Since Black reported a cluster of children with leukaemia near Sellafield in 1984,1 numerous studies investigated cancer incidence near nuclear power plants (NPP), with conflicting results. Some found an increased risk also at places where NPPs were planned but not built, concluding that factors other than radiation might be responsible.2,3 A recent case–control study from Germany, which reported odds ratios (ORs) of 1.61 for all cancers and 2.19 for leukaemia in 0–4 year olds living <5km from a NPP, refuelled the debate on a possible link between NPPs and childhood cancer.4,5
Most previous analyses were ecological and may have been affected by exposure misclassification and confounding.6–11 The German case–control study was criticized for potential selection and participation bias.4,5,12,13 A recent Finnish study combining ecological, cohort and case–control analyses was small, with no children living <5km from NPPs.14 All previous studies analysed residence at diagnosis. Given the higher vulnerability to radiation of fetuses and infants and the latency between radiation exposure and cancer development, residence at birth might be more relevant.15
We investigated the risk of childhood leukaemia and all childhood cancers in the vicinity of Swiss NPPs, using a cohort approach with person-years derived from the Swiss censuses 1990 and 2000 and incident cases from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry (SCCR). We analysed distance of residence at birth to the nearest NPP in the main analysis, and distance to residence at diagnosis in a secondary analysis. Outcomes of interest were leukaemia and all cancers diagnosed at ages 0–4 (<5) and 0–15 (<16) years. We adjusted for confounders, included other nuclear installations (research reactors and storage sites), and locations where NPPs were planned but not built, and assessed the robustness of the results in sensitivity analyses.
Choose Language / 言語
Updates / 最新記事
- Living above Germany’s old nuclear waste via Deutsche Welle
- Fukushima No. 1 can’t keep its head above tainted water via The Japan Times
- Feds again delay San Onofre nuke restart decision via San Francisco Chronicle
- Japan, India to resume talks on nuclear cooperation pact via Global Post
- 日本とインドが原子力協定検討 原発輸出を加速 via msn.産経ニュース
- 放射性セシウム、深部で濃度高く 海洋機構が分析結果 via 日本経済新聞
- Why Ernest Moniz matters via Herald Everett, Washington
- Farmers plant rice in former no-go zone in Fukushima for the first time via JDP
- 女川原発の燃料カバー欠損 溶接不良が原因 via 北海道新聞
- 福島市民ら400人、自主的に一斉除染 via msn.産経ニュース
カレンダー
Archives / 月別アーカイブ
- May 2013 (114)
- April 2013 (156)
- March 2013 (199)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (173)
- December 2012 (92)
- November 2012 (198)
- October 2012 (229)
- September 2012 (207)
- August 2012 (255)
- July 2012 (347)
- June 2012 (231)
- May 2012 (168)
- April 2012 (116)
- March 2012 (150)
- February 2012 (198)
- January 2012 (292)
- December 2011 (251)
- November 2011 (252)
- October 2011 (364)
- September 2011 (288)
- August 2011 (513)
- July 2011 (592)
- June 2011 (253)
- May 2011 (251)
- April 2011 (571)
- March 2011 (494)
- February 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
By Topic / トピック一覧
anti-nuclear energy movement
Atomic Age
Capitalism
East Japan Earthquake + Fukushima
energy policy
EU
food
France
health
Hiroshima/Nagasaki
IAEA
India
Inequality
labor
nuclear waste
Nuclear Weapons
Oi
Radiation exposure
restart
Russia/Ukraine/Chernobyl
TEPCO
U.S.
UK
エネルギー政策
メディア
ヨーロッパ
ロシア/ウクライナ/チェルノブイリ
上関
健康
公正・共生
兵器
再稼働
労働における公正・平等
原発推進
反原発運動
大飯原発
女性・フェミニズム
広島・長崎
教育
東京電力
東日本大震災・福島原発
米国
脱原発
被ばく
資本主義
km from a NPP, refuelled the debate on a possible link between NPPs and childhood cancer.



0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.