Opening Up The Mountain West To Uranium Production For Nuclear Energy Is The ‘Third Rail’ Of American Politics via Forbes

Ken Silverstein

A fallout of the coronavirus may be more uranium mining in the West and outside of the Grand Canyon. At least that is the proposed policy of the Trump administration, which is arguing that more domestic production is necessary to avoid an over-reliance on foreign sources. 

Australia, Canada and Kazakhstan supply two-thirds of the world’s uranium, which fuels nuclear power plants. Only 10% of it comes from domestic mines. And given that prices are already low, it is illogical to increase domestic supplies — especially in environmentally-sensitive places. 

[…]

To that end, the Trump administration’s Nuclear Fuel Working Groupproposed on Thursday opening up about 1,500 acres outside the Grand Canyon — places that are now off-limits to production. It wants to spend $1.5 billion over a decade buying uranium from American producers. U.S. companies Energy Fuels and Ur-Energy are pushing the White House to do so, asking it to create a uranium stockpile that would buy as much as 10 million pounds a year. 

To be precise, Canada’s Cameco and Kazakhstan’s Kazatomprom provide more than half of the global uranium supplies. The French company Orano accounts for 13% while the Russian/Canadian enterprise Uranium One, Russia’ ARMZ Uranium Holding, the China National Nuclear Corp. and the China General Nuclear Power Group make up smaller percentages, all according to World Nuclear Association.

Read more at Opening Up The Mountain West To Uranium Production For Nuclear Energy Is The ‘Third Rail’ Of American Politics

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 5 Comments

#461 – Chernobyl Fire, Chernobyl Anniversary, Covid19/Nuclear: Author Kate Brown, Timothy Mousseau via Nuclear Hotseat

Podcast: Download

This Week’s Featured Interviews:

  • Kate Brown is the author of Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide to the Future. She is an historian of environmental and nuclear history at MIT and the author of Plutopia, which won seven major awards. Her research has been funded by the American Academy in Berlin and by Carnegie and Guggenheim fellowships. In this season of Chernobyl commemorations, she made time in her daunting schedule to talk with us about what’s in her new book.  We spoke on Monday, April 15, 2019.
  • Professor Timothy Mousseau is an evolutionary biologist and faculty member of the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of South Carolina since 1991. Beginning in 1999, Professor Mousseau and his collaborators have explored the ecological, genetic and evolutionary consequences of low-dose radiation in populations of plants, animals and people inhabiting the Chernobyl region of Ukraine and Belarus. More recently, he initiated a second research program in Fukushima, Japan.  This is an excerpt from a much longer interview from February 16, 2016, which will be shared on an upcoming Nuclear Hotseat.

Chernobyl Fire Visuals:

Chernobyl Fire – Most Recent Smoke Dispersion Animation:  The red triangle represents the location of the fires, the time stated is in UTC. The discharge used was evaluated by reverse modeling (exploitation of the available measurements) over the period from April 3 to 12, 2020.

Numnutz of the Week (for Outstanding Nuclear Boneheadedness):

Covid19 decimating health and threatening the work force at nuclear power plants.  So of course, it’s a perfect time for the NRC to consider permitting so-called “low level” radioactive waste in regular landfills.  Just because we’re so distracted, they think they can get away with it…!

Activist Links:

War in Space: Weaponizing the ‘Final Frontier’ – full video of webinar by Space4Peace.org:

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

原発処理水、海への放出絶対ダメ 国内外の320市民団体が声明 via 福井新聞

東京電力福島第1原発で増え続ける放射性物質トリチウムを含む処理水の処分を巡り、国内外の計約320の市民団体が21日、陸上での保管継続を国に求める共同声明を発表した。政府小委員会は、処分は海や大気への放出が現実的だとする報告書を公表している。

声明は、処理水の放出は原発事故からの復興途上にある漁業や地域経済に大きな影響を与えるため、陸上保管が現実的だと主張。

(略)

「これ以上海を汚すな!市民会議」の佐藤和良共同代表は「スケジュールありきで処分方針を決めようとする政府のやり方は拙速だ」と訴えた。

全文は原発処理水、海への放出絶対ダメ 国内外の320市民団体が声明

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | Comments Off on 原発処理水、海への放出絶対ダメ 国内外の320市民団体が声明 via 福井新聞

原子力規制委 福島第一原発の爆発映像入手し分析へ via NHK News Web

福島第一原子力発電所の事故の調査を再開している原子力規制委員会は、3号機が水素爆発をおこした瞬間の映像を入手し、分析することになりました。爆発の威力や原因となった水素がどれだけ漏れ出したかなど解明を試みるとしています。

東京電力の福島第一原発3号機は9年前の事故の際、核燃料が溶け落ちるメルトダウンを起こして水素が発生し、原子炉のある建物の上部が吹き飛びました。

事故原因の調査を再開している原子力規制委員会は去年12月には、3号機の内部に入って激しく壊れた壁や設備の様子を撮影するなど調査を進めています。

そして、より詳しく爆発の状況を調べるため、地元のテレビ局が撮影した爆発の瞬間の映像を入手して、分析を行うことになりました。

3号機の水素爆発は最上階付近で起きたとみられ、下の階にも大きなダメージを与えましたが、爆発の詳しい分析はこれまで行われていません。

規制委員会では水素や爆発物の専門家も加えて、炎や爆風の様子を分析し、爆発の威力のほか、どこからどれだけの水素が漏れ出したのか、また発火のタイミングや原因など解明したいとしています。

[…]

ヴィデオと全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged , | 3 Comments

New rules for nuclear plant workers: 12-hour days for two weeks straight via Crain’s Chicago Business

Exelon Corp., operator of the biggest U.S. nuclear fleet, says the move allows for “healthy workers to remain on site for more hours, reducing the need to bring in outside travelers and vendors.”

[…]

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is already allowing six U.S. power plants to extend workers’ shifts, to as long as 12 hours a day for two weeks, and more may be coming. That’s up significantly from current standards that require people to get two-to-three days off a week when pulling shifts that long. Employees can also work as many as 86 hours in a week now, up from 72 hours.

[…]

The new rules come as at least 42 construction workers have tested positive for the coronavirus at a nuclear plant in Georgia where Southern Co. is building two new reactors. Last week, the utility and its partners announced they would reduce the 9,000-person workforce by 20 percent to slow the spread of the virus. The government considers nuclear power plants to be essential, and reactors will supply almost 21 percent of the country’s electricity this year.

Exelon Corp., operator of the biggest U.S. nuclear fleet, says it “can no longer meet the work-hour controls” at four of its reactors, including the Braidwood plant in Illinois. NextEra Energy Inc. said the same thing about its Seabrook power plant in New Hampshire. The companies say that the extended work hours won’t have an adverse impact on safety.

“The work-hour rule exemption is an important contingency that may be implemented to allow healthy workers to remain on site for more hours, reducing the need to bring in outside travelers and vendors,” Exelon spokeswoman Linsey Wisniewski said by email.

But watchdog groups are concerned that employees may be overworked, leading to fatigue and potentially errors. “You want an alert workforce,” said Paul Gunter, a director at Beyond Nuclear. “You don’t do this with bus drivers, but they’re saying it’s OK for nuclear power plant workers.”

The NRC is also granting utilities utilities permission to defer some inspections as dozens of reactors go through the annual spring refueling cycle. These projects can involve more than 1,000 people converging on a power plant for a month or more of maintenance and testing.

[…]

New Reality

The NRC is on board with the new reality of operating nuclear plants during a global pandemic and is developing guidance for deferring maintenance work. “There are some ancillary activities during an outage that can be deferred,” said Scott Burnell, a spokesman for the agency.

Entergy Corp. is planning to defer some leak tests at pipes at its Grand Gulf reactor in Mississippi. The tests typically are due every 11 1/2 years, but will now be rescheduled for the next refueling outage in 18 months. Pushing that period out to 13 years won’t affect safety, the company said by email. And at the Indian Point facility north of New York City, Entergy is also seeking permission to postpone annual physical evaluations for firefighters.

Nuclear watchdogs are paying close attention to four sites that have requested permission to delay tests on steam generator piping, including Exelon’s Braidwood. The agency already approved NextEra’s request for its Turkey Point plant in Florida.

The pipes carry water at high pressure, allowing it to stay liquid even as temperatures reach 600 degrees Fahrenheit (316 degrees Celsius). They are supposed to be inspected every three years, with the job requiring people working in close proximity. Because of the virus, the operators are seeking to delay this until the next refueling cycle in 18 months.

Fraught History

These components have a fraught history. 

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Britain has 139 tons of plutonium. That’s a real problem via Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

By Christopher FichtlschererFriederike FrießMoritz Kütt, April 17, 2020

The United Kingdom’s last plutonium reprocessing plant, B205, located in Sellafield in northern England, will shut down by the end of 2020. It will bring an end to the era of plutonium separation in the country, which began 68 years ago. Because the United Kingdom never used any of the material it recouped from reprocessing except in nuclear weapons, today it has amassed a stockpile of almost 139 metric tons of separated plutonium.

This creates lasting problems: Plutonium stored in Sellafield is highly toxic and poses a permanent risk of proliferation. It is enough material to build tens of thousands of nuclear weapons. According to parliamentary estimates, storage will cost the British government about 73 million pounds a year for the next century. But after decades of public and private consultation, there is still no accepted plan for its disposition. In the meantime, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority is working on the consolidation of the stockpiles in Sellafield and developing the capability to retreat the packages to allow for long-term storage once the government makes a final decision on permanent disposal. The United Kingdom views the material as a resource and is pursuing options that involve burning the plutonium in reactors, even though multiple assessments have shown risks associated with such a choice, namely immature concepts and technology. A better alternative would be to treat it as waste and begin planning for its permanent immobilization and burial.

Where did it come from? In the beginning, the British plutonium separation program was justified by military needs. A few years later, nuclear euphoria led to an increasing number of civil nuclear power plants and to dreams of nuclear-powered cars and planes. It was predicted that uranium resources would not be able to fulfill the need. As a result, the idea of a “closed” fuel cycle was born: instead of using nuclear fuel once and throwing it away, the spent fuel is reprocessed and reused in (mostly fast) reactors. In theory, this would allow greater utilization of uranium. However, the concept has never been demonstrated on an industrial scale, and only a few countries still aim at closing the nuclear fuel cycle.

[…]

In 1976, the United Kingdom started operating a new reactor class, the Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor, and 15 such reactors still operate today. To reprocess spent fuel from these reactors as well as spent fuel from overseas, the United Kingdom opened the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant in 1995. Its operation record is a disaster: It never reached planned throughputs, had a serious leakage of radioactive material in 2005, and was much more expensive than originally intended. Consequently, it was shut down in 2018 before reaching the end of its planned service life—and after separating only 23 metric tons of plutonium.

But what happened to the fast breeder reactors that were supposed to burn up reprocessed fuel and close the nuclear fuel cycle? There are several reasons why there are only two fast reactors commercially operating, the Russian-designed BN-600 and BN-800. First, nuclear energy did not expand as foreseen in the 1950s and 1960s, while at the same time new uranium resources were discovered, easing worries about a dwindling uranium supply. Second, multi-cycled use of spent fuel has proven to be far more difficult than expected, and there are some risks inherent only to fast reactors. Finally, there is the latent proliferation risk of the technology to separate plutonium and uranium from the spent fuel.

[…]

Why should the public sector continue to pay money for “new” reactor concepts—sometimes under development for decades—when it is not even clear whether these concepts might solve the problem at hand? The United Kingdom has to find a solution for its plutonium stockpile, and quickly. The British government, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, and reactor operators in general should accept that separated plutonium is a burden, not a resource, and authority should again take a closer look at immobilization options. These do not have the sheen of new, high-tech solutions like burning the plutonium in specially-tailored reactor concepts. But given that action is urgently needed, established and working concepts should be the way forward.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

江上剛の「福島第1原発を見てきた」(下)【怒れるガバナンス】 via Jiji.com

 ◆作家・江上 剛◆

[…]

◆行き場ない廃棄物

 東電の担当者は「右側のエリア、非常に多くの(汚染水を入れる)タンク群が見えてきました。大きさの違いはありますが、大体1基1000トン級のタンクです。970基ほど存在します」と説明してくれた。

 ブルーの横置きタンクがある。これらは一般の防火水槽などとして使っているタンクだ。事故直後に汚染水をためるために、全国各地からかき集められたもの。

 しかし、100トンと容量が小さく、横置きで場所を取ることから現在使われていない。空の状態なのだが、放射性廃棄物ということで撤去できない。構内には、このような空タンクが370基ほどあるという。

 手袋や作業服などの可燃性の放射性廃棄物は、焼却設備で焼却し、容積を減らす減量化措置を行い、その灰を全て福島第1原発内で保管している。

 その他、使用されていない空タンクなど、多くの廃棄物が発生するが、原発内で発生した廃棄物は、原発内で保管することしか決まっていない。最終的な行き先のない多くの放射性廃棄物が、原発内で保管され続けている。

 大型の廃棄物貯蔵庫を建設する計画だが、果たしてそれでよいのか。いずれ、汚染水と同じように最終処理をどうするかという問題に直面することになるだろう。

[…]

「1号機は、クリーム色の鉄鋼が水素爆発によりゆがんでいます。また、右側にうずたかく積もっているのががれきです。(中略)このがれきを撤去するに当たり、1点注意ポイントがありまして、そのままの状態で撤去すると、放射性のダスト、ちりを飛散させてしまいます。地域の皆さんにご迷惑をおかけしてしまうので、月に1回、がれきの周辺に飛散防止剤をまきます。石綿の飛散防止剤と全く同じものです。(中略)ダスト、がれきの周辺にはダストモニターといって、その密度を検知する装置が設置してあります。規定値以上になりますと、モニターが作動し、スプリンクラーが水をまいて、飛散させないシステムを構築しました」

放射性ダストは、風に乗ると、非常に広範囲に飛散してしまう。そのため、作業は非常に厳格に、慎重に進めなければならない。単純に、がれきを撤去すればよい、というわけではない。

[…]

全文

Posted in *English | Tagged , | 4 Comments

除染作業の朝、妻から着信「黎央死んじゃってる」 via 朝日新聞

青木美希2020年4月18日

政府と福島県原発事故の避難先住宅の提供を2017年3月末で打ち切ったため、一家で新潟県に避難していた庄司範英(のりひで)さん(55)は苦渋の選択を迫られた。

 長男の黎央(れお)さん(14)は避難で転校を余儀なくされ、当初は「福島の友達がいい」と寂しがった。今は友達を笑わせるのが好きで、いつも楽しそうだ。再びつらい思いはさせられない。家は原発から北北西22キロで、雨どいや側溝の放射線量を測ったときに、年5ミリシーベルトを超える値が出た。子どもと戻る選択肢はなかった。

 だが、提供が打ち切られると家賃月9万円が自己負担となる。避難指示区域外のため多額の賠償金はない。「子どもを守るために精いっぱいやろう」と、庄司さんだけが福島県南相馬市の実家に戻って仕事を探すことを決めた。庄司さんは新潟県長岡市と実家を行き来しながら、南相馬市除染作業員の正社員の仕事を見つけた。17年6月12日からの勤務だった。

 初出勤を1週間後に控えた日、長岡市の避難先住宅で庄司さんは夕飯を作り子どもたちと食べた。食後に黎央さんが聞いてきた。

 「お父さん、もう帰っちゃうの?」

 「うん、来週から仕事だからね」

 「いつ帰ってくるの」

 「まだわかんない」

[…]

 庄司さんは離婚し、実家で母の淑子(としこ)さん(81)と暮らしている

今年2月に庄司さんを訪ねた。

 「原発事故は終わっていないんだということは言いたい」

 そして庄司さんは、黎央さんの遺影に語りかけた。

 「タイムマシンが出来たら、お父さんはすぐ前の日に帰ります。あなたの死を防ぎます」

全文

Posted in *English | Tagged | 6 Comments

“The wrong reactor at the wrong time”: inside the UAE’s Barakah nuclear plant via Power Technology

By JP Casey

The UAE has announced that the first reactor of its under-construction Barakah nuclear power plant is scheduled to come online within “a few months”. The country’s first nuclear plant could address a key energy need in the region, but questions remain as to its usefulness and safety in a geopolitically tense environment.

[…]

But behind these grand claims, the project has been dogged by controversy. From macro problems, such as the inherent dangers of building a nuclear reactor in a geopolitically tense region, to specific weaknesses with Barakah, such as the cracking of the cement used to build the facility itself, the project has no shortage of critics. With the UAE eager to continue with the project, its completion appears a matter of when, not if, opening up a series of lessons to learn ahead of new nuclear construction.

[…]

However, questions remain about the ultimate suitability of the plant, considering the risks inherent in nuclear and the potential for alternative sources of clean energy in the region. Dr Paul Dorfman, an honorary research associate at UCL and founder and chair of the Nuclear Consulting Group, an independent group of academics that aim to assess the risks and merits of nuclear projects, is sceptical about the suitability of Barakah for the UAE.

“So, given the fact – and it is a fact – that nuclear investment generates significant financial losses, one wonders if there are other reasons for Barakah,” he said. “Especially because nuclear energy seems to make limited economic sense for the Gulf States. As desert kingdoms, they have some of the best solar resources in the world, with solar having much, much lower investment and generation costs than nuclear.”

These solar resources are particularly significant considering the relative importance of renewable technology and nuclear power to the UAE’s 2050 climate goals. The nation aims to develop renewables as a primary source of power, and nuclear as a backup, a policy that could positively impact the solar industry, but hamstring the nuclear sector.

“Saudi recently tripled its renewable energy targets, and has successfully tended for large scale projects in wind and solar, with a Saudi-based consortium launching a world record low price of $17 per megawatt hour for a 900 megawatt solar park in Dubai itself,” said Dorfman. “So, worldwide and in the Gulf, the fate of new nuclear is linked to and determined by renewable energy technology rollout.”

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | 4 Comments

福島県、一日最多「9人」新型コロナ感染 いわき、本宮など確認 via 福島民友

県などは16日、いわき市で3人、本宮市で2人、田村市と南相馬市、広野町、大玉村で各1人の計9人の新型コロナウイルス感染を確認したと発表した。県内での1日の感染確認数としては最多。計49人となった。

[…]

田村市の30代女性は三春町の県環境創造センター本館に勤務しており、県職員の感染が確認されるのは初めて。3日に頭痛や関節痛などの症状があり、4日と5日の休日を挟んで6日から自宅待機していた。

[…]

全文

Posted in *日本語 | Tagged | 3 Comments