボットを格納容器内に投入するため、投入口の手前にある放射線遮蔽(しゃへい)ブロックを撤去していたが、ブロックの最後の7個が強固に床に固着しており、用意したロボットでは外せなかった。
 ブロックを撤去できないと調査ロボを投入するための気密装置を設置できない。
[…]

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 10 Comments

三菱電機プラント/大型トラックの放射能汚染、ゲート式検査装置開発via LNews

[…]厚生労働省が労働者の放射線被ばくの低減対策として施行している電離放射線障害防止規則では(放射線)管理区域から持ち出す物品については汚染検査が規定されており、中間貯蔵施設等において大型トラックが(放射線)管理区域から出る場合にも汚染検査が必要となる。
開発した装置は、この汚染検査を自動的に行うもの。
現状ではハンディタイプの放射線検出器を用いた手作業で放射性物質による汚染の有無検査を行っているが、文部科学省のガイドラインに従って実施すれば相当の人手と時間がかかっている。
放射線検出器を実装した可動検査ゲートを2台用いることでトラックの検査を分担して行う事が出来るため高速検査(1台1分50秒程度(実績値))が可能。
現場で汚染検査に携わる作業員の人数、作業時間を減らすことができるため汚染検査作業の放射線被ばくの低減できる。
γ線に対する感度を低く抑えたβ線検出器を使用しているため、高い放射線バックグラウンドの環境下においても特別な放射線遮蔽を行わずに汚染検査ができる。

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on 三菱電機プラント/大型トラックの放射能汚染、ゲート式検査装置開発via LNews

憲法学者・木村草太氏「ノーニュークス権」掲げる「原発メーカー訴訟」原告団にエール via 弁護士ドットコム

福島第一原発の原子炉をつくったゼネラル・エレクトリック(GE)、東芝、日立を被告として、原発事故の責任を問う「原発メーカー訴訟」。その原告団が7月14日、東京・永田町の参議院議員会館で、憲法学者の木村草太・首都大学東京准教授を招いて勉強会を開いた。

この裁判は、原発事故が起こっても、原発メーカーの責任が免除される法制度(原子力損害の賠償に関する法律)はおかしいと考えて、原発メーカーの責 任を追及するために起こされた裁判。日本だけでなく、世界から4200人余りの原告が集まって、「一人当たり100円を支払え」と原発メーカーに求めてい る。

原発メーカー訴訟弁護団の共同代表・島昭宏弁護士は「僕らが東電に対して、いくら責任を追及しても、それだけでは、予定されていた仕組みの中で騒い でいるにすぎない。原発体制は痛みを感じない」と、原賠法が違憲であることを主張して、原発メーカーの責任を追及する必要性を訴えた。

木村准教授は「メーカーが完全に免責されるということは、かなり違和感がある責任制限であるように思う。この問題を社会に発信するうえで、重要な訴訟だ」と述べた。

●「ノーニュークス権」はリスクを問題にしている

今回の裁判で、原告団の主張の核となるのが、個人には、原子力の恐怖から免れて原子力の恐怖から免れて生きる権利(ノーニュークス権)があるという主張だ。

(略)

ノーニュークス権という新しい人権について、木村准教授は、「ノーニュークス権は、『リスク』を問題にしている。今回(福島原発事故)はそれより先に行っ て、リスクが現実化した状態だ。『原子力事故によって生じた損害を適切に賠償してもらう権利』、『原子力に起因する損害を完全に賠償してもらう権利』と いった構成にしたほうが、今回の訴訟には合うのではないか」とアドバイスしていた。

全文は憲法学者・木村草太氏「ノーニュークス権」掲げる「原発メーカー訴訟」原告団にエール

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 憲法学者・木村草太氏「ノーニュークス権」掲げる「原発メーカー訴訟」原告団にエール via 弁護士ドットコム

経産省前テントひろば日誌(7/12) : もう梅雨明け 暑い一日だった via レイバーネット

テント日誌7月12日(日)

経産省前テントひろば1401日商業用原発停止665日

もう梅雨明け 暑い一日だった

[…]
福島は怒っている 住民の帰還を強要するな?!

11日からの「第3回福島を忘れない!全国シンポジウム・現地視察」に参加し、日曜は
バスで現地視察に参加した。豊かな田畑を過ぎ川俣町から飯館村に入っていくと放射線量
が上がっていく。バス内でピーピーと鳴り出し、0.2μSv/hが0.5に。飯館村役
場のモニタリングポストは0.44を指し示すが、持ち込んだ測定機によれば1,3μS
vもある。
 
さらに進むとフレコンバッグがあちこちに。外では3.38、バス内で0.5。
フレコンバッグは3段積みにしないと危険と聞いていたが、目の前は5段積み、4段積み
が多い。安全を考える余裕が無くなっているようだ。この山積みが、直射日光を浴び、雨
さらししになっていて、破れるのではないかと心配になる。川俣町で75万袋、葛尾村で
71万袋が積まれる予定だという。バス内で0.7μSv/h、外で3.44μSv/h
に達した。
 
国と県から帰還を進められているが、ちょっと歩くとフレコンバッグの山があるところに
誰が帰るのか。環境省は除染のみであとの表土に関知しない、帰還しても農業できるか疑
問だそうだ。

これからは、「逃げる住民、追いかける行政」が進むと川俣町議。

[..。」

もっと読む。

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on 経産省前テントひろば日誌(7/12) : もう梅雨明け 暑い一日だった via レイバーネット

歴史社会学者・小熊英二監督作、映画『首相官邸の前で』via Facebook

歴史社会学者・小熊英二監督作、映画『首相官邸の前で』
2015年9月2日(水)より隔週水曜、渋谷アップリンクにて公開決定!

人々の力が日本を変えた 希望の瞬間を記録
歴史社会学者・小熊英二による初監督作。2012年夏、脱原発と民主主義の再建を求め約20万人が官邸前を埋めた。現代日本に実在した希望の瞬間を記録。

公式サイト http://www.uplink.co.jp/kanteimae/
Twitter https://twitter.com/kanteimaeJP
Facebook http://bit.ly/kanteimaeFB

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CvVlXDkUbM

 

 

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on 歴史社会学者・小熊英二監督作、映画『首相官邸の前で』via Facebook

Small country, big challenge: Switzerland’s upcoming transition to sustainable energy via Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Switzerland has a long tradition of using nuclear energy. With no reserves of coal, oil, or natural gas of its own, the country had to turn to other sources to meet its energy needs. As a result, a nation of only 8 million people—a bit larger in population than the state of Massachusetts—has five nuclear power plants, making Switzerland one of the top seven nuclear-powered nations on the planet on a per capita basis (IAEA, 2014). (The nuclear power plant at Beznau, in the country’s far north, is the world’s oldest operating nuclear power plant.) All told, nine percent of Switzerland’s total energy demand is met by nuclear power—a figure triple that of the United States (World Nuclear Association, 2015a).

Another telling statistic is that nearly 40 percent of Swiss electrical generation comes from nuclear power (see Figure 1). To give a sense of what that proportion means, only 19 percent of US electricity is generated from nuclear power (World Nuclear Association, 2015b). (The burning of coal has been of almost no consequence in Switzerland’s total energy mix for the past 50 years—in sharp contrast to the United States, where 44 percent of the nation’s electricity comes from coal (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2015)). The country’s famed train and trolley systems are all electric, with the energy to power them coming nearly entirely from a combination of hydro and nuclear power.

But after Fukushima the Swiss government decided to close down all its nuclear power plants, without a clear vision of what will take their place—a pressing concern at a time of ever-increasing demand. In the past Switzerland had relied heavily on wood, native hydropower, and imported fossil fuels (namely coal, crude oil, and natural gas) to meet its energy needs. But each of these energy sources faces problems: The supply of wood is diminishing (and burning wood as a fuel introduces particulates into the atmosphere (Notter, 2015)); the variety of coal most commonly available in the neighboring countries of central Europe is high in sulfur, contributing heavily to acid rain and global warming; and climate change is making the snowpack in the high mountains shrink, causing uncertainty about how much longer the country can rely on hydropower.

Consequently, phasing out nuclear power could be tricky. Discussions are under way as to exactly when to close which nuclear power stations, and more importantly, how to replace the power they now generate. Will it come from purchasing—or possibly sharing—electricity from neighboring countries? Photovoltaics? Wind power? Energy conservation? No one solution is perfect, especially at a time when the economics of energy in Europe is being turned upside down by new German policies on wind and solar power. What’s more, there are geographic and strategic aspects to any decision that Switzerland makes. How will the country make the change to something more sustainable, and what will its likely energy future look like? The solution may lie not in one answer but in many answers; the solutions that Switzerland comes up with may well portend the future for other countries.

Read more at Small country, big challenge: Switzerland’s upcoming transition to sustainable energy

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Small country, big challenge: Switzerland’s upcoming transition to sustainable energy via Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Limited Emergency Evacuation Plans for Areas Near Nuclear Plants via NBC Philadelphia

There are eight different nuclear power plants in and around the Delaware Valley, but the NBC10 Investigators discovered if something goes wrong, evacuation plans are limited.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Limited Emergency Evacuation Plans for Areas Near Nuclear Plants via NBC Philadelphia

Pearl Harbor Twitter row after US World Cup win via BBC News

Victory for the US against Japan in the Women’s World Cup final turned into a Twitter row on Monday after some fans began to relate the win to Japan’s 1941 attack on the US Navy’s Pearl Harbor base.

Pearl Harbor became one of the top trends among Twitter users in the US, attracting thousands of tweets.

“Hey Japan, that one was for Pearl Harbor,” said Cloyd Rivers, in a tweet which drew more than 8,500 retweets and was favourited more than 11,000 times.

The hyper-patriotic account is generally considered to be a parody, but many on Twitter were quick to take up the theme.

“They destroyed Pearl Habor, we destroyed their dreams,” said another user Sean Garcia.

Others referenced the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, with one user remarking: “Someone forgot to tell our US women’s team that we already avenged Pearl Harbor.”

But many Twitter users also condemned the negative reaction expressed by some fans.

“Pearl Harbor isn’t funny. Hiroshima isn’t funny. Nagasaki isn’t funny,” said Twitter user Taylor Perry. “This isn’t WW2. This is a women’s soccer match in 2015.”

Another user tweeted: “Jokes about bombing, Pearl Harbor and racist remarks are never funny in the first place. Why can’t we all just watch the game and cheer?”

Other Twitter users also rose to the defence of the Japanese fans.

“Pearl Harbor? I thought the atomic bomb was enough reaction for that,” read a tweet.

“You’re not funny. You’re awful human beings,” said Twitter user Ginge.

Read more and See pictures at Pearl Harbor Twitter row after US World Cup win

 

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Pearl Harbor Twitter row after US World Cup win via BBC News

Protest against Uranium-Mining and Nuclear Weapons on the Roof of Africa via K-Project for Peace

– A documentary by ujuzi.de; Jean-Jacques Schwenzfeier, Kathy Becker & Jonathan Happ –

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Protest against Uranium-Mining and Nuclear Weapons on the Roof of Africa via K-Project for Peace