Earlier this year, the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) released a study entitled “The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle.”
The key recommendations of that study have been called into question by a group of prominent nuclear and climate change experts who challenged MIT to defend their study in a debate at a place and time of MIT’s choosing.
MIT’s response was effectively, “How about we talk about something else instead?”
I agree with the challengers. The recommendations in the MIT study are not only wrong, but they endanger the future of our planet.
I believe MIT must know this, which is why they refused to accept the challenge to debate from such a well-qualified group of experts. The experts challenging the MIT study include:
Continue reading at Is MIT Afraid to Debate Nuclear Report?
