<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOE Paying MIT for Pro-Nuclear Evaluation of Research via Reader Supported News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/06/07/doe-paying-mit-for-pro-nuclear-evaluation-of-research-via-reader-supported-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/06/07/doe-paying-mit-for-pro-nuclear-evaluation-of-research-via-reader-supported-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: norma field</title>
		<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/06/07/doe-paying-mit-for-pro-nuclear-evaluation-of-research-via-reader-supported-news/comment-page-1/#comment-213603</link>
		<dc:creator>norma field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/?p=14774#comment-213603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting that &quot;communications&quot; would be such a prominent research item for MIT.  Japanese officials always speak of seeking the &quot;understanding&quot; of communities; when such understanding is not immediately forthcoming, the problem is said to be one of &quot;insufficient explanation.&quot; The possibility that citizens may fundamentally disagree with the safety of siting or restarting a reactor is ignored: the problem, rather, is one of &quot;communication,&quot; and it sounds like MIT is investing big bucks and brain power to address this issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that &#8220;communications&#8221; would be such a prominent research item for MIT.  Japanese officials always speak of seeking the &#8220;understanding&#8221; of communities; when such understanding is not immediately forthcoming, the problem is said to be one of &#8220;insufficient explanation.&#8221; The possibility that citizens may fundamentally disagree with the safety of siting or restarting a reactor is ignored: the problem, rather, is one of &#8220;communication,&#8221; and it sounds like MIT is investing big bucks and brain power to address this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
