Skip to content

Episode 117: Brian L. Frye says to plagiarize this podcast

This month, we talk to Brian L. Frye (University of Kentucky College of Law) about how we deal with and react to plagiarism. Click here to listen to our conversation.

Plagiarism is obviously terrible, and plagiarizers should be punished to the full extent of the law. Or should they? Our guest this month thinks there are a number of issues with that position. For one thing, plagiarism isn’t illegal–it’s a social rule that’s unofficially enforced–so it isn’t even clear that the law has much of an ‘extent’ in this case. That is, plagiarists don’t go to jail; they’re just subject to other kinds of punishments, like expulsion from school or social ostracism. In the educational context, Brian L. Frye argues that punishing students for plagiarizing doesn’t contribute to the main purpose of education, which is to make as many students as possible learn as much as possible. If a student cheats on an assignment by copying an article written by someone else, the real problem is that they aren’t learning anything, because they aren’t doing the work they’re supposed to be doing. He thinks that what an instructor should do in that situation is tell the student they’re slacking off and that they need to do the work if they want to learn–rather than go ballistic and do what they can to ensure the student will never work in this town again.

Outside the educational context, a similar argument applies. Brian L. Frye thinks that educators need to remember that their primary goal is to make learning happen. Grading, ranking, flunking, expelling, and those types of things are there to benefit prospective employers, rather than students–but this is backwards. A teacher should prioritize the needs of their students over the needs of their future employers. Similarly, the primary goal of publishing a book is to intellectually transform or otherwise impact readers. So if a book has that level of impact, then it’s doing what it’s supposed to, regardless of whether the material in it is original. According to our guest, what we’re doing when we officially enforce attribution across the board is prioritizing the narrow selfish interests of authors over those of readers. But he thinks that’s getting it backwards: what we should be doing is prioritizing the needs of everyone who might be impacted by a book over the needs of the book’s creators.

This episode gives us a lot to mull over, and I hope you enjoy it. There’s a fair bit more profanity in it than is usually the case on this show, so if anyone listening is sensitive to that sort of thing, they might want to put their profanity goggles on!

Matt Teichman

Posted in Podcast.

One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Hermit of Hillsboro says

    Admittedly, I quit listening when Frye began ejaculating… “FUCK” is not tolerated in any “philosophy” podcast I care to listen to!

    However, I’m moved to dispute his argument, that student plagiarism is OK because the copied product is merely handed to the teacher, and is not “public-facing”. This only works because of his assumption that the shared purpose of the student and the professor is the student’s education. Seems to me, the purpose of the vast majority of American students nowadays is, to obtain certification (degree) to go into cleaner, higher-paid work than is available to those lacking that punched ticket. So the cheating IS public-facing: the prospective employer is defrauded (if they actually cared much, in this age of grade inflation).

    Anyhow, you can’t plagiarize a math test or a chemistry exam; you can only cheat. So this apology only applies to humanities and social science, and perhaps a history-of-science essay. Perhaps it’s time to reconsider forcing degree candidates who are admittedly indifferent or hostile to the liberal arts, to complete those courses. (And in fairness, to forget about forcing English majors to take chemistry and biology! I remember how much I hated it, in the U of C Common Core in the 70s!)

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.