A Gripping History of the Nuclear Disaster at Chernobyl via Undark

In “Midnight in Chernobyl,” Adam Higginbotham offers a thorough and readable account of one awful night in the Ukraine and its consequences.

BY Henry Fountain

[…]

A new book offers perhaps the clearest, and fullest, look at the catastrophe yet. Adam Higginbotham’s “Midnight in Chernobyl,” is a compelling and comprehensive account of one awful night in Ukraine and the consequences that were felt worldwide. Higginbotham’s observations, and his writing, are so sharp there is no need to overdo anything for dramatic effect. Told so clearly and in such detail, the story is dramatic — and horrific — enough.

[…]

Higginbotham introduces us to a few people who have never received much notice. Chief among these is Maria Protsenko, the architect of Pripyat, the city of nearly 50,000 that was built for the Chernobyl workers. Like most of the Soviet Union’s privileged atomic cities, Pripyat was a clean, comfortable place, a glorious testament to the Soviet system, and Protsenko’s job for seven years had been to make it even more glorious. 

Her world changed in an instant when the reactor exploded. Pripyat, just a few miles away, was heavily contaminated immediately, though it took the authorities a day and a half to order an evacuation. (This was just one of many examples of Soviet officialdom’s callousness and irresponsibility in handling the disaster. Another was telling the evacuees to plan to be away for a few days; in reality they would be gone forever.)

It’s hard not to feel sorry for Protsenko, who in the space of 36 hours went from proudly planning Pripyat’s expansion to calculating how many buses would be needed to get its residents to safety. (Precisely 1,225, as it turned out.) Ever the dutiful technocrat, she rode the last one, zig-zagging across the ghost city to pick up stragglers.

It’s this kind of detail that makes Higginbotham’s book so gripping. His accounts of the “liquidators,” or clean-up workers, are especially riveting — including the “bio robots,” men who had to clean lethally radioactive debris off the roof of the plant by hand after mechanical robots failed, and the workers whose job was to enter the destroyed reactor building itself, hunting for the remaining uranium fuel in an effort to allays fears that another, potentially worse, explosion was possible.

No aspect of the disaster and its aftermath are ignored. Higginbotham describes how members of a hunting and fishing association were enlisted to exterminate the dogs and other pets Pripyat residents were forced to leave behind. He recounts the woeful tales of plant operators and first-responding firefighters who lived their final days in a Moscow hospital, having been so heavily irradiated during the accident that they had no chance of survival. 

He devotes a full chapter to the unprecedented job of building the sarcophagus, which was constructed by thousands of workers, many of whom only toiled for a short time before being sent home, having reached radiation exposure limits. One task was almost suicidal: finding solid supports among the radioactive ruins for the massive roof beams that were lifted by crane operators working behind lead shields.

[…]

With his detailing of the reactor’s many design flaws — which were long known in Moscow — and discussion of the inevitability of an accident, Higginbotham makes it clear where Brukhanov and others lie on the victim-villain scale. In a very clearly written book, it is perhaps the ultimate moment of clarity.

Read more at A Gripping History of the Nuclear Disaster at Chernobyl

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

福島原発で合鍵9千本の管理不備 第1の扉に汎用品の南京錠 via 福井新聞

原子力規制委員会は26日、東京電力福島第1原発で、核物質の防護措置が徹底されない違反が2件あったとして、東電に注意文書を出した。昨年12月、1号機の原子炉建屋につながる扉に汎用品の南京錠が使われ、事務棟のキャビネットなどから、厳重に管理されていない合鍵が約9050本見つかったという。

(略)

昨年11月には、東電社員が同建屋にある別の扉の鍵1本をレジ袋に入れて着替えていたところ、同僚がゴミと誤認して捨てた。

全文は福島原発で合鍵9千本の管理不備 第1の扉に汎用品の南京錠

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

検査不正製品、全17原発に納入 via Reuters

電線大手フジクラや日立化成などの製品で発覚した一連の検査不正問題で、東京電力福島第1原発を含む国内にある全17原発に、これらのメーカーから必要な検査をしなかったケーブルや蓄電池などが納入され、安全上の重要度の高い機器でも多く使われていたことが26日、電力10社や原子力規制委員会への取材で分かった。

(略)

10社は問題の製品の一部を交換し、それ以外は性能試験や点検などで安全に影響がないことを確認でき、使用を継続するとしている。

全文は検査不正製品、全17原発に納入

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Eyewitness account: the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster via BBC Histories Magazine

On 26 April 1986, an experiment on the cooling pump system at Chernobyl power station, in the then-Soviet city of Pripyat, Ukraine, went badly wrong. The nuclear reactor exploded, causing a fire that raged for nine days and emitting large quantities of radioactive debris. Fallout settled largely in nearby Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, but the radioactive cloud covered much of Europe. At least 30 people died during or shortly after the incident, with many thousands of cancer cases since linked to radiation exposure. Shortly after the catastrophe, journalist Svetlana Alexievich visited the region affected by the Chernobyl disaster. Here she describes her experiences…

At the time that the Chernobyl incident happened my sister was in hospital in Minsk, so I was spending almost all of my time with her there. It just so happened that on one of those days a Swedish friend of mine called me and told me about a serious accident at a nuclear power station. We hadn’t been told anything about it.

[…]

When I first visited the zone, everyone had bewildered, almost crazed faces. They looked on while they sheared the upper, infected layer of earth and buried it in special pits. They buried earth in earth. They buried eggs and milk, and infected animals they had shot. They just kept burying and burying. The information about Chernobyl in the papers was straight out of a military report: an explosion, an evacuation, heroes, soldiers… The system was reacting as usual when faced with extreme conditions, but a soldier with an assault rifle in this new world cut a tragic figure. All he could do was amass an enormous dose of radiation and then die when he returned home.

[…]

Among the stories that stand out for me are those of the firemen who, on the night after the explosion, found themselves on the roof of the reactor and were exposed to radiation 1,000 times exceeding a lethal dose. When they were taken to the hospital, even the doctors, auxiliary medical staff and their relatives had to wear protective clothing just to be around them. They were no longer human beings, but objects to be decontaminated. Scientists, doctors, family and loved ones – all were afraid of them, of going near them. The irradiated lay on the other side of a boundary, posing us new moral questions.

[…]

I saw a terrible sight that I’ll never forget when they evacuated people from the infected villages. All around the buses gathered the pet cats and dogs that had been left behind. People were afraid to look them in the eye, and turned away; only the children cried. Soldiers went into the villages and shot the animals… Man saved only himself. An old bee-keeper told me that his bees refused to leave their hives for a week. Fishermen recalled that they couldn’t dig up a single worm – they had gone deep into the earth. The bees, the worms and the beetles knew something that people didn’t.

The government did everything in its power to keep the people as ignorant as possible. That’s because, if the people had known more, they would have demanded checks on food products, dosimeters [radiation detectors], and medicines to cleanse the body – and the government had no intention of providing these things. That’s why they lied. At one point they promised to give everyone dosimeters; they did give them to some, but people began to panic so they quickly changed tack.

[…]

Svetlana Alexievich is a journalist and author who won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Literature. Her books include Chernobyl Prayer: A Chronicle of the Future (first published 1997; updated version Penguin Classics, 2016).

This article was first published in the December 2016/January 2017 issue of BBC World Histories magazine

Read more at Eyewitness account: the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Japan needs thousands of foreign workers to decommission Fukushima plant, prompting backlash from anti-nuke campaigners and rights activists via South China Morning Post

・Activists are not convinced working at the site is safe for anyone and they fear foreign workers will feel ‘pressured’ to ignore risks if jobs are at risk
・Towns and villages around the plant are still out of bounds because radiation levels are dangerously high

Julian Ryall  

Anti-nuclear campaigners have teamed up with human rights activists in Japan to condemn plans by the operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant to hire foreign workers to help decommission the facility.

Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) has announced it will take advantage of the government’s new working visa scheme, which was introduced on April 1 and permits thousands of foreign workers to come to Japan to meet soaring demand for labourers. The company has informed subcontractors overseas nationals will be eligible to work cleaning up the site and providing food services.

About 4,000 people work at the plant each day as experts attempt to decommission three reactors that melted down in the aftermath of the March 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and the huge tsunami it triggered. Towns and villages around the plant are still out of bounds because radiation levels are dangerously high.

[…]

Companies are desperately short of labourers, in part because of the construction work connected to Tokyo hosting the 2020 Olympic Games, while TEPCO is further hampered because any worker who has been exposed to 50 millisieverts of radiation in a single year or 100 millisieverts over five years is not permitted to remain at the plant. Those limits mean the company must find labourers from a shrinking pool.

In February, the Tokyo branch of Human Rights Now submitted a statement to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva demanding action be taken to help and protect people with homes near the plant and workers at the site.

[…]

Cade Moseley, an official of the organisation, said there are “very clear, very definite concerns”.

“There is evidence that foreign workers in Japan have already felt under pressure to do work that is unsafe and where they do not fully understand the risks involved simply because they are worried they will lose their working visas if they refuse,” he said.

[…]

In an editorial published on Wednesday, the Mainichi newspaper also raised concerns about the use of semi-skilled foreign labourers at the site.

“There is a real risk of radiation exposure at the Daiichi plant and the terminology used on-site is highly technical, making for a difficult environment,” the paper said. “TEPCO and its partners must not treat the new foreign worker system as an employee pool that they can simply dip into.”

The paper pointed out that it may be difficult to accurately determine foreign employees’ radiation levels if they have been working in the nuclear industry before coming to Japan, while they may also confront problems in the event of an accident and they need to apply for workers’ accident compensation. TEPCO has played down the concerns.

Read more at Japan needs thousands of foreign workers to decommission Fukushima plant, prompting backlash from anti-nuke campaigners and rights activists

Related article: Tepco says foreign workers on new visas can work at crisis-hit Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant via Japan Times

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

原子力発電はバベルの塔 via Blogos

わたなべ美樹

(略)

今回は、私の「脱原発」についての考えを述べたい。
2013年の参院議員初当選以来、 「原発ゼロへの道筋を作りましょう」と繰り返し 言ってきたが、国をその方向に動かせなかった。

当初は私も、高速増殖炉「もんじゅ」の 核燃料リサイクル構想などを聞き、 永久にコストの安い電気をつくることができ、 ゆくゆくは途上国のエネルギー政策に貢献できる 素晴らしい技術かもしれないと思っていた。

だが、2011年3月11日の東日本大震災に伴う 福島第1原発事故は大きな転換点だった。
福島県は妻の田舎で繋がりも深い

エネルギー政策を審議する参院経済産業委員として、 福島第1原発と同県大熊町を視察した際、 人っ子一人いないゴーストタウンの光景に 大変な衝撃を受けた。
崩れた安全神話を目の前にした。

(略)

私が参院議員に当選した13年当時は、 自民党内にも「脱原発」の雰囲気がまだあった。

その頃の主たる議論は「東京電力をどうするか」だった。

私は、東電は上場企業として、巨額の負債を抱えており、 国民との合意のなかで、一度「整理」をしてから 前に進むのが、あるべき姿ではないかと、 経営者目線の提言を続けた。

しかし、東京電力が存続されるという方針が決まり、 そこから巨額の負債の返済のため、コストの安い原発を 再稼動する流れが出来上がっていく。

コストが安いとはいえ、福島のように事故がおきたら 「安い」は当然あてはまらない。

(略)

しかし、昨年策定された「第5次エネルギー基本計画」 で「原発を事実上残す」という方針が示された。

「何年までにゼロ」と決めれば、そこに創意工夫が 始まる。「原発ありき」と決めた段階で何も起きない。

ワタミグループは震災以降、風力や太陽光など 自然エネルギーへと本格的にかじを切った。

農業と環境エネルギー事業を手がける子会社、 ワタミファーム&エナジーは、新時代の主力事業 とさえ位置づけている。さらに、世界の外食企業で 初めて、再生エネルギー100%を目指す「RE100」 をワタミは宣言し、40年までにその実現を目指して、 いる。秋田県で巨大風車、北海道ではメガソーラーが 今日も稼動し、全国の和民などの店舗では電力使用量を 「見える化」するシステムなどを導入し、 原発ゼロへ一歩ずつ創意工夫をはじめている。

「RE100」はワタミの他にも、ソニーやイオン、 海外だとアップルやP&Gなど、その輪が年々広がって いる。政治家より経営者の方が、理想を実現しやすい と感じてしまうこともある。

全文は原子力発電はバベルの塔

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

無情の福島県 原発事故自主避難者に公務員宿舎“退去通告” via 日刊ゲンダイ

福島原発事故の、いわゆる「自主避難者」のうち全国の国家公務員宿舎に居住する人が“強制退去”を迫られている。

避難者支援団体の「原発事故被害者団体連絡会」(ひだんれん)が25日、衆院議員会館で避難者の窮状を訴える緊急集会を開く。

 問題となっているのは、福島県が先月28日付で国家公務員宿舎に入居する自主避難者71世帯へ送った通知書。県は財務省の委託を受け避難者に国家公務員宿舎を貸しているが、契約終了となる3月31日までに退去しない場合、避難者に<損害金を請求する>と迫ったのだ。

損害金は「2倍の家賃」。公務員宿舎は一般の家賃相場より格安とはいえ、避難者の多くは不安定な収入で働いているのが実情だ。自身も避難者で「ひだんれん」の幹事を務める熊本美弥子氏がこう憤る。

(略)

 公営住宅は倍率が高く、転居したくてもできない状況だという。

「福島県に、今後の避難者への支援をどうするのか聞いても『個別の相談には応じる』の一点張りです。このままでは、2年前に自主避難者への住宅の無償提供が打ち切られ、行き場を失った状態に戻ってしまいます」(熊本美弥子氏)

 県は「通知内容に変更はない」(生活拠点課)とつれない答えだ。復興アピールの裏で、被災者イジメとは度し難い。 

全文は無情の福島県 原発事故自主避難者に公務員宿舎“退去通告”

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Ohio nuclear subsidy bill designed to undermine wind and solar, experts say via Energy News

Hearings continue in the Ohio House this week on the bill, which creates a “Clean Air Program” that would benefit existing nuclear and coal plants.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Analysts say legislation to subsidize Ohio’s nuclear plants through the creation of a statewide “Clean Air Program” would discourage development of wind and solar energy because it would undermine renewable energy requirements set in place a decade ago.

The bill would eliminate a surcharge allowing utilities to pass along their costs for complying with the state’s renewable portfolio standard, replacing a competitive renewable energy market with subsidies that appear aimed toward existing nuclear and coal power plants.

[…]

The bill, O’Donnell wrote, is tantamount to undoing the renewable portfolio standard, which “sets out competitive, market-based procurements whereby the state sets a target and allows the flourishing clean energy private sector to select least cost projects.”

[…]

In other words, the bill seems designed to support existing power plants, rather than new clean energy projects, which currently have to compete to show they are the lowest-cost option. HB 6 imposes no such requirement for facilities trying to qualify for the Clean Air Fund.

The bill also excludes solar facilities smaller than 50 megawatts. While there are large solar farms under development in the state, no existing facility would meet the 50-megawatt threshold.

[…]

“API opposes HB 6 because instead of encouraging innovation and recognizing those who have risked private capital and provided beneficial outcomes without burdening Ohio ratepayers, this bill would effectively destroy the market that has provided these positive outcomes,” he added. 

“The practical effect of HB 6 is to direct hundreds of millions of dollars to one company to the exclusion of its existing or potential competitors.”

Read more at Ohio nuclear subsidy bill designed to undermine wind and solar, experts say

Posted in *English | Tagged | 2 Comments

States Are Using Taxpayer Money to Greenwash Dirty Nuclear Power via The New Republic

New Jersey is the latest state to subsidize aging reactors with credits designated for clean energy.

By GREGG LEVINE

This week, New Jersey’s public utilities commission awarded clean-energy credits to three vintage nuclear reactors. In doing so, the state joined New York, Illinois, and Connecticut in falling for the nuclear industry’s latest scheme: keeping itself afloat with public money that was supposed to incentivize a cleaner, greener future. Bills moving through legislatures in PennsylvaniaOhio, and Maryland could soon mean all the top nuclear energy-producing states in the northeast would be using public funds to prop up an aging and uncompetitive technology.

[…]

Nuclear power is not what anyone can consider carbon neutral. While it could be said that the fission inside a nuclear reactor does not produce much carbon dioxide, that is only one part of the total lifecycle of atomic energy production. Beyond the operation of the reactor, the nuclear fuel cycle includes the mining, milling, processing, enrichment, fabrication, and transport of the uranium-based fuel. Each step is energy intensive and creates a lot of greenhouse gases.

The power plants themselves have sizable carbon footprints. New nuclear facilities require, at minimum, more than a decade of heavy construction, with all the diesel-powered equipment that entails. The reactor and containment buildings use prodigious amounts of cement and steel—the production of which is a large contributor to global CO2—and the shipping of these large components only compounds their emissions contribution.

Running a nuclear power plant also requires power. One of the most paradoxical points about light-water reactors is that to safely generate electricity, the plants need a significant and constant flow of electricity; the same goes for the storage of the irradiated spent fuel. When the reactor can’t supply that electricity itself—which at many U.S. facilities is a not insubstantial amount of the time—the plant becomes an energy consumer. (A total loss of power for any significant amount of time creates a scenario much like that seen at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi, where a station blackout disabled cooling systems, resulting in multiple meltdowns, hydrogen explosions, and containment breaches.)

Another thing nuclear plants consume in copious amounts is water, making them particularly ill-suited to a warming climate. Reactors need water to keep their cores and condensers cool—not to mention their spent fuel storage pools—and that water needs to be plentiful, circulating, and relatively cool. Over the last 15 years, as the globe has warmed, nuclear plants in the U.S., Europe, Russia, and China have experienced numerous shutdowns and many more days of reduced output because there was simply no effective heat sink.

A nuclear plant in the U.S. requires between 19 million and 1.4 billion gallons of water a day, depending on design. In cases where facilities draw from a river, droughts have caused the water level to drop too low for a plant’s intake valves. When the power plant relies on a lake, warmer days and warmer nights have meant the water is simply not cold enough to efficiently cool reactors or condense steam. This has become an annual problem at U.S. nuclear plants, especially during prolonged heat waves, which are when demand for electricity is highest.

[…]

Nuclear plants—again belying the “clean energy” moniker—produce mountains of highly radioactive waste. The U.S. already has over 75,000 tons of irradiated spent nuclear fuel and no viable plan for permanent storage. Nevada’s Yucca Mountain repository was once slated to take this poisonous payload, but over 20 years of effort proved it geologically, logistically, and politically unfeasible. A decade after the Obama administration pulled the plug on Yucca, there is still no Plan B.

Read more at States Are Using Taxpayer Money to Greenwash Dirty Nuclear Power

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

「安全性ばかり強調」国の放射線副読本を市教委が回収 via 京都新聞

文部科学省が全国の小中学校と高校に昨年配布した「放射線副読本」の最新版について、滋賀県の野洲市教育委員会が、福島第1原発事故の被災者の心情に配慮せず、安全性を強調していることを問題視し、回収を進めていることが分かった。改訂前に比べ、原発事故の記述よりも日常生活で受ける放射線量などの説明を優先した内容に、福島県からの避難者が憤りを表しているほか、専門家も「放射線被ばくのリスクは大したことがないと思わせる印象操作だ」と批判している。

 副読本は小学生用と中高生用があり、前回改訂から約4年たったことから昨年10月に改訂された。放射線について科学的な知識を身に付け、理解を深める目的で全国の小学校に約700万部、中学・高校に約750万部が配られた。

 第1章では放射線の人体への影響や、自然環境や医療機器から受ける放射線量などを解説。第2章は福島原発事故の被害や復興の現状、避難者へのいじめ事案などを取り上げている。改訂前は第1章で原発事故を説明し、第2章で日常的な放射線による影響などを記していたが、「正しい知識を身に付けることが先」(同省)と章立てを替えた。

野洲市では3月8日、市議会の質問で「副読本は、自然界のものと事故による放射線を同一視し、安全だという結論に導こうとしている」などと指摘を受け、市教委が内容を精査した上で同日中に回収を決めた。同11日付で保護者に「内容や取り扱いについて改めて協議した結果、記述された内容に課題があると判断しました」との文書を送り、回収への協力を求めた。

 市教委は取材に対し、被災者の声が書かれていない▽廃炉作業など今後の課題を記述せず、安全性ばかり強調した内容になっている▽内容が高度なところがある-を理由に挙げる。  既に市内の小学校に2113部、中学校に314部を配布したが、各校の対応は▽全生徒児童に配布▽高学年児童にのみ配布▽活用方法を検討中で配布せず-に分かれていたという。

 市教委は現在も回収中で、西村健教育長は「原発事故で今も4万人以上の避難者がいるにもかかわらず、副読本にはその人々の思いが抜け落ちている。一度回収してから、資料を補うなどの活用方法を検討したい」と話している。一方、文科省教育課程課は「副読本が全てではない。足りないことがあれば別の資料で補うなど各現場で工夫して使ってほしい」とする。

原文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments