<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to the Atomic Age Website / アトミック・エイジのサイトへようこそ。</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2011/03/25/welcome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2011/03/25/welcome/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: norma field</title>
		<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2011/03/25/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-91952</link>
		<dc:creator>norma field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/?p=1052#comment-91952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you very much for this link.

Just from the sections on health effects, it&#039;s very clear that this site promotes the minimalist version of Chernobyl&#039;s impact on health in line with the position of the IAEA and the WHO (which apparently has to secure IAEA approval for its radiation-related health reports).

To promote &quot;safe use&quot; requires some recognition of danger, such as in the case of Chernobyl. But even Chernobyl, this site seems to say, was not so bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this link.</p>
<p>Just from the sections on health effects, it&#8217;s very clear that this site promotes the minimalist version of Chernobyl&#8217;s impact on health in line with the position of the IAEA and the WHO (which apparently has to secure IAEA approval for its radiation-related health reports).</p>
<p>To promote &#8220;safe use&#8221; requires some recognition of danger, such as in the case of Chernobyl. But even Chernobyl, this site seems to say, was not so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jun Mizukawa</title>
		<link>http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/2011/03/25/welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-88341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jun Mizukawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/atomicage/?p=1052#comment-88341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just thought I&#039;d bring the following link to your attention. It&#039;s a site managed by Japan Atomic Energy Relations Organization. The foundation is responsible for promoting &#039;safe use&#039; of nuclear power in Japan. But if you pay close attention to the rhetoric in the videos and texts regarding the Chernobyl disaster, the contradictions and careful phrasing of the &#039;effects&#039; are bewildering.
http://www.jaero.or.jp/data/02topic/cher25/index.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d bring the following link to your attention. It&#8217;s a site managed by Japan Atomic Energy Relations Organization. The foundation is responsible for promoting &#8216;safe use&#8217; of nuclear power in Japan. But if you pay close attention to the rhetoric in the videos and texts regarding the Chernobyl disaster, the contradictions and careful phrasing of the &#8216;effects&#8217; are bewildering.<br />
<a href="http://www.jaero.or.jp/data/02topic/cher25/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jaero.or.jp/data/02topic/cher25/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
