Skip to content


Why molten salt reactors are problematic and Canada investing in them is a mistake via The Conversation

MV Ramana

One of the beneficiaries of the run-up to a potential federal election has been the nuclear energy industry, specifically companies that are touting new nuclear reactor designs called small modular reactors. The largest two financial handouts have been to two companies, both developing a specific class of these reactors, called molten salt reactors (MSRs).

[…]

As a physicist who has analyzed different nuclear reactor designs, including small modular reactors, I believe that molten salt reactors are unlikely to be successfully deployed anytime soon. MSRs face difficult technical problems, and cannot be counted on to produce electricity consistently.[…]

Because of the different kinds of fuel used, these MSR designs need special facilities — not present in Canada currently — to fabricate their fuel. The enriched uranium for the IMSR must be produced using centrifuges, while the Moltex design proposes to use a special chemical process called pyroprocessing to produce the plutonium required to fuel it. Pyroprocessing is extremely costly and unreliable.

Both processes are intimately linked to the potential to make fissile materials used in nuclear weapons. Earlier this year, nine non-proliferation experts from the United States wrote to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau expressing serious concerns “about the technology Moltex proposes to use.”

[…]

Another basic problem with MSRs is that the materials used to manufacture the various reactor components will be exposed to hot salts that are chemically corrosive, while being bombarded by radioactive particles. So far, there is no material that can perform satisfactorily in such an environment. A 2018 review from the Idaho National Laboratory could only recommended that “a systematic development program be initiated” to develop new alloys that might work better. There is, of course, no guarantee that the program will be successful.

These problems and others have been identified by various research laboratories, ranging from France’s Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire (IRSN) to the Nuclear Innovation and Research Office in the United Kingdom. Their conclusion: molten salt reactors are still far from proven.

As the IRSN put it in 2015: “numerous technological challenges remain to be overcome before the construction of an MSR can be considered,” going as far as saying that it does not envision construction of such reactors “during the first half of this century.”

[…]

Problematic solutions

Should an MSR be built, it will also saddle society with the challenge of dealing with the radioactive waste it will produce. This is especially difficult for MSRs because the waste is in chemical forms that are “not known to occur in nature” and it is unclear “which, if any, disposal environment could accommodate this high-level waste.” The Union of Concerned Scientists has also detailed the safety and security risks associated with MSR designs.

The Liberal government’s argument for investing in molten salt reactors is that nuclear power is necessary to mitigate climate change. There are good reasons to doubt this claim. But even if one were to ignore those reasons, the problems with MSRs laid out here show that they cannot be deployed for decades.

The climate crisis is far more urgent. Investing in technologies that are proven to be problematic is no way to deal with this emergency.

Read more.

Posted in *English.

Tagged with , , , , .


11 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. takeoffprojects says

    Hi.Thanks for the information on how salt reactors are problematic.This will be useful and also helpful in embedded systems projects

  2. Adobe Inc says

    As the initial injunction of the Publishers Association is six years old, it is not obvious whatever kinds of preparatory actions have been implemented from the beginning. More current orders offer dynamically adaptable alternatives for modifications to the surface domain and IP address that seek to reduce their impacts, but may drift out of date if they are not present in a case of the Publishers Association.
    ws, a site not listed in the blocking list of TalkTalk. A full range of other ebook download sites, like the Sci-Hub, DownloadBooks, Ebook777, BookSC, ZLibrary and Ebook3000, can only aggravate the problem if visitedors to that domain locate a list.

  3. Ramona Williams says

    Wonderful submit, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not realize this.
    You should proceed your writing. I am sure,
    you have a great readers’ base already!
    Wonderful submit, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not realize this. You should proceed your writing.

  4. freeactivationkeys says

    Wonderful submit, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not realize this.
    You should proceed your writing. I am sure,
    you have a great readers’ base already!
    diskgenius professional crack

  5. kursi tamu mewah says

    I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not realize this.
    https://tempattidurjeparaku.blogspot.com

  6. tukang taman says

    Hello there, just turned into alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you should continue this in future. A lot of other folks will be benefited from your writing. Cheers! https://ahlibambu.com

  7. gstarcad crack says

    f secure antivirus crack key redesigns and transforms Windows PC malware with simple scanning and cleaning – and now fixes rootkits too. Malicious products (malware, spyware, viruses, and Trojans) can disrupt the performance of your device and the Internet and reduce connectivity and access.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.