<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Regulatory Commission may study power plant health risks via The LA Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/08/24/nuclear-regulatory-commission-may-study-power-plant-health-risks-via-the-los-angeles-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/08/24/nuclear-regulatory-commission-may-study-power-plant-health-risks-via-the-los-angeles-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: norma field</title>
		<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/08/24/nuclear-regulatory-commission-may-study-power-plant-health-risks-via-the-los-angeles-times/comment-page-1/#comment-263602</link>
		<dc:creator>norma field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/?p=16985#comment-263602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this study is indeed undertaken, how will we know whether and how to trust it? On the one hand, as pointed out in this article, it is notoriously difficult to attribute cancers uniquely to radiation exposure, given the many other carcinogens in our environment; on the other, we already have many, many studies showing such an association, such as the work of statistician and epidemiologist Jay A. Gold.  They have uniformly be condemned by the nuclear power industry and its supporters in the academy and government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this study is indeed undertaken, how will we know whether and how to trust it? On the one hand, as pointed out in this article, it is notoriously difficult to attribute cancers uniquely to radiation exposure, given the many other carcinogens in our environment; on the other, we already have many, many studies showing such an association, such as the work of statistician and epidemiologist Jay A. Gold.  They have uniformly be condemned by the nuclear power industry and its supporters in the academy and government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
