Comments on: Episode 31: Branden Fitelson discusses reasoning fallacies

By: wr

wr — Wed, 16 May 2012 20:45:37 +0000

This is probably the single best piece of audio ever recorded on the subject. Thanks for the fantastic podcast guys.

By: Confirmation in a ‘threshold’ sense and in a ‘relevance’ sense | Argument in journalism

Thu, 08 Mar 2012 06:45:08 +0000

[...] Brandon Fitelson, appearing on the Elucidations podcast in January, introduced me to a useful distinction in forms of “confirmation,” as in some evidence [...]

By: Branden Fitelson on Reasoning Fallacies (Fitelson論推理謬誤) « 法哲學、生活與實踐

Branden Fitelson on Reasoning Fallacies (Fitelson論推理謬誤) « 法哲學、生活與實踐 — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:37:39 +0000

[...] 經由Prof. Leiter的轉載，發現了這一個訪談，Prof. Fitelson討論推理謬誤，很值得一聽。文中討論到了對於疾病的例子，以及說明如果使用比率或是次數對於人們的發生機率的認知有所影響。但更有趣的是，Fitelson教授利用銀行出納員（bank teller）的例子說明日常生活中的推理謬誤。整段訪談有點長，約40分鐘，但強烈推薦聆聽！！ Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

By: The Non Sequitur » Too timid too object

The Non Sequitur » Too timid too object — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:12:24 +0000

[...] via Leiter, an interesting podcast on fallacies of reasoning. Bookmark on Delicious Digg this post Recommend on Facebook share via [...]

By: Fitelson on Fallacies « Florida Student Philosophy Blog

Fitelson on Fallacies « Florida Student Philosophy Blog — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:59:22 +0000

[...] some learning here. Share this:ShareEmailFacebookStumbleUponTwitterRedditDiggPrintLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]