Taiwanese protesting against the completion of the island’s fourth nuclear power plant vowed to continue their campaign after mustering more than 68,000 people in weekend marches across major cities.
As Japan marks the second anniversary of the meltdown at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi plant, Taiwan’s Longmen Nuclear Power Plant, the NT$264 billion ($8.9 billion) project that state-run Taiwan Power Co. is building, has drawn new criticism. The company missed a deadline to start commercial operations at the end of 2012.
“Nuclear power is toxic,” 87-year-old Wu Lien-mien, who has spent her life in Gongliao, 25 miles east of Taipei, where the plant is, said at the protests. “It is dangerous. I would have come to protest even if I were 100.”
Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou is caught between a pledge to reduce carbon emissions to year-2000 levels by 2025 while also phasing out nuclear power, which accounts for about a fifth of Taiwan’s electricity. Opposition parties are against the construction of nuclear reactors and Ma has supported calls to put the issue to a referendum.
“We’ve heard Taiwanese people’s concerns and we’ll seek to address their concerns in a neutral and unbiased manner,” said Roger Lee, spokesman of Taiwan Power. “We’ll continue to communicate with the public over the nuclear power plant.”
Continue reading at Taiwan Anti-Nuclear Protests May Derail $8.9 Billion Power Plant
Choose Language / 言語
Updates / 最新記事
- Lawmaker resurrects radioactive waste bill via My San Antonio
- 保管のセシウム汚泥 1年で3倍に via とある原発の溶融貫通(メルトスルー)
- 核融合発電の安全性は識者の間でも意見が割れている via 週プレNews
- Living above Germany’s old nuclear waste via Deutsche Welle
- Fukushima No. 1 can’t keep its head above tainted water via The Japan Times
- Feds again delay San Onofre nuke restart decision via San Francisco Chronicle
- Japan, India to resume talks on nuclear cooperation pact via Global Post
- 日本とインドが原子力協定検討 原発輸出を加速 via msn.産経ニュース
- 放射性セシウム、深部で濃度高く 海洋機構が分析結果 via 日本経済新聞
- Why Ernest Moniz matters via Herald Everett, Washington
カレンダー
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- May 2013 (117)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (231)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
By Topic / トピック一覧
anti-nuclear energy movement
Atomic Age
Capitalism
East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
energy policy
EU
food
France
health
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
IAEA
India
Inequality
labor
nuclear waste
Nuclear Weapons
Oi
Radiation exposure
restart
Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
TEPCO
U.S.
UK
エネルギー政策
メディア
ヨーロッパ
ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
上関
健康
公正・共生
兵器
再稼働
労働における公正・平等
原発推進
反原発運動
大飯原発
女性・フェミニズム
広島・長崎
教育
東京電力
東日本大震災・福島原発
米国
脱原発
被ばく
資本主義



President Ma’s dilemma between reducing carbon emissions and phasing out nuclear power is tricky, that echoes with the logic repeated in “Nuclear Renaissance”. We need to recognize the fact that nuclear power does emit carbon dioxide throughout the whole process from uranium mining, uranium enrichment, transportation, to radioactive waste disposal. It should be also recognized that the operation of nuclear power plant itself emits tremendous heat that directly raises air and sea temperature to the level that its ecology is affected.