Skip to content


The deterrence myth: The naked emperor who’s still in power via Beyond Nuclear International

By David Barash

In his classic The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (1989), Lawrence Freedman, the dean of British military historians and strategists, concluded: ‘The Emperor Deterrence may have no clothes, but he is still Emperor.’ Despite his nakedness, this emperor continues to strut about, receiving deference he doesn’t deserve, while endangering the entire world. Nuclear deterrence is an idea that became a potentially lethal ideology, one that remains influential despite having been increasingly discredited.

After the United States’ nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, war changed. Until then, the overriding purpose of military forces had ostensibly been to win wars. But according to the influential US strategist Bernard Brodie writing in 1978: ‘From now on its chief purpose must be to avert them. It can have almost no other useful purpose.’ Thus, nuclear deterrence was born, a seemingly rational arrangement by which peace and stability were to arise by the threat of mutually assured destruction (MAD, appropriately enough). Winston Churchill described it in 1955 with characteristic vigour: ‘Safety will be the sturdy child of terror, and survival the twin brother of annihilation.’ Importantly, deterrence became not only a purported strategy, but the very grounds on which governments justified nuclear weapons themselves. Every government that now possesses nuclear weapons claims that they deter attacks by their threat of catastrophic retaliation.

[…]

Deterrence, in short, does not deter. The pattern is deep and geographically widespread. Nuclear-armed France couldn’t prevail over the non-nuclear Algerian National Liberation Front. The US nuclear arsenal didn’t inhibit North Korea from seizing a US intelligence-gathering vessel, the USS Pueblo, in 1968. Even today, this boat remains in North Korean hands. US nukes didn’t enable China to get Vietnam to end its invasion of Cambodia in 1979. Nor did US nuclear weapons stop Iranian Revolutionary Guards from capturing US diplomats and holding them hostage (1979-81), just as fear of US nuclear weapons didn’t empower the US and its allies to force Iraq to retreat from Kuwait without a fight in 1990.

[…]

First, deterrence via nuclear weapons lacks credibility. A police officer armed with a backpack nuclear weapon would be unlikely to deter a robber: ‘Stop in the name of the law, or I’ll blow us all up!’ […]

Second, deterrence requires that each side’s arsenal remains invulnerable to attack, or at least that such an attack would be prevented insofar as a potential victim retained a ‘second-strike’ retaliatory capability, sufficient to prevent such an attack in the first place. […]

Third, deterrence theory assumes optimal rationality on the part of decision-makers. It presumes that those with their fingers on the nuclear triggers are rational actors who will also remain calm and cognitively unimpaired under extremely stressful conditions. […]

In Black Lamb and Grey Falcon: A Journey Through Yugoslavia (1941), Rebecca West noted that: ‘Only part of us is sane: only part of us loves pleasure and the longer day of happiness, wants to live to our 90s and die in peace …’ It requires no arcane wisdom to know that people often act out of misperceptions, anger, despair, insanity, stubbornness, revenge, pride and/or dogmatic conviction. Moreover, in certain situations – as when either side is convinced that war is inevitable, or when the pressures to avoid losing face are especially intense – an irrational act, including a lethal one, can appear appropriate, even unavoidable. […]

Finally, there is just no way for civilian or military leaders to know when their country has accumulated enough nuclear firepower to satisfy the requirement of having an ‘effective deterrent’. […]

In addition, ethical deterrence is an oxymoron. Theologians know that a nuclear war could never meet so-called ‘just war’ criteria. In 1966, the Second Vatican Council concluded: ‘Any act of war aimed indiscriminately at the destruction of entire cities or of extensive areas along with their populations is a crime against God and man itself. It merits unequivocal and unhesitating condemnation.’ […]

In The Just War (1968), the Protestant ethicist Paul Ramsey asked his readers to imagine that traffic accidents in a particular city had suddenly been reduced to zero, after which it was found that everyone had been required to strap a newborn infant to the bumper of every car.[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English.

Tagged with , .


9 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Bonus Veren Bahis Siteleri says

    Türkiye’de para kazanma denildiğinde internetin adının çok fazla geçtiğini biliyoruz. Pek çok model olmasına karşın en çok hangisini tercih ediyorsunuz denildiğinde büyük bir çoğunluğun bahis siteleri yanıtını vereceğini hemen söyleyebiliriz. Bonus veren bahis siteleri kullanıcılarının daha fazla kazanması ve yeni üyeler kazanabilmeleri açısından bu tercihi yaparlar. Büyük olasılıkla her bahis sitesi bonus verir ancak yatırımsız deneme bonusu veren site sayısının da az olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Bu zamana kadar bahis hususunda herhangi bir girişiminiz olmamışsa o zaman yapacağınız ilk güvenebileceğiniz bir bahis şirketi bulmak olmalıdır. Bunu da daha önceki yorumlardan ve sitenin lisansının olup olmadığından anlayabilirsiniz.

    Kaynak : https://sa-777-vegas.net/

  2. dark web links says

    When we say Dark Net, it doesn’t mean that the whole internet is dark. It simply refers to hidden areas of the World Wide Web that is not visible to the normal users. These links are considered by some people as a way for money-making schemes. While some people think that there’s no point trying to make money through these web pages, there are others who consider that using the dark web for making money is highly unethical. However, it is still possible to earn money through these web portals by knowing how to find them.

  3. Lock Repair Phoenix AZ says

    Wonderful illustrated information. I thank you about that. No doubt it will be very useful for my future projects. Would like to see some other posts on the same subject!

  4. Muds Management says

    Good same way countries had also brought out the NBFC Guidelines for different countries.

  5. rhino 6 crack says

    Rhinoceros Crack is widely used as a 3D design program. It uses 3D design alternatives developed to deliver users the best, professional, and best outcomes. rhinoceros crack license key

Continuing the Discussion

  1. The deterrence myth: The naked emperor who linked to this post on 2021/06/13

    Ssl Proxies

    I found a great…

  2. Between Deterrence And Survival – OpEd – Eurasia Review – Space Aeronautics Club linked to this post on 2021/08/08

    […] Emperor Deterrence might don’t have any garments, however he’s nonetheless Emperor.” David Barash provides: “Regardless of his nakedness, this emperor continues to strut about, receiving […]

  3. Spectres of Nuclear ‘MAD’ness: Between Deterrence and Survival – KM Seethi linked to this post on 2021/08/08

    […] Lawrence Freedman says, “The Emperor Deterrence may have no clothes, but he is still Emperor.” David Barash adds: “Despite his nakedness, this emperor continues to strut about, receiving deference he […]

  4. Spectres Of Nuclear ‘MAD’ness: Between Deterrence And Survival | Global South Colloquy linked to this post on 2021/08/11

    […] Lawrence Freedman says, “The Emperor Deterrence may have no clothes, but he is still Emperor.” David Barash adds: “Despite his nakedness, this emperor continues to strut about, receiving deference he […]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.