<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delivery of quake-tsunami debris to Kitakyushu blocked via The Mainichi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/05/21/delivery-of-quake-tsunami-debris-to-kitakyushu-blocked-via-the-mainichi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/05/21/delivery-of-quake-tsunami-debris-to-kitakyushu-blocked-via-the-mainichi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: norma field</title>
		<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2012/05/21/delivery-of-quake-tsunami-debris-to-kitakyushu-blocked-via-the-mainichi/comment-page-1/#comment-188826</link>
		<dc:creator>norma field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/?p=14419#comment-188826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The photo caption in the Japan Times version says &quot;Not in my backyard.&quot; Is that appropriate for this action?  Opposition to debris acceptance is no doubt in part about not wanting radioactive substances for incineration (a dubious solution) in one&#039;s backyard, but it&#039;s more than self-interest: transporting the debris around the country involves exposing many more people, not to mention soil, water, and air. It isn&#039;t about lack of sympathy for people in Fukushima.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photo caption in the Japan Times version says &#8220;Not in my backyard.&#8221; Is that appropriate for this action?  Opposition to debris acceptance is no doubt in part about not wanting radioactive substances for incineration (a dubious solution) in one&#8217;s backyard, but it&#8217;s more than self-interest: transporting the debris around the country involves exposing many more people, not to mention soil, water, and air. It isn&#8217;t about lack of sympathy for people in Fukushima.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
