It has only been a month since Japan declared that it would close down its nuclear industry by the end of the 2030s, but already a contentious plan to complete several partially built reactors is sowing doubts about the government’s commitment to the radical policy shift.
The facilities – stretching from the northern tip to the southwestern part of the country – were approved years before the triple meltdown in Fukushima in March last year, but construction had been frozen following the disaster. The decision over their fate is seen as a test of just how serious Japan is about abolishing an industry that had been the source of 30 per cent of its electricity.
In the weeks since the nuclear phase-out was announced, Yukio Edano, industry minister, has said three approved but unfinished reactors are exempt from a central provision of the phase-out policy, under which no new plants will be built. Electric Power Development, the utility that owns one of the facilities, responded by saying it plans to resume work this year, with an eye to beginning electricity production some time after 2014.
In theory, it is possible to reconcile finishing the plants with the gradual phase-out envisioned by the new energy policy. Japan has 50 reactors already in service, and they are to be used while the country develops alternative energy sources such as solar and wind power. Supporters of the partially built plants argue that they will contain the latest, safest technology, and scrapping them now would mean writing off the tens of billions of yen already sunk into construction.
However, Kenichi Oshima, a nuclear policy expert at Ritsumeikan University, says uncertainties about the future cost of operating nuclear plants in Japan weaken the economic case for more atomic power. “There will be more costs for safety upgrades, and no one knows what kind of insurance system is going to be put in place. These things will make a big difference to generating costs.”
Since it takes about 40 years for a reactor to recoup its initial building costs, switching off the new plants in the 2030s, around two decades before the end of their normal operating lifespans, would mean accepting major investment losses – something a future government might be unwilling or unable to impose on utilities. “Basically, building these reactors would mean reversing the nuclear phase-out,” Mr Oshima says.
Allowing Oma and Shimane to go ahead could also open the door to more plants being built. Nine other reactors were in various stages of planning before Fukushima, and while the government has said they will not be constructed, some pro-nuclear local leaders have continued to push.
The governor of Fukui prefecture, a western area with a big nuclear industry, has recently stepped up lobbying for two planned reactors in his jurisdiction that had been close to receiving final approval before the accident. Higashidori’s village council has appealed for construction on its reactor to resume over fears for the local economy.
The phase-out plan could recede even further if Mr Noda’s Democratic party of Japan is ousted in an election early next year, which polls suggest is likely. The opposition Liberal Democrats nurtured the nuclear industry for decades when they were in power, and are more sceptical towards renewable energy.
Continue reading at Doubts cast over Japan nuclear phase-out (subscription is required)
Choose Language / 言語
Updates / 最新記事
- Group: Shutting down Richland nuke plant would save money via Tri-City Herald
- Saugeen Ojibwe and U.S. Politicians Oppose Nuclear Waste Burial Near Lake Huron via Indian Country Today
- Council measure urges lab to clean up nuke dump via Santa Fe New Mexican
- Former Japanese leader firm on nuclear energy via DW
- Nuke industry to Obama: You need us via The Hill
- 中間貯蔵施設候補地「使用可能」で評価へ via NHK News Web
- The Escalating Catastrophe Japan’s New ‘Fukushima Fascism’ via Counterpunch
- Energy Department to Give $226 Million to Support Nuclear Reactor Design via The New York Times
- 【movie review】Nuclear Nation via The Dissolve
- Arkansas Nuclear Plant Explosion Goes Largely Unreported By National Media via Political Blindspot
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- December 2013 (74)
- November 2013 (164)
- October 2013 (200)
- September 2013 (255)
- August 2013 (198)
- July 2013 (208)
- June 2013 (231)
- May 2013 (174)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (231)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
By Topic / トピック一覧
anti-nuclear energy movement Atomic Age Capitalism East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima energy policy EU food France health Hiroshima/Nagasaki IAEA India Inequality labor NRC nuclear waste Nuclear Weapons Radiation exposure Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl TEPCO U.S. UK エネルギー政策 メディア ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ 上関 健康 公正・共生 兵器 再稼働 労働における公正・平等 原発推進 反原発運動 大飯原発 女性・フェミニズム 広島・長崎 教育 東京電力 東日本大震災・福島原発 汚染水 米国 脱原発 被ばく 資本主義 除染