Comments on: Possible Worlds Semantics http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/elucidations/2011/11/03/possible-worlds-semantics/ A University of Chicago Philosophy Podcast Wed, 01 May 2013 10:17:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Matt Teichman http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/elucidations/2011/11/03/possible-worlds-semantics/#comment-221 Matt Teichman Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:07:47 +0000 http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/elucidations/?p=178#comment-221 Indeed! Yeah; that’s set theory for you. Immensely valuable for both computer programming and semantics. And much more! If you’re curious about the origins of set theory, this is how it used to look back when it was invented in the 19th century, before we had either computers or semantics. (pp. 14-58.)

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/21016/21016-pdf.pdf

]]> By: Mark Balaz http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/elucidations/2011/11/03/possible-worlds-semantics/#comment-220 Mark Balaz Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:53:30 +0000 http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/elucidations/?p=178#comment-220 This whole idea of included and not included reminds me of basic computer programming books with all those tree diagrams and such.
Quite particular subjects indeed!!!

]]>